LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS OF ALABAMA FISHES From: River and Impoundment Surveys, 1949-1964 by Fisheries Staffs of Auburn University and Alabama Department of Conservation Wayne E. Swingle Zoology-Entomology Department Series Fisheries No. 3 AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AUBURN UNIVERSITY E V. Smith, Director June 1965 Auburn, Alabama LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS OF ALABAMA FISHES Wayne E. Swingle* The tables presented herein contain length-weight data of Alabama fishes from river and river impoundment surveys conducted by the fisheries staffs of Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station and the Alabama Department of Conservation, and those surveys made in cooperation with the Tennessee Valley Authority, Georgia Game and Fish Commission, and the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. The values presented in the following tables represent data collected during the period of 1949 to 1964. Pages 1 through 80 contain total length-weight values for 95 species of fish arranged alphabetically by common name. The common names used are those given in the American Fisheries Society Special Publication No. 2 (1960), with the following exceptions: The carp, Cprinis cario, is called the common carp, following FAO usage to distinguish it from Chinese and Indian carps. The deep-bodied Israeli strain of mirror carp is re- corded separately because its length-weight relationships are different from the more cylindrical scaled common carp found in rivers and impound- ments. Four species of exotic tilapias are listed as the Java, Nile, Congo, and Tampa tilapias. The southern variety of brown bullhead is listed as the speckled (brown) bullhead. Rock bass are listed as northern and southern rock bass. Data for certain species of fish collected from the rivers and river impoundments are supplemented with data for the same species raised in ponds. This was done to extend the range of the length-weight relationships *Formerly, Graduate Aide in Fisheries at Auburn University. and tables in which pond data were included and designated as such. A few tables of 1length-weight data from ponds are included for species absent or rarely collected from river waters. The fish usd toobin these - di data wre measidually to determine total .- ength and .most,: :of ;them were place d weighed in agggte. Ts, pro edure undoubtedlyrtheae between maximum and ,inimum .w-eights for each- inch.group. The., -values in-the.tables tht falow w :calculated by a opu program, (Swingle, -W, E, 196,-Auburn Univers*i1tyx S Z 'Et. D:- Dept. Series, Fishries No., 119. pp, ). Theyr ith the possible exception of the condition index and calculated weights. The. condiion t index11is.. of-. the. . form: 5 3 wheree is the aeLrarical weight. in pounds and L is the inch.integer for an, inch-grou. The standard calculated weights are from equations of the form: b ,L rlg(W)log(a)+blog(L) The paramersa andlg (a) as asthecorrelation co effic ient, 6r, ad th'e"'s'tandard error of the e6stimate , 5 yx' arepresented. in-, thetable begi.nning: on- page 81 tws necessary to c ompte two -or moe tndrdlngh-egh eutons-for manyl Specie s to. adeq uately Thre raneovr hih sngeqsctanadleghwegteqain a omue was seleted by etermir~ng the onsint ov r pit)weeteiceeto poins wre sedto ivie te dta ntogrops or hic a inge'equation thelyoma clclte wihsgve th-etabesae fo qain ii of the form: b 2 2 b 3 W = b 0 + b1L + + b3L The parameters bo, bl, b 2 and b 3 of this equation are presented in the table beginning on page 81. This table also gives the length intervals over which the equations were calculated, the number of observations (n) used in the calculations, and the number of fish included in these observations. The polynomial equations adequately described the length- weight relationships during a longer length interval for some species than did the standard equations; however, in the tables that follow, the length interval was the same for both equations, unless otherwise indicated. The author made little use of the condition index other than the selection of length intervals for which a single standard equation ad- equately described the data, but prefered to use the LeCren relative con- dition index and a modification of this equation to compare populations and individual fish. For comparisons of condition between individual fish, the relative condition index (LeCren, E.D., 1951, Jour. Animal Ecol., 20(2):201-209), Kn was expressed as follows: Kn = W A w A where W equals the weight of the individual fish and W is the calculated weight computed from the standard equation for a fish of the same length from the same population. For comparisons of the average condition between populations, W became the calculated weight computed from the A standard equation for a particular population and W became the weight com- puted from the standard equation for fish of the same length for all populations in the state, i.e. the W values are those given under the heading "standard calculated weights" and are taken to represent the "state averages." Thus, the LeCren relative condition index reduces the condition of fish to a multiple of the computed "state average" weight (Figure 1). iii PICKWICK GUNTERSVILLE WHEELER WILSON WARRIOR TOIIGDEE COOSA-~ I I w 4 4, L- J .. j 5 10 15 5 10 15 U--- H i - 9.-I 5 10 15 5 10 I. -T ~ .. L- 10 15 5 10 15 - o - 5 10 15 FIGURE 1 COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE CONDITION OF FRFSHNATER DRUM OF' LENGTHS 5,10, AND 15 INCHES -FROM 7 P0PUJ.IT20 1.2 z 0 H H 1.0 0.9 0.8 PICKWICK GUNTERSVILLE WHEELER WILSON WARRIOR TOMIGBEE C006A ,. J i r-m-E""' a I L.:ELwj...d...lIII L.1 - - 1 I . . -. . urs INDEX' SPECIES Alaboma Hog Sucker American Eel Atlantic Needlefish Bay Anchovy Bigeye Chub Bigmouth Buffalo Black Bullhead Black Crappie Black Drum Blackspotted Topminnow Blacktail Redhorse Blacktail Shiner Blue Catfish Bluegill Blue Sucker Bluntnose Minnow Brook Silverside Bullhead -Minnow Chain Pickerel Channel Catfish Cherryf in Shiner Common Carp, Israeli Mirror Commnomarpo Scae HLIZaeelum etounum (Jordan) Anguilla rostrata (LeSueur) StrongZlur marina (Walbaum) Anchoa mitchilli (Val.) tybopuis aestivalis (Girard) pWANOW" Ictiobus cvprinellus-(Val.) Ictalurus melas (Raf.) Pomoxis annularis (Raf.) Pog~oniau cromis (Linn.) Fundulus olivaceus (Storer) Moxostoma erythrurum (Raf.) Notr venustus (Girard) Ictalurus furcatus (LeSueur) Lepomis macrochirus (Raf.) Cycleptus elongatus,(LeSueur) Pimpnhales notatus Labidesthes sicculus (Cope) Pineales!viilax (Baird6Girard) Esox ni (LeSueur) Ictalurus punctatus (Raf.) Not s rose ipinnis (Hay) C~prinu'x' caErio Linn. Cyprinus T. Linn. V pae 2 3 4 4 5.6 6 7 8 8 9 10 11-12 13 13 14 14 14 15 16-17 17 18-19 89rrlC20-21Z ata (22 1~ 322 Li (23 wrljt24 24 Flathead Catfish Flier Freckled Madtom Freshwater Drum Gizzard Shad Golden Redhorse Golden Shiner Goldfish Green Sunfish Highfin Carpsucker Java Tilapia Largemouth Bass Largecle Menhaden Logperch Longear Sunfi sh Loagnose Gar. Mooneye Mosquito Fish. Nile Tilapia Northern Hog- Sucker Northern Rock Ssn Orangespotted Sunfish. Pit =ftIh Pyldicisolivuris (Rat. Centrarchus matcrop~terus (Lac.) Noturus nocturnus Jordon& Gilbert Aplo dinotus grunniens. Rat. Dorosoci el~dinum (LeSueur) Moxostoma erythrur m(Raf.) Notemigonus crysoleucas (Mitchill) Carassius ciurcitus (Linn.) Lepomis cyaellus Raf. CG~oe velifer (Rat.) Tilcipa ossambica (Peters) Microp2terus salmoides (Lac) Brevoortia patronus Goode Percina C poes (Raf) Lepomis mega-lotis (Rat.) Lepisosteus,-s~ m(Linn.) Hiodon tergisus LeSueur Gubuicaffinis (Baird& Girard) Tilspia nilotica Linn* Hypentelim niaricans (LeSueur) Aalpites rupestris ruPestrs(R) vi' 25-26 27, 27 28-29 30 31 32 33 ~34 35 36 37 38, 38 3 9 40-41 42 42 .43 .44, 44 Redbreast Suntish Redear Suntish Redeye Bass Riffle Minnow River Carpsucker River Redhorse Sauger Shortnose Gar Silverband Shiner Silver Chub Silverjaw Minnow Silverstripe Shiner Silvery Minnow Skipjack Herring Smalimouth Bass Smalimouth Buttfalo Southern Southern Speckled Speckled Flounder Rock Bass (Brown) Bullhead Chub Speckled Madtom Spot Spottin Spotted Spotted Spotted Shiner Bass Gar Sucker Spotted Suntish Stoneroller Lepomis auritus (Li.nn)51 Lepomis microlophus (Gunther) 51 Microterus coosae Hubba & Biley-52 Phenacobius catostomus Jordan-53 CaE!iodes carpio (Rat 53 Moxoe;toma carinatum (Cope) 54 Stizostedion canadense (Smith) 55 L teus 1tomus Rat. 56 Notropis shumardi (Girand) 57 Hybopsis storeriancz (Kirtland) 57 Ericyba buccata Cope 58 Notropis -jijis (Jordan) 58 ybogathus nuchalis Agassiz 58 Alosa chrsochioris (Rat)59 Kicropterus dolonieui (Lac.) 60 Ictiobus bubalus(Rat.)61-62 ricrtschthvs lethosti Jordan Gilbert 63 Aublolites rupestris arioi=mus Viosca 63 Ictalurus nebulosus (LeSueur) 64 Hyosis cestivalis (Girard) 65 Noturus letaanthus Jordan 65 Leiostomusa xanthurus Lac. 66 Cqu to anomalum (Rat. 70 vii Striped Mullet Striped Shiner Taupa -Tilapia Threadf in Shad Wclleye Warmouth Weed Shiner. 'White Bass White Catfish White Crappie Yellow.Bass Yellow Bullhead Mgil- cep~hclus Linn.S 71 Notrop~is chryscpc.u Rcf)71 Tjilj heude lot i Da~m 72 Dorosoaca petenense (Gunther) 73 Stizostedion vitreum( tc~1)74 Noroi texcanus (Girard) 75 Roccus chrysops,(Rat. 76 Ictalurus catus (Linn.) 77 Pouoxis annularis lRat. 78 Roccus mississippiensis (Jordan Eigenaann)79 Ictalurus natalis (LeSueur) 80 viii LjENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONS HIPS IN INCHES AND, POUNDS OF ALABAMA -HOG'SUCKER Average Calculated Gn Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights Idition Length of~ Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 17 O0h - .0*05~3 0*0033 -66.17i 342 0.0006 0.013 o,,oo8h 0.010 -30*95 4 3 0.013 _____ .20 O.02h 0.0019 31.77 5___4_ "00035 0-50O0 45 ooL ao4o[ 4ooo 6 8 0.070 amp0.070 0. 076 o,,o8h 32,,4o 7 5_____0.11 O*lh 1 0.13-- 0.12 0.13 38o48 8 1 0.21 -0.21 0.17 0.19 wh4101 2 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF AMERICAN Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Wihsdto Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight StandariPolynoiI 5 14 0.00050 0.010 0.0063 05.00 6 11 1 0.003 - 00062 0.0094 0.011 12.86 7 22 0.0087 0.025 0.020. 00016 0o031 5.80 8 6 09039 0.25 0s047 7.71 11 0.074 0.038 0061 10.18 10 12 0.034 0.10 0*051 0.055 0*076 5.18 11 0.026 0.10 o,o68 09077- 0092 5.10 12 .9 0.060 0.o15 0.1 0.10 0.11 6.49 13 16 0.13 0.21 0.18 0.14 0.14 8.19 14 - --- 0.18 0.17- 15 6 - 015 - 0.20 0.23 0.21 5.77 16_5 0.18 0.30 0.23 -0.28 0.25 5.71 17 4 0.30 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.31 6.86 19 .5 -- 0.51 0.53. 0.47 7.49 20 - --- 0.61 0.57- 21- j5 0.0 u 0.66 0.62 073 0.69 66 -22L. 5 i 0Q.2 0*850.*85 Qj~ 0.847#70 23 3. 0.80 1.25 1.010 1.00 1.009.0 2 La I a *& 0 1.305 1.19 90 3 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF ATLANTIC NEEDLEFISH Average Calculated ]Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition 31 -- 0.001 0.0010, - 3.70 090015 OoO0.022 0.002 040025 0*0023 3.12 O5s -0.08 0Q9050 090080 6.40- 6 4J 0.03r -00011 0.0088 0.013 5.20 7 .15 0.008, 0.021 0*1 0o14 0.017 4.10 8 11 0.015 0.030 0.025 09022 0.022 4.o81 .96 0.028 0.035- 0031 0s031 0.029 4929 J10 5L. 0*0?30 0.038 09036, 0*043 0*039 3.60- 11 2 o .060 Qe058 0.052 4.50 12- 1 -- 0.070 0.076 0.069 4.05. 13 - -0.10 016099 0.092 4.55 2L. 1o .16 0*12 0.12 5.83 1L 6 0.10 0.13 0.12 0.5,.16 3.60 Q22 0LJS.9 0-.2LJ3 7 -0930 0023- 0.25 6.10 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OFBA ANCHOVY Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight 1 . 054 - - 0.00082 0.00080 -82. 2 02 52 09.,0012 0e0017 15*3 .LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS. IN INCHS AND.POUNDS OF BI GEYE CHU Average Calculated iCon- Number Range in Weight Empirical WeightsIdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 030015 QQ5 0.0020 QQ2L QsQQ2_ 25.1 3L.10 0.0050 0.011 0.0090 0.0066 0.0063 3 A4 7 .0 0.017 0.016 0.012 0.015 25.6 1--0.033 9.O020 0.032 269 _____________ ________________ I I LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BIGM0UM{ BUFFALO Average .. Calculated Con- Nube Rng i Wigt Empirical Weights diti on Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 380 0.0079 -0.008 0*.05 98 3 19622 0w0136 0.014 0.016 -50,4. 4 25900 0.029 0.038 0.032 0.038 4 9~i 5 4514 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07- 44.7 6 809 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.13- 50.1 7 126 0.16 0.38 0.22 0.20 0.26 66.6 8 183 0.27 .0.63 0.32 0o30 0.36 63.4 9 9 0.44 0.0 0.74 0.43 0.47 JLQL2. 10 - - 0.59 0.60 118 0.60 - 0.060 0978 0.78 45.1 12 32 0. 70 1.30, 0.q96 1.02 1.00 55j. 13 310 1. 17 1.40 1.25., 1,29 1.27 57.0. 14 144 1.37 2.48 1.56 1.62 1.60 56.8 1 ~123 180 ,3Q2 -0l 9 a .f 6 2~ .16 122 1.70 2.70. 2.30 2941 2.34 56L 17 85 2.48 3.17 2.65' 2.65 2.70 __3, 18 129 2.75 3.70. 3.20- 3.20 3.14 54.9 19 109 3.30 3.95 3y2923,Z68--& .57- 20 26 4.23 4.63 4.25 4.53 4*3i 51L 21 6 4.44 5.50 4-72 5.32 5J11 5L1. LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN -INCHES AND POUNDS OF BIGMOUTH.BUFFALO Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 26 16 11.35 11.35 .10.77 11.33 64.57 27 8 13.15 , 13.15 12.20 13.13. 66.80 NOW-~ LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLACK BULLHAD Average Calculated Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 133 0*0906 09M70~oo _ _0000055 5Aa536 -2 L9 0001-Qs 3 2fla 4 1128 0e028 0*0O2k.8.030 .L~.. ~ 0&0 905-7 02042 39.~2.1L LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLACK CRAPPIE Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 295 0.0007 0.002 0.0008 0*0005 85976 2 3,772 0.001 0.007 0.004 0.004 0.004 46951 9 2,839 0*005 0.013 0.009 0.012 0e017 32.03 4 7,592 .020 0.057 0.03100.033 48.31 5 2,157 0.022 0.100 0.05 0.06 0.06 39.77 6 458 0.063 0.110 0.08 0.10 0.10 37.41 7 50. 0.01 0.25 0.16 0.15, 0.15 45.18 8 42 0.13 0.40 0.23 0.23 0.24 9 .52 0.17 0.50 0.310.32 0.35 42.99 10 51 0.23 0.60 0.4200.4 050 41.64 11 13 0.60 0.76 0.68 0.58 0.69 51.43 12 2 0.80 1.00 0.90 0.76 0.3; 52.08 13 1 1.40- 1.40 0.98 1.22 63.72 1A 1 1 kw1 1548 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLACK DRUM Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 4 50 -0.010 0.011 0.010 15.6 5 106 0.0260,024 0*026 21.1 6 163 - - 0.052 0.044 0*052 24.1 7 8 0.0630,074 0.062 182 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLACKSPOTTD TOPHINNOW Average Calculated Con- Number Range in.Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 43 0.00077 0.0011 0.0010 0.0010 0.0016 102e32 2/ .108 0.0010 0. 0033 0.0027 0.0031 0.0025 334-91 3 66 0.0050 0.020 0.0083 000060 0.0089 AQAM -:NG 4"WEGlT RLTIONSHIPS, IN INCHES AND) POUNDS OF BL.CXTAIL REDI{ORSE Ave-rage Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights diM or. Length. of Fish I.Minimum MSamum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 4 35 0.012 0.10 0.033. 0.026 2. 45___0..040 0.10 0.046 0.04 0.9 I27*P 6 ~ 75' 10-.050 001 0.10 0'0086, 0.083o- 7 92. 0.10 0.20 0.13- 0.14 0.12 37.4 8 1 115 0.15 0.35 , 0.819 :0.20 0.619 37.2 9 74 0.15 0.45 0.27 0.29 0.28 37.7 10 117 0 :?A 0.50 0.38,-,. 0.39 0.39 37.9' 11 ii, 0.40 095 0.52 0.53 49 12 721.0.50 1.10 0.65 0.68 0.70 37.9 13 52 0.60 1010 0.o86 0.86 0.0 39.1 14 .4. 0.83 1*.5 1 1 1.07 1.131 .15 1.l20 1*5.- *401042 1.38 415 16 13 1.57 2.20 1.72 1.60 1.67 42.1l 18 ~. 210. 2 0 2.28 2o27 2eJ4 35 3 l 19 2 5.5.2 68 265 2 66 2o7238o6 20 2 3000Q 3e10 3o05, 3.10*3o4- 8l 10 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN IN.CHES AND BOUNDS OF BLACKTAIL SHINER IAverage I Calculated ICon- Number Rnei egt EprcLWeights ditior Length of' FishI Minimum Maxilmllm Weight Standard Polynomial Jlndeyx 1 92 i00001 90501151.s2 2 669 1 G0.000 70.011 l _27_ 10_0026 0.*0030. QQQ98L000 0 *0024 0Q0021L40*00,78 0.0092 3* 4 892 0.:0043 0.044 0.017 09017 0.017 26.5 j. 283 0.010 0.050 0*034 0.031 0.032 2. 6 4 00.040 00.070 0.063 10.0L51 0.059 28.9 11 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES-'AND POUNDS OF BLUE CATFISH Average Calculated ICon- Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 1313 0.0004 0.0012 0*00093 - -7 -2 W132 0*Q0Q33 0*0071 0Q-033L 0.0027 000007 40* 0m007_ a 3 OeO~a 0.0091 00012 28.8 4 1970 0.008 0*044 0.018 0.0211 09026 1.277. ~ Q 00013 0 Q? 0 0,*041 0 *045 32L~ 6 2358 0.045 0.15 0.062 0.070 0.073 2o 7 1717 0043 &2 0.10 0.11 QO2ll 29a. 8 -102. .Qo7 0Q2 Q5l s1 1&6Q 29.5. 9 1361 0e.14 0.44 0.24 0.23 0.23 32.7 10 745 0.19 0.52 0.32 0.31 0.32 31.5 11 606 0.30 0Q97..0Q4 .0.041 0.43 30*2 13 L I.JL - 1.00 o.67 o0.68 0*71 30 11. 2390 0.63 1.16 0.88 0.*87, 0.89 3* 15 280 0.95: 1.46 1.09 1.10 1.10 32.4 16 .2 65 1.044 1.36 1.36. 1e35 3 17. 1, 1.e20 1.95 1.5 167 31.66 18 33- L 1*05 2..60 1*9 2*.Z&2*34A2 19 111 1.4 44 45 2L432.43 3 5L7 20 88 _2e *9 3.08 -- 29. 2.91- J. 38* 12 LENGTH-WEIGHT- RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLUE. CATFISH Average Calculated Con- Number. Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of' Fish Minimum Maxlimum Wegh Standard Polynomial Index 25 Z H 5.60 7.00 6.4 6.947 f6,o45 41.1 26, 29 6.37 8.75 7.32 7.44 -77JQ4.1L. 27 1 1 '7.19 %.9000. 8*345 7 -142.4 28 21 9.00 10.93 9.64 9.69 9.18 4*- 29 12 9.20 12.0 10.15 i10.197 10.-61 e 30 .11 10.50 15.60 12.61 12.38 12.26 46 31 9 11.00 15.80 14291391 1as 1 LL3 32 7 14.38 18.10 15L. 6 16.,15 7 &3- 33 6 1.5 1.0~~18.35 34. 81 14.70 19.75 18.o79 19.31 20.a68 7 35 1 -- 22.00 21*41 23e1L 36 -23o67- 25a.66 37 1- 27.50 26.009 28.26 50 J7i3 2845 2o2 2&68 3~01~ 5~ 39 ---- 31045 3t5 40 4151 8*6 3442 38.905 60-35- 11 79_ 3*2 42__80_ 590__"24 402A3L..jhL5- 944. ___L___L61.051- 13 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLUEGILL Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Emica Weights dition Length of FiJsh Minimum Maximum Eightc tanardPolynomial, Index 1 52376 0900036 0.0090 00.0011, L9____J1& 2 3-I31 5 QOQ2L QQ47 QQ49 Q0.0056 J4. 13103 0.020 0.10 0*041 00042 0.043 63 8.8 5 859 09014 '0.14. 0908-1. 0083 09,084 64o 6 5020 0.063 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 666. 7. 1810 .0.15 . 0940 0.23 0.24 oQ2I 6Z&. 8 324 Q 1 .ZQ Q.3 03 0.Q3i. 013& . 6aa*7- *90.53 0.91 105 10__ 7 0.83 1.,12 0.96 - J........ 2,. 1.01 2.04 1.52 - ____ 14 ____ ___ 3.50 . LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLUE SUCKER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish iMinimum Maximum Weight__ standard Polynomial Index 18 2 lo 155. 2.00 1.78 1*710. *Inh..rouU 9to14 are from ponds z2L i 4L 9 i5L7 9 4Is64 25L_ 5 1-5-,20 53O7 *Inch-groups 9 to 14 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BLUNTNOSE MINNOW Average Calculated Con- Number Range in weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 170_ 0.0026 0.0064 0.0032 0.0032 0.0036 39085 3 73 000050 0.015 0.0076 0.0087 0.0081. 28.10 4 10 0.020 0,020 0.018 0.020 31.25 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BROOK SILVERSIDE Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empiricaleightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial'Index 1 16 0.00033 0.00066 0.00050 0.0004710,00050 jQLQQ 2 259 0.00050 0.0033 0,00 9 19OoOO17L 23.35 3r 3 6 0 Q Q 0 65 Q4A ,QQ4J QQ45 16A6- 4 1 00.010 - 0.010 0.0072 0.0098 15.62 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF BULLHEAD MINNOW Average Calculated jCon- 15 LENGTH-WEIGHI RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF CHAIN PICKEREL Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights- dition Length of Fish Minimum Ma xi mum Weigrht StnadPlomlIde 3 1 0.003 0*003 0*004 0.0 4 3 0.013 0*013 0.010 0.012 20.8 5 75 0.023 0.028 0,023 0*02 0*016 18,2 6 128 0.039 0.040 0.04 0,04 0.03 18.2 7 52 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.8 8 35 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 18.0 9 35 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.13 0.14 18.8 10 11 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 17.9 11 13 0.22 0.230.20.26 17.6 12 12 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.34 15.9 13 14 0.37 - 0.39 0.42 0.43 17.7 14 9 0.48 0.480.530.53 17.4 15 6 0.59 1.20 0.79 0.66 0.64 23.4 16 5 0.72 1.10 0.87 0.81 0,77 2I1 17* 15 1.31 1.33 1.24 1.22 27.0 18 58 .1. 29* 1.41 1.40 1.44 1.42 24.'00 19 34 1.58 1.71 1.67 1.66 1.67 24.4 20 7 1.v80 -1.80 1.90 1.95 22.5 21 4 2.02 2.02 2.15 2624 21.8 22 4 1.92 3.10 2.51 2.43 2.531 23.6 16 LUENGTH-WE.IGHT RELATIONSHIPS. IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF CHANNEL CATFISH Average Calculated Con- Number. Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Wegh Standard Polynomial Index 1 4856 0.00014 0.0044 OoOO084 83e2. 2 142.9 .. QQa07 . Q.7a. .. &LO235a 3 7W 0*00089 0.030 s 068 -QO0.I0Xn89 25o2 4 2452 0.0067 0.067 0.019 0.018 0.020 2a.3 5 2898 0.013 0.083 094 0.035 0Q?QaL 7 26a 6- 2582 0.026 0.13 0.s056 0.060 0.062 26.0 7 1734 0.050 0.22 0,04 . 0*095 Q09L7 2L. 8- 1583 0.080 0.25 001L Q.01L . Q &3224 9 111 12. Q j Q2Q..26L.. 10 1057 0.095 0.53 0.28 0*7 0.28* U 953 0.23 0.65 0.38 0Q&3.7-- .~ Q&35. 2L . 12 _750 0.33 0079. 0050 sQ.' Q 29a 13 594 0.-50 - 0.68 9*65' 0.70 30e8 14 .434 0.050 1.90 0.83 0.83 0.87 3 15. 341 0.55 1.38 1.02 1. 04 1.07 30.2 16 248 0.050 1.90 1.28* 1.29 1.29 31.2 17 149 0.73 2.06 1.-57 1.57 1.55 32.2 18 92 1.0 2.40 l1.90 1.90 1.86 32.o6 19 .57 1.70 2.70 .2.22 2.27 .2.23 32.8 20 29 2.45 - 3.75 2e89 2.69 .2.67 36.1 17 LENGTH-WEIGHT. RELATIONSHIPS. IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF CHANNEL CATFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 25 5* - - 5.61 6.25 , 26 2- .65Q.. 7.14 6.87 6.39 7.32 39.1 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS-OF CHERRYFIN 3HINR Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight EmpiricalWeights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 .2421 0000012 00012e4 L3115 . - 0.0016 090015 20.4- 1 12. - 000050 0.0058 18-5 18 LENGTH-WEIGHT -RELATIONSHIPS ) IN INCHEq'S- AND 'POUNDS. OF :COMMON -CARP, ISRAELI MIRROR* Average Calculated Gon-- Number Range in Weight Empiric'al Weights dition Lenth f'Fis Mnimm axium Weight' Standard Polynomial Idex 4 8 0.03 7 - 0.37 0.036 58.6- 5 55. 0.10 -0.100 0o071 0.065. 0. 6 -264 0.11 -0.11 0.12 oQ1.a 7 93 0.14 -0.14 0.19 0.17 42.0 8 12 0.22 - 0.22 0.29 0.27 42.3 9 824 0.30 0.,50 .0.,50 0.41 0.41 67.9 -10 446 0.40 0.70 0,59 0.57 0.58 59.1 11 377 0.65 0083 0.68 0,75 0.78 51.1 12 478 0.90 1.11 1.02 0.98 1.01 58.8 13 858 1.05. 1.65 1.20 1.25 1.28 54.5 14 406 1.,43 184 1.54 1.56 1.58- 56.2 15 193- 1.68 .2.15 1.95 11 1.90 5, 16 -23 2.44 2.60 2.46 232 2. 46 60. 18 1 4090 - 4.90 .4*644.....a6 4.... 19* 5 4.60 - 69,.0 5*35 5.. .9.4 90o..... .. 4__ 20 16 5.165 -7.55 6.12 .. i...25 4A4__ 21 67 6.*30- - ... C.-... .25.. z. %84 2.. 22 77 8.*45 9.73 9. 70 .Z........Z5L.2.1.. IL 23%16 9.532 1020 $IfL.e%.&.v.LaZ00 . n.Lo4.A. "7.f% 19 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF COMMON CARP, ISRAELI MIRROR Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length ofFish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 28 3 11o87 11.87 14.77 12.54 29 1 13*30 13.30 16.19 12.96 54. 20 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS. OF COMMON CARP# SCALED* Average Calculated Con- Number RneiWigt' Empirical Weights ...dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1.39 0.003 OQ?L 0001 - 3I33. 2 .48800 sQOi 0Q68 QQSi- OO07 6-2 3 ,- 0 01Q0 00QWJ -QQ5 QQA2L -5742 ll e 225 0.022 o0.16 Q000046 47J2Q 6 156 0.059 0.30 0.16 0.14 0.19 7,2 7 3Q 1,10Q Q4. 0.18 Q?21 2& 51a.50Q. 0 8 52 Q013 0031 0023 3Q Q00445A18 9 42 0.37 0.50 0*380.42 Q00L451965- 10 19 0.40 0.60 0.52 0.56 0.56 52.42 11 35 R0.66 0.75, 097 0.72 Q?2Q .504 12 24 0.85 10.0 0090Q02.LO 52A0 13 23. 1.00 1.17 1.08 1.16108 J&2.27.. 14 .. 0 1.18 1*75j *321s3 L32. . 5Qa7 15 59. 1.25 2.*06 1.56 1.68 1.o61 46.30 16 49 1.60 2.50 1.99 2*01 1.94 48o62 17 81 1.84 2.60 2*11 2.37 2 18 73 2.00 4400 2o68. 2.77 2.76 JL6as.Q 19 40- 2.08 4.20 3.o09 3.21. 3.126 45iaO5-,. 20 i35 2.84 4L.655js5.81.0Jd~ 21 LENGTH-WEIGT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF COMMON CARP, SCALED* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 5 3 7.70 8.00 7.80 6.79 775 49 26 5 7.30 8.65 8.44"756 8.79 48.02 27 2 7.20 8.50 7.85 8.38 9.93 39.8 28, . 1 12.2 12.20 9.26 11.16 55.57 29 10.19 12.50 30 2 12.80 16.80 14.80 13.5 54.81 22 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF CONGO TILAPIA* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditIon Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial.Index 1 21 756 0,001 0.002 0,0013 0.0009 _1 2 1601472 0.004 0.008 0.006 0,007 0.006- J8. 0.161,617 0*010 0.019 0.014 0,023 0.018 50.2. 4 35039 0.04 0.12 0.05 0.05 73.8 5 17,498 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 79.3 6 _7814 0.14 0.22 0.17 0.18 0.18 77.3 7 1,348 0.27 0.32 0.29 0.28 0,30 84.1 8 599 0.40 0.50 0.47 0.41 .A691. 9 308 0.56 0.95 0.63 0.58 0.67 86.1 10 44 0.82 1.00 0.93 0.79 0.94 93.2 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF-CREEK CHUB Average CalculatedCoh Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition ngth of' Fish Minimum Maximum Weight -Standard Polynomial Index 171 0.00073 -0.0011 0.00069 105O.63 2 74 0.0018 O.OOhJ. 0*0035 0*0042 o.,oC47 43,58 3 27 0.0070 10015 0. 012.' 0.012 0*012 45*26 *Pond dataz 2 3 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF EMERALD SHINER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 2133 0.00005 0.004 0.00082_82.04 2 10022 0.0013 0.0040 0.0020 090020 0.0020 124.9 3 3468 0.0028 0.0096 0.0059 0.0059 0.0059 22.0 4 133 00044 0.025 0.014 0*013 0.016 22.6 24 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES ANT POUNDS OF FATHEAD MINNOW* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights- dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 88,049 0*00079 0.0007 0*0007 .JLIQ 2 71,721 0.0023 0.0028 0.0022 28 3 19,639 0.0069 0.0061 000068 25A2. LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF FLAT BULLHEAD Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights- dition Len t f Fish Minimum Maximum WihLgth ofFihMiimmMaium Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 14 0.0020 0.0030 0.0028 0*0029 3 3 22 0.0096 0.010 0.012 0Q0L1 20Q22 A4.M4 4 700,2 0050 0.027_ 0Z26 0A4L 41, 5 9 .046 0.10 0.060 0.054 0o061 48.00 6 4 0.10 0.10 00096 0*092 47,,45 7 8 '0.13 0. 20 0.14 0. 16 0.14 '40.o74 8. 5 0.19 - 021 0.24 0.22 40.3 9I1 033 - 033 .Qs35 -03 4.26. 25 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES-AND POUNDS OF FLATHEAD CATFISH 1 Nmbr Rng inWeghtTAver'age Calculated Con- MubrRninm Weight Length of Fish [MnmmMaximumSadr oyoIalTde 1 ~22 000QQI L100012~~L Q 7 12* U2 11 000870 0038- 007 05 0 02O1 5626. .~ 155 .. QQ3.Q. Q0.070 Q0Q045. Q?Q"L.0.Q4 3& 6 184 Q0g95. 0.1 3 0.080 0.080 0e080 3. 7L 2s2090Q2e Q2Q0s.13 0M13 j9 124 0.10 0ashA 0.27 0926 0927 J7tL3 10 71 0.20 0.60 0.36 0.357936JA j 6 .0.60 197 0*8I3 0.80 0 .d5- 15 39 0.90 1e80, 1.26 1.26. 1.22 7 16 29 1. 20 2.00 1.55 1.54 1.50 37.7 17 27 1.50 2. *06 1.79 1.87 1.84 36.5 18 -21 1*7. 2.50 2.12' 2.25 2*24_ 3 4. 19 14 2*27 2.90 2.62 2.67 270-. 38.2 20 13 3?.00 9305 i's2 J1]k e'L3 4&. 26 LENGTH-WEIGHT. RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF FLATHEAD- CATFISH Average Calculated Con- Numb er Range 'in Weight Empiica Weig-hts 1-1 *0 or Length of' Fish IMinimum Maximum 'Wih tnadPlnmalIndex 25' 4 A~5 *90 710 6087 6 a 663 4 26 1 -- 8.00 7987 8.00 h_5. 51 2-14 8.20 94000 .8*59 09& 92~ L 28- 5 9.60 12.50 .10.44 10.16 10.51 4 29 -4 10.2 113.44 12.23 11146 1172 5PIL 1 30 1 - 13.50 12.88 12.94 50.0 31 - -14.42 _____ 32 1 - 1690 16oLQ& 15s3 51257 33 1700-0 - 17.16- 34 ---- 19.82 18.87- 35 - a21L99 208 36 2s00 2j25 2X&L.. 24s1. 229. 5LOA 27 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF FLIER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Lenth of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight StandardPonomial Index- 2 1 0.010 0*0099 0.010 125.00 3 3 0.027 0*027 0.025 98.76 4 8 - - .56 0.056 0,059 87.89 5 10 0.11 0.099 0.10 84.00 6 1 - 0.150.16 0.15 69.44 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF FRECKLED MM)TOM Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Le h of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Inde 1 17 0.0009011 00011 0014111.76 2 95 0.0027 0*0037 090028 0.0043 09031.526 3 6 090066 0*08 0004 0*012 9a 12 0.010 0031!!- 9022017 2 0*020 LENGTH-WEIGHIT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES-AND POUNDS OF FRESHWATER DRUM Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard PolynomialIndex 1. 10 0.0023 0.032 0000393& 2 1462 0.0017 0.011 o0ooi6 -- Da J 13837 00033 - 0032 0Q1 .Q0.013 445 4 17694 0.010 0.10 0.020 0.025 0.034 3200 5 5553 0.021 0.1*0043 10.049 0,0059 34.*4 6 5812 0.042 0.20 0.0086 0092 39.7 7 7575 0.076 0.31 0.14 0.14 0,14 39.4 8 5363 0.37 0.19 0.20 0.20 37.9 9 5166 0.17 0.47 0.29 0.29 0.280 39.8 10 4361 0.20. .56 0.40 0.40 0.39 40.2 U 2953 0.30 0.88 0.54 0.53 0.53 40.6 12 1712 -1.10 0.69 0.69 0.69 39.7 13 926 0.49 1*33 0.92 0.87 0090 41.9 15 305 0. 56 1.90. 1e38 1*.4 1.45 40 16 -127 0.60' 2.30 1.91 1.*62 17 17 68 1.00 2.-90 2.26 -102.95 2.19 46.0 Ail ....Q..3 030 2*74 Z*32 2*5? L~L 19 2 41.55 3* 6 3.22 3.20 51*9 20 17 2 8O gO 3~9k. 390 3o99 49.2_ 21 10 3.70 5.o60 .J? .. 4.86 579L7 22- 10 4,60' 6.03) 7 5.56 5.81 5* ... L. 5 .640 8,10 7.6 6.56 6 o84. -58.o0 24, 1 7'.6 - I .7.95 57.5 29 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF FRESHWATER DRUM Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight EmpiricalWion Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight .25L. 6 86 60 9a_ 1 L e3 15m 26 5 10.20 11.02 .Je3i 10o39- 62. 27 4 8.50 11.70 1011,0 91 J 7 4 56901. 28 1 11.50 13.64 13.17 52.4 29 2 14.50 16.50 15.50 15.54 14.68 63.5 30) LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF GIZZAIRD SHAD Range in Weight Minimum Maximum Average Empirical Weight Calculated 1 n- Weights Standard Polynomial _ 190 _O - 5, 3 J 4457 i 040012 0.0O25,__00035 0oO039 -- J2Q55t L11L 34 9Q74 0.0090 0.034, Q. 0012 QL12,j410,L 4 27076 0.010 0.041 0.023 0.026 I 0.25 -3602-1 5 8715 0.0o25 0,095 0.047 0e048 0*048 3177 6 11006 0.040 0,.14 0.084 0*078 0.088 3808 7 13535 0.050 0.20 0.10 0.12 0.12 3o 8 1 7823 0.10 0oI4 0.18 0.18 0 it20 -3t- %9 18956 0.17 0.47 0.27 0.26 0Q7 j000 10 16137 0.23 0.o50 0.34 0.35 0.935 - 11 12296 0932 0.71 GOO . 0.46 0Q 45 32o5 12 53QL 0940 QQ9.Ot5. QM52 Q05 22a 271 0.50 1.10 0.78 0.74 0.75 35.6 15 69 1.20 1.50 1.44 1.12' 1.26 42.8 16 21 1.00 1.690 1.67 1.35 1.62 40.8 17 4 2.00 2.10 .2.05 1.61 2.07 41.7 Length Number of Fish dition z ndex 31 LENGTH-WE-IGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF GOLDEN.REDHORSE Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditior Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 3 OOO01 0.01 0.0070 0.0034-87.5 3 99 0.Oo33 0.027 0.018 0.012 0.0089 166.9 4 165 00018 0.065 0.032 0.030 0.030 49.3 79 0.025 0.13 0*057 0.060 0.071 45.7 6 33 0.075 0.25 0.12 0.11 0.12 54.9 7 41 04095 0.30 0.17 0.17 0.17 48o3 8 59 0.13 0.35 0.22 0.23 0.21 42.3 9 79 0.17- 0.44 0.30 0.31 0.32 41.3 10 58 0.30 0.63 0.44 0.42 0.44 43.5 11 77 0.40 0.80 0.55 0.54 0.57 41.1 12 121 0.50 1.04 0.74 0.69 0.73 42.7 13 126 0.60 1.15 0.90 0.87' 0.90 40o8 14 223 0.88 1e50 1.12 1.06 1.09 41.0 1 246 e 23L.J 25 22 131 31. 16 194 1.27 2.*00 1.59 1.54 9 L 38.8 17 111 1.18 2.10 1.78 1.o82 1.81 36.o2 18 23 1.20. 2.51 2.17 2.13 2.09 37o2 .19% .10 2.10 42.0180 2.51 2.48 2413o 20 13 2.9 2e84 2985--- j276___ 3505 21 -6 2-902,53 3.27 32 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF GOLDEN SINER* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 294013 0.0036 0.0037 0.0007 365.2 2 151928 0.0020 0.005 0.0054. 0.004 67.8 31 67498 0.0059 0.013 0.0077.0.011 0.009, 28.3 4 34996 0.010 0.020 0.015 01.02 0.02 23.5 5 2571 0.03 0.07 003 0.04 0.04 26.9 6 586 0.05 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.07 30.1 7 776 0.07 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.11. .32.2 8 179 0. 14 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.17 31.6 .9 2 0.20 0.30 0.25 0.18 0.25 34.3 33 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF GOLDFISH* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight EmpiricalWeightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 9866 0.001 0.008 040012 0Q016 2 -89297 0.001 0.02 0.008 0.006 101QL 3 123897 0.01 0.02 0.015 00018. 4 21451 0.02 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.05 51.1 5 2957 0.04 0.15 0.07 0.08 0.09 55.0 6 537 0.07 0.20 0.13 0.14 0.15' 60.1 7 1336 0.12 0.28 0.26 0.21 0.23 76.2 8 1319 0.22 0.48 0.40 031033 J8 9 286 0.39 0.57 0.4800.47 66.3 10 126. 0.45 -0.88 0.72 0.60 0,65 720 11 .90 0.80 1*07 0. 97 0.79 0.86- 12 36 0.50 1.54 1.11. L101 12Z64L 13 30 0.60 1.70 1.451.281.44 66.2 1A .5 .70 1.84 1.58 181.jZ6 L 15 2 '1.40 2.40. 1.90 1.93 2.24 56. 16 1 3.20'. 3.20' 2.33 2.73 78.61 *Pond data 34 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES.AND POUNDS OF GREEN SUNFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 5097 0.00020 0.0086 0.0030-297.1 2 4428 0.0004 0.038 0.0058 0.0051 0.0066 72.9 3 2757 0.0067 0.063 0.017 0.017 0.019 6 4 1400 0.011 - 0.039 0.041 0.045 60.6 462 0.022 0.15 0.082 0083 6 111 0.083 0.25 0.15 0.14 0.15 67.9 7 24 0.10 0.30 0.22 0.22- 0.21 64.1 8 5 0.30 0.38 0.3300.33 35 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF HIGHFIN CARPSUCKER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length, of Fi'sh Minimum.Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 7 '3. 9.0.17 0 .18 0.19 8 L31 0.19 0.28 95 0.26 002 S10 ob 10o .60 0.52 0.53 59*. 1 8 0.63 0.70 0.69 0.68 52.9 12 10 0.75 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.86 48.9 13 2 1.00114 1.08 1914 L5Q0 1.6 1.42 1.37 49.8 1 7 12* 1.61 1.75 1.72 47.6 16 5 1.90 2.20 2.14 2e13 2.16 52.2 L7 5 2.72 2L 2o83 2.56 2.68 .TeL 1830 66 3271*2 36 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF JAVA TILAPIA* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights- dition Length. of Fish Minimum Maximum. Weight. Sta ,ndard Polynomial Index .165689 Q0Q0000 Q10 0.021 .0.01Q -e r.118Q0006 .0-0187J 0-0057. Q0Q007 0,010 7L0. 0Q11Q0,0441 0.0163 0.022. 0.024 60.6, 4 615 0025 0,08.3 109037 .0.05 0.05 57. .6037 0.07 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.08 63.0 6 .66818 .0.11 0.37 0.13 0.14 0.14 60.9 7 .. 21907. 0e192.0.24 0.22- 0.21 0*22' 64.8, a.,.A453L. ft26 0.70Q 0,2 QL3L 0.33 _62.*6 .2 8302 0*35 0.53 _0.50 0.42 0.47 68.3 10 636 0.51- 0.63 0.6*056 0.66 66.9 139E.. 6& 0980. 73 0.89 -.73.9- 12 139 12L13 .J.28BQ921,18 l743 JL. 2 19.60__ 1.60, 1.14 1.52 72.*8 14' 1881.88 1.39 1.93 68.3 37 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF LARGEMO0Unh BASS Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditior, Length of Fi'sh Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 190 0.*00;23 00 15 090045 0.0039 090063 56a3 3 1083 0.*0053 09030 0.014 0y013 L . 0~13 500L1 4 1J554. 0.0060 Q0~.9065ZL*Q27?0Q033.Q200 Z42.9.. 5. .1283 0.030 0.13 0.056 0.058 0.060 44o 6 839 0.035. 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 4o 71 391 0.050 0.31 0.17 0.16 0.17 50.3 " 8 234 .0019_.__ OQ o40.23 0.25 4o j .202 0 *20 0050 0Q3?Oo3Q3LQ5. L.5. 10 208 0.030 QO75 o.46 0e5 .. 9746o 11 119 0.50 1.40 o.68 0.64 0.72. 50.9 12 121 0925 1.26 0.87 0.85 0.82 5* 13 70Q 0.-80 1.38 1.08 J1Q03JQL9Jei2. j ~ 66 0.90 2.00 1.35 1.38 1.34 42 15--3 162.25 s1 a7 12L - 16 27 1.75 2.50 2.06 2.10 4%19Q509 17 25 200 3.09 2.63 2.55 go7Q 53j NN 18' 13'. 2.000. 3.801 3.20 3.05 3.24 5o i2. 7. 3.00 o5Q 3.70 3.62. 90Q 50 20 4 1 3.90 5 476 . 4.26 4.36 s 38 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPSIN INCHES AND POUNDS OF LARGESCALE MENHADEN Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index I L 09014 0.016 0e0_4 52.9 21 0 'U &--3O- 11 5 40 0.053 0.059 042.6 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES ANT POUNDS OF LOGPERCH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight EmpiricalWeightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1..35 0.00071 0.0020 OoO-17 167.*8 2 2 .. 591 0.0015 0.0060 0.0021. 0.0026 0*905 26.0- 32 .625 000010 000.02 4 L '0.0080 Q?QQ227 31e2 4 1151 0.0046 0.040 0.013 0*013 0.2*033 5. 65 0.013 09070 0.03-5' 0034 0o038_ 28.3 6 19 .0.040 0.10 0.062 0*056, 0e060 .28.7 39 LE"ONGTH-WEIGHT -RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES...AND: POUNDS OF, LONGEAR SUNFISH Nubr agAv eih- erage Calculated ICon- Numer ane i Wigh9 .Empiric al1 Weights. dto Length of Fish Minimum Maximum StnadPlomljde 1 1292 0.006 0.*015 0.0030 -- 3[Q.2. 2 L539 Q017 0901 . 5L O06OQ61 6~AL 7.9 3 "06a O2LQa&~ Q2 ~Q2 00Q23 _2395- 4. 27.2 09017 0.10 0004 0.045 09048 68o. 5 867 ?0*040 00192 e STQ.,Q8 Q- 99 6 15 0.03 3 0.22 0.13 0 014 0.15 61.8 7. i 8 Q-441&L s2Z Qa2L Q 23 63aQO 40 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS TN INCHES AND POUNDS OF LONGNOSE GAR Average Calculated Con~- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights- dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2' 2 0.002 - 0.002 0.0004 O0Q_ - - 0.00O18 __ 4 -UP 0.0043- 5 1 0.08 - 0,e008 0*009 -6,,40 6 -- 0015 7 2 004 0.20 0.017 0.025 9 7 0.003 0.25 0.106 0.05A -QsQB2 .5Q 10 9 0.05- 0.10 0.06 0*075 0.097 .6.22 1.1 3 0.10 0.20 0.13l 0.810 0.12 10.01 12 11 0.09 0.40 .0.16 0Q0094?QQ?0 13 17 0.10 Q0081 0.117. 0*1L 768- 14 6 0.1 019 0.-20- 0.21 00,20 7.28. Jj 2 0.20 - 0.20 0.*26 0.24 5.92 16- 1 0.3*038 0.32. 0.299.27-- 17. 4 -0.26 0.32 0.27 0.,39 0.935 5.54 189 -2 - j 0- l------ 0t65 0.42 60 21 .0- 0,58 0.75 0.71 6.20 41 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN, ICHES AND POUNDS OFLONGNOSE GAR Average Calculated' fCon- Number, Range in Weight Empiricalion Length of Fish Minimum. Maximum Weight Standard Polymial.Index 26 a m 1.47 1.51 27..1 .2.60 . 2.1.65 1.73 13 281.80 2.13 1.85 1.97 9.71 29 1 1 1.80 1.80 2.06 2.23 30 4 A 2.20 2.30 2.23. 2.29' 2.52 8.24 31 6 1.80 2.57 2.35' 2.54 2.83 7.88 .32.3-25 577 2.80 3.17. 7.8 : ::2o .. 7 2o57*8 33 3 3.77 - 3.77. 3.09 3.54 10.48 34 -2 3.50 .50 4.50 3.39 311.4 35 1 3.30 3.303.71 4.36 769 36 3 350 4.50.964 37 1 650 6.50 441 5.30 12.83 38-4.79 5.82 39 L k5Q. 6 50.'Q5.201 6,3. 10.95 40 ---- 5.62 6.96 ___ 41 --- 6.07 7.59 42. -- -6.55 8.25 1 1150 - 11.50 7.094- 8.96 -14 ___ __ - -7.57. 9.701 - - -- 8..2 1.48m 42 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS -ININCHES AND 1POUNDS OFMOONEY AverageCalCon- Number Range in Weight -:EmpiricWghts Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight -Standard:Polynomial Index 3.. 23 0.0045 0.015 0.00 83 00072 - 07 Ii 107 0.010 0.02 0.017263 510120026 0*038 0.026 200.8 6 33- 0.040- 0.083 0.063 .069 0.060 29.0 j7 _32 0.10 0.17 0.11 10.12 0.11 33.0 8 17 0.13 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.19 36.9 0.22 0O0 0.260.26 0.35 20 1L*Q? 5Q 0Q53i ---QJL Qs3i 34a7 11o .3 1 o.65 Q 51,: 050 0QL1 J38*2 12 8 0.50: 0.80 0.68 00T. o.66 LENGTH-WEI.GHT -.RELATIONSHIPS, IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF'MOSQUITO FISH Average Calculated Con- Number. Range in Wegt Empirical Weights dition Length o?f Fish Minimum maximum. Wegh Standard Polynomial. Index 1 2. - - 00010 0001310000___ _____I___. 43 LENGTH-WEIGHT, RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF NILE TILAPIA* Average Calculated Con- Number Rangein Weight Empirical Length of Fish Minimum MaXimum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn 1 70,531 0.0010 0.0082 0.0015 QQ1 2 2 0.003 0.014 0.0058 QQZ 0,6007 3 232,817 0.'014 0.025. Qj .Q23 aOaii5 66af 4 203,232 0.038 0.044 0.04 0.05 0.0464 5 1281055 0,066 0.13- 0. 08 0.10 0.0863. 6 54,576 0.13 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.15 67.6 7 14731 021 0.34 0.27 0.26 j j &A 8 J47 0.36 0.58 0.40 0.3809 77-6 9 740 0.34 0.62 0.58 0.53 0.56 7914-A 10 2,305 0.60 0.84 0.79 0.72 0.79 7993 11 j1078 0.98 119 1.05 0.951.&a8 12 511 1.19 1.65 1.48 ZL i9 13 148 1.58 1.92 1.74 1.52 1.7a 17 11 1 -81 _20 2A *Pond data ENGTHWEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF NORTHERN HOG SUCKER Average Calculated Con- Number, Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum MimumWeight Standard L Index 3 1 0.0090 0.009933.33own 4 1 0.020 0.023 0.039 31.25 5 5 0.047 0.050 0,050 _0.045 0.064_40.00 6 4 0.10 0.078 0.081 46.29 7- 2 0.10 0.11 0.-1 0.12 0.10 30.61 8 2 0.15 0.19 017 0.18 0.15 33.20 9 1 -- 0.927 0.26 0.23 37.03 10 2 0.32 0.36 0.37131.50 11 1 o m 0.63 0.47 0.58 47.33 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF NORTHERN ROCK BASS Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight ,Empirical Weights dition Legh of Fish... -inimm Maimum igt Slaal ,Polyomial nde 0 010.- 00*0 000203 -- -----.4 0 Q37____.. .t 40037,-8.3 45 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF ORANGESPOTTED SUNFISH Average Calculated Con- Number RangeinWeight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight" Standard.PolynomialIndex 1 3500 0.0010 0.0027 0.0026 - - 2 3833. 0,0022 09015 090037 Q*QQ6i& QoQ65 4, 3 13Q3 QoQQ6 63 QQL QsQ1 0*017 &~ 4 125 0.013 0.10 0.029 0.032 0.040 * j5- 10 0.060 0.088 0.077 00057 0e073 61.6 6 6 0.10 0.13 0.11 0.090 0.11 48.6 46 LUENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF PADDLEFI SH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 3 3 000100 -00010 0.003 .3, 4 -- 0.006 - 6 1 0.015 -0.015 0.02 0.02 6.9 7 8 0.,030 0.081* 0.08 0.035 0.04 21.9 86 0,.036 0.-v044 0.04 0.0 0.5 7.5 914 0.05 0.077' 0.06 0.06 0.07 8.7 10 .25 .0.007 0.10Q. 0*08 8.9~Q 2~ 11 19, 0.10 0.o13 0.11 0.12 0.11 8.4 12 11 0.011. 0.16 0.13, 0.15 0.14 79. 13 5 0.16 0.3 0' 020 0.19 09-1780 14 _.-_ -0623Q . 15 1 0.30 - 030 0.28 0.-25 80,. 3 0.409 QoL -6-29- oaa."Mn U' 0~. 2_____SQ 0 Q0P6D...A0. 0Ai 19' . 0d, . D..~.50, 7.3 20J.0,0-Q ~0& 6 Z._ 0a64 06 7& 21 6 02.194 0 a24... __0, 7-4Z6 _1.JI2 IJnrQnQrL3QA n LJ7Z 4 7 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AN POUNDS OF PADDLEFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 27 7 1.50 2.30 1.89 1.76 1.85 9.58 28 11 1.50 3.10 2.36 2.03 2.07 10.76 29 8 2.10 3.30 2.48 2.32 2.31 10.17 30 7 2.00 3.00 2.44 2.64 2.58 9.02 31 4 2.25 3.20 2.74 2.99 2.88 9.18 32 4 2.70 4.20 3.20 3.37 3.21 9.76 33 3 2.75 4.00 3.25 3.79 3.59 9.04 34 3 3.50 4.90 4.38 4.25 4.01 11.15 35 6 3.25 4.50 4.08 4.74 4.49 9.52 36 2 4.75 6.00 5.38 5.28 5.02 11.52 37-5.86 5.62 38 3 4.25 6.94 5.90 6.48 6.28 10.74 39 5 5.25 8.38 7.03 .7.16 7.01 11.84 40 2 9.50 11.38 10.44 7.88 7.81 16.31 41 1 .1000 10.00 8.66- 8.71 1450 42 --- 9.49 9.69 43 5 7.50 11.10 8.87 10.38 10.76 11.15 44 1 1100 - 11.00 11.33 11.93 12.91 45 1 11.25 11.25 12.34 13.20 12.34 46 2 15.25 18.38 16.82 13.42 14.58 17.27 48 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS'OF PADDLEFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Wihsdto Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn 51 2 20.00 25.5 22.75 19.88 23.26 17.15 52 1 26.50 gig 26.50 21.41 25.38 18.84 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF PINFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 28 0.007 - 0.007 00006_ 89.28. 3. 3i *0.015 15 0018 56o.98 IJbL 9j 0.03 - 2 0*036 0905, 52.08' 540 0.06 - 006 0.0*007 50'00 6. 5 0.12 - 0.12 0.10 _ 0.11 55.55 73 0.13 - 013 0.e14 0.14 38.87 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF PIRATE PERCH Average Calculated ICon- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index j 6 .Q?Q0070 oL.. 1.L. 23 0.0030 OQQ LALL 0 .00 5 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF PUGNOSE MINNOW Average Calculated Con-w Number Range in Weight IEmpirical Weightsa dition Legt-of Fish Mi-* he eiht Standard RlyomalIZ9 1 147 0.00060 090013L110SM83 0900084 . 0A00080M 22 2 62 0.e0013 - 0.0021" 0.00229 0.00190 26.20 35 0e0045 - 00048 0.00411 0.00510 17.o77, 11 KJ M - - _-t ---- :::_J------- -1__- 50 LENGTH-WEIGHT REIATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF QUILLBACK Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial. Index 1 2 -- 0.0020 0.00076 - 200.0 2 6 0*9073LL 0.0054 45, 3 0Q?215i -QitQ17 55. 4 3 0.020 0.035 9Q 003Q8 46- 5j - 0.210 02072 80 6 221 0.071 0.20 0.210 0.12 - J7?L 7 428 ... JL.0.12. 0.20 0QL70.19 0-0-15 9*8.. 8 .57..... .Q. 2L.. Q. 2&5. Q2L. .. LL..O25 L , 9'. 164 0.32 0*QL & Q5 Q03 s3 7o 10. 93 0.45 .0.70 4. 0.51 0e3 &9a 1. 196 0.a56 0975 L.....Q?69.... e a.LQ&71 ~ 1 13 52 0.97 1.25 1.11 .1.08 ?15 50 15 91.13 2.00 1.78 1.61 17 . 52*6 16 16 1.80' 2.38 2*01.l94 2.01 51*2 IL 5 2.06- 27 29502.30 2*35 50.9 18 6 .1*2 3,3 2a6222L 19 1 2o88-3a..15 1's10 51 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS.OF REDBREAST SUNFISH Number Range inWeight Average Calculated Con- Empirical .Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 31 *-20196.o8 2 19 0.0020 .0095 0.0056 0.0061 0.0051 169.7 3 34 0.011 0.035 0.030 0.021 0.023 111.0 4 48 0.038 0.065 0.044 0.050 0.055 68.1 5 45 0.060 0.019 0*097 0.097 0.11 77.8 6 34 0.13 0.23 0.17 0.17 0.18 77.3 7 46 0.20 0.35 0.29 0.27 0.27 84. 8 10 0.34 0.50 0.36 0.40 0.40 70.1 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF REDEAR SUNFISH Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight EmpiricalWeights Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 55 oooo67 - 000011-109.1 2 1993 0.0010 0.013 0.0063 0.0053 0.0049 78.3 3 290 00010 0.040 0e015 0e017 0.018 54.6 4 .420 0.015 0.068 0.049 0.041 0.044 76.7 5 550 0.03 0.20 0.076 09079 06,084L. 60.5 6 266 0.10 0.25 0.14 0.14 0.14 64.o6' 7 232 .0.17 0.30 0.w22 0.21 0.22 63.7 5 2 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF REDEYE BASS Average Calculated [Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical. Weightsdo Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight 2 54 0.0020 0.0050 0.0040 0.0031 000092 50.2 3_ 603 0. o06 0.01 0.011 23_ e Q80.1829 5 12 .040 0.10 0.030.54 0.059 42.7 6 18 0.070 0*13 0.10 005 0.10 47.8 7 5 0.11 0.20 .6015 017 47.8 8 4 0.23 0.32 0.26 0.23 0.25 51*3 L 0 38 0v40 Q03034 Q*35 5.L2 10 0 - 48_ 5 11 4 0.50 0.60 0.57 0.63 0.63 43.2 12 2 A 0 *98083 U e .e _ 7L&703 53 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF RIFFLE MINNOW Nubr Rag n egt Average Calculated ]Con- Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum EmpStandarde Polynomiidex N u m e r R a g e n e i h tE p i r i c a lr d W e i g h t sa l I d e xor 2 22 0.0050 - 0.0055 090053- 0.005 62 j 35 0.011 -09013 00013 Q013- Le 2, L . __ 0&023aL 0QaL3 Q0Q2Q. 36aLL LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF RIVER CARPSUCKER Average Calculated ICon- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 13 2 -- 1.25 1.19 1.20 156.*9 14 3 lo 147 1.44 1.51 53.o4 15 17 1.57 1.69 1.67 1.72. 1.75 49.5 16 17 1.69 2.e50 24Q9 2.,03 2.00 50.9 0 17 6 2.20 2.40 2.37 2.38 2.32 48.o2 188 2.50 2.84 2,80 2.75 2.77 48.0 54 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS- IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF RIVER REDHORSE Average Calculated Con- Numb erL Range in Weight Empirical Wihsdto Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight SPIndex 10 1 - 30 0.40 0.42 30.0 11 053057 12 2 - 0.70 0.69v 0.74 40.5 13 3 0.90 0.87 0.92 41.0 14 5 1.00 1.10 1*04 1.09 1.12 37.9 15 5 1.27 1.40 1.30 1,33 1.34 38.5 16 3 1 9 18061 1.60 43o. 17 1090 2. 1 9Q 18 4 1.90 2.10 2.28 3 19 3 - - 2.53 7 2.62 6o9 20 7 3.10 3e22 3.16239,65 21 6 3I37 LQQ L57 2 82A's7 22 1 -400 4.11 4.14 37.6 23 24 4 5.00 5.907 5.05 5.v31 5.49 36.5 25 2 5.90 7.30 6.60 5.99 6.29 42.2 5 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SAUGER Average Calculated fCon- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditlon Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial.jIndex 5 30 0.020 0.10 09054 0.041 0.059 .43.2 6 76 0.043 0.10 o,o63 0.069 0.065 29.2 7 74 0.063 0.819 011 0.11 0.11 32.4 8 23 0.095 0.25 o,.16 0.16 0.17 30. 9 21 0.20 0.38 0.28 0.22 0.24 38.3 10 17 0.20 0.50 0.33 0.30 0.32 33.5 11 37 0.30 0.50 0.40 0.41 0.41 30.2 12 31 0.40 0.67 0.53 0.53 0.52 30.8 13 33 0.56 0.88 o,.69 0.67 0.67 31.4 14 36 0.*59 1.13 0.80 0.84 0.86 29.2 .15 47 0.78 1.25 1.01 1.04 1.06 30.0 16 17 1.20 2.00 1.37 1.26 1.29 33.4 17 18 1.34 1.70 1.40 1.51 1.53 28.5 19 2 -- , 2.00 2.11 2.02*- 20 1 - ____ 2.30 2.047 2.*26 2 56 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SHORTNOSE GAR Average Calculated' Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight -Standard Polynomial Index 11 1 .- .16 0. 12 7 0.18 20 - 0020021 13 2 0.18 0.30 002 Q2Q0U2 1Qe9 14 -- 36 0 - 15 1 - 0.38045 0.44 16-0.56 0.56 18 19 1 - 119 1.02 103 17.3 20 -1921 1.23 21 1.431.46 22 7 1.69 - 1.v81 1.68 1.71 17.0 23 3 1.70 .94 1.86 1.96 1.99 15.3 24 2.7 2.29 25 2 2.70 2.76 2.73 2.61 2.63 17.4 26 2 2.88 3.0o6 2.97 2.98 2.99 16.9 57 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPSIN INCH{ES AND POUNDS OF SILVERBAND SHINER Av erage Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empiric al Weights dition Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum :Weight Standard Polynomial. Index 1 49 0.00066 0.0010 00O067 0.00055 0.00080 673 2 .808 0*00090 0.0050 0.0022 0,a002$ 09w0029 1 27.7 441L1kL L o0.047 0.011 0.00.77 06-0072 0.0082 28.6 4 445 0.00o60' 0.023 0.014 0.015 0.015 22*. LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SILVER CHUB Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditlon Length of' Fish. Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1. . J402 0.. Q 0.0017 Q0900080 .Q.QQ58 & QaLOQ22.~ 2 .3583 )9Q2 0e0Q10Q 0&0-02 a Q3Z 016001 z7nO .111- QO23 -o1u- a SAB 8~fl5 0.009 321 4J. 782 0.011. 09027 0.0 1 0.017 09019~ 27.i 5 30Q:0.020 0-9045i,. 0.t040 * 3 Q?QL~ 6 8 0.62. 0.046 *?A 28.0 58 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SILVERIJAW MINNOW Nubr Rag n egt Average Calculated Con- Numbero Rah Mngeinm Weaight Empirical Weights dition Lenth of is Miimm Mxium Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 82 0.00050 - 0.00083 0.00063 0.00060 820.9203 2 371 0.0017 0.00331 .0020 0.0027 0.0025. ] 25.60 3 42 0.0040 0.011 3.0060 0.0062 0.0067 22.04 4~ 1 * 014 10.0111 0.014 21.87 LENGTH-WEIGHT~ RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SILVERSTRIPE SHINER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights diti or. Lenth f FshMiniu aiu Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 1363 0.00049 0.0008 0.000070 0OO058 0oO0070 74-ol 2 1961 I090013 0o0041 0.0015 0o0026 000027 1 19o. 558. 0.0042 0.010 0*0065 0.0062 0.0066. 24.1l 4 627 0.0065 00019- 0.013' 0.012 0.012 20*83 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SILVERY MINNOW Average Calculated Con- Number Rang 'e in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight' Standard Polynomial Index 1- 3 o0.0033 - 0.00033 0.00044 0*00020 33.3 2 45 .0.0020 0.0047 0,0031- 0&0024- 0Q&027Zff _3 8.81 3 4 2 0.0060-0.060-- OQ' QQ4 0,0058 24.4 41 ~ 0,010 - 00010 0*013 0,0099 15.62 L ________________ C 5 9 LENGTH-'WEIGHT'. RELATIONSHIPS IN..INCHES AND POUNDS:OF.SKIPJACK HERRING Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight E gh. J 1 ca1dt r Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight S Weiht Stndrd_ _l nm _ _e 1 6 0.00040 0.0012 _ 0.0011 107 2 212 0.0020 0.0050 090033 0.0031 0.0037 2392 0.0028 Q 74 9?Q 0.003 0.012 4 2288 0.0067 0.11 0.022 0.020 0.022 34.0 S1 556 0.012 0.088 0.034 0.037 0.039 27.5 6 783 0.045 0.11 0.057 0.060 0.066 26.2 7 383 0.050 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.11 28.8 8 311 0.080 044 0.15 0.15 015 9 258 0.10 0.38 0.23 0.22 0.22 31.7 10 369 0.15 050 0.340.31 032 34.5 11 53 0.30 0 0.70 0500.44 378 12. 0.30 0970 . 0.62 L5L 5 jU.35,*6 1 0.55 1.00 0780.71 0. 158 0.70 1.10 09090 0. 15 156 0.83 1.,60 1.14 1.12 1.13 33.7 16 28 0.88 1.79 1e29 1.37 1.35 31.5 17 9 1.030 1.88 1.65 1.66 1.60 33.6 18 4 1.30 2.38 1.v86 1.099 1.86 31.9 60 LENGTH-WEIG1HT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SMALLMOUhBASS raAverage. Calculated Con- Ne rnge in Wight Emplrlcal Weights ditior Lenth f *1shMinimum Maximum WihLenthofFih inmu MxiumWeight "Standard Polynomial Index 2 130 0.0038 0.o0075 0 .0042 0.0038 - 52.9 561 0.00933 0.020 0.013 0.012 0.011 4 546 0.0038 0.050 0.028 00.029, 0.025 43*4 5 255 0.027 0.13 0.055 00e059 43.8 6 14 0e060 0.18 0010 .09 0.11 7 63 0.10 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.17 45.2 :41 015 0.40 0.25 0.24 48.1 L 0.32 Q??2 0.32 430 0% 2 Q3L 0.63 0.49 o 0.40 48.8 11 1 0Q44 .0.v98 0.w710.63 0.61 53.6 2,- 1.27 1j31 1.*30 46.5' S- 1.61 1.65 16 1 -- 2.13 1.95 2.05 52.0 17 -2.34 2.50 18 1 -- 3.00 2.*77 2.099 51.4 19 1-- 3.50 3.26 3.52 51.0 61 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SMALLMOJTH BUFFALO Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn 3 14 0.0128 0.0133 0.013 0.014 48.41 4 39 0.020 0.050 0.035 0.034 54.28 5 127 0.050 0.125 0.076 0.066 60.85 6 222 0.082 0.135r 0.10 0.12 0.14 47.96 7 120 0.17 0.25 0.19 0.18 0.19 54.34 8 35 0.26 0.40 0.25 0.28 0.28 48.90 9 75 0.05 0.56 0.39 0.40 0.39 52.96 10 162 0.08 0.69 0.53 0.55 0.53 53.35 11 261 0.11 1.05 0.73 0.73 0.71 54.65 12 251 0.69 1.50 0.98 0.95 0.93 56.76 1 3 47 0 .84 6 4 1.21 1.19 56o32 14 601 1.30 2.08 1.57 1.52 1.50 57.21 15 405 1.38 2.50 1.81 1.87 1.86 53.51 16 339 1.80 3.25 2.21 2.28 2.28 54.07 17 225 _2.13 3.50 2.67 2.74 2.976 54.32 18 157- 2.21 5.50 3.17 3.o26 3.31 54.34 19 112 2.54 4.70 3.88 3.84 3.92 56.51 20 70 3.80, 5.68 4.80 4.49 4.60 59.99 21 49 4.5 14 6.30 5.46 5.21 5.36 58.*94"-% 229 37 46 .5 6.23 6.00 6.20 584 62 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SLOUTH BUFFALO Nubr RneAnWih verage Calculated ICon- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditlon Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weiht Standard Polynomialindex 2 10. 8 11 1 t2. 12.0 5 35 12a 29 2 15.0 17.5 16.2513.90 14.64 66.62 30 1 14.4_ 14.40 15.41 16.26 53.33 63 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SOUTHERN FLOUNDER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weight dition Length of Fish Minimum Maimum eiht Standard 2 4 0.0070 _ 0.0078 0.00061 0.011 0e015 0.01 05 0.010 00016 0.026 0.0212 .*82 1 0 0 0 _ 0.045 0 L0.00 6 go,0.069 0.058 L. - - - 0.10 0.096 ____ 8 2 0.15 - 015 0.14 0.15 29.29 LENGTH-WE IGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SOUTHERN ROCK BASS Average Calculated Con- Number -Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition _Len h of Fish nimum Mmum Weiht Standar omialIndex 1 8 0.0010 00002 OoOO21 0*L00- 2 7 2QJ0j. 0e075____ Q,.006. 0 . 0084 0.015 81.6"M 21, 0201&. 0*3 0.022 _0.024 0.028 82.01 6 .0 0.16 0.13 , o07 6 L 2 0 _8 028 .8_____ 01 1=- 060M 2-' 0 0 0.57 6.3 - IA n1 ;0IL 0- 92 64 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPECKLED (BROWN) BULLHEAD* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 47150 0.0028 - 0.0034 0.0008 338o5 2 11111 0.0030 0.0074 0.007 0.006 83.5 3 2920 0.001 0.020 0.017 0,017 64.8 4 183 0.020 0.045 0.035 0,037 54.3 5 246 0.03 0.10 0,050 0.070 0.038 39.9 6' 225 0.07 0.13 0.085 0.115 0.090 3901 7 77 0.08 0.30 0*13 0.17 0.16 38.2 8 279 0,18 0,26 0.22 0.25 0.26 42.3 9 1405 0.25 0.40 0.32 0.35 0.39 44.0 10 941 0.44 0.75 044 0.47 0.5344.4 11 260 0.52 0,99 0,68 0a61' 0*72 51.1 12 301 0.69 1.20 0,98 0.78 0.92 56.7 13 83 0.97 1.19 1.12 0.97 1.16 50.9 -i191.30 12 1*42 4725 15 206 1.35 2.27 1.57 1,44 1.72 46.4 16 131 1.80 2.16 1.94 1. 72 2.05 47.o4' 17 76 1.997 2.59 2.54 2.04 2.41 51.6_ 18 36 2..95 -2.95 2.39 2.80 50.6 *Includeu d n data 65 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPECKLED CHUB Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Wihsdto Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn . 2 0 o0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 100.00 2 23 0.0020 0.0030 0.0024 0.0024 0.00250 29.89 3 7 0.0036 0.0037 0.0040 0.0038 13.75 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPECKLED MADTM Average Calculated Con- Number Range 'in Weight Empirical Weights dition Lenth f'Fis Mnimm axium Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 4 -- 0.00075 0.00070 O00070 75.0 2 47 0000~o 5 8 0.0043 0.0064 73.01 3 42 -- 00011 0.0088 0.0092 39.5 4 22 -- 0.019 0.9019 0.019 30.3 5 1-- 0.040 o06 0.040 32.0 66 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPOTr Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard:Polynomial Index 2 152 0.004 m 0000e003 0e004 368 _0.007 - 00007 0.011 .01006 1-27.23 2 L34 0.023 0992J0,028 0.029 3 *7 5 13 0.077 0.077 0,056 0.067 61.53 6 7 0.11- 0011 0010 0.12 52,91 7 13 0.17 _0.917 0.16 0.18 49.33 8 2 0.25 255 0,24 0.24 48.82 9 1 0.30 0.30 0.35 0301 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SF0 N SHINER Nubr Rag n egt Average Calculated Con- Numbero Ras I~ nge inMWeight Empirical Weights. dition Lenth ofFih inmu Mxium We ight Standard Polynomial Index 2 1 2665 0*00131 0.0i 0 020 _,__9&003-172& _________ __t______ i- -______ I_ 67 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPOTTED BASS Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Wihsdt r Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn 2 6420 0.0010 0.060 0.0031 0.0029 0.0033 39.0 3 44 00017 0.026 0.0093 0.010 0.011 30 1665 0.0092 0.050 0.021 00.024 .26 3 5 483 0.006 0.095 0.050 10.049 0.051 399 6 356 0.050 0.14 0.087 0.086 0.089 40.2 7 254, 0.087 0.25 0.14 0.14 0.14 41.9 8 173 0.13 0.35 0.22 0.21 0.22 9 147 0.20 0.47 0.30 0.30 0.31 41.2 10 84 0.31 0.63 0.43 0.42 0.43 42.7 11 71 0.80 0.57 0.60 0.77 426 12 53 0.60 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.81 46.2 13 .43 0.75 1.30 1.01 1.00 0.97 45.8 15 27 1.20 2.00. 1531.54 1.57 4 16 1L 1.20' 220 1921.88 1.95 6e jpfinn-7 8 1.60. 2.80 .2392.27 295 8* 68 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS'OF SPOTTED GAR Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum WeightPlynomialIndex 6 2 0.02 - 0.,02-0 0017 0.015 9.3 7 2 0.015 0.015 0.03 0.03 4.4 8 10 0.04 0.10 0.05 0.04- 0.05 10.2 9 24 0.03 0.19 0.08 0.07 0.07 10.8 10 9 0.05 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.10 8.7 11 6 0.10 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.14 11.0 12 11 0.10 0.31 0.18 0.17 0.18 10.4 13 5 0.19 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.23 9.9 14 3 0.16. 0.38 0.23 0.28 .0.29 8.5 15 2 0.40 0.40 0.36 0.37 11.9 16 1 0.50 - 0.50 0.44 0.46 12.2 17 11 0.50 0.70 0.64 0.57 0.54 13.0 18 6 0.50 0.80 0.60 0.69 0.74 10.3 19 -12 0_Q C). 13"~9 0.83 Q0.91 J13.0. 20 13 .0.70 1.10. 0.92 0.99 1.06 11.4 21 13 1.00 3.078 1.4044 .116- 1.21 15. 6 22 8 1.000 1.72 1.34 1.36 1.36 12.6 2-31, 20Q 1.J.JQ 1A491.58., 1.55,. 12 24 5.-,. 1.50 2.00 -1.78 1.8*177 12 9 72 7Q 2 0 .0 .5 JI.. 69 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN, INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPOTTD SUCKER Nubr age''nWe t Average Calculated Con- Nube Rne n eih Empirical Weights diltior Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weih Standard Polynomial Index L 2 1-- 0001011 0.90029- 0.0011 12.5 3 422 0*0096 0.020 0.010 0.010 00a13 37.8 4 161kI 09-013 Q905 0.9021 0.024 0.023 32*2~ 5 26 0.025 0.10 0.047- 0.046 0.050 37.5 6 .24 090233 0.18 0.095 0.086 .063 44.0 7 97 0.090 0.20 0.14 0.14 0.14 40.1 8 277- 0.096 90*1 0.18 0.20 0.21 3* 9 296 0.017 0 * 50 0.28 j002 0.30 J38,5 0 *5e,9 303901041 38j 99 11 182 0.32 0.81 0.50 0.52 00 37.6 12 ~0.50 1200 0.71 o0.68 0.y69 0s 1i 13L 0.68 1?17 Uji QQ6 o & J239e 14 88 0.75 1.30 1.04..- 1.08 1.07, 72 16 10 1.20 .~L. 1.6121*61 L l J2.23-. 17 1 O0 2.60 2.08 1*92 1.94 4 70 L&EINGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF SPOTTED SUNFISH .Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights'dition Lenet h of Fish Minimum Maximm eiht Standard*Index 2 0.00550 0.0090 96. 87 3 38 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.023 0.019 72.90 4 39 0.035 0.040 0.049 0.051 63.06 5 103 0097 0 0 80.090 009778.40 6 42 0.15 - 0.M150.15 0.15 68.01 7 1 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.20 59.76 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF ST0NER0LLR Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weightsdition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 . - 0.076- 0.00511 0.0061 9o Q.0l20L 0QQ3 a . QD,04.. QAl27 Qa22 379*2 5 5 -4W 0*040 0.045 .01045 32.0 6 1 - .100.070 0).09QA 46.3 71 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF STRIPED MULT Average Calculated Con Number Range in Weight Empiricaldition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight S 3 .50.026 0.026 0*018 0.026 96.29 - - - - .037 09064- 6 1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 46.29 7 2 0.1 0.150.1501 42.27 8 5 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.18 39.06 9 1 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.24 27.43 10 - -03702 11 6 00 0 0.480.47 0.43 36.31 12 15 0.52 0.60 0.55 0.59 0.58 32.02 1 1 0.90 0.90 0.72 078 40.96 14- -o.86 1.02 go 15 _ _ --- 1.03 1.33- LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF STIPED SHINER Average Calculate d Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 0.006 0016 0.0070 0.0094 0.0098 25.92 72 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF TAMPA. TILAPIA* Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical, Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 882 0.01,__ 00017 0,4001 - J al 2 9.5 0z..035 OP0058 0a005 &,Q.QL7 3 619 0,017QQI QQ 2 O.Q2Q012 2.1 4 420 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 62.5 5 2 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.10 60.0. 6 - - ______ .0.14 0.17 ___ 7 1 0.30 ____ 0.30 0.22 0.27- 87.5. 8 7 0.39 ____ 0.39 0.31 0.38 7593, 9 8 0.5,0 _____ 050 0.44 0.53 68.6 10 1 0.70 _____ 070 0.59 0.69 70.0 73 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS.OFTHREADFIN SHAD Avera ge Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length ofFlhM"-imum Maximum WihLenthof is Miimm Mxium Weight Standard Polynomial. Index 1 83923 0.00031 0.0023 0.00095 94.6 2 103391 0.0011 0.011 0.0029 0.0031 0.0037 1 36.1 133115 0.0039 0.065 0.010 0.0096 0.011 37.3 4 41458 0.0017 0.050 0.022 0.021 0.022 34.2 5 25891 0.016 0.10 0.08 0.040 0.046 38.05 6 4267 -0.12 0.070 0.060 0.065 32.5 7 535 0.05 0.14 Q.092 0.098 0.10 26.9 8 119 0.10 0.19 0.12 0.15 0.16 22.7 9 38 0.20 0.27 0.21 0.22 0.23 29.5 10 25 1 0.25 0.40 0.31 0.30 0.32 315 11 24 0.40 0.45 0.42 0.41 0.42 31.4 12 9 0.49 0.54 0.52 0.54 0.51. 30.0 13 2 0.58 0.63 0.61 0.70 0.61 27.5 74 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF WALLEY Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum W Ieight Standard Polynomial Index 4L - 0 *020 0Q018 .$ QQ ~5 JL *Q2Q Q Q6Q0Q 0Q039 QsQ35 Os3731.3 23 0.038 0.070 0.@050 'Q6Q Z Q62 2301 7 3 - 0*073 0.010 0*099 21.4 8 1-- 0.20, 00j5 Q1 J32 t L 9 3 -- 0.20 0.22 0.21 27. 10 12.e3-0*300.30 Q 30 J.D 11 -20Q 39 0Q84 Qa29.7 12 2 e5- 0.504 0953L 8 13 2 - - .75 0%69 0.69 34.1l ____ 6 a - L 000 105 1.7 A180 16 -- 1JL7 193 1 L33 .33041 17 2 50 1.a61 39 18 5 1.80 1.90 1.88 1.89 1.93 32.2 19 ---- 2.24 2.29 20 1-- 2*80 2.62' 2.s69 35.90 21 ---- 3.0O5 3.14 22 1 -- 3.60 353 3.63 33.8 75 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OFWARMtT Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of'Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 4704 0.000L8 0.0033 0.0028 1281 2 2068 00006 0045 0*0047 0.058 0.0062 1 521 Q?03 Q?e070 0.020 0.020 0.028 15 4 685 0.017- 0.052 0.049 00056 81.1 5 300 0.031 0.25 0.079 0.097 0.10 6 149 0.05 0.38 0.17 0.17 0.18 77.1 7 64 0.13 0.45 0.29 0.28 0.29 83.1 8 21 030 1.30 044 042 045 85 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND POUNDS OF WEED SINER Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of' Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 67 -- 0900097 0.00094 0.00090 97. 2 112 090043 % 00039 0,OO0L2 5a5 4 13 -010083 60.0I0.08 8. 76 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES ANT) POUNDS OF WHITE BASS Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Stndrde olnomalIn 2 93 0.0020 0.0084 0.0073 9 - 3 139 0.0050 0.050 0.012 0*013 0.0084. 3*7 JL L32 0.015 0.057 0.034 QJO3j Q0031L 5208 5 743 - 0.13 0.049 0.0061 0067 2 6 450 0.050 0.19, 0.13 0.10 0.12 7 285 0.10 0.24 0.17 0.16 0.18 48.9 8 165 0.19 0.36 0.29 0.25 0.27 5695 95 0.25 0.50 0.39 Q*35 07 53o6 10 89 040 071 050 11 214 0.50 0.81 0.66 0.63 0.64 12 200 0.67 1.10 0870.82 0.82 13 9L 0.80 1.13 1.0211e02 14 116 0.90 1.60 123 1.30 1.24 82 1611L231_ 6 -4-raw,~ 16 10 150 2e13. 1.7leU2L1993- J2.9 J17 1 -- 2.31 23 * s 77 LE.jNGT'1- wE1~IGH"T RELATIONSHKIPS IN INCHES ATID PUDS OF i H"I T. H CATFL3H * Averar~e Calcul1-ted Con- Numb er Ran ge in v4ih Empirical e% tsdin Lenth of F.i*sD inimum M1fa x imumr rL eir7ht Sandard- Lol,-nomial Index 1 2 0.00050 Go0.0050 0.00043 ) 0.800 2 77 0.0035 0.0043 10.0041 0.0035 j 0.00283 51.6 2 3 25 0.0050 0.0O12 0.0097 0.012 0.017 35.40 4 9 0.023 fob 0.023 0.023 0.034 43.40 5 16 0.030 0.053 0.9052 10.9055 0.060 41.50 6 4 0.10 0.11 0.11 *4 0*098 49.907 7 2 0.14 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.13 49.56 1___00__0___0,6o __01032 ______0*76 0.32 16 1 2.10 - 2.10 1.30 2*10 51.v26 78 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHES AND'POUNDS OF WHITE CRAPPIE Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights dition Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 173 0.00027 0.0020 0.00051'. 2 1796 1 0.0010 0.025 0e0037 0.0036 0*00145 J695 J 2325 o .0036 0.02 0.010 0a012 00Q1 $80 4 778 0.012 0.076 0.027 0.030 0.029 419 339 0.025 0.1 0.057 10.059 0.062 6 173 0.075 0.25 0.10 0.10 0.11 48.2 7 210 1 0.28 0.15 0.16 0.18 8 162 01 0.70 ,50.25 0.27, 49o7 1 17 0019 0.62 0, 0o35 0.38 48.1 10 67 0.30 0.63 0.52 0.49 0.52 51.5 11 5 0.22 0.87 0,69 0.65 0.68 51o9 12 41 0.44 1o30 0a86 0.85 0.87 13 19 0.75 1.34 1.04 1.09 1.09 15 4 0.90 1.a75 103 1.68 1.63 42.3 16 2 -- 2.19 2.05 1.96 53.5 79 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN INCHS AND POUNDS OF YELLW BASS Average Calculated Con- Number Range in Weight Empirical Weights ditior Length of Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 2 793 0.0046 00080 0.0057 0.0032 711 1210 0.008 0.032 00086 0012 00089 18 95 0.011 09033 0.023, 00029 0e025 3597 5 394 0.020 0.,10 00 0.058 0.060 6 786 09063 0.20 0.10 0.10 .12 4 7 356 0011 0.50 0.17 0.17 0.19 51.0 8 6 4 0.1 037 0.28 0.26 OP?7U 5399 L .428L Q? 9 0Q50Q 0037 Q03 50.0-4 10 232 0.38 o.69 Q0 A2 0.52 0e48 48.9 11 30 0.45 0.75 0.58, 0.70 0.60 12 L. 0.71 0.74 720.20.73 80 LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIPS IN .INCHES AND POUNDS OF YELLOW BULLHEAD Average Calculated FCon- Number Range in Weight. Empirical W Length of'Fish Minimum Maximum Weight Standard Polynomial Index 1 5 0*001 0.004 0.0016 0.0009 160.0 49 0.003 0.020 0.0050- 0.006 0.005 62.2 il.. 64 0.008 0.025 0.010 0.017 0.012- 38.5 4 22 0.020 0.090 0.030 0.04 0.03 46.2 5 51 0.030 0.055 0.05 0.07 0.06 41.4 6 48 0.075 0.17 0.09 0111 0.11 40.5 7 38 0.11 0.30 0.16 0.17 0.17. 47.4 10 0.20 0.50 0.25 0.24 0.26 48.8 9 27 0.30 0.52 0.37 0.32 0.37 51. 10 17 0.40 0.70 0.42 0.43 0.50 42.4 11 12 0.60 - 0.60 0.55 0.67 45.1 12 19 0.87 1,00 0.89 0.69 0.87 51.5 13 6 0.94 098 0.86 1.10 44.8 14 3 1.37 1.37 1.05 1.37 49.8 ESTIMATED PARAMETRS OF LENGTH-WEIGHT EQUATIONS Length --'- Number 5 Species interval r s n of fi sh b axlO 5 log(a) b 0 1 b Y. x0 b 3 I I 25-47 Alabama Hog Sucker 2-8 American Eel 5-24 Atlantic Needlefish 3-17 Bay Anchovy 1-2 Bigeye Chub 1-5 S:2-16 Biguouth Buffalo P:2-14 * S:17-27 P:15-27 Black Bullhead 1-5 Black Crappie 1-14 Black Drum4-7 Blackspotted Topminnov 1-3 Blacktail Redhorse -4-20 Blacktail Shiner 2-6 Blue Catfish 2-12 11 111 1 2 0.980 0,955 0.982 0.742 0,925 0.984 0. 979 0,970 0,972 0.980 0,733 0.978 0.888 0.973 0.968 0.986 0.127 0.217 0.114 0.187 0.191 0.111 0.051 0,151 0.185 0.088 0.250 0.101 01196 0.139 0.065 0.047 17 74 42 5 28 104 89 14 174 4 23 196 143 409 359 96 81 144 65 34,803 552 52,f163 549 2,049 17,328 327 217 906 2,829 24,035 2,123 197 2.85 3,47 3.13 1.09 2.20 3.00 3.30 3.14 2.97 3.37 1*619 2-.97 2.72 2.94 3.36 3.55 45.69 1.89 3.21 80.5 59.1 58,7 22.9 36.4 46.78 10.4 101.70 41.9 39.2 35.9 12.3 -3.34 -4.72 -4.49 -3.09 -3.23 -3,23 -3.64 -3.43 -3.33 -3.98 -2.993 -3.38 -3.41 -3.44 -3.91 6.9 -4.16 150.66 0.0626 -0.262 -0.0486 -0. 00387 -0.4390- -2.6391 0.0114 -0,035 0,531 0.00572 0.331 -0.0258 -0,0251 -0.696 0.00929-0.000203 -0.0073 0.00027 -0.0028 0.00015 -0.00306 -0. 0214 -0.0702 0.000623 0.00132 0.0022 -0.0449 0. 0796 0.0214 0. 00696 0,1857 0,8686 -0. 0183 0.030 -0.330 -0. 00624 -0.105 0.025 0. 0166 0.213 -14.33 -0.00278 -0.020 0.000454 0. 00092 0.435 -0.00371 *Inch groups fitted by standard (5) and polynomial (P) equations. 00 N.. 0.00816-0.000598 -0.007 0.00093 0.0664 -0.00412 0,00215 0.000097 0,00994 0.000117 -0.00708 0.000877 t'"ES LI ThD PAIPAMETEIRS Length Number 5 Species interval r Y. n of f ish b axlO 5 log(a) b 0 Bluegill 'I Blue Sucker Bluntnose Minnow Brook Silversides Bullhead Minnow Chain Pickerel Channel Catfish Cherryf in Shiner 2-6 7-8 18-25 2-4 1-4 1-2 1-16 17-25 3-10 11-26 1-3 Common Carp IsraeliS3:4-16 P :4-15 0.954 0.770 0,951 0.887 0.870 0.868 0.985 0.910 0.964 0.965 0.996 0.983 Israeli s: 17-29 0,925 II P: -16-29 Congo Tilapia 1-10 0.988 Common Carp Scaled 1-14 0.967 Common Carp Scaled 14-30 0.958 0.157 0.079 00061 0.161 0,204 0,260 0,093 0,082 0.*132. 0.075 0. 0775 0.075 0.081 0.129 0.184 619 198 6 12 21 75 26 23 752 703 4 36 20 57 117 82,212 2, 150 6 253 312 4,356 388 142 21,317 3,682 5,548 3,272 490 406,?495 31,344 3.07 2.95 3.19 2.43 1.96 2.26 3.14 2.61 2.94 3.30 3.42 3.00 2.62 2.92 2.63 58.9 75.4 18.3 60.17 47,7 76.4 13.4 77.6 31.2 13.8 13.6 56.4 239.0 95.3 123.6 -3.23 -3.12 -3.74 -3.2 2 -3.32 -3.12 -3.87 -3.11 -3.51 -3.86 -3,87 -3.25 -2.62 -3.02 -2.91 -0.0214 23.37 54,7973 0,00718 0.00014 0.0162 0.1003 18,0349 -0.0103 -4.85 0,4314 -30,0427 0.0076 0.088 0.0216 -8.66 -8.4025 -0.00339 0. 00042 -0. 0271 -0.04,28 -2,8501 0.00659 0.974 -0.1654 2.8737 -0.0029 -0. 0486 -0. 0066 01XQ 0131 1.06 -0.042 0.4235 -090067. 0. 000021 0.000407 -0.00011 0.000155 0.0138 -0.00172 0.01052 0.000006 0.1500 -0.0024 -0.00104 0.000327 -0.0648 0.00174 0.0188 -0.000085 -0.0584 -0. 0012 -0. 0089 0.0003 6 0.00108 0.00007 0.060 146 352 3.07 38.3 -3.41 -6.818 b 3 1.0745 0.0564 0.0014 ESTIMATED PARAMETERS Length Number5 Species interval. r s n of fish b ax10 5 log(a) b 0 1 b y.x0 Creek Chub Emerald Shiner Fathead Minnow Flat Bullhead Flathead Catfish Flier Freckled Madtom Freshwater Drum It 11 Gizzaerd Sa II i i 1-7 2-4 1-3 2-9 2-12 13-24 25.36 2-6 1-4 1-18 19-29 2.6 7-17 1-16 2-7 8-21 0.960 0.835 0.988 0,988 0.978 0,975 0.975 0.999 0.927 0.983 0.941 0.931 0.957 0.975 0.914 0.953 0.179 0.215 0.102 0.112 0.142 0. 0539 0.052 0.020 0.202 0.121 0. 0776 0.164 0.078 0,180 0.196 0.091 25 42 3 23 501 193 23 5 11 1144 55 212 647 115 79 319 185 13,f623 179,409 71 3,r564 279 26 130 73,545 99 192,307 74,892 251,236 420 1,346 2.58 2.73 1.93 3.197 2.89 3.18 3.44 2.51 1.95 3.00 3.72 2.73 2.89 2.90 3.12 2.77 69.6 29.7 73.38 31.4 44.9 23.0 10.6 174.3 111.1 40.0 5.6 58.6 45.2 75.1 39.1 71. 1 -3.16 -0.00899 -3.53 0.0101 -3.13 0.000002 -3.50 -0.120 -3.35 0,0269 -3.64 4,73 -3. 97-174,1 -2,76 0.0721 -2.95 0,0137 -3.40 -0.0707 -4.25 2.27 -3.23 -0.0101 -3.34 -3.12 -3.41 -3.15 -1.30 -0.0403 0.178 -0.388 0. 0123 -0.0085 0. 0012 0.0864 -0.0166 -0. 726 17.12 -0.0695 -0.0217 0. 0412 -0.629 0. 0138 0.419 0. 0224 -0.137 0. 0639 b 3 -0.00473 0.000966 0.00.203 0.000121 -0.00078 0.00038 -0.0176 0.00151 0.00293 0.000219 0.0336 -0.0000517 -0,;560 0.00656 0.0221 -0.00139 0.0106 -0.00118 -0.00657 0.000704 0.0342 0.0000755 -0.0047 0.000857 -0.0431 0.00177 -0.0034 0.0008 0.0323 -0.00185 -0.00094 0.00028 co K~11; ltw 00 ESTIMATED PARAMETERS Length Number 5 Species interval r s Y n. of fish b axlO log(a) b b Golden Shiner 1-9 0.953 0.178 47 552,544 2.55 65.7 -3.18 -0,0057 0.0080 -0.0026 0.00054 Green Sunfish Highf in Carpsucker Java Tilapia Largemouth Bass Largemouth Bass Largescale Menhaden Logperch Longear Sunf ish Longnose Gar Mooneye Mosquitof ish Nile Tilapia Northern Hog Sucker Northern Rock Bass 2-4 5-8 7-18 1-14 2-10 11-21 3-5 2-8 2-7 2-47 3-12 1-2 1-14 3-11 1-9 Orangespotted Sunfish 2-6 Paddlefish S:6-23 P:6-26 0.839 0.788 0.982 0.969 0.*970 0,949 0.990 0.904 0.930 0,973 0.986 0.303 0.990 0.986 0.976 0,822 0.983 0*242 0*.137 0,064 0.208 0. 139 0.0815 0.0660 0.208 0.171 0,189 0,104 0.236 0.122 0.088 0.151 0,229 235 118 34 172 519 251 5 109 352 82 77 5 144 14 15 93 8,585 602 101 1550, 912 5,984 490 287 5,474 11,649 120 550 121 988,577 19 31 5,if277 3.01 2.97 3.02 2.70 2.96 3.16 2.59 2.81 2.88 3.12 3.27 0.48 2.86 2.98 2.79 2.53 63.8 68.9 49.8 112.0 49,7 32.8 90.7 36.4 83.4 5.72 20.0 127,8 100.1 37.5 113.4 96,9 -3.20 -3.16 -3.30 -2.95 -3.30 -3.48 -3.04 -3.44 - 3.08 -4.24 -3.70 -2.89 -3.00 -3.43 -2.94 -3.01 -0,0268 -2.77 01.56 -0.0164 0.,0173 11-.82 -0,323 0.0271 -0.0296 -0.103 0.136 0.,0196 -0.460 0.,0371 0. 0342 0.097 120 163 2.88 11.7 -3.93 -0.1382 0. 0318 1.33 0.482 0. 0174 -0. 0113 -2.38 0.213 -0.0247 0. 0246 0.0419 -0.0704 -0. 0102 0.256 -0.0447 -0. 0326 -0.0116 0.00204 -0.209 0.0113 -0,0467 0.00194 .0.0040 0.00091 0.0023 0. 00033.7 0,154 -0.00270 .0.0424 .0.003.00 -0.0054- 0.001,04 0.0.04 0.00019 0',00980-0.0000256 0.00032 0.00084 -0.0433 0.0026 0.0106 0.000135 0.0103 -0.000440 0.0441 -0.0040 0.00019 3 ESTIMATED PARAMETERS Paddlefish Pinfish Pirate Perch Pugnose Minnow Quililback Redbreast Sunfish Redear Sunfish Redeye Bass Riffle Minnow River Carpsucker River Redhorse Sauger to Shortnose Gar Silverband Shiner Silver Chub Si'lverjuw Minnow Silveratripe Shiner Silvery Minnow 3:24-52 0.972 S: 27-52 2 -7 1-3 1-3 1-19 2-8 2-10 2-13 2-4 13-18 10-25 5-10 11-20 11-26 1-4 1-6 1-4 1-4 1-4 0,994 0,838 0.915 0.987 0.963 0,967 0*.987 0,948 0.940 0.989 0,896 0,956 0.987 0,858 00909 0.945 0,944 0.952 0.078 93 96 0.061 0.233 0,126 0,094 0,167 0.136 0,125 0.111 0,044 0.048 0.137 0.061 0,085 0,242 0,263 0.130 0.143 0.146. 6 15 15 95 49 323 56 8 13 30 75 110 16 41 73 19 35 8 124 44 214 958 267 3,937 944 86 54 52 248 220 26 5,713 6,919 496 4,f509 145 3.81 0.6 -5.20 -14.4930 2.48 1.99 1.44 2.83 3.01 2.96 3.12 2.15 2.58 2.94 2.88 3.02 3.43 2.34 2.44 2.09 2.15 2.42 115.05 133.6 84.2 76.5 76.4 67.9 35.4 118.9 159.9 46.2 39.8 29.3 4.2 55.5 58.2 63.1 58.7 44,3 -2.*94 -2.87 -3.34 -3.12 -3.12 -3.17 -3.45 -2.92 -2.80 -3.33 -3.40 -3.53 -4.37 -3.26 -3.23 -3.20 -3.23 -3.35 0.132 0.00704 0.00093 0.202 -0.00803 0.00258 0100100 -0.106 -38,14 -1.85 0,927 3.66 0.505 0.0035 0.00146 0.00084 0.00092 -0. 001 76 1.6154 -0.0602 0.00084 -0.114 -0.0102 0.00027 -0. 103 0.00042 -0.00408 -0. 00378 0.111 7.53 0.394 -0.379 -0.811 -0.0747 -0.00555 -0.00194 .0.000889 -0.00156 0.00199 0,031 -0.002 0.00471-0.0000545 0.00019 0.00014 0.0137 -0.0000116 0.00042 0.000706 0.00171 0.000474 0.00105 0.000410 -0.0357 0.00393 -0.488 0.0109 -0.0261 0.000936 0.0504 -0,00187 0.0589 -0.00109 0.0022 0.000167 0.00309-0.000243 0.00121 0.0000972 0.0006830.000091 0.00133 -0.0000594 0.0000620. 0000438 t t;~i-1'~H1A'i'~U ~A~AYt;'l'EnY co ESTIMATED PARAMETERS ?% Length Number Species Interval r sY*X n of f ish b axlO 5 log(aL) b b b 3 Skipjack Herring iR Smalimouth Bass It 1 Sai mllouth Buffalo Southern Flounder Southern Rock Bass Speckled Bullhead* Speckled Chub Speckled Madtoi Spot Spottail Goby Spotted Bass Spotted Bass Spotted Gar Spotted Sucker Spotf in Shiner 2-6 7-18 2-10 11-19 3-30 2-8 1-9 1-8 1-3 3-5 1-2 2-9 1-5 2-10 11-18 6-16 17-2 9 2-5 6-17 2-3 0.889 0.961 0,960 0,961 0. 992 0.946 0,987 0.1957 0.961 0.853 0.647 0.989 0.940 0.973 0.946 0.873 0.894 0.854 0.965 0.917 0.193 01109 0.142 0,070 0,058 0,208 0.111 0,234 0,061 0.126 0.361 0.114 0.144 0.152 0.0618 0.165 0.096 0,185 0. 0839 0,258 141 288 160 26 612 10 38 103 7 19 13 8 5 537 106 38 79 35 343 4,762 2,519 1,742 44 3,830 22 116 66,443 32 65 51 290 81 13,867 177 74 89 610 1,611 2.69 3.17 2.95 3.00 3.04 2.42 2.58 2.76 1.217 2.77 2.59 3.14 1.245 3.09 3.06 3.31 3.40 3.00 2.99 48.8 20.9 48.8 47.8 49.83 90.68 140.0 81.9 104.2 41.8 70.7 35.65 402.3 33.6 38.5 4.6 3.8 36.9 40.6 -3.31 -3.68 -3.31 -3.32 -3.30 -3.04 -2.85 -3.09 -2.98 -3.38 -3.15 -3.45 -2.39 -3.47 -3.41 -4.34 -4.42 -3.43 -3.39 -0. 0271 0.554 0.11 5.02 0.067 -0.0283 -0.0361 0.0979 -0,00203 0.*0108 -0,00013 0.078 -0.00284 -0. 00217 16.16 -0.1423 -22.3789 -0. 0998 -0.460 3 2,688 4.12 11.3 -3.94 -0.0387 0. 0247 -0.166 -0. 0759 -1.05 -0.009 0. 0285 0.0427 -0. 0600 0,00423 -0.00122 -0,0015 0. 0123 0. 00239 -3.30 0. 0448 3. 1924 0.0944 0.130 -0.0062 -0.000780 0.0155 -0.000124 0.0157 -0.000524 0.0693 -0.000968 -0.002 01.0007 -0.00732 0.000827 -0.0120 0,00163 0.0088 0.00016 -0.00141 0.000219 -0.00152 0.000587 0.00235 0.00001 75 0.016 -0.0007 -0.00533 0.000942 -0.0008130.000490 0.221 -0.00441 -0.0047 0.00027 -0.1507 0.0025 -0.0281 0.00304 -0.0113 0.000706 0.0186 0.0042 -0.00165 *Southern variety of brown bullhead ESTIMATED PARAMETERS Length Number 5 Species interval r a n of f ish b axlO ogo) b 0 b Spotted Sunfish Stoneroller Striped Mullet Striped Shiner Tampa Tilopin Threodfin Shad Walleye Wormouth Weed Shiner White Boss White Catfish White Crappie Yellow Dass Yellow Dullhead 2-7 2-6 3-16 3-6 1-10 2-5 6-13 4-22 2-8 1-4 3-17 1-16 2-16 2-12 1-14 0,985 0,883 0.982 0. 928 0.989 0.889 0.908 0.993 0.940 0.990 0.978 00990 0.977 0.971 0.973 0.088 0,222 0,083 0,140 0.147 0.207 0.158 0.087 0.203 0.066 0.136 0.133 0.169 0.137 0.191 15 7 20 12 13 255 99 32 320 17 305 18 353 233 63 227 2.68 89 2.39 38 2.50 53 3.29 2,896 2.75 303,855 2.80 5,019 3.16 69 3.11 3,860 3.08 335 2.05 3,209 2.98 137 3.01 6,305 3.05 5,071 3.15 371 2.66 121.01 96.4 118.57 25.2 104.3 44,5 20.9 23.5 68.0 94.6 50.1 43.3 43.2 36.4 93.4 -2.92 -3.02 -2.93 -3.60 -2.98 -3,35 -3.68 -3.63 -3.17 .3.02 -3.30 -3.36 -3.36 -3.44 -3.03 0.0821 -0,0733 -0.215 -0,422 0.0292 -0.0463 0.624 -0.,0120 -0.0605 -0,0076 -0.,00237 -0.0309 0.,0222 0.103 0,0115 -0.0749 0.0760 0.127 0.313 -0.0328 0.0476 .0.238 0: 00897 0. 0521 0.0131 -0.0075 0.0231 -0.,0167 -0. 0703 -0. 0071 b 3 0.0216 -0.00120 -0.0233 0.00256 -0.019 0.0012 -0.0750 0.00623 0.0087 0.00011 -0.0150 0.00183 0.0293 -0.000851 -0.00188 0.000409 -0.0130 0.00181 -0.0055 0.000961 0.00294 0.000289 -0.00456 0.000714 0.0033 0.000334 0.0139 -0.000304 0.00114 0.00045