This Is AuburnAU Scholarly Repository

Show simple item record

Assessing Tricolored Bat Acoustic Monitoring for Regulatory Purposes in Relation to Reproductive Period, Cover Type, and Presence of Eastern Red Bats


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFord, W. Mark
dc.creatorThorne, Emily D.
dc.creatorDe La Cruz, Jesse L.
dc.creatorSilvis, Alexander
dc.creatorKuczynska, Vona
dc.creatorArmstrong, Michael P.
dc.creatorKing, R. Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-08T21:11:15Z
dc.date.available2026-06-08T21:11:15Z
dc.date.created2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://seafwa.org/journal/2025/assessing-tricolored-bat-acoustic-monitoring-regulatory-purposes-relation-reproductiveen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50788
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) allows use of acoustical surveys and automated identification software to determine the presence of the proposed endangered tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus). Analytical software is required to assess the probability of species absence on a sitenight basis using a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) that accounts for interspecific misclassification rates. The current standard for occupancy determination is a returned MLE P-value ≤0.05 at the nightly level irrespective of the number of files identified as tricolored bats. For this species, MLE P-values can vary based on presence and proportion of other bat species with similar echolocation characteristics such as the eastern red bats (Lasiurus borealis). Large numbers of eastern red bat echolocation passes may lead to a swamping effect, causing false-negative tricolored bat determinations. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between MLE values returned by Kaleidoscope Pro automated software and nightly tricolored bat counts, along with count proportion relative to eastern red bat detections, for various summer reproductive stages (e.g., pregnancy, lactation, and volancy) and vegetation cover types. We also examined the effectiveness of using the 14-site-night level of effort (LOE) set by USFWS for the endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) for determining how many cumulative nights of tricolored bat presence would occur under that LOE standard. Automated identification software identified tricolored bat echolocation pass presence at the file level. However, software returned nightly MLE values that were not significant when tricolored bat passes were infrequent (<20 passes) and proportionally low relative to eastern red bat passes, suggesting an acoustic swamping effect. The probability of a significant MLE for tricolored bats was greatest during the late summer when juvenile bats were volant and actively foraging on the landscape. Cumulative nights of tricolored bat presence based on significant MLE values were greatest during the late summer and in riparian cover types.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.publisherSoutheastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agenciesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agenciesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2330-5142en_US
dc.subjectacoustic samplingen_US
dc.subjectacoustic swampingen_US
dc.subjectecholocation passen_US
dc.subjectLasiurus borealisen_US
dc.subjectPerimyotis subflavusen_US
dc.titleAssessing Tricolored Bat Acoustic Monitoring for Regulatory Purposes in Relation to Reproductive Period, Cover Type, and Presence of Eastern Red Batsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genreJournal Article, Academic Journalen_US
dc.citation.volume12en_US
dc.citation.spage69en_US
dc.citation.epage76en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record