Performance of Soybean Varieties in Alabama, 2009 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 306 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Richard Guthrie, Director Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, February 2010 Printed in cooperation with the Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Alabama A&M University and Auburn University) Table of ConTenTs Introduction................................................................................................................................................3 Experimental.procedures............................................................................................................................3 Seasonal.conditions....................................................................................................................................4 Comparing.varieties...................................................................................................................................4 . Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................4 Locations of experiments Table.1...Performance.of.Group.IV.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama,.2009................................5 Table.2...Performance.of.Group.IV.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama., Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009.............................................................................................7 Table.3...Performance.of.Group.IV.Soybean.Varieties.at.Tallassee.Alabama,.2009................................9 . Table.4...Performance.of.Group.IV.Soybean.Varieties.at.at.Tallassee., Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009.............................................................................................9 Table.5...Performance.of..Group.IV.and.V.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama,.2009. .................10 . Table.6...Performance.of..Group.IV.and.V.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama,. Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009...........................................................................................12 Table.7...Performance.of..Group.VI.and.VII.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama,.2009................14 Table.8...Performance.of.Group.VI.and.VII.Soybean.Varieties.in.Northern.Alabama, Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009...........................................................................................15 Table.9..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Shorter,.Alabama,.2009..................................................16 Table.10..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Shorter,.Alabama,. Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009...........................................................................................18 Table.11..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.on.Vaiden.Soil,.Marion.Junction,.Alabama,.2009............20 Table.12..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.on.Vaiden.Soil,.Marion.Junction,.Alabama, Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009...........................................................................................22 Table.13..Iron.Chlorosis.Rating.of.Soybean.Varieties.on.Sumter.Soil,.Marion.Junction,. . Alabama,.2009..........................................................................................................................24 Table.14..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Fairhope,.Alabama,.2009..............................................25 Table.15..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Fairhope,.Alabama, Three-year.Summary,.2007.-.2009...........................................................................................27 Table.16..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Brewton,.Alabama,.2009...............................................29 Table.17..Performance.of.Soybean.Varieties.at.Brewton,.Alabama, Three-year.Summary,.2007.and.2009.......................................................................................31 Table.18..Cultural.Practices.for.Soybean.Variety.Tests.in.2009..............................................................33 . Table.19..Soil.Types.for.Soybean.Tests,.2009..........................................................................................33 Table.20..Rainfall.at.Test.Locations.During.Growing.Season,..2009......................................................34 Table.21..Entries.and.Sources.of.Seed.for.Soybean.Tests,.2009..............................................................35. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 3 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES In alabaMa, 2009 K..M..Glass,.D.P..Delaney,..and.Edzard.van.Santen Advisor,.Natl..Res..Prog.,.Extension.Soybean.Specialist,.and.Professor INTRODUCTION Soybean.variety.tests.are.conducted.annually.by.the.Alabama.Agricultural.Experiment.Station...The.7.locations.used.represent.the.major.soil.and.climatic.regions.of.Alabama...These.locations.are.divided.into.logical. soybean.growing.regions...The.regions.and.locations.are: . . . . . . . . . . . . Region. .. Northern. Central.. Southern. Black.Belt. Gulf.Coast. . . . . . . . . . . . . Location. . . Belle.Mina,.Crossville Tallassee,.Shorter Brewton Marion.Junction.(2.soils) Fairhope. . . EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES . The. standard. tests. were. conducted. as. a. randomized. complete. block. design. with. four. replications.. . Standard.plot.size.was.four.30-.to.38-inch.rows.by.20.feet.long...Fifteen.feet.of.the.middle.two.rows.were. harvested.for.yield....Seeding.rate.was.10.viable.seeds.per.foot.of.row...The.Group.IV.test.was.drilled.with. seven.7-inch.rows..Seeding.rate.was.five.viable.seeds.per.foot.of.row.. . Data.were.collected.on.seed.yield,.moisture,.lodging,.shattering,.plant.height,.and.maturity.date...Plot. yields.were.adjusted.to.13.percent.moisture.and.converted.to.bushels.(60.pounds).per.acre...Lodging.was. scored.on.a.scale.of..1.to.5.as.follows: . 1.-.almost.all.plants.erect. . 2.-.either.all.plants.leaning.slightly.(less.than.45%).or.a.few.plants.down. . 3.-.either.all.plants.leaning.moderately.(approximately.45%).or.25.to.50.percent.of.the.plants.down. . 4.-.either.all.plants.leaning.more.than.45%.or.50.to.80.percent.of.the.plants.down. . 5.-.more.than.80.percent.of.the.plants.down. . Shattering.was.rated.on.a.scale.of.1.to.5.based.on.performance.of.the.border.rows.14.days.after.maturity...A.rating.of.1.indicates.no.shattering,.a.rating.of.3.indicates.a.4.to.8.percent.shattering,.and.a.rating.of. 5.is.20.percent.or.more.shattering...Plant.height.was.determined.by.measuring.from.the.ground.to.the.top.of. the.plant.at.maturity...Maturity.date.was.the.day.95.percent.of.the.pods.achieved.mature.pod.color....Harvest. was.approximately.7.to.10.days.later. 4 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION SEASONAL CONDITIONS Rainfall.for.2009.is.shown.in.Table.20...The.normal.planting.dates.for.the.standard.tests.are.the.first.week. in.May,.May.15-25,.and.May.25.to.June.5.for.northern,.central,.and.southern.Alabama.locations,.respectively. COMPARING VARIETIES To.aid.in.determining.real.yield.differences,.a.statistical.analysis.of.variance.was.performed.on.the.data. from.each.location..The.L.S.D..(least.significant.difference).and.C.V..(coefficient.of.variation).are.reported.for. each.location’s.2009.test,.and.for.the.location’s.or.region’s.2-.and.3-year.averages..The.difference.in.yield.of. two.varieties.must.exceed.the.L.S.D..value.for.one.variety.to.be.considered.superior.to.others.in.yield.in.that. particular.test..The.C.V..is.a.measure.of.the.variability.in.an.experiment..An.increase.in.its.value.indicates.an. increase.in.the.unexplained.variability. . Since. the. performance. of. varieties. varies. with. location. and. year,. long-term. averages. from. several. locations.are.more.reliable.than.1-year.performance..Three-year.regional.averages.are.considered.a.reliable. evaluation.of.the.relative.performance.of.varieties..However.varietal.rankings.may.change.among.years.and. among. locations..This. change. in. rankings. is. measured. by. the. significance. of. variety. x. location,. variety. x. year,.variety.x.location*year.interaction..These.interactions.were.significant.in.all.cases..Thus,.care.should.be. exercised.when.extrapolating.results.from.one.location.or.year.to.another. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . Appreciation.is.expressed.to.the.following.station.superintendents.and.their.staffs..It.is.their.quality. work,.which.makes.this.report.a.reliable.source.of.information.for.farmers.in.their.regions.. Chet. Norris. and. David. Harkins,. Tennessee. Valley. Research. and. Extension. Center;. Tony. Dawkins. and. Joyce.Ducar,.Sand.Mountain.Research.and.Extension.Center;.Steve.Nightengale,.E.V..Smith.Research.Center,. Plant.Breeding.Unit;.Bobby.Durbin,.E.V..Smith.Research.Center,.Field.Crops.Research.Unit;.Jimmy.Holliman,.Black.Belt.Research.and.Extension.Center;.Randy.Akridge,.Brewton.Agricultural.Research.Unit;.Ronnie.McDaniel,.Malcomb.Pegues.and.Jarrod.Jones,.Gulf.Coast.Research.and.Extension.Center. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORThERN ALABAMA, 2009. Belle. Mina Cross. ville Regional.Average Lodging. Shattering. Plant. score score height - inches 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.8 1.6 1.0 1.9 1.3 1.3 2.4 1.5 1.3 2.1 1.1 1.8 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.4 2.1 2.0 1.6 2.1 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.8 1.9 24 33 35 30 28 29 32 35 23 27 30 29 30 29 24 33 28 23 21 26 27 26 26 24 27 27 26 26 27 26 25 9-10 9-22 9-22 9-11 9-14 9-21 9-13 9-14 9-13 9-19 9-15 9-14 9-16 9-19 9-9 9-20 9-12 9-10 9-10 9-21 9-16 9-22 9-11 9-19 9-15 9-22 9-19 9-10 9-10 9-13 9-11 5 Variety Yield Maturity. date ------------- bu/acre ---------Maturity.Group.III Dyna.Gro.31J39 SS.LL.499N USG.74G99 Terral.TV.47R18 Schillinger.4990.RC Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Terral.TV.49R19 Terral.TV.49R17 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4757RR/STS UA.4805 Dyna-Gro.35Z49 Schillinger.495.RC Dyna-Gro.39C49 USG.74T98 Dyna-Gro.33Y45 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4955RR Dyna-Gro.V49N6RR Dyna-Gro.32R46 Dyna-Gro.V48N7RS SS.RT.4996N Dyna-Gro.37P49 MorSoy.RTs.4955N Croplan.Genetics.RC.4417RR USG.74D79 Asgrow.AG.4907 Schillinger.499.RC Dyna-Gro.36Y48 Asgrow.AG.4403 SS.RT.4451N Croplan.Genetics.RC.4877RR Asgrow.AG.4606 34.1 70.1 68.5 48.2 53.2 61.6 61.0 54.1 47.5 63.5 53.0 48.5 55.5 55.6 45.6 51.0 50.1 40.8 41.6 46.4 47.1 44.8 38.6 41.3 48.9 42.5 47.6 40.0 39.6 36.0 39.1 69.5 92.2 91.7 101.7 94.4 85.6 84.9 90.9 94.1 77.2 87.4 91.2 83.7 80.3 88.5 83.0 82.7 90.9 88.8 83.9 82.3 84.5 90.3 87.2 79.1 84.1 78.2 84.7 81.4 84.1 77.2 51.8 81.1 80.1 75.0 73.8 73.6 72.9 72.3 70.8 70.3 70.2 69.8 69.6 67.9 67.2 67.0 66.4 66.1 65.2 65.1 64.7 64.7 64.4 64.2 64.0 63.3 62.9 62.3 60.5 60.0 58.1 Maturity.Group.IV continued 6 TABLE 1. CONTINUED. ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Variety Belle. Mina Cross. ville Yield Regional.Average Lodging. Shattering. Plant. score score height - inches 1.8 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.4 1.7 1.8 24 25 27 25 23 22 20 30 27.1 Maturity. date ------------- bu/acre ---------Maturity.Group.IV.continued SS.RT.4808N SS.RT.4370N SS.RT.4777N Dyna-Gro.32P48 Dyna-Gro.V47N9RS Asgrow.AG.4005 Dyna-Gro.36C44 SS.RT.5160N Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 37.1 32.6 27.3 35.6 33.0 25.3 32.9 65.8 46.3 10.6 21.7 78.2 81.1 84.0 71.3 67.2 72.9 61.6 93.4 83.7 13.8 15.7 57.6 56.9 55.7 53.5 50.1 49.1 47.1 79.6 65.0 8.7 17.9 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 9-15 9-11 9-13 9-13 9-11 9-13 9-10 9-25 9-15 Maturity.Group.V PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 2. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORTh ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007 - 2009. Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Maturity.Group.III Dyna.Gro.31J39 UA.4805 Schillinger.495.RC Croplan.Genetics.RC.4955RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.4757RR/STS SS.RT.4451N SS.RT.4996N SS.RT.4808N Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Dyna-Gro.32R46 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4417RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.4877RR Dyna-Gro.32P48 SS.RT.4370N SS.RT.4777N SS.LL.499N USG.74G99 Terral.TV.47R18 Schillinger.4990.RC Terral.TV.49R19 Terral.TV.49R17 Dyna-Gro.35Z49 Dyna-Gro.39C49 51.8 Maturity.Group.IV 70.3 69.8 67.0 70.8 60.5 65.1 57.6 73.6 66.1 64.4 60.0 53.5 56.9 55.7 81.1 80.1 75.0 73.8 72.9 72.3 70.2 69.6 50.8 47.7 48.8 47.2 41.8 45.1 40.2 52.0 44.2 43.3 41.7 39.4 39.4 39.3 40.4 37.8 37.2 37.1 35.3 35.0 31.4 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.0 2.2 1.6 1.4 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.3 1.5 1.3 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.5 23.5 26.6 28.2 21.3 24.9 24.5 23.6 27.8 22.3 24.9 24.9 23.8 24.3 26.0 32.8 35.0 29.9 27.9 32.0 35.3 29.9 30.5 9-17 9-12 9-17 9-8 9-5 9-13 9-10 9-23 9-13 9-13 9-16 9-16 9-14 9-11 9-22 9-22 9-11 9-14 9-13 9-14 9-8 9-16 1.1 2.4 24.1 9-10 Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch - 7 Variety 2009 Maturity. date --------- bu/acre ------- continued 8 TABLE 2. CONTINUED. Variety ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1 Maturity.Group.V 57.2 45.2 3.8 15.9 43.5 37.2 2.6 16.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.4 1.3 1.8 29.0 23.8 27.6 21.4 25.7 26.1 24.4 26.8 27.5 26.0 25.9 25.3 22.8 22.0 20.4 27.7 26.3 9-19 9-9 9-12 9-10 9-9 9-22 9-19 9-15 9-22 9-8 9-10 9-11 9-11 9-13 9-10 9-22 9-14 2009 Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Lodging. score Maturity. date --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.IV.continued USG.74T98 Dyna-Gro.33Y45 Dyna-Gro.V49N6RR Dyna-Gro.V48N7RS Dyna-Gro.37P49 MorSoy.RTs.4955N USG.74D79 Asgrow.AG.4907 Schillinger.499.RC Dyna-Gro.36Y48 Asgrow.AG.4403 Asgrow.AG.4606 Dyna-Gro.V47N9RS Asgrow.AG.4005 Dyna-Gro.36C44 SS.RT.5160N Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 67.9 67.2 66.4 65.2 64.7 64.7 64.2 64.0 63.3 62.9 62.3 58.1 50.1 49.1 47.1 79.6 65.0 8.7 17.9 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 3. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN TALLASSEE, ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 4. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN TALLASSEE, ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007 - 2009 9 The 2009 Group IV test at Tallassee was planted but could not be harvested due to prolonged autumn rains. 10 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 5. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV AND V SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORThERN ALABAMA, 2009. Regional.Average Variety Belle. Mina Cross. ville Yield Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. height - inches 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 2.6 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.9 2.3 1.9 1.6 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.5 3.3 2.2 1.1 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.1 41 39 39 41 40 38 41 36 43 38 39 33 40 39 41 41 36 32 34 37 38 38 36 39 35 39 39 39 10-6 9-29 9-30 7-29 10-3 7-26 10-4 10-8 10-5 10-11 10-4 10-11 10-11 10-14 10-8 10-10 10-10 10-12 10-10 10-4 10-14 10-10 10-16 10-19 10-12 10-17 10-9 10-16 continued Maturity. date ----------- bu/acre --------Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 Progeny.P.4906RR Progeny.P.4908RR Progeny.P.4807RR NK.S.49-H7.Brand HALO.4:65 Progeny.P.4949RR USG.75M49 Progeny.P.5409RR MorSoy.RT.5388N Asgrow.AG.5503 SS.LL.511N Croplan.Genetics.RC.5007RR HALO.5:65 Terral.TV.54R28 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5222RR Asgrow.AG.5405 HALO.5:25 Schillinger.5440R MorSoy.RT.5168 Schillinger.557RC Ozark USG.75Z98 AGS.597RR Osage USG.7553nRS Dyna-Gro.32A53 Progeny.P.5622RR 61.5 54.8 59.7 59.0 49.4 42.2 50.6 62.1 56.3 59.6 57.5 63.7 61.7 64.0 64.7 55.7 63.6 63.6 59.3 57.5 59.6 56.9 62.5 63.2 61.4 59.3 53.0 58.6 93.2 87.7 81.6 77.9 82.1 87.1 71.1 80.2 85.0 81.3 81.6 75.1 74.5 72.1 71.0 79.6 71.6 70.4 74.6 74.7 70.9 72.5 66.7 65.2 66.8 67.3 73.0 66.8 77.4 71.2 70.6 68.4 65.7 64.7 60.9 71.2 70.6 70.5 69.5 69.4 68.1 68.1 67.9 67.7 67.6 67.0 67.0 66.1 65.2 64.7 64.6 64.2 64.1 63.3 63.0 62.7 Maturity.Group.V PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 5. CONTINUED. Belle. Mina Cross. ville Regional.Average Lodging. Shattering. Plant. score score height - inches 1.8 2.8 1.5 2.5 2.3 1.9 2.4 1.6 1.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.6 1.4 1.9 2.0 2.5 1.9 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.8 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.3 39 41 40 41 38 41 37 39 38 40 41 40 40 36 42 43 38 47 40 39 44 41 40 38 39.1 11 Variety Yield Maturity. date ----------- bu/acre --------Maturity.Group.V.continued SS.LL.595N Asgrow.AG.5606 USG.Allen Croplan.Genetics.RC.5419RR NK.S.52-F2.Brand SS.RT.5760N Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.33X55 SS.RT.5471N AGS.554RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 Progeny.P.5650RR Terral.TV.55R15 Progeny.P.5218RR Progeny.P.5319RR Asgrow.AG.5905 Hutcheson Croplan.Genetics.RC.5892 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5955RR AGS.568RR NK.Brand.S59-B8 SS.RT.5960N Progeny.P.5706RR SS.RT.5951N Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 62.1 63.6 61.6 62.3 59.5 58.8 62.1 59.6 54.4 54.7 57.0 54.8 58.3 56.1 60.1 56.6 57.3 54.9 55.5 56.7 57.1 56.6 54.0 52.8 58.2 7.0 11.5 63.0 61.5 62.9 61.5 64.2 64.9 61.5 63.2 67.8 67.2 64.7 66.4 61.8 63.5 58.3 61.3 60.4 62.5 61.0 59.2 58.6 57.3 59.8 59.9 69.5 9.7 13.3 62.5 62.5 62.2 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.8 61.4 61.1 61.0 60.9 60.6 60.1 59.8 59.2 58.9 58.8 58.7 58.3 58.0 57.9 57.0 56.9 56.3 63.9 6.1 13.0 10-14 10-17 10-20 10-15 10-9 10-15 10-12 10-13 10-10 10-11 10-14 10-18 10-15 10-11 10-14 10-18 10-12 10-19 10-19 10-12 10-15 10-19 10-17 10-17 10-9 12 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 6. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP IV AND V SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORThERN ALABAMA, ThREEYEAR SUMMARY, 2007 - 2009. Variety Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. Maturity. score height date - inch 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.9 1.6 Maturity.Group.V Croplan.Genetics.RC.5222RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.5892 USG.7553nRS USG.Allen Croplan.Genetics.RC.5007RR Ozark Croplan.Genetics.RC.5955RR Dyna-Gro.33X55 SS.RT.5760N AGS.568RR SS.RT.5471N SS.RT.5960N SS.RT.5951N USG.75Z98 Progeny.P.5650RR Osage Progeny.P.5622RR Asgrow.AG.5503 NK.S.52-F2.Brand Progeny.P.5706RR Progeny.P.5218RR Dyna-Gro.32A53 USG.75M49 67.7 58.7 63.3 62.2 68.1 64.7 58.3 61.4 61.9 58.0 61.1 57.0 56.3 64.6 60.6 64.1 62.7 69.5 61.9 56.9 59.8 63.0 71.2 56.1 51.5 51.6 52.3 53.6 53.2 48.5 51.6 51.1 49.5 50.9 48.3 47.3 55.2 54.6 53.2 53.1 51.9 51.0 49.7 48.6 48.3 44.1 43.1 42.0 41.9 41.7 41.7 41.6 41.3 40.9 40.7 40.0 39.2 36.9 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8 1.4 1.9 2.7 1.5 2.1 1.5 1.9 1.6 2.5 2.7 2.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 34.7 39.4 32.3 34.5 33.3 31.7 35.1 32.8 33.4 34.2 32.0 34.8 31.4 33.1 37.2 30.4 36.3 33.7 33.8 35.5 32.0 33.8 36.3 10-8 10-12 10-13 10-14 10-9 10-7 10-13 10-11 10-12 10-11 10-9 10-15 10-12 10-13 10-13 10-8 10-14 10-4 10-7 10-14 10-10 10-9 10-8 continued 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.1 1.7 1.6 33.5 33.0 34.2 33.8 41.3 40.3 38.7 9-28 9-28 8-31 10-1 10-5 10-2 8-4 2009 --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.IV Progeny.P.4908RR Progeny.P.4906RR Progeny.P.4807RR Progeny.P.4949RR HALO.4:94 NK.S.49-H7.Brand HALO.4:65 70.6 71.2 68.4 60.9 77.4 65.7 64.7 53.1 52.2 49.2 45.1 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 6. continued. Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Lodging. score 13 Variety 2009 Averages Shattering. Plant. Maturity. score height date - inch - --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.V.continued Progeny.P.5409RR MorSoy.RT.5388N SS.LL.511N HALO.5:65 Terral.TV.54R28 Asgrow.AG.5405 HALO.5:25 Schillinger.5440R MorSoy.RT.5168 Schillinger.557RC AGS.597RR SS.LL.595N Asgrow.AG.5606 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5419RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR AGS.554RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 Terral.TV.55R15 Progeny.P.5319RR Asgrow.AG.5905 Hutcheson NK.Brand.S59-B8 Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 70.6 70.5 69.4 68.1 67.9 67.6 67.0 67.0 66.1 65.2 64.2 62.5 62.5 61.9 61.8 61.0 60.9 60.1 59.2 58.9 58.8 57.9 63.9 6.1 13.0 51.2 3.6 13.3 41.2 2.8 15.7 2.3 1.4 2.4 1.6 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.4 1.9 2.9 2.6 2.4 3.1 2.6 2.9 2.7 1.4 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 43.9 39.0 33.7 39.7 41.3 36.7 32.7 34.4 37.9 38.4 39.7 40.1 41.6 42.0 38.0 40.4 41.4 40.6 42.7 43.6 31.2 38.0 36.4 10-5 10-11 10-11 10-14 10-8 10-11 10-12 10-10 10-3 10-14 10-19 10-14 10-18 10-16 10-12 10-12 10-14 10-15 10-14 10-19 10-11 10-14 10-8 14 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 7. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP VI AND VII SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORThERN ALABAMA, 2009. Belle. Mina Cross. ville Regional.Average Lodging. Shattering. score score Plant. height - inches 2.0 1.5 1.9 3.2 1.9 2.5 2.2 1.9 3.0 3.8 2.2 2.6 3.5 4.0 2.6 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.2 39 36 43 39 38 40 44 44 37 41 45 43 45 47 42 10-18 10-18 10-18 10-20 10-17 10-15 10-18 10-21 10-20 10-19 10-20 10-21 10-22 10-23 10-19 Maturity. date Variety Yield -------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.VI SS.RT.6207N R01-2346 SS.RT.6451N Progeny.P.6208RR AGS.606.RR Asgrow.AG.6301 Desha SS.RT.6988N Progeny.P.6708RR Stonewall Asgrow.AG.7501 Progeny.P.7208RR Deltapine.DP.7330RR Asgrow.AG.7502 Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 65.3 65.2 58.8 56.6 59.4 58.7 52.2 55.6 57.3 56.2 54.1 55.5 50.4 54.3 57.1 4.7 7.6 64.2 62.4 54.2 56.2 50.9 48.6 50.2 46.2 40.8 49.1 49.0 46.3 47.0 42.8 50.6 5.6 10.5 64.8 63.8 56.5 56.4 55.1 53.6 51.2 50.9 49.1 52.6 51.5 50.9 48.7 48.6 53.8 3.7 9.3 Maturity.Group.VII PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 15 TABLE 8. PERFORMANCE OF GROUP VI AND VII SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN NORThERN ALABAMA, ThREEYEAR SUMMARY, 2007 - 2009. Yield 2-yr... avg 3-yr. avg Lodging. score Shattering. score Averages Variety 2009 Plant. height Maturity. date --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.VI SS.RT.6207N SS.RT.6451N SS.RT.6988N R01-2346 Progeny.P.6208RR AGS.606.RR Asgrow.AG.6301 Desha Progeny.P.6708RR Stonewall Asgrow.AG.7501 Progeny.P.7208RR Deltapine.DP.7330RR Asgrow.AG.7502 Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 64.8 56.5 50.9 63.8 56.4 55.1 53.6 51.2 49.1 Maturity.Group.VII 52.6 51.5 50.9 48.7 48.6 53.8 3.7 9.3 49.5 2.1 7.6 42.1 2.2 12.1 47.2 39.6 2.8 2.1 2.7 3.7 4.1 2.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.2 54.4 50.5 45.8 44.8 42.0 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.4 3.1 2.0 2.6 2.3 3.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 - inch 34.2 37.4 40.4 36.6 39.7 32.9 40.7 44.7 37.7 36.5 45.6 43.9 45.6 47.0 40.2 10-14 10-16 10-19 10-18 10-21 10-15 10-15 10-18 10-20 10-19 10-20 10-21 10-22 10-23 10-19 16 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Lodging. score Shattering. Plant. score height .-.inches.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 32.8 29.5 32.0 36.0 32.0 30.0 27.3 30.8 29.5 32.3 29.3 25.5 25.5 23.5 25.5 26.0 30.0 24.8 26.5 25.0 26.0 28.3 27.0 26.3 25.3 32.5 10-8 9-30 9-30 9-29 10-10 9-30 9-28 10-14 10-13 10-10 10-15 10-13 10-6 10-11 10-14 10-19 10-15 10-13 10-13 10-11 10-14 10-16 10-17 10-7 10-7 10-17 9-30 continued Maturity. date TABLE 9. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT ShORTER, ALABAMA, 2009. Variety Yield .-.bu/acre.Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Progeny.P.4908RR Progeny.P.4949RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Progeny.P.4906RR Progeny.P.4807RR HALO.5:25 Terral.TV.55R15 Progeny.P.5319RR Asgrow.AG.5905 HALO.5:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR AGS.568RR Osage Progeny.P.5706RR Dyna-Gro.33C59 Dyna-Gro.35F55 Hutcheson USG.75M49 Dyna-Gro.32B57 Progeny.P.5622RR Progeny.P.5650RR Terral.TV.54R28 Ozark USG.75Z98 MorSoy.RT.5168 58.9 54.4 52.8 51.9 48.6 47.2 45.8 Maturity.Group.V 64.0 61.2 60.6 60.5 58.6 58.0 57.8 57.5 57.1 56.5 56.3 56.1 54.3 54.2 53.7 53.7 52.8 51.9 51.8 51.6 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 9. CONTINUED. Variety Yield Lodging. score Shattering. Plant. score height .-.inches.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 27.0 25.0 22.0 25.0 23.0 27.0 23.0 32.3 27.8 29.5 27.5 23.5 25.8 26.0 21.3 20.0 34.8 28.3 30.0 30.5 29.5 27.0 33.3 29.3 28.0 10-8 10-10 10-20 10-11 10-6 10-4 10-8 10-7 10-29 10-28 10-20 10-23 10-23 10-18 10-16 10-17 10-17 10-31 10-30 10-27 10-28 10-27 10-28 11-5 10-25 10-14 17 Maturity. date .-.bu/acre.Maturity.Group.V.continued Progeny.P.5409RR USG.7553nRS USG.Allen Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.36N57 Dyna-Gro.32A53 MorSoy.RT.5388N Progeny.P.5218RR Asgrow.AG.6702 Progeny.P.6708RR Progeny.P.6208RR Desha Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Asgrow.AG.6301 R01-2346 Dyna-Gro.36T60 AGS.606.RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Dyna-Gro.35K73 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Deltapine.DP.7330RR Stonewall Asgrow.AG.7502 Progeny.P.7208RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 50.8 50.6 50.4 50.3 49.7 47.5 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.8 0.0 Maturity.Group.VI 65.1 59.8 59.3 58.9 54.0 51.9 50.3 44.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 Maturity.Group.VII 64.4 63.4 62.9 62.6 56.8 56.3 56.1 53.6 54.6 9.2 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 10. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT ShORTER, ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007-2009. Variety Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Maturity.Group.IV Progeny.P.4908RR Progeny.P.4949RR Progeny.P.4906RR Progeny.P.4807RR HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Asgrow.AG.5905 AGS.568RR USG.Allen Ozark USG.7553nRS Osage Progeny.P.5706RR USG.75Z98 Progeny.P.5650RR Progeny.P.5622RR Progeny.P.5218RR HALO.5:25 Terral.TV.55R15 Progeny.P.5319RR HALO.5:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.33C59 Dyna-Gro.35F55 Hutcheson USG.75M49 Dyna-Gro.32B57 Terral.TV.54R28 52.8 51.9 47.2 45.8 58.9 54.4 48.6 Maturity.Group.V 60.5 57.8 50.4 51.9 50.6 57.5 57.1 51.8 53.7 53.7 43.8 64.0 61.2 60.6 58.6 58.0 56.5 56.3 56.1 54.3 54.2 52.8 60.7 58.6 54.5 55.2 51.9 58.0 57.8 56.9 56.5 53.2 50.0 49.7 47.0 46.5 46.2 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.6 28.8 28.0 28.6 27.2 26.3 29.5 29.9 33.1 30.0 25.9 27.3 30.8 29.5 29.3 25.5 26.0 30.0 24.4 26.5 25.0 27.0 10-7 10-4 10-9 10-2 10-2 10-7 10-10 10-8 10-9 10-7 10-2 10-14 10-13 10-10 10-13 10-6 10-15 10-13 10-9 10-11 10-14 10-7 ontinued 53.9 50.6 48.4 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.9 34.1 34.9 31.9 33.0 32.8 36.0 9-21 9-22 9-22 9-20 10-8 9-30 10-10 Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch Maturity. date 2009 --------- bu/acre ------- PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 10. continued. Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Maturity.Group.VI Asgrow.AG.6301 Asgrow.AG.6702 Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Progeny.P.6708RR Progeny.P.6208RR Desha R01-2346 Dyna-Gro.36T60 AGS.606.RR Deltapine.DP.7330RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Stonewall Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Asgrow.AG.7502 Dyna-Gro.35K73 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Progeny.P.7208RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 51.9 65.1 54.0 59.8 59.3 58.9 50.3 44.5 39.2 Maturity.Group.VII 56.8 64.4 56.3 63.4 56.1 62.9 62.6 53.6 54.6 5.0 12.3 53.9 3.6 12.6 45.0 2.5 13.1 53.2 55.1 51.5 53.7 49.2 44.1 44.1 42.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 34.3 27.3 28.9 36.1 30.0 30.5 29.3 27.3 10-18 10-19 10-17 10-22 10-25 10-27 10-28 10-25 11-20 54.3 56.3 55.8 44.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 29.9 34.5 27.8 27.8 29.5 27.5 26.0 21.3 22.9 10-10 10-18 10-13 10-28 10-20 10-23 10-16 10-17 10-11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.5 37.5 22.0 25.0 23.0 27.0 9-30 10-8 10-11 10-6 10-4 10-8 19 Variety 2009 Maturity. date --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.V.continued MorSoy.RT.5168 Progeny.P.5409RR Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.36N57 Dyna-Gro.32A53 MorSoy.RT.5388N 51.6 50.8 50.3 49.7 47.5 47.3 20 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 11. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES ON VAIDEN SOIL, MARION JUNCTION, ALABAMA, 2009. Variety Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR HALO.4:65 Dyna-Gro.33C59 HALO.5:25 Armor.GP-533 Delta.King.52K6 MorSoy.RT.5168 HALO.5:65 Dyna-Gro.32A53 Osage Ozark Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 MorSoy.RT.5388N Dyna-Gro.33X55 Delta.King.5567 Dyna-Gro.36N57 Asgrow.AG.5905 Dyna-Gro.32B57 Armor.GP-500 Hutcheson 33.5 33.1 26.4 Maturity.Group.V 42.4 38.6 38.2 37.9 37.1 37.0 36.1 35.9 35.4 35.3 35.1 33.7 33.3 32.7 32.6 32.6 32.4 31.1 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.8 25.3 31.5 33.8 36.5 31.8 29.5 22.0 29.3 31.0 35.5 30.8 29.5 32.0 28.0 41.3 27.3 34.0 28.3 10-7 9-27 10-8 10-6 10-1 10-5 10-4 9-29 10-2 10-1 10-4 10-1 10-3 9-30 10-7 10-5 10-5 10-2 9-27 continued 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 42.0 36.5 9-28 10-3 9-30 Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. height - inches Maturity. date PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 11. CONTINUED. Variety Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.VI Desha Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Dyna-Gro.36T60 R01-2346 Asgrow.AG.6702 Asgrow.AG.6301 Dyna-Gro.35K73 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Deltapine.DP.7330RR Deltapine.DP.7870RR AGS.758.RR Asgrow.AG.7502 Benning Stonewall Woodruff AGS.747.RR Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 41.2 39.5 38.4 37.1 35.6 31.2 Maturity.Group.VII 41.5 38.6 35.8 35.0 34.4 34.1 34.1 31.9 31.9 30.6 30.5 25.4 Maturity.Group.VIII 32.2 19.5 34.2 4.5 12.4 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.3 41.5 33.7 10-24 10-27 10-10 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 30.8 40.5 38.5 36.3 40.3 32.3 40.3 39.5 36.0 34.8 34.8 10-17 10-18 10-23 10-22 10-16 10-22 10-19 10-25 10-18 10-18 10-16 10-22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 33.0 27.5 27.0 41.0 36.0 10-8 10-17 10-11 10-6 10-24 10-4 Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. height - inches - 21 Maturity. date 22 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 12. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES ON VAIDEN SOIL, MARION JUNCTION, ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007-2009 Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR HALO.4:65 Osage Ozark Asgrow.AG.5905 Dyna-Gro.33C59 HALO.5:25 Armor.GP-533 Delta.King.52K6 MorSoy.RT.5168 HALO.5:65 Dyna-Gro.32A53 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 MorSoy.RT.5388N Dyna-Gro.33X55 Delta.King.5567 Dyna-Gro.36N57 Dyna-Gro.32B57 Armor.GP-500 Hutcheson Asgrow.AG.6301 Asgrow.AG.6702 Desha Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Dyna-Gro.36T60 R01-2346 33.5 33.1 26.4 Maturity.Group.V 35.9 35.4 32.6 42.4 38.6 38.2 37.9 37.1 37.0 36.1 35.3 35.1 33.7 33.3 32.7 32.6 32.4 31.1 26.2 Maturity.Group.VI 31.2 35.6 41.2 39.5 38.4 37.1 36.4 36.1 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 33.0 35.3 33.0 33.0 27.5 27.0 10-7 10-22 10-8 10-17 10-11 10-6 40.4 40.3 38.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 22.3 27.0 36.4 29.8 25.3 31.5 33.8 36.5 31.8 29.5 31.0 35.5 30.8 29.5 32.0 28.0 27.3 34.0 28.3 10-2 10-3 10-9 10-7 9-27 10-8 10-6 10-1 10-5 10-4 10-1 10-4 10-1 10-3 9-30 10-7 10-5 10-2 9-27 † 0.0 0.3 0.5 34.0 42.0 36.5 9-28 10-3 9-30 Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch Maturity. date Variety 2009 --------- bu/acre ------- continued PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 12. CONTINUED. Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Maturity.Group.VII Deltapine.DP.7330RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Deltapine.DP.7870RR Stonewall Asgrow.AG.7502 Dyna-Gro.35K73 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR AGS.758.RR Benning Woodruff AGS.747.RR Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 34.4 35.0 34.1 30.6 31.9 41.5 38.6 35.8 34.1 31.9 30.5 25.4 Maturity.Group.VIII 32.2 19.5 34.2 3.0 12.0 37.3 1.8 9.2 0.0 1.0 0.4 1.4 37.3 41.5 33.1 38.4 37.5 36.9 34.9 33.9 0.6 0.8 1.5 0.9 2.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 34.4 36.0 38.1 34.8 39.5 36.8 30.8 40.5 32.3 39.5 34.8 34.8 Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch - 23 Variety 2009 Maturity. date --------- bu/acre ------- 10-16 10-18 10-25 10-16 10-23 10-17 10-18 10-23 10-19 10-18 10-16 10-22 10-24 10-27 10-10 †.The.2007.trial.was.not.planted.due.to.extreme.drought.conditions. 24 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 13. IRON ChLOROSIS RATING OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES ON SUMTER SOIL, MARION JUNCTION, ALABAMA, 2009†. Cultivar AGS.747.RR AGS.758.RR Armor.GP-500 Armor.GP-533 Asgrow.AG.5905 Asgrow.AG.6301 Asgrow.AG.6702 Asgrow.AG.7501 Asgrow.AG.7502 Au.02-2814 Benning Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Delta.King.52K6 Delta.King.5567 Deltapine.DP.7330RR Deltapine.DP.7870RR Desha Dyna-Gro.32A53 Iron.chlorosis. rating.† 9.4 7.9 9.0 8.9 8.3 7.9 7.9 9.1 8.3 8.4 6.8 8.8 9.4 8.1 7.3 8.6 9.1 7.6 7.4 5.8 7.6 Cultivar Dyna-Gro.32B57 Dyna-Gro.33C59 Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.35F55 Dyna-Gro.35K73 Dyna-Gro.36N57 Dyna-Gro.36T60 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR HALO.4:65 HALO.4:94 HALO.5:25 HALO.5:65 Hutcheson MorSoy.RT.5168 MorSoy.RT.5388N Osage Ozark Pritchard.RR R01-2346 Stonewall Woodruff Trial mean Iron.chlorosis. rating.† 7.6 9.0 8.6 7.8 8.0 9.1 7.6 8.4 9.3 8.0 7.0 4.3 8.0 8.8 8.3 5.5 7.5 8.4 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.0 † The trial was not harvested for yield ‡ Iron chlorosis ratings made on July 10, 2009. 1 = no chlorosis; 10 = plants losing leaves due to necrotic spots on leaves. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 14. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT FAIRhOPE, ALABAMA, 2009. Variety Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Progeny.P.4949RR HALO.5:25 Osage Progeny.P.5622RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR HALO.5:65 MorSoy.RT.5388N Progeny.P.5218RR Dyna-Gro.36N57 Progeny.P.5319RR Progeny.P.5706RR Hutcheson Dyna-Gro.32B57 Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.35F55 Ozark Asgrow.AG.5905 Progeny.P.5650RR MorSoy.RT.5168 Progeny.P.5409RR 55.2 52.1 50.1 43.6 Maturity.Group.V 65.0 64.8 62.1 59.7 58.8 58.8 58.4 57.8 57.5 57.2 55.8 55.2 55.1 54.9 54.8 53.4 52.7 51.6 50.4 2.5 1.5 2.5 3.8 2.8 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.3 2.8 3.2 2.8 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.2 3.2 4.0 3.0 1.3 2.8 2.0 1.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.3 2.5 1.3 1.3 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 32.0 30.5 35.3 32.8 34.3 33.3 31.3 32.3 33.8 37.3 32.0 35.0 35.3 32.8 32.8 37.8 35.8 39.0 44.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 2.3 1.3 2.3 38.5 38.0 45.8 43.0 Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. height - inches - 25 Maturity. date 10-1 10-1 10-12 9-29 10-10 10-3 10-13 10-6 10-13 10-5 10-7 10-8 10-10 10-12 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-12 10-3 10-7 10-9 10-1 10-10 continued 26 TABLE 14.CONTINUED. Variety ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.VI Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. height - inches - Maturity. date Progeny.P.6708RR Asgrow.AG.6702 R01-2346 Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Desha Asgrow.AG.6301 Progeny.P.6208RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Asgrow.AG.7502 Progeny.P.7208RR Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Deltapine.DP.7330RR Deltapine.DP.7870RR AGS.758.RR AGS.747.RR Woodruff Stonewall Benning Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 63.0 62.3 61.3 56.5 55.1 52.9 51.0 Maturity.Group.VII 62.3 59.5 59.4 59.2 57.7 56.5 55.6 55.1 54.1 49.6 49.5 48.6 Maturity.Group.VIII 58.0 43.5 55.8 6.1 10.5 2.5 3.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.0 2.8 3.2 2.8 1.3 2.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.9 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.3 2.5 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.6 33.0 38.5 30.0 32.3 38.3 35.3 38.8 36.5 39.5 33.8 35.5 35.3 37.0 36.0 39.0 41.5 36.3 36.5 35.8 37.0 40.0 36.1 10-19 10-21 10-12 10-13 10-13 10-10 10-17 10-27 10-28 10-21 10-25 10-21 10-17 10-21 10-18 10-25 10-15 10-16 10-17 10-28 10-27 10-13 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 15. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT FAIRhOPE, ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007-2009. Variety Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. 2009 avg avg --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Progeny.P.4949RR Dyna-Gro.33X55 Ozark Asgrow.AG.5905 Osage Dyna-Gro.32B57 HALO.5:25 Progeny.P.5622RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR HALO.5:65 MorSoy.RT.5388N Progeny.P.5218RR Dyna-Gro.36N57 Progeny.P.5319RR Progeny.P.5706RR Hutcheson Dyna-Gro.35F55 Progeny.P.5650RR MorSoy.RT.5168 Progeny.P.5409RR 55.2 52.1 50.1 43.6 Maturity.Group.V 55.1 54.8 53.4 64.8 55.2 65.0 62.1 59.7 58.8 58.8 58.4 57.8 57.5 57.2 55.8 54.9 52.7 51.6 50.4 49.3 52.3 46.2 59.2 47.1 53.8 53.6 51.8 2.5 3.2 2.4 2.0 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.8 2.8 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.3 2.8 2.3 3.5 3.3 4.0 3.0 1.8 1.5 1.6 2.0 1.1 1.3 2.0 1.3 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.1 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.5 36.8 36.1 43.2 29.4 37.4 32.0 35.3 32.8 34.3 33.3 31.3 37.6 33.8 37.3 28.9 32.8 35.8 39.0 44.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.0 2.3 1.3 2.3 38.5 38.0 45.8 43.0 Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch - 27 Maturity. date 10-1 10-1 10-12 9-29 10-3 10-6 10-7 9-30 9-30 10-10 10-13 10-6 10-13 10-5 10-7 10-5 10-10 10-12 10-2 10-12 10-9 10-1 10-10 continued 28 TABLE 15. CONTINUED. Variety ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. 2009 avg avg --------- bu/acre ------Maturity.Group.VI Lodging. score Averages Shattering. Plant. score height - inch - Maturity. date Asgrow.AG.6301 Asgrow.AG.6702 Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Progeny.P.6708RR R01-2346 Desha Progeny.P.6208RR Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Asgrow.AG.7501 Deltapine.DP.7870RR AGS.758.RR Deltapine.DP.7330RR Stonewall Asgrow.AG.7502 Progeny.P.7208RR Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR AGS.747.RR Woodruff Benning Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 52.9 62.3 56.5 63.0 61.3 55.1 51.0 45.1 52.5 47.8 50.1 2.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.3 2.5 3.0 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.0 2.5 2.5 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 38.8 41.8 35.1 33.0 30.0 38.3 38.8 37.3 40.7 42.8 39.2 39.3 38.1 42.5 33.8 35.5 41.5 36.3 35.8 40.4 41.4 37.2 10-10 10-19 10-11 10-19 10-12 10-13 10-17 10-22 10-26 10-21 10-19 10-18 10-18 10-25 10-21 10-25 10-25 10-15 10-17 10-26 10-26 10-12 Maturity.Group.VII 57.7 62.3 55.6 55.1 56.5 49.5 59.5 59.4 59.2 54.1 49.6 48.6 Maturity.Group.VIII 58.0 43.5 55.8 4.2 10.1 48.8 36.0 48.0 2.2 8.7 55.7 43.4 52.1 1.7 7.6 3.3 3.7 2.9 49.0 50.6 48.8 47.6 45.5 39.9 49.7 55.6 55.5 54.5 52.7 52.7 45.4 2.4 2.8 3.5 2.9 2.5 2.9 3.3 2.8 3.0 1.3 2.5 3.0 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 16. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT BREWTON, ALABAMA, 2009. Variety Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Progeny.P.4949RR Terral.TV.55R15 HALO.5:65 Ozark HALO.5:25 Progeny.P.5622RR Asgrow.AG.5905 Progeny.P.5650RR Progeny.P.5319RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 Hutcheson Progeny.P.5409RR Progeny.P.5706RR Terral.TV.54R28 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.32B57 Progeny.P.5218RR MorSoy.RT.5168 MorSoy.RT.5388N Osage Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.36N57 56.7 52.9 49.5 43.7 Maturity.Group.V 60.2 59.5 57.6 57.6 57.0 56.7 56.5 56.2 55.2 54.4 54.4 54.2 54.1 53.8 53.6 53.4 51.8 51.4 50.4 50.2 46.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.8 23.5 22.3 18.3 24.3 25.0 25.0 27.5 25.3 21.8 37.3 24.0 25.5 21.0 22.5 21.8 32.8 21.8 20.0 21.5 20.8 10-3 10-5 10-1 10-3 10-7 10-5 10-7 10-3 10-3 10-2 9-30 10-7 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-2 9-26 10-4 10-2 10-3 9-30 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.3 29.0 37.5 30.0 9-26 9-24 9-27 9-24 Lodging. score Shattering. Plant. score height - inches - 29 Maturity. date continued 30 TABLE 16. CONTINUED. Variety ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Yield - bu/acre Maturity.Group.VI Lodging. score Shattering. Plant. score height - inches - Maturity. date Progeny.P.6708RR Asgrow.AG.6702 Progeny.P.6208RR Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Desha R01-2346 Asgrow.AG.7501 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Benning Asgrow.AG.7502 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Woodruff Stonewall Progeny.P.7208RR AGS.758.RR AGS.747.RR Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 57.1 55.5 54.4 51.1 51.1 49.9 Maturity.Group.VII 59.2 58.5 56.9 56.4 53.0 52.9 51.7 51.5 51.1 46.7 Maturity.Group.VIII 55.9 50.1 53.7 5.4 9.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 31.5 26.5 21.8 24.3 20.5 35.3 34.5 28.5 37.5 24.8 27.3 27.3 25.8 26.8 27.8 30.2 36.3 26.7 10-11 10-14 10-8 10-8 10-10 10-6 10-17 10-19 10-12 10-20 10-14 10-13 10-10 10-12 10-13 10-15 10-25 10-21 10-7 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 17. PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AT BREWTON, ALABAMA, ThREE-YEAR SUMMARY, 2007-2009. Yield 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg Lodging. score 31 Variety 2009 Averages Shattering. Plant. Maturity. score height date .---------.bu/acre.------Maturity.Group.IV HALO.4:94 HALO.4:65 Croplan.Genetics.RC.4998RR Progeny.P.4949RR Ozark Terral.TV.55R15 HALO.5:65 HALO.5:25 Progeny.P.5622RR Asgrow.AG.5905 Progeny.P.5650RR Progeny.P.5319RR Dyna-Gro.35F55 Hutcheson Progeny.P.5409RR Progeny.P.5706RR Terral.TV.54R28 Croplan.Genetics.RC.5663RR Dyna-Gro.32B57 Progeny.P.5218RR MorSoy.RT.5168 MorSoy.RT.5388N Osage Dyna-Gro.33X55 Dyna-Gro.36N57 56.7 52.9 49.5 43.7 Maturity.Group.V 57.6 60.2 59.5 57.6 57.0 56.7 56.5 56.2 55.2 54.4 54.4 54.2 54.1 53.8 53.6 53.4 51.8 51.4 50.4 50.2 46.3 51.2 45.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .-.inch.31.3 29.0 37.5 30.0 25.7 28.8 23.5 18.3 24.3 25.0 25.0 27.5 25.3 21.8 37.3 24.0 25.5 21.0 22.5 21.8 32.8 21.8 20.0 21.5 20.8 9-26 9-24 9-27 9-24 10-3 10-3 10-5 10-3 10-7 10-5 10-7 10-3 10-3 10-2 9-30 10-7 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-2 9-26 10-4 10-2 10-3 9-30 continued 32 TABLE 17. CONTINUED. ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Yield Averages Lodging. score Shattering. score Plant. Maturity. height date Variety 2009 2-yr... 3-yr. avg avg .---------.bu/acre.------Maturity.Group.VI Croplan.Genetics.RC.6298 Progeny.P.6708RR Asgrow.AG.6702 Progeny.P.6208RR Desha R01-2346 Croplan.Genetics.RT.7355 Stonewall AGS.758.RR Asgrow.AG.7501 Dyna-Gro.V76N9RR Benning Asgrow.AG.7502 Woodruff Progeny.P.7208RR AGS.747.RR Au.02-2814 Pritchard.RR Trial mean LSD(0.10) CV (%) 51.1 57.1 55.5 54.4 51.1 49.9 Maturity.Group.VII 53.0 51.7 51.1 59.2 58.5 56.9 56.4 52.9 51.5 46.7 Maturity.Group.VIII 55.9 50.1 53.7 3.2 8.0 47.7 44.6 47.9 2.3 8.8 50.5 46.0 46.2 2.1 10.6 47.3 46.3 48.6 46.3 44.8 44.2 49.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .-.inch.28.4 24.3 31.5 26.5 24.3 20.5 27.6 29.7 28.3 35.3 34.5 28.5 37.5 27.3 25.8 27.8 34.4 37.3 27.2 10-6 10-11 10-14 10-8 10-10 10-6 10-15 10-14 10-15 10-17 10-19 10-12 10-20 10-13 10-12 10-15 10-24 10-23 10-7 PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 18. CULTURAL PRACTICES FOR SOYBEAN VARIETY TESTS IN 2009. Location Type.of test Date planted Row width - inches Belle.Mina Group.IV Group.IV-V Group.VI-VII Crossville Group.IV Group.IV-V Group.VI-VII Tallassee Shorter Marion.Junction Group.IV Standard Standard.(Sumter) Standard.(Vaiden) Brewton Fairhope Standard Standard April.24 June.1 June.2 April.27 May.20 May.21 April.23 June.1 May.22 June.2 June.3 June.9 7 30 30 7 30 30 7 36 36 36 36 38 Treflan,.Valor Treflan,.Valor Treflan,.Valor Valor,.FirstRate Valor,.Select Valor,.Select None None None None Dual Herbicide used Fertilizer. applied 33 none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended none.recommended Ultra.Blazer,.Poast,. Reflex none.recommended TABLE 19. SOIL TYPES FOR SOYBEAN TESTS, 2009. Location Belle.Mina Crossville Tallassee Shorter Marion.Junction Marion.Junction Fairhope Soil.Type Emory.silt.loam Wynnville.fine.sandy.loam Augusta.silt.loam Cowarts.loamy.sand Sumter.clay.(high.pH.soil) Vaiden.clay Malbis.fine.sandy.loam 34 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION TABLE 20. RAINFALL AT TEST LOCATIONS DURING GROWING SEASON, 2009. Month May Days 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 July 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-31 Belle.Mina 7.39 1.65 0.14 1.03 0.27 0.59 0.23 0.00 0.76 0.42 0.00 0.00 2.85 0.05 1.46 0.13 1.30 0.51 1.86 0.00 0.39 1.49 0.32 0.62 0.32 0.40 1.33 2.02 1.26 3.32 1.18 2.12 1.78 0.22 0.34 1.86 Crossville 3.59 2.79 0.09 0.36 0.72 1.34 0.50 0.00 0.45 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.06 1.31 2.39 0.00 0.01 2.70 0.95 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.69 0.78 0.01 0.52 0.17 3.63 1.34 0.71 1.55 0.60 3.26 0.35 0.10 1.21 Shorter 1.74 5.90 0.79 1.78 1.00 1.48 2.32 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 1.46 0.38 0.07 0.92 2.13 0.40 0.70 0.49 2.11 1.64 0.41 0.07 3.84 1.47 0.71 0.30 2.34 0.49 1.96 0.69 0.23 1.73 Marion. Junction 0.90 1.11 0.58 0.45 1.65 1.00 0.60 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 1.15 3.40 0.65 0.10 1.26 4.21 0.30 0.90 0.22 0.17 0.94 0.10 1.53 1.80 1.52 0.45 0.10 0.15 0.20 2.32 0.20 1.40 1.29 Brewton 2.83 0.77 1.13 0.85 2.06 0.99 3.12 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.14 0.00 1.09 0.33 2.33 0.00 2.35 1.38 0.54 2.01 2.42 0.42 1.40 0.31 1.50 1.77 0.61 1.33 0.02 0.90 1.04 0.99 0.33 1.02 2.30 Fairhope 3.60 0.00 0.03 1.48 2.17 0.02 2.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 1.33 0.98 0.72 0.52 0.19 1.32 1.45 1.48 0.29 0.14 1.32 1.77 1.24 3.09 1.66 2.56 0.39 0.42 0.04 1.97 0.99 0.94 1.70 1.55 0.52 .------------------------------------.inches.-------------------------------------- June August September October PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES IN ALABAMA, 2009 TABLE 21. ENTRIES AND SOURCES OF SEED FOR SOYBEAN TESTS, 2009. Source AG.South.Genetics,.LLC Albany,.Georgia Alabama.Crop.Imp..Assoc. Auburn,.Alabama Auburn.University Auburn,.Alabama Cache.River.Valley.Seed,.LLC Cash,.Arkansas Cullum.Seeds Fisher,.Arkansas Croplan.Genetics/Land.O’.Lakes Elkmont,.Alabama Crop.Production.Services Leland,.Mississippi Monsanto St..Louis,.Missouri Progeny.Ag.Products Wynne,.Arkansas Schillinger.Seed.Inc. West.Des.Moines,.Iowa Southern.States.Coop. Richmond,.Virginia Syngenta/NK.Brand.Seed Laurinburg,.North.Carolina Terral.Seed,.Inc. Lake.Providence,.Louisiana UniSouth.Genetics,.Inc. Nashville,.Tennessee University.of.Arkansas Fayetteville,.Arkansas US.Seeds.by.Hornbeck.Seed.Co. De.Witt,.Arkansas Entry AGS.brand.varieties Prichard.RR,.Woodruff,.Benning Hutcheson,.Stonewall Au.02-2814 MorSoy.brand.varieties Armor.brand.varieties Delta.King.brand.varieties Croplan.Genetics. Dyna-Gro.brand.varieties Asgrow.AG.brand.varieties, Deltapine.DP.brand.varieties Progeny.brand.varieties Schillinger.brand.varieties SS.RT.&.LL.brand.varieties NK.S.brand.varieties Terral.TV.brand.varieties USG.brand.varieties Allen UA.4805,.R01-2346, Desha,.Osage,.Ozark HALO.brand.varieties 35