This Is AuburnAUrora

Show simple item record

Field line distribution of mass density at geostationary orbit


Metadata FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorKyungguk Min, kmin@auburn.eduen_US
dc.creatorDenton, R. E.
dc.creatorTakahashi, Kazue
dc.creatorLee, Jimyoung
dc.creatorZeitler, C. K.
dc.creatorWimer, N. T.
dc.creatorLitscher, L. E.
dc.creatorSinger, H. J.
dc.creatorMin, Kyungguk
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-05T20:05:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-05T20:05:03Z
dc.date.created2015-06
dc.identifier10.1002/2014JA020810en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2014JA020810en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11200/49866
dc.description.abstractThe distribution of mass density along the field lines affects the ratios of toroidal (azimuthally oscillating) Alfven frequencies, and given the ratios of these frequencies, we can get information about that distribution. Here we assume the commonly used power law form for the field line distribution, 𝜌m=𝜌m,eq(LRE∕R)𝛼, where 𝜌m,eq is the value of the mass density (m) at the magnetic equator, L is the L shell, R-E is the Earth's radius, R is the geocentric distance to a point on the field line, and is the power law coefficient. Positive values of indicate that (m) increases away from the magnetic equator, zero value indicates that (m) is constant along the magnetic field line, and negative indicates that there is a local peak in (m) at the magnetic equator. Using 12years of observations of toroidal Alfven frequencies by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites, we study the typical dependence of inferred values of on the magnetic local time (MLT), the phase of the solar cycle as specified by the F-10.7 extreme ultraviolet solar flux, and geomagnetic activity as specified by the auroral electrojet (AE) index. Over the mostly dayside range of the observations, we find that decreases with respect to increasing MLT and F-10.7, but increases with respect to increasing AE. We develop a formula that depends on all three parameters, 3Dmodel=2.2+1.3.cos(MLT15 degrees)+0.0026AEcos(MLT-0.8)15 degrees)+2.110-5AEF10.7-0.010F10.7, that models the binned values of within a standard deviation of 0.3. While we do not yet have a complete theoretical understanding of why should depend on these parameters in such a way, we do make some observations and speculations about the causes. At least part of the dependence is related to that of (m,eq); higher , corresponding to steeper variation with respect to magnetic latitude, occurs when (m,eq) is lower.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.publisherAMER GEOPHYSICAL UNIONen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2169-9380en_US
dc.subjectmass density; field line distribution; geostationary orbit; Alfven wavesen_US
dc.subjectALFVEN-WAVE HARMONICS; GEOMAGNETIC STORMS; PLASMA; MAGNETOSPHERE; EIGENFREQUENCIESen_US
dc.titleField line distribution of mass density at geostationary orbiten_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.type.genreJournal Article, Academic Journalen_US
dc.citation.volume120en_US
dc.citation.issue6en_US
dc.citation.spage4409en_US
dc.citation.epage4422en_US
dc.description.statusPublisheden_US
dc.creator.orcid0000-0002-2095-8529en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record