<976 -r r:1 1r ,, xk A - .w,,f . 9 , r ' : a. } a..axai i ,4 1 ?p «r.- . w: . r~ i~., ' ~~ ~ R Yr 'MOt'i^ ' .Y s '/ t 4 :,5,....k a'' a..% " n : '. SVt 'V} 3.~c +r^ {' N '". Cr y 18'1' ' " ^ S 4si:n}'r 9p ; .F e: f~a 1«.'a ;, +'r p a'+I" w~i-K. I+-ib. ^ 4 :ar' _",o, 17 "' "r 9 i:;'4v ?w a.4,s. ' 4,.k...w t h ' "', s f , ra }-7 x' Z '-.--. ak-_ZY^A k4+i}''9 3p~ te Gri, ,tW-Jr aM. " H _ , .'" p, I , .i ± '4xto A t i y iR "liy . . :Y. it' . ) * t ik . , .- "'rl' .+ r _ '_ _ _ _ _ _ __ , a f.'.s ,. X1l }rt + __ __ __ _ FEBRUARY 1977 DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY & SOILS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION R. DENNIS ROUSE, Director DONALD L. THUJRLOW DEPARTMENTAL SERIES NO. 35 AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUBURN, ALABAMA The following is a suggested list of varieties by planting dates for northern, central, and southern Alabama. Within planting dates, varieties are listed in order of maturity with .early maturity ones listed first. Northern Alabama Plantings May 1 to 31 Essex, Forrest, Coker 136, McNair 600, Tracy, Lee 74, Centennial, Davis Plantings June 1 to 30 Forrest, Coker 136, McNair 600, Lee 74,.Tracy, Centennial, Davis, Bragg, Ransom Central Alabama Plantings April 20 to May 15 Forrest, Davis, McNair 600, Lee 74, Tracy, Centennial Plantings May 16 to June 5 Davis, McNair 600, Lee 74, Tracy, Centennial, McNair 800, Bragg, Ransom, Hutton Plantings June 6 to 30 Davis, Bragg, Ransom, Hutton, Coker 338 Southern Alabama Plantings May 15 to May 31 Davis, McNair 600, Lee 74, Tracy, Centennial, McNair 800, Bragg, Ransom Plantings June 1 to 30 Davis, McNair 800, Bragg, Ransom, Hutton, Coker 338, Cobb i1. Table of Contents Page Introduction......... Experimental Procedures, Discussion of Data, Season Conditions, and Description of Data Recorded . Sources of Seed Used in 1976 Tests Soybean Variety Descriptions and Disease Resistance. Soybean Yield Data and Other Growth Characteristics by Location: Northern Alabama. . ... . *..10-17 . . . 1- * . . 6-7 8 9 Sand Mountain Substation, Crossville, Ala... Tennessee Valley Substation, Belle Mina,.Ala. Upper Coastal Plain Substation,.Winfield, Ala. Central Alabama. Black Belt Substation, Marion Junction, Ala. Lower Coastal Plain Substation, Camden, Ala.. Prattville Experiment Field, Prattville, Ala, Southern Alabama Brewton Experiment Field, Brewton, . . " " **.18-20 **.21-26' . 27 " 28-39 . * . 40 *.*41-46 * . . 47 Ala*... .. .. *.. **.48-54. Gulf Coast Substation, Fairhope, Ala,.... ..... Monroeville Experiment Field, Monroeville, Ala.. Wiregrass Substation, Headland, Ala. ..... .. .. 55-57 " 58 *.. 59-61 INTRODUCTION To properly evaluate a soybean variety it is necessary that it be grown at a number of locations, at various planting dates, and over a This will subject the variety to differences in soil and period of years. The most common limitclimatic conditions that occur throughout the State. ing factor in soybean production is inadequate moisture during pod developThus, it is important that varieties from more than one ment and filling. Since soybeans are highly maturity group be evaluated at each location. and photoperiodic, the blooming period, period of pod development and fill, maturity date of a particular variety do not vary greatly from.year to Continued testing and evaluation of soybean varieties and experimental year. strains by agricultural experiment stations are essential if farmers, county Extension agents, seedsmen, and other agricultural workers are to be provided with information to help them select varieties best adapted to their locality and individual requirements. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES All tests were conducted at outlying units of the Alabama Agricultural A randomized block design with 4 Experiment Station of Auburn University. replications was used at each of 10 locations. One to three planting dates plantings made at the optimum time were used at each location with the first Plots were planted with regular commercial soybean for maximum yield. Plots planters equipped with a special seed hopper adapted for small plots. were four rows wide and 23 feet long with 16 feet of the two center rows Row width varied from 36 to 40 inches harvested for yield determinations. Seeding rates were 10 viable seed per foot of row depending on location. according to All plot areas were fertilized based on germination at 750 F. soil test. The entries in these tests included varieties released prior to 1976, a number of unreleased strains in the late stages of development from the Sources USDA Regional Testing Program, and a number of commercial lines. of seed are listed on pages 6 and 7. DISCUSSION OF DATA Since results of field plot research are influenced by inherent soil differences and soil moisture availability, it is not possible to determine the exact yield of a variety at a given location. Varietal performance may temperature, diseases, vary from year to year because of variation in rainfall, Therefore, long term studies are necessary in order to properly and nematodes. evaluate varietal performance. Differences in yield data for 1976, which may be due to chance, have been computed using Duncan's New Multiple Range Test at the 5% level of are not considered to beYields followed by the same letter probability. significantly different; however, means not associated by a common letter Coefficients of variation (C.V.) are footare considered to be different. This value reflects the relative precision of the noted in the tables. experiment, a small C.V. indicating more precision relative performance of varieties. in estimating the SEASONAL CONDITIONS Early season moisture was good at all locations and good stands were obtained in all tests. Due to a lack of 'moisture in the southern part of the State in June and early July, plants were shorter than normal and lodging Lodging was, however, a problem in north was not a problem in these tests. The early Alabama at Belle Mina for the third year out of the last four. planting dates at Brewton Field, Black Belt Substation, and Sand Mountain Substation reflect this early moisture stress in plant height as these varieties are shorter than later plantings. Good early season moisture was available in northern Alabama with adequate plant height obtained. This resulted in considerably more lodging than in the other areas of the State. The central and southern areas of the State were deficient in moisture during early August which resulted in lower The total rainfall than normal yields for the early maturing varieties. during pod development and fill stage from August 15 through September 30 for the past five years are shown in Table 1. Sand Mountain Substation showed the lowest rainfall from the middle of August through September. There were also 25 days of moisture stress during this period. The Black Belt, Upper Coastal Plain, and Wiregrass substations had 20 or more moisture stress days during this period. All other locations had less than 15 days of moisture stress with the Gulf Coast Substation having less than 10 days. In the northern part of the State the early varieties yielded best for early planting. For example the top two varieties at Sand Mountain and Tennessee Valley substations were Group V varieties with Essex yielding the best at each location with 39.9 and 41.8 bu/A, respectively. The early varieties did well at the second planting in the central and northern locations but were near the bottom of the list at southern locations. The mid-season and late-season varieties yielded the best in central and southern Alabama for both early and late plantings. Seed quality was good at most locations and in general the early varieties had the poorest quality, particularly when planted at the early planting dates. Table 1. Rainfall by Location During the Period August 30 for 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, and 1976 15 through September Location 1972 In. 3.85 3.10 6.76 - 1973 In. 4.88 8.43 12.77 --- 1974 In. 9.87 8.19 10.40 1975 In. 7.72 9.77 14.54 1976 In. 6.20 5.34 8.33 9.37 Black Belt Substation (Marion Junction) Brewton Experiment Field (Brewton) Gulf Coast Substation (Fairhope) Lower Coastal Plain Substation (Camden) Monroeville Experiment Field (Monroeville) Prattville Experiment Field 4.20 5.70 4.81 5.95 2.95 10.12 3.% 8.71 4.49 8.73 9.09 , 7.45 5.76 6.41 7.06 9.76 3. 7 (Prattville) Sand Mountain Substtin Upper Coastal Plain Substation (Winfield) Tennessee Valley Substation (Belle Mina) Wiregrass Substation (Headland) 8.J$ 4.82 3.58 6.26 5.15' 5.87 7.42 DATA RECORDED The yield of a crop is the primary factor of production when profits are to be maximized. Other characteristics which are important are plant height, height of first pod, maturity, lodging, and size and quality of seed. Yield of soybeans was determined by cutting the two center rows of each plot and threshing with a plot thresher (or small plot combine). Plot yields were adjusted to 13% moisture and converted to bushels (60 pounds) per acre. First bloom was taken as the date when there was one flower at any node on 10% of the plants. Maturity was rated as the date when the pods were dry and most of the leaves had dropped. Under most conditions, the stems were also dry. Harvest date was approximately 7-10 days later than maturity date. Lodging was based on a scale of 1 to 5 according to the following criteria, see page 5 for illustrations: 1 - almost all plants erect. 2 - either all plants leaning slightly (less than 450) or a few plants down. 3 - either all plants leaning moderately (approximately 45 ° ) or 25 to 50% of the plants down. 4 - either all plants leaning considerably (more than 450) or 50 to 80% of the plants down. plants down. all 5Shattering ratings were based on shattering of the border rows 14 days after maturity. The visual estimates were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows: 1 2 3 45 - -1 no shattering to 3% shattering 4 to 8% shattering 9 to 19% shattering 20% or more shattering Plant height was determined as the average length of plants from the ground to the top extremity at time of maturity. Height of first pod was determined as the average height of the lowest pods from the ground at maturity. Seed size for each variety was determined from acomposite sample Seed size is of all replications at a given planting date and location. reported as grams per 100 seeds. Seed quality was based on a rating from 1 to 5 according to the following scale: (1) very good, (2) good, (3) fair, (4) poor, and The factors considered were development of seed, wrinkling due (5) very poor. to late harvesting and to excessive rain. Purple stain ratings were given to seed samples on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows: 1no purple staining 2 - 1 to 3% purple staining 3 - 4 to 8% purple staining 45 9 to 19% staining 20% or more staining VARIETY DATA Soybean varieties grown in Alabama are in Maturity Groups V,VI, VII, and VIII. The following is a list of the varieties and strains with source For more information on these by maturity groups. of seed for 1976 listed varieties see table 2. (4, ~A A. -,JI-t ~~ - : ~ 4~ i&s' ~* '.::; 8 ,rr~~:~t~: 4-' I..A I 7 ." !fit,- .. ' 7 1Ii rwg.. ' .y r' a 4-i.' ' 1. - : .y' .",, ,K ' .. " ; ; } t " , tir , w . .. , +... ~r;' {' .J V. r i a y C t r ° , / r I*4rf; ; ir i ,i f 'V .4 lJ .4"I try ! a . 'it r 4 ; ".. : ' .; lm + f .j f 06 - t ~ ,jt~T ii 7 t. 4 Pi A t0, - V Lodging was based on a scale of 1 to 5 according to the following criteria and illustrated by figures 1 through 5 respectively. 1 - almost all plants erect. plants down. 2 -. either all plants leaning slightly (less than 450) or .a few 3 - either all plants leaning moderately (approximately 450) or 25 to 50% of the plants down. 4 - either all plants leaning considerably (more than 45°) or 50 to 80% of the plants down. 5 - all plants down. Very Early Varieties Coker 136 - Maturity Group V Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co., Carolina Harsville, South Dare Essex Forrest Green Soy 74-35* Mack McNair 500* Van Dyke Farms, Huntsville, Alabama Bragg Farms, Toney, Alabama Bragg Farms, Toney, Alabama Green Seed Co., Gallatin, Tennessee Mississippi Phizer Genetics Inc., Cleveland, McNair Seed Company, Laurinburg, North Carolina Early Varieties - Maturity Group VI Centennial USDA Delta Branch Experiment Station, Stoneville, Mississippi Davis Alabama Foundation Seed StockFarm, Thorsby, Alabama Mr. Percey J. Jannum, Cobden, Illinois Lafayette, Indiana E-X-C-E-L 200* FFR 666 FFR 6024* Green Soy 74-64* Green Soy 74-7* Lancer Lee 68 Lee 74 Farmers Forage Research Corp., Farmers Forage Research Corp., Lafayette, Indiana Green Seed Co., Gallatin, Tennessee Green Seed Co., Gallatin, Tennessee North American Plant Breeders, Hutcheson, Kansas Van Dyke Farms, Huntsville, Alabama Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farms, Thorsby, Alabama McNair Seed Co., McNair Seed Co., Laurinburg, North Carolina Laurinburg, North Carolina McNair 600 McNair 3130* Tracy Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farms, Thorsby, Alabama Mid-Season Varieties - Maturity Group VII Bragg Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farm, Thorsby, Alabama 6 Coker 277* Coker's Pedigreed South Carolina Seed Co., Hartsville, Coker 842* Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co., South Carolina Hartsville, FFR 667* Farmers Forage Research Corp., Lafayette, Indiana Green Seed Co., Gallatin, Tennessee McNair Seed Co., Laurinburg, North Carolina McNair Seed Co., Laurinburg, North Carolina Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farm, Thorsby, Alabama Green Soy 74-85* McNair 800 McNair 3129* Ransom Late-Season Variety - Maturity Group VIII Cobb Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farm, Alabama Coker's Pedigreed Carolina Seed Co., Thorsby, Coker 338 Hartsville, South Hutton Alabama Foundation Seed Stocks Farm, Thorsby, Alabama McNair 3131* McNair Seed Co., Laurinburg, North Carolina *Breeding line selections not yet released by seed company. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express appreciation to J. E. Barrett, W. E. Brown, J. K. Boseck, J. T. Eason, F. T. Glaze, J.A. iittle, R. A. Moore, Jr. L. A. Smith, and J.G. Starling for growing and harvesting variety tests, and W. H. Hearn, Research Data Analysis, for help in summarizing data. Table 2. Physical Descriptions and Disease Resistance of Some Soybean Varieties Tested _.__ Group Variety Pubescence Plant characteristics Hilum Pod Flower color color color 1/ Reaction to individual diseases Purple Tar- Phytoseed phthora get Bacteria Wildstain rot fire spot pustule Nematode resistantce RootCyst knot (Race 3) V Dare Forrest Essex Mack Davis Lee 68 McNair 600 Centennial Tracy Lee 74 Bragg McNair 800 Ransom Coker 338 Hutton Cobb Gray Tawny Gray Tawny Gray Tawny Tawny Tawny Tawny Tawny Tawny Gray Tawny Gray Brown Gray White White Purple Purple White Purple Purple Purple White Purple White White Purple Purple Purple White Tan Tan Tan Tan Lt. Tan Tan Lt. Tan Tan Tan Tan Tan Tan Tan Lt. Tan Tan Tan Buff Black Buff Black Buff Black Black Black Black Black Black Buff Black Buff Black Buff R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R MR R R MR MR MR R R VR S R R VR R S MS VS S S R MR R R MR R R MR R S S R S S S S R S R S S S R S S S S S S S S MR R S S S S R R S R R S S S R R VI 0o VII VIII R-resistant; MR-moderately resistant; S-susceptible; VS-very susceptible. 1/VR-very resistant; varieties by the breeders and are not based on performance in Alabama alone. given these These are ratings Northern Alabama The test locations in north Alabama were on Decatur clay loam at Belle Mina, Hartsells fine sandy loam at Crossville, and Savannah fine sandy loam at Winfield. varieties for this area. Soybeans of Maturity Group VI are full season Varieties of Group VII maturity tend to be taller and later maturing in north Alabama than at more southern locations. bama. Thus, lodging becomes a problem for these varieties in north Ala- Lodging has been a problem for the past 4 to 5 years at both and Belle Minaand the taller has been the shorter varieties varieties have not yielded of Group V maturity varieties Crossville well. It that have been the best yielding varieties in early plantings at Crossville and Belle Mina locations. Essex has been the highest yielding variety for the past 4 years at Crossville and Belle Mina with 38 and 53 bu/A, respectively, outyielding the second variety Forrest by 3 and 4 bu/A, respectively. The best Group VI maturity variety was Davis in the early plantings at Crossville with Tracy yielding well at later plantings. At Winfield McNair 600, Lee 74, Davis, and Tracy yielded best for mid-May plantings. New early lines that have looked good in north Alabama for the past 1 to 2 years are Coker 842 and McNair 500. Table 3. Yields, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant First Pod Heights, Lodging, Shatterig QualityA/ of Soybean Varieties When Planted May 4, at Sand Mountain Substatio 1976, an Sedizad Plant Variety Ht, 1st t.'.a-.- Yieldi' Bu/A a ab abc bcd bcd bcd e bcde bcde bcde bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef cdeof 32 .4 cdeof 32.3 cdef 31.3 def 31.2 ef 31.2 ef 30.3 f n r b10om-r - Maturi tv 2 nn ' Rhattarina2 TTnoina L--I".. L.. .LLAEJ.11 Dates Dates 9/21 9/25 10/07 10/05 10/06 10/05 10/0510/06 10/01 10/14 10/06 10/01 9/25 10/02 10/12 10/14 10/01 10/12 10/01 10/02 10/13 10/11 10/02 LV In. In. 6 8 8 8 9 9 8 7 7 10 9 8 6 7 10 11 9 9 10 9 10 10 8 Rating 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.8 1.3 2.5 2.5 1.8 2.3 4.5 2.5 .2. 3 3.0 2.8 2.5 3.9 3.0 2.3 1.8 2.8 1.8 3.0 Rating 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 t Seed Size gf 10seed 13.7 12.1 14.8 12.1 14.7 13.3 12.7 13.0 12.3 16.2 12.9 13.1 15.3 14.3 15.7 12.3 15.6 13.9 14.8 15.1 16.0 16.6 Essex Forrest Davis FFR 666 Lancer Lee 68 FFR 6024 Coker 842 MlcNair 500 Hutton a Lee 74 Dare Mack E-X-C-E-L 200 FFR 667 Bragg .McNair McNair FFR 600 39.9 36.7 36.5 35.5 35.5 35.0 34.5 34.8 34.7 34.5 34.2 33.6 33.6 33.1 33.0 32. 9. 32.5 7/14 7/17 7/27 7/21 7/25 7/21 7/21 7 /22 7/18 7 /28 7/23 7/23 7/17 7/18 7/18 7/24 7/20 7/27 7/22 27 36 38. 34 42 35 35 35 36 40 36 37 37 34 39 45 40 42 3130 Coker 136 5002 7 /14 7/21 7/22 7/18 L_ Ransom Centennia] Tracy C l/ 40. 46 40 43 37 2.8 95 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P=.05). 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. U/ C.V. ~/JVL 3/Seed quality and purple stain ratings were very good for all varieties in this test. Table 4. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, ShatteinadSe at Sand Mountain Substation and Qualityl/of Soybean Varieties Planted May 26, 1976, ie Var iet . -W Yield Bu/A r 1st 2 bloom-a i V V Plant MaturitvZ! " Y a .. " " - Hit.1st pod?/ V, Lodin2/ p _ - Shatter ins Rating Dates Dates 9/26 10/10 10/07 10/11 In. In. 7 Rating Purple Stain Rating 1.0 1.0 1.51.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 Seed size g/l00 seed v te Essex Coker 842 Coker 136 Lancer McNair 500 Green Soy 74-35 Forrest Lee 74 Hutton Mack -Dare 37.7 37.0 36.7 36.4 36.0 35.1 34.4 34.1 33.6 33.3 33.1 32.9 32.9 32.5 Tracy Bragg Davis E-X-C--E-L 200 Centennial Ransom McNair rl)r r PSI 32.2 32.2 31.8 31.0 600 a ababc abcd abcd abcde abcde abcde abcde abcde abcde bcde bcde bcde cde cde de .e 7/26 8/01 8/01 8/02 30 37 7/28 7/27 7/26 8/01 8/06 7/27 7/29 7/28 8/04 8/08 7/29 7/31 8/01 7/10 I / LU 10/05 10/05 10/04 10/11 10/16 9/30 10/01 10/06 10/14 10/15 10/05 10/14 10/14 10/06 IV/ yq 41 41 36 35 36 36 39 35 3936 43 9 11 8 8 :7 40 32 4136 38 JV 8 8 12 8 9 7 11 10 .7 12 10 9 u 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.5 1.5 2.3 3.3 4.5 2.5 1.8 2.5 2.8 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.8 L J 13.4 14.8 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 14.8 17.5 13.6 14.3 13.3 13 .0 18.2 14.4 13.4 17.4 17.0 17.3 12.7 16.9 16..9 12.9 ~LC ill)C-Clt~ _q 8.2 C.V.% "Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P = .05). 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Seed quality rating was very good for all varieties in this test. Table 5. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Sha Quality / of Soybean Varieties When Planted June 17, 1976, at Sand Mountain Subs .nd 1st Variety Yield" Bu/A 38.6 37.3 36.9 36.7 36.6 35.4 35.0 33.4 33.3 33.3 33.2 32.9 " 32.3 32.0 31.9 31.6 31.1 2toom/tMaturitZ/ Dates Dates a ab abc abc abc abcd abcd bcd bcd bcd bcd cde de de de de de Plant ht.2! In. 26 23 27 24 27 24 31 25 24 Ht. 1st pod.2./LodginS Rating In. 6 4 6 4 7 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 4 4 5 .4 8 ts g t Hutton Coker 842 Coker 338 Tracy Bragg McNair 500 Green Soy 74-7 Forrest Ransom Lancer Coker 136 Centennial McNair 600 Mack Lee 74 Essex Cobb 8/19 8/18 8/19 8/17 8/17 8/17 8/17 8/18 8/18 8/19 8/17 8/17 8/17 8/ 17 8/18 8/16 8/24 10/25 10/21 10/27 10/17 10/22 10/21 10/17 10/20 10/23 10/24 10/22 10/21 10/19 10/ 15 10/21 10/15 2.0 1.0 2.3 2.3 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.0 2.01 1.5 2.5.11. 2.3 1.3 3.0 27 22 28 25 24 22 11. 11. 11. 11. 11. 11. 11. 05). 18 36 10/28 10/15 10/25 10/15 E-X-C-E-L 200 Davis Dare 31.1 28.7 3/ e e .8/17 8/17 8/24 . 21 28 15 5 6 3 2.5 2.0 1.0 7.6 C.V.% 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields. with a common letter aentdfeet( 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Yield not taken due to poor stand. 4/Seed quality and purple stain ratings were very good for all varieties in this test. Table 6. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom an ''cturity Shatteri ng of Soybean Varieties with Average y Planting Dates, Date - May Plant and First Pod Hci~hts, ^'r Lodging, and 3 at Sand, Mountain Substati.:1, 1975 and 1976 Variety Essex Coker 842 Davis Lancer FFR 666 Hutton Lee 68. FFR 6024 Forrest McNair 600 Tracy Mack 1/ 1st 2 Yield-bloom ! Bu/A Dates 36.9 7/08 33.3 7/16 32.1 7/26 31.5 7/22 31.0 7/16 31.0 7/24 30.4 7/16 30.4 7/14 30.4-7/10 30.3 7/17 30.1 Plant U 7/13 -zRansom 29.8 7/11 29..7 7/16 Lee 74 29.6 7/17 Dare 29.3 7/15 Coker 136 28.3 7/17 Bragg 28.3 7/23 Centennial 26.8 7/16 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 2/An explanation of data and ratings In. In. 26 6 35 7 38 10/10 9 10/09 40 9 10/05 33 7 38 8 10/14 8 34 10/04 35 7 10/08 9/25 36 7 10/05 39 8 10/05 36 7 9/25 36 6 10/13 39 9 10/05 8 35 9/25 36 7 10/03 38 9 10 10/14 42 10/09 40 10 6( pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter 0 i-,c given on page 3 of this report. Maturity 2 ' Dates 9/21 10/01 ht.l'/ Ht. 1st od ' ar .e not 1 Lodging ' Rating 1.1 1.6 2.6 1.3. 1.9 3.6 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.1 3.0 1.8 2.3 2.4 1.5 2.8 2.4 Shattering1 Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 different (P=.05). Table 7. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and '*'irst PodHegtLdian t Sand MountainSbtio,17ad Shattering of Soybean Varieties with Average Planting Date Maz" 1976 Variety Yield"1 t, Bu /A 1st 2/ bloom., ' Plant Maturity?' --J Ht. 1st pod Dates Dates In. In. 10 8 10 7 10 7 8 7 10 7 7 8 10 7 Lodging Rating 4.1 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.3 1.1 2.6 3.4 / Shat tering Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 40 8/06 10/17 34.2 34.2 7/30 37 10/09 10/08 41 33.1 7/30 33.0 7/27 10/11 3832.8 7/30 37 10/16 29 32.4 7/21 9/26 32.2 39 8/06 10/14 32.0 10/10 35 7/30 31.5 43 8/03 10/16 38 30.5 7/28 10/08 30.5 36 7/26 10/04 Dare 28.6 7/28 39 9/29 D7 0-3 185 27.6 40 7/29 10/12 Mack 27.3 36 7/26 10/01 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel.. Yields with a 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. Hutton Coker 842 Coker 136 Tracy Ransom Ess~ex Davis Lee 74 Bragg M'cNair 600 Forrest 2.8 2.8 2.4 1.9 2.1 2.4 n~ot different column letter are 1 1 1 1 1 (P=.05) . Two-Year Averages for Yield, First. Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod S .ing of Soybean Varieties- with Average Planting date June 18 at Sand Mounta 1976 VreyYield!' Bu/A 1st bloom-i' Maturit 2/ Plant Dates 10/24 10/23 10/17 10/1610/22 11/06 10/17 ht.-'Ht In.In 31 32 29 30 30 37 29 32 25 27 31 32 31 32 30 s o Ld2n2 Dates 8/18 8/17 Hutton Bragg Coker 842 Tracy Ransom Cobb Coker 136 Lancer Es sex Lee 74 Forrest ,- Centennial LDavis 35.3 34.6 34.1 33.3 32.3 31.3 31.2 31.1 30.3 30.2 29.8 29.6 8/14 8/14 8/17 8/23 8/15 8/17 8/10 8/17 8/12 8/14 29.2 8/22 McNair 600 29.1 8/15 Mack 28.2 8/12 Dare 27.63/ 8/13 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 2/An explanation data and ratings is given on page 3 of 3/Yield data- for 1975. No yield 1976 due to poor stand. of' 10/2010/09 10/17 10/14 10/16 10/21 10/18 10/12 10/09 60 pounds per bushel. '2A 8 7 6 6 10 8 7 6 6 7 8 7 7 6 6- 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.1 3.0 2.1 2.5 2.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.0 -2. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 this report. Table 9 for Yield, Date of Maturity, Plant and First Pod Heights ,and Lodging of Soybean. Varieties Planted at Three Dates on Sand Mountain Substation, 1974 through 1976 Three-Year Averages Plant Ht.1 Lodging2/ Variety Yield-i' Bu/A. ?ht.podMat urityl! Date In. In. Rating Essex Forrest Tracy Davis Lee 74 FFR 666 Ransom Coker 136 Dare Lee 68 McNair 600 Hutton Bragg 39.7 35.0 34.7 33.5 33.4 33. 3 33. 1 32.8 32.6 32.4 31.9 30.7 30.5 Average planting date May 5 9/22 27 6 7 37 9/27 6 10/04 36 8 10/10 40 9 10/05 36 10/04 7 32 9 10/09 38 8 10/02 41 9/27 7 37 8 10/04 35 8 10/03 39 9 10/1439 9 44 10/14 Aver age planting 29 9/27 10/16 37 10/11 37 40 10/08 10/10 35 10/17 39 10/02 36 10/14 39 9/29 38 10/08 37 10/16 41 date 1.1 2.7 3.1 3.4 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.0 2.9 3.4 3.5 May 7 9 7 .9 7 7 8 7 7 9 25 Essex Ransom. Tracy Goker 136 Lee 74Hutton Forrest Davis Dare McNair 600 Bragg 33.9 33.6 32.6 32.6 32.3 32.0 31.5 31.3 31.1 30.9 30.5 1.5 2.6 2.8 2.3 3.5 4.0 2.9 2.9 2.3 3.3 2.8 Average planting date June 20 2.3 6 26 10/09 30.9 Essex 3.0 6 32 10/16 30.3 Tracy 2.5 8 34 10/23 30.0 Bragg 7 30 10/17 28.7 Coker 136 3.1 7 29 10/24 28.2 Hutton 2.7 9 31 10/22 28.0 Ransom 3.0 8 32 10/14 27.5 Forrest 2.7 6 33 10/ 18 27.1 McNair 600, 7 3.4 27 10/ 17 26..4 Lee. 74 2.7 7 32 10/21 25.0 Davis 2.7 6 28 10/09 23.74/ Dare 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this. report. 3/Frost killed beans- date October 3, 2.5 1.97 5, 1976 average maturity dates are listed. 4/No 1976 yield due to poor stand. 16 Table 10. Four-Year Averages for Yield, Date of Maturity, Plant and First. Pod' Heights, and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted at Three *Dates at Sand Mountain Substation, 1973 through 1976 Variety Bu/A / 37.8 34.5 34.4 33.9 33.3 33.3 32.8 32 .2 Plant Maturity2 !ht. 2Yield-I lit .1 podIn. Lodging-, Rating Date- In.- Essex Forrest Tracy Davis Coker*136 Dare Lee 74 Ransom McNair 600 Lee 68 Bragg 32.1 31.7 31.2 Average planting date May 7 9/21 24 5 9/26 33 6 10/04 34 5 10 /083/ 37 6 9/30 37 7 9/26 34 5 10 /0 .34 73/ 7 ,10/10 35 7 10/03 36 5 10/ 063/ 33 7 10/143/ 41 8 Average planting date May 25 9/25 27 6 10 /073/ 38 8 10 /0921 35 6 10/163/ 35 7 10 /201/ 37 8 10/01 35 6 9/283. 36 6 10/073/ 36 6 10/ 10 / 33 6 10/13 / 37 7 10/163 39 8 Average planting date June 21 10/223/ 35 8 10/073/ 25.6 10/241/ 30 7 10/221/ 31 8 10/143/ 31 7 10/111/ 32 7 10/ 15/ 33' 5 10/221/ .33 7 10/181/ 28 7 10/071/ 29 5 1.1 2.3 2.8 3.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.4 1.8 2.8 Essex Coker 136 TracyRansom Hutton Forrest Dare M4cNair 600 Lee 74 Davis Bragg 34.0 33. 1 33.0 32.9 32.5 32.3 31.8 31.7 31.7 30.8 30.6 1.3 2.6 2.23.5 2.4 2.0 2.8 3.2 2.7 2.14 Bragg Essex Hutton - Ransom Coker 136 Forrest McNair 600 Davis Lee 74 Dare_ 32.2 32.0 30.8 30.0 29.6 28.9 2.5 1.9 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.8 28.3 27.6 27.3 2.3 2.4 3.6 2.3 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this 3/Average maturity for 1973, iFrost- killed soybeans on October 3, 1974. 1975,-and 1976; report. '7 Table 11. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant Height, Lodging, and Seed SizeadQuaiyl/ of Soybean Varieties. When Planted May 4, 1976, at Tennessee Valley Substation Variety Yieldl Bu/A 41.8 41.4 40.9 40.5 40.4 40.1 39.9 39.9 39.8 39.2 39.0 38.7 38.3 38.3 38.2 37.2 36.3 36.1 35.7 35.1 34.4 34.2 33.9 ,,~,Lf, 1st b iooml Heht. 2/ Matr iyl Plant 2 ! Lod z Seed _, Dates ,, Matur it-v Date 10/02 10/01 10/10 10/14 10/10 10/12 10/09 10/14 10/09 10/16 10/08 10/13 10/0210/02 10/13 10/09 10/17 10/07 10/07 10/06 10/05 10/10 10/01 %AC)17G Q ins/ In. 34 40 38' 42 39 43 4247 44 46 38 45 37 40 45 38 43 37 51 42 46 42 42 Rating g/100 Seed 12.0 11.0 12.9 15.4 11.6 15.3 1.3.6 14.9 16.5 15.3 11.8 12.8 12.6 12.2 12.9 11.9 15.6 11.9 16.4 16.8 15.3 14.2 12.3 00J Essex McNair 500 Lee 68 Ransom Lee 74 FFR 667 MeNair 600 Bragg Lancer MeNair 3130 FFR 6024 Coker 842 Dare Forrest Cent ennial E-X-C-E-L 200 Hutton FFR 666 FFR 5002 Tracy Coker 136 Davis Mack a ab. abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc. abc abc abc abc abc abc be c. c 7/09 7/19 1.3 3.0 3.3 2.9 2.9 2.3 3.4 3.8 2.3 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.3 1.9 3.8 2.6 4.3 2.4 7/22 7/20 7/23 7/20 7/20 7/25 7/23 7/25 7/22 7/21 7/18 7/13 7/20 7/21 7/26 7/20 7/14 7/17 2'.4 3.5 1.9. 3.6 2.6 7/21 7/28 7/16 C.V.% = 11.0 1/Yield adjusted 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are nut different 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Seed quality rating was very" good for all varieties in this test. to (P=.05). Table 12. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant Height and L Varieties Planted May 3 at Tennessee Valley Substation, 1975 and 1976 'lani Lnd 111L_ht._ _ 1st Plant Variety Yield-L loomi aturi 2/ Bu/A Essex Bragg Ransom iracy Dates 7/09 7/22 7/17 Dates. 10/01 10/17 10/17 In. 331. 43 42 51.9 46'.4 46.4 45.2 45.1 7/12 7/19 7/11 7/15 7/15 7/17 7/16 10/08 10/06 10/02 10/08 43 45 38 42 45 37 39 352. Lancer "'orrest :IcNair 600 Centennial Lee 68 74 1'FIR 666 45.0 44.1 44.1 43.8 43.6 10/12 10/08 10/10 10/07 Lee 43.6 7/16 FFR 6024 Coker 842 Hack 43.5 4.3.5 7/16 7/12 7/15 10/09 10/ 11 36 432. . 43.1. 10/01 392. 5737 382. F'IR 5002 Dare 41.0) 40.0 7/11 7/13 7/24 7/23 7/15 10/03 10/01 Davis Hutton _Coker adjusted to 13%' moistur e and 60 pounds per bushel. 1 3 of this report. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on /Yields 136 39.2 38.3 38.2 10/08 10/21 10/03 444. 444. 452. page Table 13. Three and Four-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, ,Plant Height, and Lodging of Soybean Varieties at Tennessee Valley Substation, 1973 through 1976 1St 2 bloom3 ' Dates Plant ht. 3/ Variety Yie ldi'/ Bu/A Saturitvi hod ging3' Rat in g Three-year average planting date May 5 Essex Forrest Tracy Ransom Dare McNair 600 Bragg Lee 74 FFR 51.1 45.0 44.8 43.0 666. Lee 68 Coker 136 Hutton oDavis 41.9 41.7 411.5 41.2 40.9 40.5 38. 3 36.6 36.5 7/09 7/11 7/11 7/17 7/13 7/13 7/23 7/16 7/1; 7/16 7/15 7/24 10/01 10/72/ 10/152/ 10/01 10/82/ 10/ 142/ 10/10o2/ 10/72/ 10/92/ 10 /04 10/19q2/ 10 /921/ 7/24 1 37 42 40 38 41 47 37 34 36 45 42 43 1.3 2.3 3.4 2.7 2.6 3.5 4.0 3.2 2.4 2.8 2.1 4.4 4.3 Four-year average planting date hay 6 Essex Forrest Dare RansomMcNair 600 Lee 74 Lee 68 Coker 136 Bragg FFR 666 Davis Hutton 52.8 48.6 45.1 43.4 43.0 42.7 4.2.6 42.6 42.4 42.3 38.9 38.8 7/09 7/11 7/ 14 7/ 17 7/14 7/16 7/16 7/15 7/22-10/141/ 7/15 7/24 7/23 9/28 9/30 9/29 10/ 144/ 312 36 317 41 10/8 10/9 4/ 10/843 10/021/ 10/7 4/ 10/104/ 10/ 1c4/ 4 37 6 43 46 14 42 4:2 1.4 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.6 3.3 3.0 4.0 2.6 4.3 3/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this 3 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/Maturity date for 1975-76; frost killed soybeans October 3, 1974 report., 4/1Maturity date of 1973,1975. and .1976; frost killed Table 14. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Shattering n and Quality3 of Soybean Varieties when Planted May 19, 1976, at Upper Coastal Plain Sbtto edSz ~1st Variety McNair 600 Mc Nair 3130 For rest t Bragg Essex Lee 74 Davis Coker 842 Hutton Tracy Mack rv E-X-C --1 EL 200 Lee 68 FFR 50(FR'62 32 24 Ransom Coker R 2/ Maturity.? Dates 10/08 10/10 10/04 10/10 10/04 10/09 Plant In. 39 42 37 46 30 34 38 39 3939 37 Yieldi/ Bu/A 44.4 a 43.6 a 42.7 a 40.8 ab 39.7 ab 39.6 ab bloomDates 7/26 7/30 7/21 7/30 Ht. 1st pod,/! In. 6 Lodging? Rating 2.3 5 4 7 5 5 5 2.3 2.9 3.8 1.5 3.4 2.0 1.1 4.6 3.5 3.9 3.1 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.1 1.4 2.8 1.0 2.3 2.0 1.8 2.5 39.0 38.6 38.2 37.9 37.8 37.6 37.5 37.0 ab ab 7/ 21 7/25 8/ 02 7/26 Shattering/? Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rI 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Purple Stain Rating 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Seed size g/100 Sceed 14.2 16.1 13.9 14.6 13.5 13.6 16.1 14.2 38.9'ab ab ab ab ab ab ab 7/31 7/21 7/ 21 7/25 7/26 7/21 7/25 7/26 7/26 L36 I6 36.6 ab. 35.2 ab 7 Lancer McNair 500 FFR 666 C en t enrKial Da re 35.2 34.8 34.7 34.4 30.5 .19.'6 ab ab ab ab b J 7/26. 7/28 10/07 10/08 10/14 10/16 10/04 10/07 10/07 10/05 10/07 10/11 10/04 10/13 10/04 5 6 4 16.4 16.5 15.0 13.6 14.1 34. 36 45 32 39 39 43 40 5 6 5 7 7 7 6 1.0 1.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.9 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 17.6 13.6 16.2 16.2 16.4 17.8 14.5 13.1 14.4 7/22 7/25 7/25 7/22 10/ 04 37 34 5 33.6 ab C.V.% ~IL--L V 10/05 10/08 10/04 39 36\II-u, I 5 6 5 114 1/Yield adjusted to moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P=.05) 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Seed quality was very good for all varieties in this test. 13% Table 15. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Shattering, andSerSz Quality 3 / of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 15, 1976, at Upper Coastal Plain Substation n Variety -J Y ield J --- 2 1st bloom / --- 2 Bu/A Dates Ma tur ity?/ Dates ----I F-) Plant ht.2/ 1 71 ) i i I IIL In. ilt. 1st pod 2/ In. 3 2 5 5 5 7 6 4 6 4 4 5 5 4 7 7 5 5 4. 4 Lodging2/ Shattering2/ L... Seed size t~ Rating 1.0 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.1 2.5 1.0 2.4 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.0 1.5 2.5 2.1 2.6 1.6 1.5 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 '1 Rating g/100 seed Essex Mack E-X-C-E-L 200 Dare Forrest Coker 338 Coker 842 Lee 74 Coker 136 McNair 500 ~McNair 600 Cobb Ransom Lanecer Centennial Bragg Green Soy 74-7 Hut ton Tracy Davis 29.8 29.8 29.1 29.0 28.3 27.5 26.2 25.9 25.3 25.1. 24.7 23.2 22.2 22.0 21.7 21.0 20.7 20.4 19.9 14.9 rlr ? a a ab ab ab abc abcd abcde abcdef abcdeof bcdefg cdef g deofgh defgh defgh efgh fgh fgh gh h _1 ~lf 8/09 8/09 8/13 8/10 8/09 8/18 8/15 8/18 8/14 8/10 8/11 8./ 2 5 8/18 8/18 8/14 8/18 8/12 8/19 8/Il 8/23 . 10/06 10/05 10/12 10/09 10/06 10/26 10/12 10/13 10/10 10/04 10/10 10/26 10/17 10/13 10/12 10/17 10/07 10/19 10/07 10/20 23 31 31 31 32 38 32 31 36 30 33 40 34 31 35 40 38 34 32 30 ?/ 14.2 14.3 11.9 13.4 12.4 14.7 11.5 12.2 12.6 11.8j 11.4 12.2 13.6 12.8 11.0 12.5 15.1 13.0 15.6 12.3 C.V.%21.8 1/Yields adjusted to mositure and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Seed quality and purple stain ratings were very good for all varieties in this test. 13% = .05). Table 16. m , ? r / Two-Year Average Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights., Lodgingr Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted May 7, 1975-76, at Upper Coastal Plain Substatio m rr r rr r -rr r -rr-r +- n - rr ? ht -~Vr -- Variety 1st Yield"/ llIIVI)tlrill bloom?/ ~II Veil It~t Bu/A Dates 50.5 Plant 1 7 1 1~ Ir_.Li. Maturity r(l f~lrfV I WII%~I I lillll Ht. 1st pod!/ Dates 10/13 10/21.41 10/11 10/09 10/15 10/15 10/02 10/16 10/16 10/02 10/15 10/07 9/30 10/03 10/14 In. 37 38 38 38 31 30 44 38 35 39 38 35' 3.6 In. Lod gingl/ Rating 1.8 3.9 1.2 2.0 2.5 2.2 1.3 3.0 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.1 Shattering3 ] Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 McNair 600 Hutton Coker 842 Davis Tracy 49.6 49.3 48.7 48.4 47.5 47.3 46.9 46.2 45.8 44.9 44.0 43.9 43.4 43.4 Lee 74 Essex Bragg Ransom Forrest SCentennial SLancer Mack Coker 136 FFR 6024 Lee FFR 7/21 7/28 7/22 7/29 7/18 7/19 7/15 7/27 7/22 7/15 7/19 7/24 7/17 7/20 7/18 2.9 1.2 2.1 2.0 1.5 vl LV r ~T 31 report.. 34 10/08 7/22 31 10/10 7/20 Dare 41.6 10/03 34 7/17 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this 68 666 -41.9 41.6 1.9 Table 17. Two-Year Average Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod HeightLdig Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 20, 1975-76, at Upper Coastal PanSbtt~ n 1st Variety . Co vr-i tv? ~ ~ CI Yi eld .d 35.5 35.3 34.8 1L ao/ e- -L.J-LL(-. Dates Cobb Coker 338 Lee 74 McNair 600 Forrest Ma c k32.6 Dates 11/03 10/29 Plano 2/ In. LAL. .-. 14 Y.,n r 2 IlL t- *C l LVL c jJ In. LodgingRating 1.9 2.0 2.1 1. 1 1.2 1.9 *1.5 2.6 1.6. 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.9 *2.7 1.5 1.9 3/25 8/19 39 37 31 5 6 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 8/17 8/15 8/12 8/12 10/17 10/16 10/12 10/07 10/11 32.6 32.6 Dare Bragg Ransom 32.1 31.6. 31 30 31 31 8/12 8/19 8/19 31.3 30.9 '30.6 Coker 136 8/14 8/12 3 SCoker 842 30.4 8/18 4. Tracy 30.3 8/16 4 Hutton 29.7 8/20 6 Centennial 28.6 8/17 -10/16 6 Davis 26.9 8/22 10/20 31 4 II ' I/IIt 1/Yields adjusted' to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. '34 Essex 10/23 10/25 10/13 10/09 10/16 10/16 10/27 36 33 32 22 31 31 34 5 Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 "1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 18. Three Year Average Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lod , Shattering of Soybean Varieties at Upper Coastal Plain Substation, 1974 through 1976 1st Variety Yieldi/ bloomz/ Plant Bu/A Dates 1Maturity1/ Dates ht. 2/ In. Ht. 1st podi' Ldin2/hatr 2/n In.Raigatn r4ay Three-year Hutton Lee 74 Davis McNair 600 Ransom Tracy Bragg Essex Forrest Coker 136 Lee 68 Dare 48.4 48.-0 47.7 47.7 47.2 47.0 46.5 average early planting date 13 t~FFR 666 45.8 44.0 43.1l 40.9 40. 1 39.8 7/25 7/17 7/27 7/17 7/19 7/15 7/22 7/13 7/13 7/17 7/18 7/15 7/17 10/22 10/12 10/08 10/09 10/14 10/10 10/16 9/27 10/01 10/02 10/08 10/01 10/08 38 32 40 36 38 36 43 28 34 3734 33 30 3.3 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.6 1.2 2.0 1.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 Three-year average late planting date June 18 Lee 74 36.6 35.3 34.5 34.4 34.2 33.8 33.5 33.4 32.8 32.8 32.8 31.8 29.0 8/15 8/18 8/24 8/17. 0/15 8/10 8/10 10/17 32 32 Forrest Coker 338 Cobb Ransom Tracy Dare -Essex McNair 600 Coker 136 Bragg Hutton Davis 1/Yields adjusted 8/10.10/11 10/29 39 11/01 42 10/23 34 10/17 33 10/10 33 10/07 24 8/14 10/14 34 8/14 10/ 13 34 8/17 10/22 39 8/18 10/24 34 8/20 10/20 34 to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 5 5 6 6 5 4 5 3 4 6 6 6 4 2. 1.6 2.4 2.3 1.8 2.2 1.5 1.1 1.5 1.6 2.7 2.5 2.1 i Table 19. m 11 Four-Year Average Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant First Pod Heights, Lodging Shattering of Soybean Varieties at Upper Coastal Plain Substation, 1974 though 1976 e~ I rr, -r r n n~ . ~ and n 1 VarietyYil! Bu/A 1st bloom Dates Plant Mat urity= Dates 1st lit. podi2/ In. In. Lodgingi/ Ra tin g Shat teringi! Rating Four-year average early planting date May 16 McNair 600 Lee 74 Davis Tracy Ransom Hutton Forrest Bragg Essex Coker 136 Lee 68 FFR 46.7 46.3 46.0 45.8 45.0 44.4 666 Dare 44.0 43.2 43. 1 42.9 40.9 39.8 38.4 7/19 7/18 7/26 7/17 7/20 7/24 7/14 7/23 7/14 7/19 7/19 7/19 7/15 10/07 10/ 11 10/06 10/07 10/11 10/ 18 9/29 10/14 9/25 10/01 10/06 10/05 9/30 36 32 39 35 37 38 34 43" 28 36 33 29 32 5 6 6 5 7 8 5 8 4 7 5 5. 5 1.5 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.5 2.9 1.8 2.2 1.1 1.2 1.81.4 1.5 Four-year .Lee average late planting date June 18 7'436.1 Forrest Coker 338Essex Ransom Tracy McNair 600 Dare Coker 136 Bragg Hutton Davis 34.7 34.4 34.1 34.0 33.4 33.4 32.5 32.4 31.4 30.7 8/13 8/08 8/18 8/08 10/16 10/09 10/27 32 32 39 25 10/06 10/21 10/15 10/12 10/09 10/11 10/20 10/22 10/17 per bushel. 1/Yields 29.0 adjusted to 13% 8/15 8/14 8/13 8/10 8/13 8/14 8/16 8/19 moisture and 60 pounds given on 34 33 34 33 34 38 35 34 5 5 6. 4 6 5 4 5 6 6 7 49 2.2 1.5 2.2 1.I 1.6 2.1 1.4 1.4 1.5 2.3 2.2 1.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 2/An explanation of data and ratings is page 3of this report. Central Alabama The test locations in Central Alabama were on Sumter clay at Marion Junction, Lucedale sandy loam at Prattville, and Forkland loam at Camden. ties in sandy Soybeans of Maturity Group VII are full season varieVarieties of maturity groups V and VI are very early Maturity Group V varieties are approximately 10 this area. and early, respectively. inches shorter in central than northern Alabama locations. Coker 136 and Forrest are the tallest the central tests. group V varieties planted in Their yields are not as good as the full season varieties, but could be used for early harvest varieties as they mature between September 22 and 30. Essex has produced slightly better yields maturity tends to a.t Prattville than either Coker 136 or Forrest, but its be very erratic in central and southern locations. The maximum yielding varieties at central Alabama locations past 3 to 4 years are: Group VI Group V varieties Essex, Forrest, for the and Coker 136; varieties McNair 600, Davis, Lee 74, and FFR 666 for mid-May plantings and Davis and Tracy at later plantings at Marion Junction; Group VII varieties Bragg, McNair 800, and Ransom, particularly at the late May and early June plantings; Group VIII varieties Coker 338, Hutton, and Cobb looked good at later planting at Marion Junction and Prattville. .This is the first year a variety test was planted at Camden and the six highest yielding varieties were the full season (Group VII) and late maturity (Group VIII) varieties. New lines that looked good were Coker 842 and E-X-C-E-L 200 at Marion Junction and McNair 3129 at Camden on Prattville in 1976. 27 Table 20. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering o Varieties when Planted May 13, 1976, at Black Belt Substation la .cL [l.(t oba Yielt 1.l 1st-btoomr.± Ma tur Dates P BuADates FFR tt In 26 26 31 32 33 31 32 22 29 27 31 30 32 31 36 23 33 25 30 31" 34 27 34 41 2/ . 2/ pcV In. 1st2// -- Lod ging2 Rating 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.1 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.4 1.1. 1.9 1.5 Shatter ing-2 Rating 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.0. 1..5 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 666 E-X-C-E-L 200 800 3131 Coker 842 McNair MENair McNair Essex 600 Centennia1 Lee 74 McNair 500 Coker 136 Lee 63 Coker 277 Trac y Coker 338 F{or re st MNair 3129 Mack Dare CO Lancer 'ransom Hutton Davis Bragg Cobb 46.2 a 44.2 ab 44. 1 ab 43.4 abc 40.7 abcd 40.4 abcd 39.7 abcde 38.9 abcd ef bcdefg 38.4 bcdefg 37.7 37.3 bcd ef gh bcd e fgh 37.0 bcdefgh 37.0 cdefgh 35.9 cdefgh 35.6 d ef gh 34.8 defgh 33.6 defgh 32.9 ef gli 32.0 eof gh 32.0 fgh 31.7 fgh 31.6 f gh 31.5 gh 30.5 h 29.6 12.9 1.7/1.4i~r 7/14 7/16 7/27 7/25 7/16 7/15 7/06 7/17 7/15 7/ 13 7/19 7/18 7/14 7/22 7/12 10/07 10/06 10/11 10/11 10/12 10/08 10/09 9/17 10/09 9/25 9/25 7 /20 7 /12 7/12 7/17 7/19 7 /23 7 /21 7/21 7/21 10/08 10/13 10/08 10/ 17 9/22 10/14 9/20 9/22 10/01 10/14 10/16 10/01 10/13 10/21 1.5 1.3 2.0 C.V.% 11 2 Adjusted to 13%ofmoisture and 60 /An explanation data and ratings pounds is per bushel. Yields with a commo given on page3 of this report. letter are not different (P = 05) Table 21. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant. and First Pod Heights, Lodging, andShteigoSyba at Black Belt Substation Varieties when Planted May 31, 1976, Variety YTILldJ }1ADates 2/ 1st bloom- 2/ Maturity .. _ . Plant t _?/ . ^ "Lt. .Vaa _ t Lodging?/ Vui i Dates 10/15 10/16 10/08 10/12 9/28 10/13 10/15 10/17 9/30 10/07 10/12 10/17 10/14 10/13 10/21 10/03 10/14 9/27 10/25 10/02 i,, Inl. 39 38 36 35 35 35 33 36 26 37 35 37 37 37 42 38 42 33 44 33 h- l In. 4 4 5 3 4 5 6 3 4 4 4 4 3. 3 4 S 4 4 .5 3 I Ra tin g Shattering Rating 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.3 1..0 1.8 1.01.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Coker 84 Ransom :McNair 3131 Lee 74 Forrest McNair 00 Green Soy 74-85 Tracy SEssex SLancer. Davis Hut ton Cent ennial MNair 600 Cokter 338 Coker 136 Bragg Dare Cobb Ian k IV 41.1 a 40.8 a 37.7 ab 37.2 ab 36.7 ab 36.2 ab 35.8 ab 35.2 ab 35.2 ab 34.9 ab 34.6 ab 34.-6ab 33.5 be bc 33.4 33.3 be 33.1 be 33.1 bc 32.7 be be 32.6 c 27.6 11.6 7/23 7/25 7/27 7 /26 7/19 8 /04 7 /22 7/22 7/18 7 /27 7 /30 7/29 7/23 7/22 7/30 7/23 7 /28 7 /21 8 /01 7 / 21 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.5 1 .9 1.5 1.6 2.4 1.3 2.0 1.5 3.1 1.6 2.3 3.1 2.0 2.6 2.3 2.3 3.4 c~v.;Z!, "Adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common /An explanation of data and ratingsis given on page 3 of this report. letter are not different (P .05). Table 22. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, andShteigoSyba Varieties when Planted June 21, 1976, at Black Belt Substation Mtr 2/ Variety Green Soy 74-64 Forrest Hutton Green Soy 74-35 Davis Tracy Coker 338 Coker 842 Bragg Essex o Centennial Lee 74 Mack McNair 800 Dare McNair 600 Cobb Lancer Ransom Coker 136 nY~OO Plant Ht.I t pock Yield!' Bu/A 39.1.a 37.5 ab 37.1 ab 36.8 ab 36.5 abc 36.3 abc 34.4 ab( 1st blooml/ Dates 8/06 Mauity- ht.-l' In. 30 29 32 27 29 33 35 29 33 20 32 30 27 24 26 31 38 29 27 26 2 :-- --- 8/04 8/14 8/05 8/11 8/06 8/15 8/06 33.9 33.0 32.3 31.8 31.1 30.8 29.8 29.6 27.8 27.7 27.2 26.6 24.8 ab( ab(cde ab(cde abccde abccde abccde b( cde b(ce cde cde de 8/08 8/02 8/07 8/08 8/05 8/16 8/06 8/07 8/11 8/11 8/08 8 /07 K/tl~ Dates 10/20 10/08 10/23 10/27 10/25 10/24 10/25 10/21 10/21 10/23 10/19 10/20 9/21 10/22 10/07 10/17 11/01 10/16 10/24 10/12 1111/1 In. 3 3. 4 . 2 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 . 2 2 2 2 2 6 4 3 2 LL Lodging-f 10/2/ Rating 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.0 ht.2/ Shatter ing-2 Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1-.5 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ~~ 11 Il~rno C.V.% 16.4 "lYields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. klAn explanation of data and ratings is given on Yields with a common letter are not different (P ='0.5) page3 of this report Table 23. Soybean Seed Quality and Size by Variety When Grown at Black Belt Substation, 197 Planting dates Hay 31, 1976 Seed Purple** Variety Hay 13, 1976 Seed* Purple** quality stain Rating Rating 2.0 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 2.') 2.0 2.9 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0. 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 Seed size quality 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 Seed size stain g/100 seed 12.6 12.0 13.2 11.3 14.7 12.3 12.3 13.2 16.4 12.9 13.0 Rating Rating 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 g/100 seed 13.9 12.6 13.6 12.8 14.8 Seed* quality Rating 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 upe* sansz aig 2.0 1.5 2.0 Se g10S ?ed 15.8 14. 1 14.5 12.7 13.8 Essex Dare Mack Forrest Coker 136 McNair 500 E-X-C-E-L 200 McNair 600 Tracy Coker 842 Lee 68 FFR 666 Davis Lancer Lee 74 Centennial McNair 800 Ransom Bragg Coker 277 HcNair 3129. Hutton Coker 338 McNair 3131 Cobb Green Soy 74-85 Green Soy 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 14.0 16.2 14.9 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 x* 12.7 16.1 12.6 11.8 1!4. 2 15. 3 12.7 13.6 12.0 14.4 13.2 13.0 15.3" 14.5 13.7 13.8 12.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 14.9 15.7 13.5 12.6 12.2 15.3 14.8 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 l.. O 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 13.5 14.5 13.2 11.7 10.7 14.0 13.6 1.5 1.5 1.0 th oloin 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 III cae 74-35 15.0 14..7 15.7 12.5 14.1 1.5 1.5 * 1.0 1.0 13.7 13.0 11.7 * 1.0 1.0 = 2.0 Green Soy 74-64 *Seed the followingscale quality is rated 5= very poor. from 1.0 1=very good; 2 1 = = 1 to 5 according to good; 3 fair; 4 = 14.3 14. 1 poor; , **Purple stain .ratings ar given to seed samples on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows: 2 = 1-3% purple staining; 3 = 4-8% purple staining; 4=9-19% purple staining; 5 = no purple staining; ***Variety not in test. over 20% purple staining. Table 24. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom arnd Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodig Planted May 17, on Black Belt Substation During 1975 and 17 and Shattering of Soybean Varieties 1st Variety Coker 842 FFR 666 Centennial. Lee 74 Tracy.35.8 McNair 600 Lee 68 Yield"- bloomi!/ --Dates 7/14 7/12 Maturity2/ Dates 10/07 Bu/A' 40.3 39.9 Plant ht. 2/ In. 31' 24 Ht. 1st In. 3 3 4 5 4 )a 4 4 .0A 4 L~A od2/ Lod ging Rating 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.6 2.3 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 11 Shattering1 1 Rating 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.1 10/06 l10/09 .10/03 10/06 10/05 10/07 10/11 9/13 10/15 9/23 10/01 37.3 36.3 35.8 35.2 McNair Essex 800 34.9. 34. 1 Ransom Coker rWDavis 33.0 136 32.6 32.0 7/13 7/16 7/14 7/15 7/16 7/23 7/04 7/17 7/13 7/20 34 28 32 31 28 32 22 31 30 30 '34 3 6 3 7/22 31.5 Hutton 10/17 7/21 31.4 Bragg 10/09 7/17 31.4 Lancer 9/19 7/09 30.9 Forrest 9/15 7/10 .29.5 Mack 9/18 ~ 7/09 28.8 Dare 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of 10/18 35 32 29 28 28 this report. -C"I 1.4 2.3 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.6 1.0 Table 25. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates Plant and First Pod of Soybean Varieties Planted June 1 on Black Belt Substation During 1975 and 1976 1st 2/ Plant In. t. 1st In. 4 turit 5 r "'nd Lod~g , Variety ker 842 Cuc Rinsom Lee 74 Tracy Yield" bloom 2 a'h2 Dates 10/16 10/ 12 Lod gin - 2/ Rat i ng 1.0 1.1 1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 Bu /A Dates 7/2')10/I13 Rating 1.6 2.0 33.6 31.7 32.6 7/24 7/24 3235 31.1 30.7 7/23 7/22 7/29 7/29 8/04 7/18 10/1-3 10/1) Centennial ijs 36 30.0 10/09 10/13 9/27 10/22 35 31. 31 38 Hutton i'lai r 800 338 600 28.3. 28.?2 28.2 10/20.35 4 4 6 .5 5 5 5 4 3 2.2 123 2.6 orrest Coker 28.0 'icnir 27.9 7/30 7/23 7/28 7/22 7/16 7/20 7/20 13% SBragg Co(:ker Essex Dare 136 27.9 26.6 26.6 24.5 adjusted to 'lack 1/Yields, 23. 6 1)/12 10/17 10/02 9/22 9/25 9/25 is 33 37 34 24. 32 31 moisture qnd 60 pounds per bushel. ~I i 1 1!11 1.4 1.6 2.8 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.1 1.6 2.6 1 .0 1.0 . ____ 2/Afn explanation of data and ratings given on page 3 of this report. Table 26. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First PdHihs of Soybean Varieties Planted June. 20 on Black Belt Substation During 1975 and 17 1 L n ogn Vrey Hut ton33.1 Davis Vait il" YedbloomyI 1st Dates 8/12 8/11 8/05 8/05 8/03 8/11 8/05 8/05 8/15 8/03 8/12 8/05 8/08 7/29 8/04 8/06 8/07 .2/ Plant ht.l' pd.ogn ilt. 1st o2/ ' Satrn Maturity-/ 1/ Bu/A Dates 10/23 10/13 10/18 10/18 10/08 10/26 10/16 10/ 1628 In. 31 31 31. 33 29 34 29 24 29 38 30 31 23 28 28 27 In. 5 3 3 .4 3 5 3 3 3 3 6 3 5 3 3 4 4 RtingRtn 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.0 1.1 1. 1.) 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 32.5 32.2 31.5 29.6 29.6 Tracy Centennial Forrest Coker 338 Lee ' 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 74 842 29.1 28.8 27.5 27.4 27.3 Coker McNair 800 Mack ,,Cobb -McNair 600 27.2 26.4 26.2 Bragg Essex Dare 25.0 136 24.8 Coker Ransom 1/Yields adjusted to 13°% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 24.5 10/21 9/25 11/01 10/14 10/20 10/09 10/05 10/09 10/23 , c\ ,,, Table 27. Three-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted May 16 on Black Belt Substation During 1974 through Variety YieldBu/A 40.6 39.9 37.2 37.1 36.9 36.6 36.5 35.8 35-.4 35.3 34.8 34.4 34.0 33.2 1st bloomi=d Dates 7/11 7/11 7/12 7/13 7/15 7/26 7/12 7/08 7/05 7/19 7/14 7/21 7/09 7/18 Maturity1 ' Dates 10/04 10/05 10/04 10/07 10/14 10/11 9/23 9/18 9/11 9/28 10/08 10/18 9/18 10/15 Plant ht.2/ In. 22 31 30 26 30 33 31 29 20 33 25 35 27 36' Ht. 1st pod In. 2 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 2 3 3 5 3 6 Lodg Ra 1 2 1 1 1 1 1.11 1.10 1.12 161. 1.13 2.10 1.11 161. 2/ U, FFR 666 Tracy McNair 600 Lee 74 Ransom McNair 800 Coker 136 Forrest Essex Davis Lee 68 Hutton Dare Bragg 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report . Table 28. Three Year Avearges for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights,;ogig and Shattering of Soybean Varieties When Planted June 2, 1973, 1975, and at Black Bel Sb 19762-/ staition , res Variety Vait Yed'1st Yieldr l bloom' s Bu/A Ran som Davis McNair 600 Forrest* Coker 136 Essex 31.6 29-8 28.4 28.2 27.3 27.1 26.8 25.6 25.4 25.3 Dates, 7/25 MaturityDates 10/12 10/06 10/03 Plantodht.!/ In. 35 36 34 31 Logns'hatrn' Ht. 1st p - In'. Rating 1.9 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.2 1.9 2.-9 2.3 2.0 Rain 7/29 McNair $800 Hut ton Bragg Dare 7/23 7/20 7/22 7/16 8 /05 7/30 7/29 9/25 9/29 9/22 10/09 10/19 10/13 9/25 7/21 60 36 26 33 35 3U 32 5 .4 4 6 4 5 6 6 5 .I.'2Adjusted to 13/o moisture and pounds per bushel. No planting made in 1974 due to wet soil conditions during planting period. A'An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 1 Table 29. Three-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 19 on Black Belt Substation During 1974 through 1976 ni~r;nrr 1Q7/1 1Q7~ 1st bloont2 Dates' 8/11 8/06 8/12 8/13 b~2/ Plant ht.In. 32 32 35 31 30 29 32 26 24 34 40 29 30 28 L~ ilt. pod- t Lodging-/ Variety Davis Tracy Coker 338 Hut ton Lee 74 Forrest McNair 600 McNair 800 Essex SBragg Cobb Ransom Coker 136 Dare I~VL L C3 L ' YieldBu /A 33.6 33.5 32.2 31.5 31.1. 29.3 29.0 29.0 28.6 27.9 27.8 27. 1 26. 9 25.5. Maturity2 8/07 8/04 8/07 8/15 7/31 8/09 8/14 8 /08 8/07 8 /04 (~I I IY Dates 10/19 10/17 10/27 10/23 10/16 10/09 10/ 15 10/19 10/07 10/2 1 11/02 10/24 10/10 10/06 In. 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3. 3 5 5 4 Rating 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.8 1.1 1.4 1.1 Shattering-Ra ting 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture, and 60 pounds per 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. bushel.*. Table 30. Four-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Ldig and Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted at Two Dates on Black Belt Substation During 197C houh17 Pl2a 1st Variety Plant Maturity? Dates ht.2/pod2/ In. Ht. 1st In. Lc gS Rating Rating Yieldil' Bu/A bloom 2! Dates Average planting date May 16 *Coker 136 McNair 600 Essex Davis Lee 74 *Lee 68 Forrest Ransom McNair 800 SDare Bragg 38.0 37.9 37.6 37. 1 36.9 36.4 36.4 35.0 34.9 34.1 32.9 7/12 7/12 7 /07 7/18 7/13 7/13 7/09 7/14 9/22 10/03 9/13 9/28 10/05 10/05 9/18 10/12 10/08' 9/18 10/11 7/26 7/10 7/16 32 30 21 34 28 27 29 31 34 28 37 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.9 1.2 1.7 1. 1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 Average-planting date June 23 Davis 31.0 8/12'10/18 Hutton 28.9 8/14 Forrest 26.8 8/05 Bragg 26.6 8/10 McNair 800 26.3 8/16 McNair 600 26.2 8/08 Essex 25.6 8/02 Ransom 25.2 8/09 Coker 136 24.4 8/08 Dare 22.0 8/06 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given 29 29 27 31 24 29 22 27 28 25 this report. pounds 10/23 10/08 10/20 10/ 18 10/ 13 10/07 10/24 10/09 10/06 per bushel. 3 5 .3 4 4 2 3 4 4 J 1.5 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.3 1 .1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.]1 on page 3 of Table 3. Four-Year Averages for Yield, Date of Maturity, Plant-and First Pod Heights, and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted' June 2 on Black Belt Substation During 1972, 1973, 1975, and 19761/ Variety Yield/ BuI/A Ransom Davis McNair 600 Forrest 34.6 31.9 30.8 30.7 Maturityz-Plant ht.1 date In. 10/14 10/06 10/08 9/25* 36 37 35 34 Ht. 1st pod Inatn 5.6 4.5 4.1 4.7 Lodging 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 McNair 800 Dare 29.1 27.2 10/10 9/24 32 -34 4.9 4.4 2.1 2.0 Bragg Hutton 1/Yield 28.7 28.7 10/13 10/22 39 36 5.7 5.5 2.5 2.9 adjusted to 13% moisture and60pudpebshl 2 No planting made in 1974 due to wet conditions during 'planting period. given on -/An explanation of data and ratings is page 3 of this report. 39 Table 32. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Sha Quality of Soybean Varieties when Planted May 20, 1976, at Lower Coastal Plain S and Variety Bragg McNair 3129 McNair 800 Coker 338 Cobb Yield- 1st bloom-./ Plant Maturityl- ht.-- Ht. l 7 tSed podIn. 5 0 . Lodging2 uty R Bu/A. 41.2 a 41.0 a Dates Dates In. Rtn Rating PrlS ti atn g1 eed' ize 0 seed 7/24 7/19 40.6 ab40.4 39.8 39.6 39.6 ab abc abc abc ab-c 8 /01 7/26 McNair 3131 8 /02 7/28 7/18 7/22 FFR 667 Lancer Coker 842 Ransom oMcNair 37.937.9 37.6 37.5 36.8 36.6 36.5 35.0 34.9 34.8 3130 McNair 600 FFR 666 Hutton Centennial Tracy Coker 277 Lee 68 Davis McNair 500 Lee 74 Forrest abcd abcd abcd abcd abcde abcde abcdef abcdef abcdef abcdef 7/20 7/23 7 / 21 7/17 7/15 7/31 7/18 7/15 7/19 7/16 7/26 7/19 7/21 34.2 32.6 34.1 abcdef bcdefg cdefg cdefg defg defg def g E-X-C-E-L 200 FFR 6024 Coker 136 Dare Essex Mack 32.2 32.1 31.4 30.3 7/14 7/19 7/15 7/19 7/15 7/13 7/15 I 30.2 28.9 efg 28.2 fg 26.2 g C' 13.4 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 10/16 10/12 10/11 10/2 2 10/18 10/09 10/17 9/29 10/05 10/1-7 10/01 10/04 10/05 10/14 10/08 10/02 10/16 10/06 10/02 9/26 10/05 9/22 10/04 10/04 9/22 9/18 9/18 9/15 7/'3 32 27 26 30 33 26 30 25 23 27 27 27 22 29 28 25 26 23 25 21 2224 22 22 2?6 23 19 23 5 5 4 6 6 4 4 .6 5 4 .3 3 3 3 3 '4 3 '5 2.0 2.3 1.8 3 2.3 1.5 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 ?.0 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2LO 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 10 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1-.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1'.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 = 14.9 14.5 12.1 15.6 13.8 15.4 14.5 13.5 12.3 14.9 13.5 12.9 11.9 17.2 13.4 16.2 13.7 12.6 13.4 11.2 12.6 12.3 12.1 12.5 12.5 12.5 14.6 13.9 .05). 2 /An explanation of data and ratings is giv~en on pag~e 3 of this Yields with a common letter are not different (P report. Table 33. S Yield, Date of Maturity, Plant Height, Lodging, Shattering, and Seed Size and QuaityPofdSoybeanrVarieties when, Planted~ May 17, 1976, at Pr~ttvile~ experment+ ild ed Variety McNair 800 McNair 3129 Ransom Coker 277 Coker 338 Cobb Coker 842 McNair 600 Davis Ne1cNair 3131 667 Bragg Lancer Lee 74 E-X-C-E--L 200 FFR 666 Hutton McNair 3130 Dare Centennial Y-ied! 1 1. 1 A-l 1 Maturi t 14i 4 4L A.-& 4 Plant ht!2/' La l- . - Ht. 1t . Lod ging~ Rating 2.5 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 Seed- / Shattering! Rating 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 quali"ty Bu/A Dates In. and In. 5 4 5 2 4 5 3 2 2 6 5 5 3 2 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 4 6 3 4 5 2 Yields with Rating 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1..5 2.0 (P Seed size Rating g/100 seed Purple stain -FFR 46.3 a 10/14 35 45.7 ab 10/15 37 45.6 abc 10/16 33 45.1 abcd 33 10/13 44.4 abcd 37 10/15 43.5 abcd~e 10/15 39 43.2 abcde 10/14 30 43.0 abcdef 34 10/11 42.6 abcdefg 28 10/04 42.6 abcdefgh 10/16 35 42.4 abcdefgh 10/15 33 42.0 abcdefgh 1-0/16 39 41.7 abcdefgh 10/02 29 40.9 abcdefgh 29 10/13 40.9 abcd efgh 10/08. 27 40.2 bcdef gh 10/11 26 39.6 cdefgh 10/15 36 39.3 defgh 10/04 33 38.3 i efgh 9/27 26 38.2 i efgh 10/11 33 FFR 6024 37.7 i efgh 10/1.l 27 Lee 68 37.1 i fgh 10/11 27 Essex 37.1 i fgh 21 9/23 Coker 136 37.0 i fgh 9/24 31 McNair 500 36.8 i. gh 10/04 29 Mack 36.7 i gh 9/27 24 Forrest 36.5 i 29 h 10/04 Tracy 33.3 i. 10/08 31 8.9 1/Yield adjust-ed to.13% moistur~e and 60 'pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 1.4 2.5 1.9 2.5 1.9 3.1 1.0 2.0 2.-1 1.9 3.9 1.18 1_.4 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 14.0 16.0 16.4 15.9 15.4 13.7 13.0 13.0 15.9 16.8 14.0 15.0 15.5 13.3 14.0 12.8 16.8 15.3 16.6 13.6 17.7 14.3 16.7 16.8 16.1 16.6 15.1 15.9 of this a .common letter are not different .05). report. Table 34. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Shatteri , Quality3/ of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 22, 1976, at Prattville ExperimentF S tt;u 1 VaieyYield-' 1st bloom-- Mtri 2 t ,Plant . Ht. Pod 1 2 t Lodgin 2= Rating 2.0 1.0 1.6 2.4 2.3 2.8 1.1 2.4 1.9 2.1 1.1 1.3 2.0 3.3 3.1 1.9 1.3 1.1 2.3 1.8 Shatterig See /00se Bu/A Dates Dates In. In. Rating Green Soy 74-64 Essex Forrest Ransom Tracy Coker 338 Coker 842 Cobb McNair 800 McNair 600 G~-reen Soy 74-35 Coker 136 Mack Bragg Hutton Centennial Lancer Dare Lee 74 Davis C.V.80 39.4 38.3 37.9 37.5 37.3 37.2 36.8 36.7 36.5 36.4 36.4 36.1 36.1 35.6 35.4 34.7. 34.6 33.0 32.8 30.2 4.5 a ab abc 8/04 8/01 10/15 10/08 8/01 8/09 8/05 8/13 abc abed abed abed 8/16 8/13 8/13 8/05 7/30 8/04 8/02 8/09 8/13 8/05 bed bed bed bcd bed bed bed cde def def 10/04 10/19 10/12 10/20 10/15 10/25 10/16 31 20 29 30 10/12 10/04 10/08 10/01 10/19 10/20 10/15 10/12 10/01 10/14 1.0/14 ef f g 8/08 8/03 8/07 8/11 30 34 26 34 29 31 25 29 27 35 33 31 29 23 27 26, 7 2 4 6 4 3 4 4 6 4 2 5 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15.4 14.0 11.7 15.4 15.4 15.4 13.0 13.0 11.5 11.7 13.0 16.2 13.6 14.1 14.7 12.4 14.0 13.1 12.5 13.9 --1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 3/Seed quality and purple stain ratings were very good for all varieties in this test. = .05) Table 35. Two-Year Averages for Yield; First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Soybean Varieties Planted May 19 at Prattville Experiment Field, 1975 and 1976 f Variety Essex Coker 338 Ransom Dare Coker 842 Hutton Davis Coker 136 McNair 600 McNair 800 Mack FFR 666 Yield"-1 2 bloom 1st /3 2 / Maturity Dates 9/19 10/22 10/17 9/22 10/10 10/21 10/02 9/22 10/10 10/14 9/21 10/09 2 Plant / ht.2tf Ht. Bu/A 42.4 42.4 41.1 40.2 39.3 38.7 38.5 38.5 38.1 38.1 38.1 37.9 Dates 7/04 7/23 7/18 7/07 7/17 7/23 7/21 7/15 7/13. 7/28 7/07 7/13 In. 25 38 36 31 37 33 podilLdin-'Shtei In.Raigatn 1st n2/ 35 34 36 29 29 rj8 4 5 6 6 5 4 5 6 5 6 1.3 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.9 4.0 2.6 2.4 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.4 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 " FFR 6024 Forrest 37.1 37.0 7/07 7/14 7/11 10/11 9/26 30 31 Le~e 74 Bragg 36.8 36.8 10/12 7/21 7/15 7/12 7/18 32 40 10/16 10/09 10/11 10/02 10/07 Lee 68 Centennial Lancer Tracy 36.5 35.4 .35.1 35.0 Ill8 1/Yields adjusted to 13%, moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. First bloom not 3/First bloom data for 1975 only. 7-/14 30 38 35 35 3 5 6 4 7 4 5 6 3.5 2.3 2.3 1.7 2.3 taen196 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0+ Table 36. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity-Dates, Plant and First Podteghs and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted June 23 at Prattville Experiment Field,1957 Shattering, 1st VarietyYield--/ Yield bloom-/' Dates Bu/A Cobb Tracy Coker 338 Hutton Bragg'32.6 McNair 600 Ransom Coker 136 Forrest Maturit Dates 10/29 10/15 Plani yht.In. 36 31 o 2 Ht. 1stonhe In. 4 4 -, 2/J Ri 2.6 2.4 2.7 Rating 1 1 1 35.6 34.0 34.0 33.2 31.6 31,6 31.5 8 / 13 8 /05 8/11 8/12 10/23 10/23 10/20 34 33 35 8/07 8/04 10/13 32 8/08 3/05. 10/2? 10/07 30 31 30.7 30.1 Centennial ~Mc1air 800 Coker 842 Essex 30. 6 30.4 30.2 29.3 29.5 29..2 28.3 8/01 8/05 8/13 8/05 10/04 10/15 .10/18 10/15 10/04 29 34 "29 27 21. 4 4 5. 5 5 4 5 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.4 1.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 4 3 3 -4 7/31 Lee 74 Dare Lancer Davis Mack and 60 pounds per bushel. 1 /Yields adjusted to 13% 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 27.9 moisture 8/01 8/04 8/09 8/10 8/02 - 10/17 10/03 10/13 10/14 9/29 28 27 32 30 29 1.6 1.1 3.0 .1 1 1 1 2.1 1.8 2.6 2.6 5 3 3 1" 1 1 Table 37. Three-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and ai2/ Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted at Prattville Experiment Field 1974 through 1976 Variety Yieldi Bu/A 1st bloom 2/3/ Plant Maturity!/ Ht. 1st podI Lodgingl' Fie: ht 2/ Shatterin DaDates Three-war ItesIn.In.Ratn average planting date May 17 25 37 40 35 38 37 32 37 33 33 36 29 36 41 31 4 6 5 5 5 7 6 7 5 6 5 4 6 7 4 1.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 4.0 2.1 1.9 2.7 2.5 2.2 3.0 1.9 3.0 3.8 2.2 Essex Ransom Coker 338 Davis Hutton Coker 136 Dare Tracy Lee 74 Forrest McNair 600 FFR 666. McNair 800 ~Bragg Lee 68 43.2 43. 1 42.3 40.8 40.3 40. 1 40. 1 40.0 39.7 39.7 39.6 39.4 38.9 38.6 38.2 7/10 7/22 7/25 7/24 7/27 7/19 7/14 7/17 7/20 7/12 7/17 7/16 8/01 7/24 7/18 9/20 10/18 10/22 10/03 10/2 1 9/28 9/22 10/08 10/13 9/25 10/09 10/09 10/14 10/ 17 10/11 Three-year average planting date June 21, 1976 Cobb. 36.8 8/13 11/01 Coker 338 33.6 8/10 10/25 Hutton 32.8 8/12 10/26 Bragg 32.7 8/07 10/23 Tracy 32.6 8/05 10/22 Forrest 32.3 8/02 10/08 McNair 600 31.9 8/05 10/17 McNair 800, 31.2 8/13 10/18 Coker 136 31.0 8/05 10/10 Davis 30.3 8/09 "10/ 15 Essex 30.3 8/01 10/04 Dare 29.9 8/03 10/03 Ransom .29.1 8/08 10/25 Lee 74 28.6 8/03 10/23. I/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is. given on page 3 this 36 35 33 34 32 4 4 4 4 4 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.2 2.5 1 1 1 1 2 29 28. 32 4 4 5 .2.9 2.5 2.3 1 1 1 of 31 4 2.1 1 31 3 2.6 1 21 3 1.2 1 26 4 1.9 1 31 5 2.11 28 3 2.5 1 3/First bloom. dates for 1974-75 only. report. First bloom not taken 1976 on first planting. Table 38. Four-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity rl T\ T1 Y Dates,. Plant TT 'and First Pod Heights, Shattering, .rr* and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted at Prattville Experiment Field, 1973 through 1976 1st bloom?!.3/ Dates Plant SMaturity Dates Four- yar C~ Ht, Variety YieldJ! rn,/A In. average 24 1st Pod2! L~n In. Lodging?! Rating Shat tering! .Rating planting date May 18 Essex Ransom Davis Coker 136 Coker 338 Forrest Tracy Dare Lee 74 Hutton FFR 666 McNair 600 Lee 68 ~McNair 800 Bragg 38.9 37.2 36.6. 35.8 35.6 35.5 35. 1 35.1 34.5 34.5 34.3 33.7 33.4 33.3 33. 1 7/10 7/22 7/24 7/19 7/25 7/12 7/17 7/14 7/20 7/27 7/16 7/17 7/18 8/01 7/24 9/19 10/14 10/01 9/22 10/2 1 9/23 10/05 9/22 10/11 10/19 10/07 10/06 10/10 36 36 35 40 31 36 30 4 6 5 6 5 5 6 5 10/12 10/14 Four-year 32 38 27 35 30 36 40 average planting date June19 1.1 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.4 1.7 2.1 3.3. 1.7 2.5 1.9 2.7 3.2 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Forrest Coker 338 Tracy Bragg McNair 600 Hutton Essex Coker 136 Dare 10/23 8/11 10/01 7/30. 10/05 8/04 10/02 8/02 10/12 8/08 27.1 Davis 10/16 8/12 26.5 McNair 800 10/22 8/07 26.0 Ransom 10/20 8/03 25.9 Lee 74 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page3 of this 29.4 29.3 29.0. 28.7 28.6 28.4 28.0 27.9 27.6 8/01 8/09.10/26 8/04 8/06 10/04 10/19 10/21 10/14.32 28 36 33 35 34 21 31 26 31 29 31 28 report. 8/05 4 5' 4 5 4 5 3 5 4, 3 5 5 3 3/First bloom date 1 2.4 1 2.3 2 2.2 1 2.6 1 2.1 1 2.4 1 1.1 1 1.: 1 1.7 1 2.2 1 2.0 1 1.8 1 2.2 for 1974 through 1975. Southern Alabama The tests in southern Alabama were on a Benndale sandy loam at Brewton, Malbis fine sandy loam at Fairhope, Lucedale sandy loam at MonSoybean of Maturity Group locations. For a roeville, and Dothan sandy loam at Headland. VIII are full season varieties in the south Alabama full season variety to yield well it must have good rainfall during podfill period. As can be seen by Table 1, there has been excellent rainfall Fairhope, and at all southern locations for the past 4 years at Brewton, Headland and this past year at Monroeville. Because of this excellent rainfall during pod fill the leading three or four varieties at each location are Maturity Group VII or VIII varieties. Hutton has been the most consistent yielder at both Brewton and Fairhope. Other Group VIII varieties that yield well are Coker 338 and Cobb. Ransom, Bragg, and McNair 800 were frequently -in the top five or six yielding varieties in the southern locations for the past 4 years. McNair 600, Davis, and Tracy have been the best yielding Group VI in southern locations. New lines that have looked good for the past 2 years were Coker 842 at Fairhope and Headland and for the past year McNair 3131 was the highest yielding variety at Brewton early planting and Monroeville. 47 Table 39. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering -of Soybean Varieties When Planted June 9, 1976, at Brewton Experiment Field' .-.M Variet mr r sr - - Yield" 1st b rr I ~- loom/' 1 8/05 Plat ~r\~ Maturity r\l 2 ' ht .' r 3.1 40 36 32 35 39 37 31 34 26 28 33 2.6 33 32 27 31 26 31 2321 22 22 r Hlt. 1stp 2 3 4 3 3 4 3 11 3 3 .2 2/ Loging 1.0, 1.5. 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 2 Shattering 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 MeNair 3131 Cobb Hutton Ransom Coker 338 Bragg McNair 3129 McNair 800 Coker 277 Coker 842 McNair 600 1.0 1.0 Lancer 4 p. Lee 74 .2 1.0 1 STracy 1..0 f 3 1.0 Davis ef Forrest 1.0 3 ef Centennial 2 1.0 ef Lee 68 2 1.0 ef Cotcer 136 4 1.0 ef Dare 3 1.0 ef Essex 1 1.0 f 2 Mack 1.0 f FFR 666 1.0 1 f C.I.% = 10.1 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P=.05). 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 this report. 50.3 49.5 49.4 46.7 46.7 46.3 45.6 44.6 44.1 42.5 41.041.0 38.0 37.1 36.3 36.3 35.9 35.9 35.0 34.6 33.8 33.3 32.7 a a a ab ab ab ab ab abc bcd bcd cde cdef 8/09 8/06 8 /02 8/05 8/03 8/03 8/03 7/30 7/28 7/30 8/03 8/01 7/28 8/03 7/27 7/30 7/31 7/30 7/29 7/28 7/27 7/30 de 10/20 11/03 10/21 10/19 10/22 10/16 10/14 10/15 10/18 10/10 10/12 10/02 10/15 10/15 10/09 9/23 10/13 10/08 9/24 9/22 9/28 9/25 10/10 of Table 40. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 18, 1976, at Brewton Experiment Field nt2/ 1st Plant Maturity Dates 10/20 10/18 10/2 1 10/18 10/30 10/28 10/3 1 10/ 17 10/24 10/20 10/15 9/29 9/27 10/19 11/03 9/06 10/0 1 9/28 ht.Z! Ht. 1st Variety Davis McNair 600 McNair 800 Lee 74 Coker 338 Ransom Hutton Lancer Bragg Green Soy 74-85 Centennial Forrest Essex Tracy Cobb Coker 136 Mack Dare Yieldi/ Bu/A 60.3 a 58.6 ab 56.0 abc 55.0 abcd 55.0 abed 54.5 abcd 54.1 abcd 53.9 abcd 53.3.bcd 53.3 bcd 52.4 bcd 49.7. cde 49.4 cde 49.0 de 48.6 de 44.2 ef f 41.8 f 41.0C.VT.% 7.9 bloom.l/ pod2/ Logni Shatterim Dates In. 38 37 31 32 38 33 35 38 40 32 38 33 24 37 40 35 34 31 ~1 Y In.Raigat 4 3 4 4 6 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 2 5 8 5 4 1.3 1.3 1.0 8/10 8/04 8/11 8/06 8 /08 8-/06 8 /08 8/06 1.8 1.3 1.5 2.8 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 8/08 8 /04 8/05 7/31] lD 7/30 8/03 8/14 8/05 8/02. 8/04 O/T\L 2.0 1.8 92.8 1.0 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 i 1.0 23 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 .05) Yields with a common letter are not different (-P 60 pounds per bushel. 1/Yield adjusted to 13% moisture grid 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3of this report. Table 41. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Po Shattering of Soybean Varieties when Planted June 3 at Brewton Field, 1975-76 Yieldi/ Bu/A 50.2 47.0 45.4 44.5 42.4 42.3 41.5. 41.5 41.4 40.1 39.8 Variety 1st bloom?/ Dates 8/01 8/01 7/27 8/05 7/28 8/01 7/24 7/24 7/23 7/27 7/24 Maturity/ Dates Plant ht.1I Ht. 1st Lodh podi 2/ in. 241. In. 4 4 5 41 Hutton Coker 338 Ransom Cobb Bragg McNair 800 McNair 600 Centennial Tracy Lee 74 Coker 136 10/24 10/25 10/21 11/01 10/18 10/16 10/14 10/14 10/13 10/16 10)/01 29 28.4 35 33 27 24 30 28 22'2 3 3 2 29 30 21 28 24 25 19 23 51.10 41.11 21.10 41.10 41.10 3101. 21.10 31.10 SLancer Coker Davis Forrest 842 Mack Essex Lee 68 FFR 39.3 39.0 38.3 38.2 38.0 37.5 37.2 7/29 7/23 7/28 7/19 7/21 7/19 7/23 10/05 10/ 13 10/Il 9/29 10/01 10/05 10/1? 666 35.1 35.0 7/24 7/22 10/13 9/28 18, 25 21.10 41.10 Dare 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings'is given on page 3 of this report. Table 42. Two-year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights,. Lodging, and U _. -1 tll rLLDUIL Shattering of Soybean Varieties When Planted June 22 at Brewton Field, 1975-76 ~IU --. YaU Variety Yield!'L Bu /A 47.8 47.0 47.0 46.1 45.6 44.9 44.2 1st bloom Dates 8/12 8/05 8/10 8/07 8/10 8/09 8/13 8/17 ~LYu ~Plan yWItaLI~~a~3 l~i r Lo cirnr? turit y2/ "'" )Ht. Dod? Sha t i Pr n Dates 10/21 10/20 10/29 10/27 10/29 10/25 10/21 ~ = 1st i v.LA ri crv ncrl ' In. In. Rat in g 1.3 1.1 Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.'6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 L o Davis McNair 600 Coker 338 Ransom Hutton Bragg McNair 800 Cobb 43.0 42.9 74 34 32 34 32 31 35 26 35 1.3 1.3 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.8 1.4 1.4 2.1 1.0 2.4 1.8 1.8 11/04 10/18 10/22 Tracy Lee 42.7 8/04 8/05 32 27 Forrest 40.2 8/02 10/06 .30 Essex 38.3 8/01 10/07 23 Mack 38.0 8/04 10/07 30 Coker 136 36.3 8/05 10/09 28 Dare 34.4 8/06 10/06 28 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. -. F Table 43. Three-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Ldig and Shattering of Soybean Varieties. Planted June 1 on Brewton Experiment Field During 1974 truh17 Variety "st Yield-Y e Bu/A 50.5 48.1 44.8 44.0 42.3 41.7 41.2 40.8 39.038.8 38.8 37.7 35.4 34.2 33.4 2 bloom- 1 oomDates 2/ . Maturithu~p Dates 10/21 10/22 10/18 10/14 10/10 10/11 10/16 10/09 9/27 10/14 10/02 9/29 9/26 10/10 10/11 P la In. .30 31 28 29 30 25 33 30 26 21 20 29 25 22 17 Ht. 1st. odLoc In. 4.5 3.8 4.1.0 3.9 2.31.. 2.4 4.7 3.8 3.8. 2.2 2.5 5.1 3.7 2.3 1.5 2 odig Rat hatrn .2/ 1.1 Hutton Coker 338* Ransom McNair 800 Tracy McNair 600 Bragg Davis Forrest. Lee 74 Essex Coker 136 Dare Lee 68 FFR 666 7/31 7/30 7/25 7/31 7/21 7/22 7/27 7/28 7/18 7/24 7/16 7/23 7/21 7/22 7/22 . 1 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.I. 1.10 1.10 1.l. 1.10 1.10 1/Yields adjusted. to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page'3 of this report. Table 44. Three-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted June 27 on Brewton Experiment Field During 1974 through 1976 Variety Yield1/ Bu/A 41.7 40.5 39.8 38.7 37.2 36.7 36.5 36.2 35.6 35.2 34.6 33.0 28.4 27.9 1st bloom2 / Dates 8/15 8/20 8/13 8/09 8/12 8/13 8/14 8/16 8/09 8/07 8/07 8/04 8/10 8/10 Maturity Dates 10/20 10/31 10/25 10/18 10/24 10/21 10/25 10/18 10/19 10/17 10/07 10/07 10/09 10/06 Plant ht. 2 / In. 29 32 29 27 27 29 26 21 23 27 26 20 23 24 Ht. t pod-Lodging/ In. 4.1 5.2 5.0 2.8 4.1 3.8 4.1 36 2.9 2.8 4.6 3.4 4.3 4.1 Rating 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.8 1.0 1.5 1.5 hatterin Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2/ Ln Davis Cobb Coker 338 McNair 600 Ransom Bragg Hutton McNair 800 Lee 74 Tracy Forrest Essex Coker 136 Dare 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. Table 45. ,lior-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Ldig and Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted at Two Dates on Brewton Experiment Field During.17 through 1976 1st Yieldi/ Blooms~/ Maturity?! 3r Plant ht.?/! p Hit. 1st Lodging? Variety Hutton Coker 338 Ransom McNair 800 Tracy Brag McNair 600 Lee 74. Davis S Forrest Essex Coker 136 Lee 68 FFR 666 od?! Bu/A Dates Dates Average planting date 10/25 10/25 10/21 10/ 13 10/14 10/18 10/13 10/15 10/12 9/29 10/ 03 9/30 10/14 10/14 In. In. Rating hteigRtn 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 June 1 31 30 27 29 29 33 25 22 30 25 20 28 22 19 5.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 2.8 5.0 2.9 2.5 4.1 3.6 3.0' 5.5 2.5 2.0 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 48. 1 46.3 43.2 41.6 40.7 40.0 39.6 38.0 37.4 35.8 35.0 34.5 32.7 31.4 7/30 7/29 7/24 8/01 7/21 7/25. 7/22 7/23 7/27 7/18 7/17 7/23 7/21 7/21- 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 Average planting date June 27 30 10/27 8/13 39.0 Coker 338 30 10/19 8/15 Davis 37.5 28 10/18 8/08 36.9 McNair 600 27 10/26 8/14 36.1 Hutton 29 10/2 1 8/13 Bragg 34. 7 10/21 24 8 /09 33.7 Lee 74 22 10/20 8/15 McNair 800 33.5 26 10/27 8/11 RansoGm 33.4 27 10/20 8/07 Tracy 32.7 26 10/07 8/07 Forrest 32. 1 20 10/08 8/04 Essex 29.3 24 10/09 8/10 Coker 136 27.724 10/06 8/10 Dare 25.7 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is-given on page3 of this report. -_ r 5.5 4.8 3.5 4.6 4.3 3.3 3.9 4.1 3.4 4.8 3.3 5.1 4.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 1. 1 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Table 46. Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, and Soybean Varieties when Planted June 5, 1976, at Gulf Coast Substation rh'a Variety ___ Yield!'1st bloon2! Bu/A Dates 8/02 7/26 7/29 51.1 50.2 50.2 49.7 47.8 46.6 46.4 45.9 44.5 44.3 a ab ab abc abcd abcde abcd e abcdef abcd ef g abcdef g abcdefg 42.9 abcdefgh 42.6 ibcdefgh 41.8 i cdefgh 41.4 i defgh 40.3 i defgh 39.6 i defgh efgh 38.9 i fgh 37.9 i 37.3 i gh h 34.8 i 34.8 i 34.4 i Maturity 2 Dates 10/26 10/17 10/21 10/17 Plant lt.2/ In. 43 39 39 33 41 34 35 39 34 38 27 34 34 lHt.2t J..f P In. 9 8 0 LodgingJ Rating 2.0 2.0 2.3 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.3 2.0 1,3 2.3 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.0 2.3 1.3 1.5 2.3 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.3 Shatter ing-/ Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 U Cobb Bragg Hutton Coker 842 Coker 333 Green Soy 74-85 Ransom Coker 277 Lee 74 lcNair 600 FFR 666 Lee 68 Forrest Essex Tracy Centennial Davis McNair 3130 Coker 7/26 7/30 7/26 10/2 4 10/15 10/17 10/1910/16 10/15 10/15 10/14 9/29 10/02 10/14 10/13 10/06 10/03 9/30 10/06 7/27 7/26 7/26 7/26 7/26 43.4 7/23 7/19 7/19 26 35 36 36 37 39 35 36 39 35 7/26 7/26 8/01 7/27 7/26 136 1cNair 800 Mack Lancer Dare C.V.% - 8 /01 7/26 7/29 5 8 6 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 8 9 6 0 10/01 10/06 10/01 7/26 7 7 1.0 11.6 Yields with a common letter are not Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. different (P_ .05). 2/An explanation- of data and ratings is given on pag e 3 of this report. Table 47. Two-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodig Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted June 6 at Gulf Coast Substation, 1975 and 1976 n arey Yed' Bu/A 1st Yieldht bloetor Dates 7/21 7/28 7/24 7/24 7/21 7/23 7/17 Mtrt Dates 10/15 10/21 10/17 1 Plant Maturity In. 33 38 37 Ht. 1st podl In.. 2 ht Lodging-saeringo Ratn Rating .2 Coker 842 Hutton Bragg Ransom Tracy Lee 74 Forrest Cobb Lee 68 Essex 52.0 51.4 51.3 1.0 2.1 1.4 51.1 48.2 48.0 47.9 47.7 10/16 10/12 101/15 10/02. 35 33 13 33 '+1 1.5 2.4 7/29 7/21 10/28 10/ 13 9/28 47.6 47.5 47.2 46.9 7/16 7/22 32 2 600 °Coker 338 SMcNair 10/14 10/23 10/12 10/uS 10/01 35 FFR 666 46.5 45.4 45.4 44.9 43.3 41.8 40.9 40.5 to 13% of data Davis Coker 136 Centennial Dare Mack McNair 800 Lancer 1I/Yields adjusted 2/An explanation 7/28 7/22 7/29 3728 36 307 1.3 1.4+ 2.3 1.3 1.0 1.9 2.0 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 7/22 7/23 7/21 10/13 9/29 '37 33 7/21 7/31 7/26 moisture and ratings __1/738 10/03 10/ 10 rnd 6(0pound 35 34 ur r ishe I [n)pige 1.6 1.4 1.1 1.8 1.9 1.3 report. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 is c given 3 of this Table 48. Three and Four-Year Averages for Yield, First Bloom and Maturity Dates, Plant and First Pod Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties Planted June at Gulf Coast' Substation, 1973 trouh17 lgt bloom! Dates Ht. 1st pod J In. date June 3 .... Variety Yiel-d!'. Bu/A Maturity2/ Dates Plant ht.Z! In. average Lo R Three- ear Hutton Ransom Bragg Tracy Lee 74 Coker 338 MceNair 600 pLanting 37 33 39 35 31 38 36 32 41 30 36 37 32 35 24 Forrest Cobb Lee 68 Davis Coker 136 SDare McNair .800 Essex 54.8 53.2 52.6 51.4 50.9 50.5 49.6 49.5 49.0 48.6 48. 1 47. 1 45.2 44.9 41:0 7/26 7/21 7/21 7/19 7/20 7/24 10/21 10/15 10/16 10/09 10/ 13 7/20 7/15 7/28 7/19 7/27 7/20 71/ 17 7/31 7/13 10/23 10/12 9/29 10/27 10/12 10/08 9/29 9/27 10/11 9/29 Four-year 6 6 7 8 6 7 5 5 7 6 6 5 6 5 2.0 1.5 1.8 2.6 1.2 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.9 1.3 2.1 1.5 1.1 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 J.. 2 average planting date June 5 39 33 38 39 7 6 7 7 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 .4 2.0 1.4 1.6 1.9 1. 1 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.4 2.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Hutton Ransom Bragg 53.4 50.5 50.0 Coker 338 49.0 Lee 74 48.9 10/15 32 Davis 47.7 10/08 37 McNair 600 46.9 10/14 36 Lee 68. 46.8 10/1229. Forrest 45.9 7/19 10/01 Coker 136 45.8 36 7/22 10/01 McNair 800 44.5 35 7/30 10/ 13 Dare.4 3.5 7/19 9/29 30 Essex 41.3 7/15 10/01 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel.* 2/An explanation of. data and ratings is given on of this report. 7/27 7/22 7/22 7/26 7/23 7/27 7/21 7/20 10/23 10/19 10/18 10/24 1.0 1.0 1.0 32 Leo 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 24. 1.0 1.2 page 3 Table 49. Yield, Date of Maturity, Plant and First Pod Heights, Planted May 25, 1976, at Monroeville Experiment Field Lodging, and Shattering of Soybean Varieties When , 2/ 2/ Sateig Rtn 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ing Variety McNair 3131 Coker 338 McNair 800 Bragg McNair 3129 Hutton Davis Coker 842 Cobb Lancer -nCoker 277 McNair 600 Yield 1 '--/Maturity 1! Dates 10/18 10/21 10/13 10/17 10/13 10/21 10/13 10/14 Plant ht.2! Ht. Bu/A 48.0 44.1 43.1 42.7 41.6 41.4 40.3 40.3 40.1 39.9 39.9 39.5 38.2 37.1 36.3 35.4 33. 3 32-.1 31.6 31.4 31.4 31.0 25.9 a ab bc bc bcd bcde bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef bcdef cdefg. h def g hij efg hif fg hij g hij ii In. 29 32 26 34 30 31 27 25 37 30 30 28 33 26 25 32 32 23 18 26 27 20 ~II 1st pod--' In. 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 I 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 4 1 1 1 2 2 Lodging- Rating 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.3 2.3 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.3 2.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 11/01 10/11 10/12 10/11 10/16 10/1 2 10/04 10/12 9/27 10/11 10/12 10/11 10/.01 10/01 10/08 IICCLt"l 1 I I111 CO Ransom Centennial Forrest Lee 68 Coker 136 Tracy Lee 74 FFR ~rn 666 ii Dare Mack Essex J j. k C.V. 8.6 1/Yield adjusted to 13o moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different(P i'An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. = .05). Table 50. Yield, Date of First Bloom, Plant and First Pod Heights, Lodging, Shattering, at Wiregrass Substation 18, of Soybean Varieties when Planted May 1976, and Seed Size and Quality ~F C~r\~rhn~rr 'I~~uia+iac~r. rhorr P7 SITI+PTI tvl~~T 1st XTar i CLJV ~q7~ ~ rl+ ~JJ~1CPP~ASS SUbS1 Ht. 2t h.Y Lodgzing-V ratio Seed?/ 'z 4 v 1G V-I e 1 1Gltd dI a ab abc abc bed blo Shattering-/ Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 quality Ul.vvUC-- Bu/A McNair*800 Bragg Ransom Coker 842 MNair 3129 Lee 68 Dates In. 32 36 29 28 In. 4 Rating 1.4 1.8 1.0 Rating 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 Purple Seed size stain Rating g/IUU seed _1nn 1 --- 48.1 44.7 43.7 43.6 41.4 1/ 27 7/22 7/22 7/21 7/23 7/18 5 4 30 29 26 2 3 2 FFR 666 Davis Lee 74. McNair 3131 Coker 277 SCentennial Cobb. Tracy Coker 338 Hutton McNair 600 Lancer Forrest Dare Essex Coker 136 Mack IJt~LL t~ L I I i~ I L II C.V.% 40.9 40.9 40.7 40.6 39.7 39.6 38.9 38.2 37.6 37.6 37.4. 36.3 35.3 27.6 27.0 25.6 22.8 18.9 ~O , 7 bcd bed. bed 7/21 7/18. 3 31 29 bed ede cde cde de. de de de de de f fg fg gh h 1_ t~ U 7/20 7/19 31 29 7/22 7/20 7/28 7/20 7/24 31 39 27 7/20 7/12 7/22 7/21 7/22 7/11 32 32 29 30 26 24 7/20 7/16 I / LII 20 30 26 3 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 2.8 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.3. 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 17.6 19.7 20.9 18.2 20.3 16.8 16.3 19.2 17.0 19.4 17.8 18.5 18.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.8 3.8 1.0 1.8 2.0 1.5 2.5 2.0 2.5 2.5 1.5 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 17.1 19.1 12.6 14.0 11'.2 13.7 13.6 I.V 8.5 1/ Yield adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. Yields with a common letter are not different (P 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of Uh .05). Table 51. Two-Year Averages for Yield, Plant and First Pod Heights, Shattering, and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted May 20 at Wiregrass Substation, 1975-76 Plant ht.2 / In. 28 32 31 29 33 37 33 30 25 25 35 21 32 35 34 26 27 31 26 Variety Yield" Bu/A 41.4 40.8 39.9 38.9 37.7 37.5 36.8 36.4 35.9 35.4 34.7 34.2 34.0 32.9 31.9 30.9 29.6 27.4 23.2 Ht. 1st pod/ In. 2 4 3 2 4 5 2 3 2 1 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 5 2 Lod 2/ Rating 1.1 1.9 1.7 1.4 2.4 2.8 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.2 2.7 1.1 1.3 3.5 2.4 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.9 Shattering Rating 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.8 1.9 o' 0 Coker 842 McNair 800 Ransom Tracy Davis Bragg Centennial McNair 600 Lee 74 Lee 68 Hutton FFR 666 Lancer Cobb Coker 338 Forrest Dare Coker 136 Mack 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds per bushel. 2/An explanation of data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. Table 52. Three and Four-Year Averages for Yield, Plant and First Pod Heights; and Lodging of Soybean Varieties Planted 1973 through 1976 at Wiregrass Substation Variety' Yield! Plnt Ht. cr In. Bu/A Three-year average planting date May 18, 4 33 McNair 800 41.9 Davi s 3 35 40.7 3 Ransom 30 40.6 2 29 Tracy 40.5 2 McNair 600 30 38.3 4 Bragg 35 37.9 . 1 Lee 74 24 37.2 Hutton 4 35 36.9 1 Lee 68 22 35.7 Coker 338 3 34 35.5 3 Forrest .27 34.5 Dare 3 27 34.2 3 Cobb 37 34.0 Coker 136 5 . .. 32 31.5 Four-year average planting date May 17 , 1973-76 4 30 McNair 800 38.4 Ransom 3 27 35.6 4 Davis 31 35.3 4 Bragg 33 35.2 3 McNair 600 27 34.4 4 Hutton 32 33.8 2 Lee 74 23 32.8 2 Lee 68 21 32.0 Dare 31.5 25 3 3 Coker 338 31 31.1 3 24 For res t 30.5 1/Yields adjusted to 13% moisture and 60 pounds.-per bushel. 2/An explanation at data and ratings is given on page 3 of this report. 1st In. pod 1 ' 1974-76 Lad gingRat ing 1.8 2.4 1.5 1.6 1.4 2.3. 1.2 2.5 1.1 2.3 1.2 1.2 3.4 1.2 1.6" 1.3 2.0 2.0 1.3 2.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 2.0 1.1 a