This Is AuburnAU Scholarly Repository

Show simple item record

Approaches Towards Revising Instrumentation-Based Reliability Coefficients


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorChristopher Clemons, cac0132@auburn.eduen_US
dc.coverage.temporalJanuary 2025 - February 2025en_US
dc.creatorClemons, Christopher
dc.creatorLindner, James
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-06T20:56:04Z
dc.date.available2025-03-06T20:56:04Z
dc.date.created2025-03-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50671
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses negative Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients observed in two constructs of a newly developed questionnaire assessing agricultural educators' adoption of artificial intelligence. A field test with ten participants revealed negative reliability in the "perceived benefits and drawbacks" (α = -.01) and "access and infrastructure" (α = -.56) constructs, indicating potential multidimensionality and reverse-coded items. Through detailed inter-item correlation matrix analysis, specific statement inconsistencies were identified. The study emphasizes the importance of transparency in reporting such irregularities to improve instrumentation. It highlights the need for careful consideration of item phrasing, reverse coding, and construct unidimensionality in early-stage instrument development, advocating for open discussion of methodological challenges and subsequent corrective actions. This research contributes to establishing guidelines for reporting and addressing instrumentation errors in social science research.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.format.extentFive pagesen_US
dc.subjectInferential statistics, reliability, instrumentation, field testingen_US
dc.titleApproaches Towards Revising Instrumentation-Based Reliability Coefficientsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genreResearch Reporten_US
dc.creator.orcid0000-0001-9879-0888en_US
dc.creator.orcid0000-0002-1448-3846en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record