This Is AuburnAUrora

Show simple item record

Bird assemblage response to restoration of fire‐suppressed longleaf pine sandhills


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorCraig Guyer, guyercr@auburn.eduen_US
dc.creatorSteen, David A.
dc.creatorConner, L. M.
dc.creatorSmith, Lora L.
dc.creatorProvencher, Louis
dc.creatorHiers, J. Kevin
dc.creatorPokswinski, Scott
dc.creatorHelms, Brian S.
dc.creatorGuyer, Craig
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T17:02:41Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T17:02:41Z
dc.date.created2013
dc.identifier10.1890/12-0197.1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1890/12-0197.1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50332
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.35099/aurora-400
dc.description.abstractThe ecological restoration of fire‐suppressed habitats may require a multifaceted approach. Removal of hardwood trees together with reintroduction of fire has been suggested as a method of restoring fire‐suppressed longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forests; however, this strategy, although widespread, has not been evaluated on large spatial and temporal scales. We used a landscape‐scale experimental design to examine how bird assemblages in fire‐suppressed longleaf pine sandhills responded to fire alone or fire following mechanical removal or herbicide application to reduce hardwood levels. Individual treatments were compared to fire‐suppressed controls and reference sites. After initial treatment, all sites were managed with prescribed fire, on an approximately two‐ to three‐year interval, for over a decade. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordinations suggested that avian assemblages on sites that experienced any form of hardwood removal differed from assemblages on both fire‐suppressed sites and reference sites 3–4 years after treatment (i.e., early posttreatment). After >10 years of prescribed burning on all sites (i.e., late posttreatment), only assemblages at sites treated with herbicide were indistinguishable from assemblages at reference sites. By the end of the study, individual species that were once indicators of reference sites no longer contributed to making reference sites unique. Occupancy modeling of these indicator species also demonstrated increasing similarity across treatments over time. Overall, although we documented long‐term and variable assemblage‐level change, our results indicate occupancy for birds considered longleaf pine specialists was similar at treatment and reference sites after over a decade of prescribed burning, regardless of initial method of hardwood removal. In other words, based on the response of species highly associated with the habitat, we found no justification for the added cost and effort of fire surrogates; fire alone was sufficient to restore these species.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Applicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries1051-0761en_US
dc.rights© 2013. This is the version of record published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Item should be cited as: Steen, D. A., Conner, L. M., Smith, L. L., Provencher, L., Hiers, J. K., Pokswinski, S., ... & Guyer, C. (2013). Bird assemblage response to restoration of fire‐suppressed longleaf pine sandhills. Ecological Applications, 23(1), 134-147.en_US
dc.subjectEglin Air Force Base, Florida, USA; longleaf pine; nonmetric multidimensional scaling;occupancy modeling;Picoides borealis; Pinus palustris;prescribed fire; Red-cockaded Woodpecker.en_US
dc.titleBird assemblage response to restoration of fire‐suppressed longleaf pine sandhillsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genreJournal Article, Academic Journalen_US
dc.citation.volume23en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage134en_US
dc.citation.epage147en_US
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record