-,tit?* -. 4 -~~:*~ ~.~ 4 i-"~-- --- - M 1982 Regional Cotton Fusariumn Wilt Report Department of Agronomy and Soils Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Gale A. Buchanan, Director Departmental Series No. 78 Auburn University, Alabama December, 1982 1982 REGIONAL COTTON FUSARIUM WILT REPORT1 A. J. Kappelman, Jr. 2 The fusarium wilt resistance of cultivars and elite breeding lines sub- mitted by 25 cooperators was evaluated. The entries were grown at the Plant Breeding Unit at Tallassee,. Alabama, on a Wickham sandy loam known to be highly infested with both fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum Schlect. f. vasinfectum [Atk.] Snyd. & Hans.) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne app.). Both a susceptible ('Rowden') and resistant ('McNair 235') check were also evaluated. Rowden was planted in row 5 (15, 25, ... , 305) and McNair 235 in row 10 (20, 30, ... , 300) and in every tenth row thereafter throughout the test. All plots were bedded, single rows, 30 feet long, spaced 40 inches apart and separated by 6-foot alleys. Four replications of the test entries were arranged in a systematically randomized complete block design. Entries were planted on May 3, plots thinned to 3 to 4 plants per row-foot on June 15, and established live plant counts recorded on June 21. Wilted plants were counted, removed, and recorded three times during the growing season (July 7, August 11, and September 8), and remaining live plants counted and recorded on September 9. The percent wilted plants per plot was then determined and mean wilting for a given entry calculated. Environmental conditions for the 7 weeks immediately following planting were cool and wet. As a result, a considerable amount of seedling disease occurred and plant development was slow. However, by July 7 some wilting was becoming evident. Additional wilting occurred throughout the season, but 1 This is a progress report for information and guidance of cooperators, the interpretation of which may be modified with additional experimentation. 2 Research Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS, Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Soils, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. 2 considerable variability in wilting occurred, especially over replications. The most severe wilting occurred in replication 1, followed by that in replications 2, 4, and 3, respectively, but the lowest variability in wilting occurred in replications I and 3. Average wilting over the entire test for Rowden (124 plots) was 56.6 per- cent, but incidence ranged from 2 to 100 percent. The incidence of wilting in McNair 235, the resistant check, ranged from 0 to 73 percent but averaged only 16.8 percent. Wilting varied in different areas of a given replication, par- tially due to the large number of entries per replication. Critical evaluation of a given entry should be made relative to those checks closest to the entry within each replication. Evaluation of breeding progess or evaluation of entries over years should be made only between values determined relative to the mean wilting of Rowden for a given year. Entries submitted by W. C. Johnson are commonly-grown cultivars or highly advanced commercial materials; therefore, these are listed by name. Entries submitted by other cooperators are listed by their coded numbers. Additional information regarding the genetic background of a specific coded entry should be obtained from the named cooperator. 3- ,Reional Cotton Fusariu Wilt Test Rests, e 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication. designation 1 2 3 4 Mean Keith R. Jones, Delta & Pine Land Co., Scott, Mississippi DPZ_-1 76.7 70.6 7.3 12.5 41.8 DPL-2 38.5 39.4 36.4 8.3 30.6 DPL-3 35.7 100.0 33.3 27.3 49.1 DPL-4 58.3 81.8 85.7 5.3 57.8 Rowden 100.0 100.0 62.9 16.4 69.8 DPL-5 16.7 90.9 14.3 7.9 32.4 DPL-6 20.0 41.7 50.0 2.0 28.4 DPL-7 6.2 74.0 40.6 12.8 33.4 DPL-8 13.8 42.9 37.0 25.0 29.7 McNair 235 12.6 72.2 42.9 908 34.4 DPL-9 55.4 30.8 18o6 17.9 30.7 DPL-10 58.5 33.3 35.5 225 37.4 Carl A. Moosberg, GroAgri Seed Company, Lubbock, Texas CAM-1 32.9 21.6 4.9 13.5 18.2 CAM-2 32.5 25.6 8.2 6.9 18.3 Rowden 94 o.0 88.4 34.8 37.0 63.6 CAM-3 59.4 3.4 24o2 25.9 28.2 CAM-4 26.7 93.0 1.7 14.0 33.8 CAM-5 18.9 21.6 5.6 92.3 34.6 Mason Hawkins, Ranger Seed Co., Tahoka, Texas RSC-1 29.0 25.0 23.1 24.1 25.3 McNair 235 10 3 4.9 20.2 5.4 20.4 RSC-2 15.1 24.4 4.9 20.0 16.1 RSC-3 14.7 18.9 6.8 35.3 18.9 RSC-4 32.3 28.6 15.5 15.3 22.9 RSC-5 35.8 33.3 2.8 11.9 21.0 Rowden 72.5 34.2 1901 60.0 464 RSC-6 10.2 17.2 0.0 23.5 12.7 RSC-7 86 9.8 26.0 11.1 13o9 RSC-8 37.7 15.6 98.6 5,4 39.3 RSC-9 40.5 15.1 20.3 4,4 20.1 McNair 235 6.9 14.3 9.7 9.0 - 10,0 Jerry L. Baker, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Vernon, Texas PR-I 61.5 29.6 7.0 15.8 28.5 PR-2 66.7 20.0 9.8 9.3 26.4 PR-3 42?4 21.3 3.7 4.5 18.0 PR-4 24,6 26.5 13.6 29.4 23.5 Rowden 69.1 40.6 33.3 67.6 52.6 PR-5 49.0 21.6 13.9 5.5 22.5 PR-6 24.1 27.7 5.9 11.5 17.3 PR-7 26.3 25.3 4.7 36.4 23.2 PR-8 18.9 22.8 2.9 35.0 19.9 McNair 235 20.5 13.6 17.5 12.9 16.1 PR-9 25.8 18,3 8.2 7~4 14.9 PR-10 1.5 18.8 8.2 21.7 12.6 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean J. B. Weaver, Jr, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia JBW-1 3.2 1.8 15.0 2.0 5.5 JBW-2 7.6 11.4 8.2 000 6.8 Rowden 66.7 75.9 35.3 51.2 57.3 JBW-3 40.5 45.3 5.7 31.8 30.8 JBW-4 40.4 35.7 10.4 35.9 30.6 JBW-5 28.0 25.0 70.6 18.9 35.6 JBW-6 16.7 11.8 0.0 10.2 9.7 McNair 235 12.2 6.6 3.4 24.1 11.6 JBW-7 0.0 18.9 21.1 14.3 13.6 JBW-8 35.5 33.3 3.3 3.7 19.0 R. B. Bridge, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, Mississippi RB-1 31.4 5.3 24.6 1.9 15.8 RB-2 30.4 2.2 37.9 5.4 19.0 Rowden 59.6 70.9 8.0 66.7 51.3 RB-3 49.3 6.8 2.8 31.6 22.6 RB-4 33,3 20.0 2.1 7.0 15.6 RB-5 26.8 7.8 0.0 58.5 23.3 RB-6 15.9 6.1 0.0 534 18.8 McNair 235 13.0 12.5 7.8 23.1 14.1 RB-7 48.3 12.7 0.0 21.6 20.6 RB-8 14.1 6.2 1.9 8.1 7.6 RB-9 5.0 13.8 9.1 10.3 9.6 RB-10 45.3 14.3 2504 28.6 28.4 Rowden 100,0 64.3 39.1 .33.3 59.2 Steve Wilhelm, University of California, Berkley, California Acala 18.4 17.3 105 6.1 10,8 Jerry D. Carrol, Delta & Pine Land Co., Lubbock, Texas JDC-1 28.6 18.6 18.4 41.0 26o7 JDC-2 37.5 13.3 44.3 55.5 37.7 JDC-3 63.5 42.9 13.8 11.1 32Q8 McNair 235 34.8 14.1 1.2 13,6 15.9 JDC-4 15Q9 7.5 29.2 26.6 19.8 JDC-5 24o2 37.2 21.3 35o7 29.6 JDC-6 71.5 93.3 2.4 7ol 43.6 JDC-7 0,0 26.7 14.0 0,0 10.2 Rowden 85.3 53.4 17.3 52.3 52.1 JDC-8 82?8 13.8 16.9 16.6 32.5 JDC-9 52.9 7.1 7.0 0.0 16.8 JDC-10 34.1 35.9 4.2 5.1 19.8 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by rep1ication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean Delbert C. Hess, Cargill Seed Division, Plainview, Texas DH-1 49.3 20.5 18.1 11.3 24.8 McNair 235 65.9 42.4 0.0 8.1 29.1 DH-2 57.1 81.8 4.5 15.3 39.7 DH-3 17.6 50.0 9.8 22.2 24.9 DH-4 36.8 58.5 16.6 3.7 28.9 DH-5 3504 15.2 18.9 25?0 23.6 Rowden 91.8 98.6 23.1 24.1 594 DH-6 22.4 25.5 13.0 7.7 17.2 DH-7 11.9 44.0 2.2 14.9 18.2 DH-8- 15.2 15.6 3.8 3.4 9.5 DH-9 12.5 18.9 9.8 10.7 13.0 McNair 235 16.8 22.8 3.4 12.8 14.0 DH-10 45.5 77.8 38.8 39.3 50.4 L.. S. Bird, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas CAMD-21-S-7-81 24.5 7.0 3.6 0.0 8.8 CABCS'-1-81 27.1 15.7 0.0 13.8 14.2 CABU' CS-2-81 10.8 l0.7 2.7 8.3 8.1 Rowden 85.7 84.7 26.5 78,8 68.9 LEBOBCS'-1-81 40.4 20.0 23.8 16.7 25.2 LEBOCAS-1-81 0.0 20.0 0.0 11.8 8.0 LEBOCAS-2-81 10.0 19.2 11.1 0.0 10.1 LEBOCAS'-3-81 11.1 23.5 0.0 4.3 9.7 McNair 235 11.0 2.9 5.1 29.9 12.2 LEBOCAS'-4-81 10.3 25.0 26.8 25.7 22.0 LEBOCAS'5-81 28.6 60.0 18.9 0.0 26.9 LEBOCDS'-1-81 28.1 8.1 13.5 16.3 16.5 LEBOCDS'-2'81 46.2 7.6 8.3 0.0 15.5 Lynn McDonald, Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co., Hartsville, South Carolina Rowden 92.4 40.3 50.0 63.2 61.5 LM-1 25.9 14.3 16.3 17.6 18.5 LM-2 5.9 41.2 17.1 9.0 18.3 LM-3 27.8 18.3 25.6 3.0 18.7 LM-4 61.0 11.4 12.1 6.2 22.7 McNair 235 5.6 3.6 9.0 4.5 5.7 LM-5 21.2 498 4,8 10.3 10.3 LM-6 38.3 10.1 31.1 9.5 22.2 LM-7 30.8 4.3 32.1 13.8 20.2 LM-8 30.9 10.4 11.9 1292 16.4 Rowden 59.7 32.0 14 8 56.5 40.8 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean Kamal El-Zik, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas KEZ-1 20.6 23.8 0.0 12.2 14.2 KEZ-2 20.0 19.4 0.0 31.2 17.6 KEZ-3 24.5 3.1 0.0 8.2 9.0 KEZ-4 15.2 6.1 14.3 12.0 11.9 McNair 235 20.2 17,7 23.1 21.8 20.7 KEZ-5 0.0 32.4 0.0 58.2 22.6 KEZ-6 22.2 106 6.7 1.9 10.4 KEZ-7 16.7 9.7 21.4 12.8 15.2 KEZ-8 16.4 7.7 0.0 11.3 8.8 Rowden 78.8 49.0 68.3 82.0 69.5 KEZ-9 6.8 9.8 9.7 4.3 7.6 KEZ-10 20.0 10,2 0.0 33.3 15.9 L. L. Barton, Rogers Delinted Cottonseed Co., Waco, Texas LLB-1 17.8 7.9 57.5 38.4 30.4 LLB-2 55.4 10.9 22.2 80.3 42.2 McNair 235 1.5 15.6 14.3 36.0 16.8 LLB-3 50.0 4.9 13.0 98.2 41.5 LLB-4 35.4 18.2 14.3 26.7 23.6 LLB-5 27.6 17.9 31.6 18.2 23.8 LLB-6 21.4 10.3 7.5 18.9 14.5 Rowden 42.9 10.7 32.9 91.4 44.5 LLB-7 31.1 12.0 40.6 60.0 35.9 LLB-8 39.8 7.8 21.8 32.0 25.4 LLB-9 25.0 55.7 54.3 28.3 40.8 LLB-10 57.1 13.8 16.9 65.1 38.2 Richard Percy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas McNair 235 41.7 18.9 15.9 7.7 21.0 RP-1 41.0 4.2 0.0 76.1 30.3 RP-2 14.7 14.3 57.8 26.2 28.2 RP-3 29.6 2.1 31.5 13.5 19.2 RP-4 72.5 24.0 29.1 70.4 49.0 Rowden 88.9 58.3 43.9 65.0 64.0 RP-5 7.5 13.5 2.3 25.0 12.1 RP-6 --- 4.0 13.3 26.7 14.7 RP-7 40.0 45.0 22.0 19.0 31.5 RP-8 37.0 59.1 27.6 36.0 39.9 McNair 235 51.3 23.6 3.3 11.3 22.4 RP-9 4.8 17ol 43 28?9 13.8 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean D. L. Van Horn, Northrup King Seed Co., Yuma, Arizona KNX-1 35.8 15.3 2.1 4.8 14.5 KNX-2 11.7 1.6 19.8 10.0 10.8 KNX-3 28.4 21.7 24.6 23.3 24.5 Rowden 62.2 57.1 65,9 50.0 58.8 KNX-4 30.0 14,3 26o9 18.6 22,4 KNX-5 63,0 35,0 4.7 27.6 32.6 KNX-6 40.4 180 50.0 3.0 27.8 KNX-7 49.4 23.9 57.1 21.0 37.8 McNair 235 39.4 8.3 18.4 1.6 16.9 KNX-8 53.5 42.0 3.8 11.7 27.8 KNX-9 24.6 26.7 20.0 16.9 22.0 KNX-10 37.7 17.8 4o3 19.0 20.4 Henry Webb, Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co., Hartsville, South Carolina C-1 20.2 11.9 119 1.2 11.3 Rowden 64.1 75,.0 74.5 7.7 55o3 C-2 27.5 48,1 22o2 0.0 24.4 C-3 225 82.3 4.0 3.8 28.2 C-4 20.0 66.7 5.5 18.3 27.6 C-5 22.8 48.4 5.1 11.4 21.9 McNair 235 5.6 22.0 9.5 8a3 11.4 C-6 28.0 53.1 31.0 10.4 30.6 C-7 23.7 33.3 9.1 14l1 20.0 C-8 36.7 21.0 8,6 00 16.6 C-9 , 17.2 22o6 8.0 5.8 13.4 Rowden 93.1 42.6 55.4 42.9 58.5 C-10 37,2 19.3 4.2 23.7 21.1 A. G. Douglas, Hollandale Agricultural Services, Hollandale, Mississippi HAS-1201 20.7 21.4 5.7 8.9 14.2 HAS-1202 7.9 10.9 15.9 1.5 9.0 HAS-1203 21.4 14.3 2.0 13.3 12.8 McNair 235 8.2 5.5 4.2 3o5 5.4 HAS-1204 7.1 6.4 26o2 12.3 13.0 HAS-1205 11.0 5.8 16.5 18.4 12.9 HAS-1206 18.0 4.4 15.9 12.2 12.6 HAS-1207 34.4 4.8 19.2 24.6 20.8 Rowden 46.2 44.8 60.3 33.3 46.2 HAS-1208 6.1 33.4 15.9 11.1 16.6 HAS-1209 1.4 27.5 37,3 15.3 20.4 HAS-1210 5.7 7.7 14.0 5.3 8.2 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean John Green, Northrup King Seed Co., Leland, Mississippi KNX-1 14.1 11.1 9.7 8.5 10.8 McNair 235 40.7 21.7 5.4 3.9 17.9 KNX-2 16.7 7.1 39.0 10.3 18.3 KNX-3 12.2 16.4 5.1 14.9 12.2 KNX-4 32.4 10.7 14.8 2.9 15.2 KNX-5 10.6 10.3 28.0 2.6 12.9 Rowden 47.6 510 57.4 55.4 52.8 KNX-6 11.5 6.8 18.5 14.9 12.9 KNX-7 16.7 12.3 6.1 21.7 14.2 KNX-8 34.0 24.0 17.4 10.9 21.6 KNX-9 15,7 31.7 31.8 21O0 25.0 McNair 235 17.9 21.1 8.5 14.9 15.6 KNX-10 13.8 5.3 15.4 30.4 16.2 L. M. Verhalen, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma OK-1 76.2 46.7 57.3 32*9 53.3 OK-2 45.6 11.1 28,8 39.5 31.2 OK-3 41.4 31.9 30.1 91.2 48.6 Rowden 70.2 67.9 65.7 89.6 73.4 OK-4 85.5 41.1 55.3 90,7 68.2 OK-5 55.7 58.5 67.9 58.1 60.0 OK-6 18.2 4,8 19.1 16o9 14.8 OK-7 18.2 32.7 17.5 68.9 34.3 McNair 235 12.3 17o8 15.2 21.1 16.6 OK-8 44.4 31.7 20o0 66.7 40o7 OK-9 14.4 19.7 17.6 15.9 16Q9 OK-10 61.5 45.7 5.2 42.1 38.6 C. W. Manning, Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co., Stoneville, Mississippi CWM-1 32.9 5.4 4a6 6.3 12.3 Rowden 59.1 23.7 7.6 90.5 45.2 CWM-2 13.3 19.8 31.1 10.1 18,o6 CWM-3 25.0 13.5 8.1 26.0 18.2 CWM-4 20.3 4.5 13.3 25.0 15.8 CWM-5 9o5 5.9 14.4 35.8 16.4 McNair 235 15.5 13.3 13.8 692 12.2 CWM-6 32,9 3.7 5,0 13.0 13,6 CWM-7 3, Q 38.2 21, 3 9,3 18.0_ CWD4-8 19.7 5.1 1.5 19.4 11.4 CWM-9 10.5 4.4 10.5 9.6 8.8 Rowden 88.0 38.7 19.4 66.7 53.2 CWM-10 39.1 16.7 26.4 49.1 32.8 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results,1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replicatio desigj tion1 2 3 )n 4 Mean iSiana 35.4 20.2 42.9 14.5 31.2 18o2 10.5 11. 3 36.7 17.1 5.7 14.0 4.6 11.2 33e3 19.2 54.4 51.8 13.3 22.9 4.5 15.7 00. 20,5 mn Jack E. Jones, Louisiana State UniversityBaton-Rouge, Lou. JJ-1 14.3 6.3 24.6 JJ-.2 11.7 1.8 1.7 JJ-3 32.1 9.5 000 McNair 235 11.2 18.8 4.6 JJ-4 17.6 8.1 6.1 JJ-5 27.1 1,5 21,7 JJ"6 2.4 1905 18.5 JJ-7 29.8 905 4.4 Rowden 86.1 64.8 1.8 JJ-8 54.3 11.9 12.2 J-.,9 25.416.4 164 JJ-l0 50.5 23.6.80 To W. Cui, ttSDA-ARS- Pee Dee Experiment Station, Florence, TWC-1 5.5 0.0 15.2 McNair 235 19.7 74.6 10.3 TWC-2 42.4 100.0 0.0 TWC-3 45.7 48o3 0,00. TWCq~w4 24.2 36.4 2.w3 TWC-5 15.6 88.7 6Q5 Rowden 91,2 98.00 16.7 TWC-6 26Q. 12.9 000 TWC-7 33,8 24.o7 13 f9 TWC-8 15.2 2.6 3.0O TWC-9 13.0 24.4 4.3 McNair 235 9.0 30.8 5.8 TWC-10 20.2 40.6 000 Carolina 8.8 27.7 43,8 24.2 21 A 4 29:9 71.4 17,0 20.09 9Q7 150*6 17.e3 17.9 Re Le Shepherd, USDA-ARS, Auburn Universityi RLS-1 48.9 58*0 RLS-2 20.7 24*5 RLS-3 9.9 7.2 Rowden 75,5 40.8 RLS-4 41.0 5.09 RLS-5 21.1 4.4 RLS-6 18.8 508 RLS-7 34,2 16.4 McNair 235 41.9 9.6 RLS-8 14.8 20Q0 RLS-9 28.97 21.0 RLS-10. 37.7 20.5 RLS-11 41,6 000 Rowden 50.*7 53,7 RLS-12 9.6 14.o3 -Auburn, Alabama 9*4 4o3 0.0 32.2 61 *8 12.8 4.9 7. 0 190 3.1l 26.5 4.0 21.6 76.4 4.8 16.4 13.6 2.2 54.2 23.4 19.3 19.6 99, 6.0 0.0 13.7 1.8 5,5 44.3 5,1 33.2 1508 4.8 50.7 33Q0 14o4 12o3 16.8 14e.6 9.*5 22.5 19.09 17o2 56.3 8 o4 South 14.7 6.3 32.8 2.8 3Q9v0 8.7 79-.7 29 *1 11.1. 17.9 20.7 23.5 10. 7 .L ~ULU ~ UUW~ CYUII L ~~ Y~L;i Il ~ ~-~Lll~~lllrrII~~ I1I~LIII1III LI C-~ II r .I L -_I~~ L- rtli~ i U / /i /1 10 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test Results, 1982 Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, Alabama Test entry Percent wilt by replication designation 1 2 3 4 Mean W. P. Sappenfield, Univ. of Mo. Delta Center, Portageville, Missouri MO-1 5.3 100.0 12.5 0.0 29.4 MO-2 15.8 4.3 11.3 3.3 8.7 MO-3 7.6 1105 8.3 22.2 12.4 McNair 235 20.0 7.5 37.3 14,3 19.8 MO-4 6.2 2,7 14.0 3.2 6.5 MO-5 18.8 19.1 0.0 1.7 9.9 MO-6 6.7 34.6 5.0 12.7 14.8 MO-7 3.8 12.7 5.6 0.0 5.5 Rowden 79.7 46.4 73.0 42.9 60.5 MO-8 4.9 12.0 3.6 8.5 7.2 MO-9 8.2 15.8 35.5 12.1 17o9 MO-10 18,6 18.9 0.0 2,1 9.9 W. C. Johnson, Jr., Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama Stoneville 825 57.5 28.2 24.1 40.0 37.4 McNair 235 29.4 27.5 1906 24.6 25.3 Stoneville 213 19.7 25.4 15.6 42,3 25.8 DES 56 27.6 16,3 5,7 22.8 181l Hancock 59.1 21.4 23.1 63,3 41,7 DES 422 55.6 3.8 3.5 33.8 24.2 Rowden 79.1 48.7 34.6 96.4 64.7 Delcot 311 17.6 5.4 7.1 7.1 9.3 Coker 80903 7.4 3.8 5.1 14.5 7.7 Deltapine 26 22.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 8.8 Coker 310 31.9 16.4 11.6 12,2 18.0 McNair 235 21.4 9,0 17.5 1.8 12.4 Coker 3Q4 26.7 40.0 3.2 9.0 19.7 Deltapine 61 14.3 47.1 13.5 14.3 22.3 Coker 315 - 13.9 42.9 0.0 17,0 18.4 Deltapine 62 68.1 55,8 10,9 54,2 47.2 Rowden 54.3 74,1o 9.2 64.9 50.6 Deltapine 55 39.2 0"0. 2.9. 19,2 15.3 Coker 3131 25Q7 20QO0 11.1 27.1 21.0 Deltapine 41 31.2 27.3 9.4 6.1 18.5 Coker 208 44?9 28.1 8.8 9o2 22,8 McNair 235 20.0 19o3 11,6 14,5 16.4 Deltapine 90 12o3 28.1 0.0 3.2 1009 Stoneville 506 17.0 26.1 1,o3 1.5 11.5 Deltapine 6150 16.0 21.4 6,0 4.4 12,0 McNair 220 16.0 24.1 16.1 38.5 23.7 Rowden 70.0 45.2 4.7 55.0 43,7 Injormation contained herein is available to al/ persons regardless (f'race. color, sex, or national origin.