<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/554">
<title>Samuel Ginn College of Engineering</title>
<link>https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/554</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50765"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50665"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50539"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50481"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T05:23:07Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50765">
<title>Secondary size distributions for single drop impacts at high wall superheat</title>
<link>https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50765</link>
<description>Secondary size distributions for single drop impacts at high wall superheat
The impingement of liquid sprays on hot walls is used extensively in both spray-cooling systems and in combustor fuel injection applications. At low and moderate wall temperatures, the secondary size distributions have been reported in the literature. For high wall superheat conditions, particularly for real multicomponent fuels, this secondary size distribution has received less attention. Understanding the resultant size distribution for a spray-wall impact is key to capturing vaporization and local mixture for fuel-spray impingement. In this study, single drop impacts for a range of single-component (n-decane) and multicomponent jet fuel (F-24) are characterized through dual-view imaging. Secondary droplets are captured for impact Weber numbers of 100–600 and wall temperatures spanning the nucleate and film boiling (Leidenfrost) regimes. Imaging through a transparent sapphire substrate is used to capture the impact phenomena and impact-induced breakup of impacting drops. We report empirical correlations for the secondary droplet size for single-component (n-decane) and multicomponent (F-24) liquid fuels with varying wall temperature to provide validation datasets for spray-wall simulations.
</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50665">
<title>Resistance model for confined circular reinforced concrete columns under eccentric loads</title>
<link>https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50665</link>
<description>Resistance model for confined circular reinforced concrete columns under eccentric loads
Circular reinforced concrete columns with spiral reinforcement exhibit an increased ductility&#13;
and resistance due to the confinement effect. Many experimental investigations and theoretical studies related&#13;
to this topic are focused on columns under axial load, while those for eccentric load are seldom. The scope of&#13;
the paper is to present a developed calculation model of resistance for eccentrically loaded confined circular&#13;
concrete columns. The model assumptions extend procedures of the ACI and Eurocode to the confined&#13;
concrete case. In order to determine the resistance of columns in the form of the force-moment interaction&#13;
diagrams, a special procedure is elaborated and described in detail. The peak stress and corresponding strain&#13;
for axially loaded confined concrete is calculated using the Richart’s model. Then, an increase of ultimate&#13;
strength capacity due to confinement is related to the axial strain level. The more the eccentricity, the less&#13;
the confinement effect is engaged in the column resistance. The contribution of spiral reinforcement in the&#13;
bearing capacity is the greatest in concentrically loaded columns and it vanishes at the point where axial&#13;
strain in the concrete column is equal to zero, which initially governed the beneficial effect of the spiral&#13;
reinforcement. A sample interaction diagram is obtained for the selected design case and compared with the&#13;
diagram for unconfined column.
</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50539">
<title>Data for: Comparison of two dielectric sensors in coarse-grained soils of increasing salinity</title>
<link>https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50539</link>
<description>Data for: Comparison of two dielectric sensors in coarse-grained soils of increasing salinity
Moisture content can impact the resilient modulus of pavement base course and subgrade layers. Given its influence on the post-inundation resilient moduli of the coastal pavement and base course and subgrade layers, it is important for transportation management personnel to understand the post-inundation moisture state for short-term and long-term planning. Dielectric soil moisture sensors can be used to obtain real-time soil moisture data; however, in coastal areas these sensors will be exposed to salinity. In this study, the performance of two commercially available dielectric soil moisture sensors, one using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) technology and one using capacitance technology, in a laboratory environment with three different soil materials was examined. Both sensors measure volumetric water content (θ), bulk electrical conductivity (σb) and temperature. Volumetric water content values from the sensors were compared to gravimetrically obtained values. The results show that the capacitance sensor was more reliable and more accurately measured volumetric water content in all three soil materials.
</description>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50481">
<title>The Role of Breccia Lenses in Regolith Generation From the Formation of Small, Simple Craters: Application to the Apollo 15 Landing Site</title>
<link>https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50481</link>
<description>The Role of Breccia Lenses in Regolith Generation From the Formation of Small, Simple Craters: Application to the Apollo 15 Landing Site
Impact cratering is likely a primary agent of regolith generation on airless bodies. Regolith production via impact cratering has long been a key topic of study since the Apollo era. The evolution of regolith due to impact cratering, however, is not well understood. A better formulation is needed to help quantify the formation mechanism and timescale of regolith evolution. Here we propose an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith generated by small, simple craters. We account for ejecta blanketing as well as regolith infilling of the transient crater cavity. Our results show that the regolith infilling plays a key role in producing regolith. Our model demonstrates that because of the stochastic nature of impact cratering, the regolith thickness varies laterally, which is consistent with earlier work. We apply this analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 site. The regolith thickness is computed considering the observed crater size-frequency distribution of small, simple lunar craters (&lt; 381m in radius for ejecta blanketing and &lt;100m in radius for the regolith infilling). Allowing for some amount of regolith coming from the outside of the area, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment. Finally, we find that the timescale of regolith growth is longer than that of crater equilibrium, implying that even if crater equilibrium is observed on a cratered surface, it is likely that the regolith thickness is still evolving due to additional impact craters. Plain Language Summary Impact cratering likely generates much of the regolith (the surface layer made up of a mixture of rocks, rock fragments, sand, and dust) observed on airless planetary surfaces. However, the way that the regolith layer evolves and thickens over time due to impact cratering events is not well understood. When a small, simple crater forms into hard rock, regolith is produced by fracturing the target rock and is deposited in the crater's ejecta blanket and within its transient crater cavity. Here we discuss an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith developed by simple craters. Our results indicate that the regolith deposited on crater interiors is particularly important to consider when describing the distribution of regolith. Our model also indicates that the regolith thickness varies from one location to another. We apply this model to the regolith at the Apollo 15 landing site by considering the size distribution of observed small, simple lunar craters. Allowing for some regolith coming from outside of the area of the landing site, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment.
</description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
