Alabama I 11di I .jiilvi 1975-vn 309BOI fII -, I IT' Ler'ar-"ten,: of A~ronc;,r and So ils De-jar ental Series No. 63 Alabar. a .Ag-Uum a DerTent S zatic- GaeA. Buc anan, Direr o - ufr -.ri ers u ur n : r&i Ala'-a Table of Contents Page Introduction........ ............................................. 5 Sample Numbers.................................................... 5 Soil Fertility Results ............................................ 7 Fertilizer Ratios................................................ 8 Alabama Soil :Test Summary, July 1, 1975-June 30, 1980 Henry C. Williams, Clyde E. Evans, and Raymond A. Hoyum * Introduction The Auburn University Soil Testing Laboratory has been in operation since 1953. The soil testing program in Alabama is a cooperative effort between the Alabama Cooperative Extension Service and the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. The Extension Service is responsible for distribution of soil test supplies, information, and education about soil testing. The Experiment Station is responsible for the research on which the lime and fertilizer recommendations are based, operates the laboratory, and makes the actual recommendations. In addition to soil test recommendations for farmers and homeowners, soil test analyses for the Agricultural Experiment Station are also conducted in the Soil Testing Laboratory. A plant analysis service is also provided for pecan and fruit growers and for "trouble-shooting" fertility problems with all crops during the growing season. Sample Numbers The purpose of this summary is to present the soil test results of all soil samples for farmers and homeowners from July 1, 1975, to June 30, 1980. Because of the large number of soil samples analyzed, this summary shows trends have developed during the last 5 years in the fertility status of the agricultural soils in Alabama. *Graduate Research Assistant, and Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Soils, and Agronomist, Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, respectively. 5 The number of soil samples analyzed for farmers and homeowners increased steadily during the first 25 years of operation. The largest number of soil samples analyzed.in a single year was 71,747 in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1976,and ending June 30, 1977. (This did not include approximately 10,000 research soil samples that are analyzed each year for the Agricultural Experiment Station.) During the next 3 years (1977-1980), the Soil Testing Laboratory analyzed almost 60,000 soil samples per year for farmers and homeowners. The 10,000 fewer samples during these 3 years is attributed to a decrease of 7,300 soil samples for pasture and hay crops and a decrease of 4,200 soil samples analyzed for row crops, see tables 1-5. Trends during the 3-year period, 1976-1980, show a 35 percent decrease in soil samples for corn, a 20 percent decrease in soil samples for cotton, a 6 percent decrease in soil samples for peanuts, but a 200 percent increase in the number of soil samples for soybeans. Soil samples for pasture and hay crops decreased 35 percent, and the number of soil samples for horticultural crops only increased slightly. Of the total number of soil samples received by the Soil Testing Laboratory in 1979-80, 47 percent were for row crops, 28 percent were for pasture and hay crops, and 25 percent were for horticultural crops. In comparison, the percentages were 40, 38, and 22 percent, respectively, in 1975-76. Tables 2-4 show where the soil samples came from by county and by districts of the Alabama Cooperative Extension Service. Table 5 shows the 12 counties that sent in the most soil samples for each year and for the 5-year period beginning July 1, 1975, and ending June 30, 1980. Houston County sent in over 5 percent of the soil samples during this 6 period and the top i2 counties sent in nearly 38 percent of the total number of soil samples. Soil Fertility Results The relative distribution of soil samples, according to the levels of phosphorus and potassium, are shown in figures 1-3. The total number of soil samples is divided into three crop groups: (1) row crops, (2) pasture and hay crops, and (3) horticultural crops. The actual percentages are shown in table 6 which also includes the levels of magnesium. Except for horticultural crops, the soil samples testing Medium or lower in P or K need fertilizer and soil samples testing High or higher in P or K do not need fertilizer. Tables 7-10 show the relative number of soil samples for each level of P, K, and Mg for each of four major row crops: cotton, corn, peanuts, and soybeans. These data suggest that soil-test P has decreased on cotton, corn, and peanut fields during the last 5 years while soil-test K has increased on cotton and corn fields. Since some marginal crop lands have been planted in soybeans in the last 5 years, it would be difficult to draw any conclusions except to say that a large number of soybean lands are deficient in P and K. The levels of magnesium have increased on all field crop samples during the 5-year period. The increase in soil test Mg, shown in tables 7-10, and the pH data in tables 11 and 12, indicate that most farmers are following a good liming program. Fertilizer Ratios One of the primary purposes of soil testing is to measure the fertility status of a given field and to make an appropriate fertilizer recommendation based on that measurement. Tables 13, 15, 17, and 19 summarize the number of soil samples according to their need for P and K fertilizer. Although the Soil Testing Laboratory recommends many different rates of P205 and K 2 0, an attempt is made to recommend these elements in only a few fertilizer ratios. For example, if one soil sample for soybeans tested Medium in P and Medium in K (P-K rating = M-M), then the fertilizer recommendation is 0-40-40. If another soil sample for cotton tested Low in P and Low in K (P-K rating = L-L), then the fertilizer recommendation would be 90-90-90. In both examples, the ratio of P 2 0 5 to K 2 0 is 1 to 1. This ratio is referred to as the P-K ratio. Most of the P-K ratios used by the Auburn University Soil Testing Laboratory are 1:1, 2:1, 1:2, 1:0, and 0:1. Only in a few instances, (for example, some horticultural crops) are other ratios recommended. By restricting the number of recommended ratios of P 2 0 5 and K 2 0, farmers and homeowners find it easier to purchase and apply fertilizer. Tables 14, 16, 18, and 20 show that for all four major row crops where P and K fertilizers were recommended, the number of samples needing a 1:1, 2:1, and 1:0 ratio increased. This brings out a point that was discussed earlier: Soil-test P seems to be decreasing while Soil-test K seems to be increasing. Tables 21 and 22 summarize the P-K ratios needed by various crops and crop groups in 1979-80. 8 Table 1. Number and Percentage~ of Soil Samples Received by Crop 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 19790 CROP Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number P. Corn Cotton Peanuts Soy beans Clover-win tergrass - Clover-summergirass Legumes Temp. wiLntergrams P'erm. wintergrass S unue r grass '0 Coastal Fruits and nuts Commercial vegetables Gardens Lawns Shrubs Row crops Pasture and hay Horticulture 14,149 20 5,264 7 4,280 6 5,250 7 4,069 6 1,230 2 727 1 545 1 4,095 6 12,022 17 3 ,530 5 855 1 1, 272 2 7,898 11 4,495 6 1,500 2 28,943 40 26,218 38 15,970 22 16,350 23 5, 252 7 3,163 4 7,645 11 3,453 * 5 1, 130 2 5415 1 650 1 4,236 6 11,378 16 3,058 4 1,105 1,161 6,711 4, 427 1,423 5,568 10 4,137 7 7,605 13 7,956 14 2,305 4 905 2 644 1 749 1 3,369 6 9,184 16 2,320 4 1,071 2 600 .1 4,563 8 5,145 9 1,319 2 2 9 6 2 32,410 45 24,450 35 14,887 21 25,266 44 19,476 34 12,698 22 6,937 12 4,052 7 6,269 10 9,997 17 2,519 4 582 1 580 1 539 1 2,865 5 8,310 14 2,098 4 1,263 2 ---578 1 6,305 11 5,194 9 1,424 2 27,255 46 17,493 30 14,764 25 9,282 15 4,191 7 4,030 7 10,705 18 2,163 4 489 1 743 1 495 1 2,573 4 8,210 13 2,451 4 1,286 2 725 1 1,366 12 5,006 8 1,551 2 28,208 47 17,124 28 15,934 25 TTL1.131 100 71/147 100'u7400 100,,,aci19 iv O a1F1 1 TOTAL 71,131 100 7147 100 57 , 400 100 59.512 100 61.267 100 Table 20. Number of Samples Received and Percent of State Total By County in District 1 COUNTY 1975-16 1976-77 1978-79 1979-80 Ttl2 r Number Pct. Number Pcte ue 't. Number Pc. Number Pct. Number Pct. Bllount 1,298 1.8 1,'i50 1.6 871 1.5 660 1.1 795 1.3 Cherokee 1,105 "1.6 1,078 1.5 725, 1'.3 88 1.5 674. 1.11 Colbert 757 - 1.1 877 1.2 985 1.7 941 1.6 1,036 1.7 Cullman 1,077 1.5 1,458 2.0 1,141 2.0 844 1.4 898 1.5 DcKaib 1,119 2.4 2,271 3.2 964 1.7 1,440 2.4 1,684 2.7 Etowah 939 1.3 667' 0.9 60b 1.1 539 0.9 623 1.0 Fayette 309 0.4 318 0.4 261 0.5 220 0.4 170 0.3 Franklin 772 1.1 939 1.3 877 1.5 525 0.9 684 1.1 Jackson '1,451 2.0 1,438 2.0 988 1.7 925 1.6 1,088 1.813 Jefferson 2,648 3.7 2,201 3.1 1.,952 3.4 2,122 3.6 1,08812 3.1 3,1 . Lamar .41 0.6 470 0.7 2981 0.5 263 0.4 379 0.66,5 0. Lauderdale 915 1.3 1,511 2.1 887 1.5 1,143 1.9 1,281 -2.1 1,5 . Lawrence 1,277 1.8 1,272 1.8 1,157 2.0 1,184 2.0 1,130 1.*8 1,7. Limestone 928 1.3 1,103 1.5 897, 1.6 878 1.5 1,134 1.9 2,1 . M~adisoni 2,003 2.8 1,772 2.5 1,560 2.7 2,004 3.4 1,540 2.5 2,9 . Marion 657 09.9 543 0.8 335 0.6 414 0.7 406 0.76,3 0. Marshall 1,134 1.6 1,101 1.5 (651 1.1 744 1.3 7414 1.2 1,0 . Morgan 1,461 2.1 1,309 1.8 1,046 1.8 946 1.6 9.51 1.6 1,5 . St. Clair- 583 0.8 783 1.1 533 0.9 499 0.8 510 0.87,6 0. Shelby 702 1.0 1,016 1.4 71.4 1.3 788 1.3 607 1.09,2 11 Walker 691 1.0 492 . 0.7 666 1.2 509 0.9 549 0.96,7 0. Winston 4r57 0.6 551 0.8 281 0.5 415 0.7 290 0.54,7 0. District total 23,324 32.8 24,320 33.3 18,425 32.0 18,891 31'.7 19,055 31.2 2295 3. Stat.toal 1,11 7 .47 . 5r7 . v . , 4 19a 862/ .13 Stae tta 7113 71.7477440 59.512 61.267 862.137 Table 3. Number of Samples Received and Percent of State Total By County in District 2 UuI ________________ Number ('ntorv197-761f7_77 .U 1J IIe Pet.' Numiber Pct. 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 Total 27 y.. N~umber P'ct. N~umaber 1 ct. Number PC t. Number Pct. Barbour Bullock Calhoun Chamtbers Clay Cleburne Coffee Coosa Coving ton Cre nshaw Dale Eilmore Geneva Henry Hlous ton Lee Macon Mon tgomuery Pike Randolph~ Ruisseall Talladega Tallapoosa 1,523 779 762 579 209 221 2,513 122 1,850 1,080 19582 1,016 2,353 2,527 4,410 1,521 941 1,645 1,883 480 794 633 391 District total ' 29,814 2.1 1..1 1.1 0.3 3.5 0.2 2.6 1.5 2.2 1.4 3.3 3.6 6.2 2.1 1.3 2.3 2.6 0.7 1.1 0.9 0.5 41.9 1,858 907 835 633 *181 171 2,279 170 1,791 694 1,4169 1,075 2,513 2,230 3s,581- 1,495 943 1,720 1,999 364 963 54~5 4 47 2.6 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.2 3.2 0.2 2.5 1.0 2.0 1.5 3.5 3.1 5.0 2.1 1.3 2.4 2.8 0.5 1.3 0.8 0.6 28,903 140.3 State total 71. 131 71,747Z 1,464 496 4i13 471 218 187 1,919 140 1,574 782 1,242 868 1,676 2,144 2,948 1,143 5 94 1,611 1,750 255 962 654 332 23,843 41, 5i7.440. 2.5 0.9" 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 3.3 0.2 2.7 1.4 2.2 1.5 2.9 3.7 5.1 2.0 1.0 2.8 3.0 0.4 1.7 1.1 0.6 1,420 650 591 398 142 140 1,472 115 13,169 581 960 8348 1,7116 2,419 3,267 1,517 721 1,551 1,748f 358 1,272 598 295 2.4 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.2 2.5 0.2 2.0 1.0 1.6 1.4 2.9 4.1 5.5 2.5 1.2 2.6 2.9 0.6 2.1 1.2 0.5 .5 24 ,078 40.4 1,436 677 745 420 167 115 1,762 125 1,615 668 1,238 980 2;065 2,505 3,101 1,806 802 1,570 1;70() 470 1,0(35 586 373 2.3 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.2 2.9 0.2 2.6 1.1 2.0 1.6 3.4 4.1 5.1 2.9 1.3 2.6 2.8 0.8 1.7 1.0 0.6 25,961 42.4 hl ')f.71 *23,345 9,956 9,053 7,214 3,570 2,719 28,254 2,241 20,403 10,495 17,327 13,613 31,590 29,698 41,813 19,473 11, 55i 24,465 26v571 4,907 9,920 8,460 6,393 2.7 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.3 3.3 0.3 2.4 1.2 2.0 1.6 3.7 3.4 4.8 2.3 1.3 2.81 3.1 0.6 1.2 1.0 0.7 363,033 42.1 ALf1 f 97 tA7w ti/ .. .r s wv." aI State total 71,131 71,747 Table 4. Number of Samples Received and Percent of State Total By County in District 3 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1913-79 1979-80 Number Pct. Number Pct. Numer Pct. Number Pt. Number Pet. Autauga 1,213 1.7 1,258 1.8 1,082 1.9 984 1.7 1,133 1. Baldwin 843 1.2 1,189 1.7 824 1.4 987 1.7 804 1. Bibb 369 -0.5 361 0.5 402 0.7 247 0.4 322 0. Butler 623 0.9 537 0.7 464 0.8 393 0.7 372 0. Chilton 769 1.1 701 1.0 615 1.1 766 1.3 505 0.8 Choctaw 271 0.4 298 0.4 255 0.4 351 0.6 301 0.5 Clarke 495 0.7 4,07 0.6 254 0.4 366 0.6 360 *0.6 Conecub 944 1.3 " 763 1.1 485 0.8 575 1.0 651 1.1 Dallas 2,054 2.9 2,536' 3.5 1,797 3.1 2,370 4.0 2,443 4.0 Eacambla 622 0.9 902 1.3 691 :1.2 8,,g)Greene 595 0.8 768 1.1 544 0.9 537 0.9 490 0.81,8 . Hale 701 1.0 686 1.0 610 1.1 630 1.1 - 511 0.81,2 . Lowndee 665 0.9 823 1.1 702 1.2 696 1.2 767 1.3:036 . Marengo 1,022 1.4 717 1.0 810 1.4 558 0.9 683 1.1 1,3 . Mobile 1,818 2.6 1,634 2.3 1,425 2.5 1,612 2.7 1,469 2.4 1,6 . Monroe 742 1.0 797 1.1 651 1.1 698 1.2 864 1.48731. Perry 546 0.8 639 0.9 648 1.1 1,003 1.7 470 0.81.9 . Pickens 746 1.0 594 0.8 571 1.0 387 0.7 4g36 0.77,80. Sumter 827 1.2 651 0.9. 552 1.0 5641 0.9 547 0.98411. Tuscaloosa 1,284 1.8 1,448 2.0 1,040 1.8 1,111 1.9 1,318 2.2 1,8 . Washington 391 0.5 365 0.5 263 0.5 335 0.6 334 0.54370. Wilcox 453 .0.6 450 0.6 487 0.8 548 0.9 425 0.77,90. District 'total 17,993 25.3 18,524 25.5 15,172 26.4 16,543 27.8 16,251 26.5 2619 2. State total 71,131 71,747 57,4410 59,512 6 6 Table 5. Top Twelve Counties According to Number of Samples Submitted Rank 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-0 County o. sarnlea County No. Samples Couty o. samples Cont No. samples County No. samlee I Houston I4410 Houston 2 Jefferson 2,648 Dallas 3 Henry .2,527 Geneva 4 Coffee 2,513 Coffee 5 Geneva 2 ,353 DeKa lb 6 Dallas 2,054 Henry 7 Madison 2,003 Jefferson 8 Pike 1,883 Pike 9 Covington 1,850 Barbour 10 Mobile 1, 818 Covington 11 DeKaib 1, 719 Madison 12 hontgomery 1,645 Montgomery Top twelve total 27,423 State total 71,131 Houston 2,948 Houston Henry 2, 144 Hlenry Jefferson 1,952 Dallas Coffee 1,919 Jefferson Dallas 1 ,797 1fadisoit Pike 1,750 Pike Geneva I1,676 Geneva Montgomery I1,611I Mobile Covington 1, 574 Montgometry Madison 1, 560) Lee Barbour 1,4641 Coffee Mobile 1,425 DeKaib 21,820 57 ,440 2,4 19 2,370 2,122 2,004 1,748 1,746 1 ,612 1,551 1,517 1,472 1,440 23, 268 59,512 henry 2,505 Dallas 2,443 Geneva 2,065 Jefferson 1,882 Lee 1,806 Coffee 1,162 Pike 1,700 DeKaib 1,684i Covington 1,615 Mlontgomsery 1,570 la(hlson 1,540 23,673 61,267 5-year totals 1975-80 Couny o. SftI5l4Ef Houston 17,305 tHenry 11,825 Dallas 11,200 Jefferson 10,805 Geneva 10,355 Coffee 9,945 Pike 9,080 Miadison' 8,580 llohtgosiery 8,095 1eKalb 8,080 Covington 8,000 Mobile 7,960 121,230 321 ,095 percent samples sent 3. by top 12 counties 38.6 '37.3' 38.0. 39.1 38.6 3,581 2,536 2,513 2,279 2,271 2,230 2,201 1,999 1,858 1,791 1,772 1,720 26,751 71,747 1s.* '430 O. ViL L M 1 VII Ell 1975- 7b I0" 60 V1. I. H I VI{ Eli 1976-771 30- ~120- .4 10' 40j 1 S20. i0" V1. L 1 U VII Eli 1977-7 4n". u30. 20. a o 10. uK.1 111VII Eli 1979-80 i El I.- S O IL-TES T RA T I NGS Fo0iR P If 0 S P 11 0 R U S M r8 e-1 .N N8 U4 5- 7 6L 40" '430. 8H 20- 10. 1916-71 SOIL- T EST RA T I NGS FO R.P OT A SSI U M 1FIG. I. Soil. test levels of P anid K for row crops, 197(-1981). iii C :20" 10. 50 i. 20 p. s0., too. ,430. 1 IA v *20.. P4 1 0., 47l Hi 11 1977-78 VI L.11-I ~ w VI I. H 11 VII * 30' U20. 610 . Ii: 30 N. '4 4 Ul Y A. 1916 11 1911-J8 S OI L-TE' S T R A TINJG S FO R U P . 19)u-)9 P11 0 S P 11 0 it u S 50 40 30 20 1o [fjjuj" j 10L IJ YL L H IU VIU Vi 1. 1t It VVU V. L HItBV1 1916-11 191)-1d 19)b-19 SOIL-TEST RATINGS FOR POTASSIUM FIG. 2. Soil test levels of P anid K for pastue and hay CLO1:S, 1976-19110. '4 '3 U a4 u. 40.4 30L~f 20 1L , H 1V 1919-A4 N- 50" 40. . 30. 20. 10. 40f, N MI 30 " .. ' a30 .Y 3 61 ~30 ,o 0.1 2020" 30u vU 20- 20- u 20.2 51. t, i . i V l tt. H1. eL I 3t ElV . 1. 1 8I7 I 1975-7b 1976-71 1917-7819 -9 S OIL -TEST R ATIN4GS FOR P 1OS P O R U S 50. 50. 50. 50- 50. "440. 4i0-. 40, 40 . 30. "Iu ~30.,r 030. 30. 4'n 20"M 0. v 40.2-N20 ai a. ? u v 10 to. io.j f . . 0 VI. I 11ItB vullvr. t. nH- t v1 V. 1. IfIt VII ViL to t (lf vii 1975-76 1916-17 1977-78 1970-79 SOIL.- TEST R ATINGS FOR POTASSIUM P IG. 3. Soil test levels of P anid K for IMor tcuttural cropfs, 170-19830. 4O*1 Tabe 6 Pecen ofSamples at IEachi Level of P, K, anid M~g for 3 Crop Groups Year Pc iupjjoris Pet. ___________ P VL .L IH 11 VUI Ell VL L H 11 Vii How crops 1975-76 1976-71 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 6.7 7.7 7.3 5.5 74,7 14.9 15.8 16.8 15. 1 17.7 33.8 32.6 35.7 34. 1 a6.4 32.6 31.5 30.4 33.6 29.0 10.3 10.3 8.3 10. 1 7.9 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.7 13.3 12.0 12.2 12.1 14.3 4 5.3 44.5 44.0 43.2 46.3 35.6 38.1 38.9 39.2 34.8 4.4 4.2 3.5 4.2 2.9 18.6 16.2 10.0 10.3 11.2 81.4 83.8 90.0 89.7 88.8 Pasture anid hay crops 10.4 10.5 9.9 10.6 8.3 19.6 18.2 17.6 18.1 3.9 2.8 16.6 5.6 1.8 15.5 6.0 1.9 14.3 5.8 1.9 14.5 4i.6 3.5 17.8 liort icultural crops 32.9 35.9 34.8 34.1 ?.1 2.8 4.1 3,2 15.9 16.7 18.0 16,3 1979-80 11.4 8.7 13.1. 16.4 17.8 32.7 4.3 - 20.1 41.6 29.4 4.5 1. 81 1975-76 1976-77 197 7-78 1978-79 1979-80 1975-76 1976-77 197 7-78 19 78-79 20. 2 18.2 19.6 17.8 21.7 8.8 9.0 10.8 9.5 18. 7 18.0 18.1 17. 1 18.3 8.0 8.4 8.5 8.4 24.8 25.0 25.0 25.7 26.0 12.8 12.4 12. 1 12.7 21.9 22. 8 21.4 23.0 21.1 18.0 16.0 16.2 17.2 38.9 39.9 39.6 38.0 39.7 39.9 43. 1 43.3 42.3 32.8 34.5 36. 1 36.5 32.1 32.8 31.5 30.3 31 18 8.9 8.4 8. 1 9.1 6.9 8.3 5.8 4.3 6,4 13.6 11.3 10. 1 9.4 10.4 13.1 11.4 9.8 9.1 86.4 88.6 89.9 90.6 89.6 86. 9 88.6 90. 2 90.9 Table 6. Percent of 11.2 88.11 Table 7. Percent Samples at each Level of P, K, arnd Mg for Cotton Pect. phosphorus Pc t. 1() LaSS I urnP .naue Year VL *L 11 VII Ell VL L _ M U HVii L I 1975-76 3.4 8.9 24.4 38.6 21.5 3.2 0.5 9.5 52.1 36.3 1.6 86 9. 1976-77 3.6 9.2 26.0 38.9 19.5 2.8 0.4 7.2 417.9 412.2 2.27.93) 1977-78 2.2 9.5 28.8 10.6 17.1 1.6 0.2 5.4 43.4 49.6 1.4 ~ 41 9. 1978-79 1.5 8.1 27.3 42.2 18.8 2.0 0.3 3.9 40.6 7-53.0 1.4 41 9. 1979-80 3.6 11.2 3 1.8 37.2 14.7 1.4 0.4 6.8 18.7 43.0 1.2 39 9. 00 Table 8. Percent Samnples at each Level of P, K, and Mig for Corn Pct. ph*OzphoIrw~a 1e1. poLa stium PCt ngiaiu Year VI. L1.IM It Vii ClI 'L l 1. I i t IVII L 1915-76 6.3 14.8 36.7 33.0 8.2 1.1 0.7 7.9 39.6 44.4 7.4 24.4 7. 1976-77 6.1 15.5 35.3 32.2 9.0 2.0 0.3 6.1 39.9 47.3 6.4 20.6 7. 1977-78 6.0 16.5 35.6 29.6 10.0 2.3 0.3 3.7 33.4 54.9 7.9 14.5 8. 1978-79 4.3 12.9 34.4 34.6 11.4 2.4 0.4 3.9 32.8 53.3 9.7 15.6 8. 1979-80 5.8 16.6 39.0 29.2 7.8 1.6 0.5 5.6 35.6- 51.6 6.7 15.6 8. Table 9. Percent Samples at each Level of P, K, and Mg for Peanuts Year ct. phosphorus c . pO ~tkt u IPC t a n iu VL L M 11 Vii E If Vi. L Ii 11 VII .I 1975-76 3.9 14.4 39.7 35.1 6.6 0.4 3.5 24.7 50.3 20.6 0.9 9.0 8. 1976-77 6.-0 15.9 38.8 32.5 6.6 0.2 3.8 27.0 52.6 16 .3 0.2 166 831 1977-78 4.5 17.6 42.3 31.0 4.0 0.6 1.6 14.5 45.8 34.8 3.3 10.4 8. 1978-79 3.5 14.7 41.2 35.0 5.1 0.6 1.8 16.4 46.8 31.6 3.4~ 10.8 8. 1979-80 5.5 19.0 40.6 30.6' 3.8 0.4 3.3 24.5 54.5 17.3 0.4 10.8 8. tN) Table 10. Percent Samples at each Level of P, K, and H4 for Soybeans Year 1 cp10 cousPc.pC~IL~ss1uiIIr Pet. iaieii VL L H It VII Eli VfL L It 11 VII L 1 9 7 5 -7 6 1 3 .6 2 1 .6 3 0 .6 2 3 . 8 8 .0 2 .5 2 . 7 2 2 .2 4 9 .6 2 3 . 9 1 .6 1 2 .817 - 7 8 7 .222 .82 . . 2 32 32 .71 8 82 .32 81 . 1977-78 13.4 20.2 32.8 25.0 6.8 1.7 2.6 19.4 50.1 26.1 1.8 9.5 9. 1978-79 9.2 19.7 32.3 28.4 8.8 1.6 1.8 18.5 49.2 28.4 2.2 8.7 9. 1979-80 11.9 20.7 34.2 24.9 6.9 1.4 2.6 20.8 51.6 23.7 1.3 10.3 8. Table 11. Percent Samples at Different Soil pH Levels for Three Crop Groups Soil acidity Year Below 4.5- 5.0- 5.5- 5.8- 6.0- 6.5- 7.0- Above No. samples 4.5 4.9 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.4 6.9 7.4 7.4 3.8 3.4 2. 7 3.3 3.0 5. 6 5.8 6.2 6.9 7.2 20.4 14.4 15.2 14.6 24.5 22.6 23.7 24.3 23.6 19.9 20.4 19. 8 19.4 17.5 Row crops 14.2 29.6 16.2 29.7 17.2 33.8 16.7 31.4 16.2 34.8 Pas cure and hay 20.4 12.6 22.9 21.8 13.8 22.1 22.0 14.6 21.9 21.0 14.3 21.6 20.7 13.8 23.4 9.0 8.5 7.9 9.7 10.7 craps S.1 6.3 6.6 6.9 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.9 1.7 2.3 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.2 2.9 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.1 23,943 32,410 25,266 27,255 28,208 26,218 24,450. 19,476 17,493 17,124 Horticultural crops 17.6 10.5. 22-.0 12.2 16.4 11.0 21.5 12.7 18.0" 11.8 24.4 11.8 16.5 11.3 21.9. 11.7 1.3 7.4 21.6 17.2 11.2 22.4 12.4 22 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1975-76 1.97 6-77 19 77-78 1978-79 1979-80 0.2 0.2 0i.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 0. 6 0.7 0.9 0.8 19 75-76 19765-77 1977-78 19 78-79 1979-80 1. 1 1. 1 1.1 1.4 6.9 7.4 6.7 8.1 21.9 20.2 20.0 21.2 5.6 2.2 6.6 3.2 4.0 ' 2.1 5.6 2.4 4.6 1.9 15, 970 14,887 12,698 14,764 15,934 Tabl~e 12. Percen Samples F'or Difrena Soil pH Levels For Cation, Corn, Peanuts and Soybeants Year Belw 46- 3.0 5. 358 6.0- 6.5-. 7.0- Above 7 4.5 4.9 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.4 6.9 7.4 7.4a: 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 19700-80 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 0.2 0.2 0. 1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 3. 1 3.3 2.7 2.8 2.3 4.4 3.5 4.5 4.3 3.7 1.3 1. 1 0.6 1.1 0.6 4.9 4.0 3.4 4.2 16.5 15.9 14.9 12.5 11.3 3.0 19. 1 17.4 18.8 15.4 16.4 14.7 9.3 11.5 11.3 20.8 19.2 17.1 16.6 16.3 16.2 18.0 16.0 15.2 20.8 22.0 21.4 21.0 13. 1 23.3 24.8 21. 1 21.3 19.0 18. 1 17.9 18.4 18.5 Cot ton 13.2 14.6 16. 3 15.2 13.9 Corn 14.5 17.6 16.7 17.9 17.4 Peanuts 16.6 20.7 21.2 20.6 20.5 Soybeans 12.6 12.6 14.2 14.0 32.5 34.2 36.6 34.4 36.2 23.9 29.4 30.9 29.5 35.3 34.2 33. 1 41.3 38'. 1 39.8 24.6 25.8 27.2 27.4 15.3 12.5 10.3 15.3 17.7 6.8 6.8 7.3 8.1 7.3 5.4 6.0 7.2 7.6 9.8 10.7 8.7 10.1 2.4 2.6 1.1 2.4 2.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.2- 0.4 3.4 3.1 3.5 3..5 0.5 0.4 0.?1 0.1 0. 1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.6 6.6 *7.3 5.5 1979-80 0.1 3.4 16.1 17.2 14.5 31.6 11.4 2.7 3.0 10,705 23 5,264 5,252 4,137 4,052 44191 14, 49 16,350 5,563 6,'937 9,232 4,280 3,163 7,605 6,269 4,030 5,250 7,645 7,956 9,997 Table 13. Number and Percent of Cotton Samples by Fertilizer Needs and 1'""K Ratios PoKfeilzr1975-76 1976-77 1977-711 1978-79 17.8 Numb-er Pet. Number Pc..Nmbr e~ Number Pet Number P Recommended- 3,706 70.4 ,502 66.7 2,607 63.0 2,388 58.9 292 7. Not recommended 1,558 29.6 1,750 33.3 1,530 37.0 1,664 41.1 129 3. Ttlsmlea 5,264 100.0 5,250 100.0 4,137 100.0 4,052 100.0 419 100 Table 14. Number and Percent of Cotton Samples Needing P or K Fertilizer by P-K Ratio P- ai*1975-76 1976-77 1977--78 1978-7919-0 P- ai*Number Pet. Number Pct. ubr Pt Number Pct.' Number Pct. 1-.1 940 25.4 964 27.5 723 27.7 608 25.5 80 3. 2-1 383 10.3 382 10.9 301 11.5 230 . 9.6 37 1. 1-2 173 4.7 107 3.1 80 3.1 56 2.3 9 . 1-0 437 11.8 586 16.7 579 22.2 603 25.2 50 2. 0- 1,7-73 47.8 11463 41.8 924 35.4 891 37.3 99 3. Total samples needing fertilizer "*3, 706 100.0 3,502 100.0 2,1607 100.0 2,388 100.0 2,3 100 *Needed by those samples for which we recommend fertil1zer. NZ Table 15. Number and Percent of Corn Samples by Need of P or K Fertilizer P or K fertilizer Recommnended Not recomunended Total samples 197 5-76 Number Pet. 10,314 72.9 3,835 27.1 1976--77 1977-78 1978-79 Number Pet. Number Pct. Number Pct.. 11,675 71.4, 3,827 68.7 4,4,53 64.2 4,675 28.6 1,741 31.3 2,484 35.8 14,149 100.0 16,350 100.0 5,568 100.0 6,937 100.0 1979-80 Number Pct. :?;786 73.1 2,497 26.9 9,283 100.0 Table 16. N4umber- and Percent of Corn Samples Needing P or K Fertilizer by P-K Ratio P-K ratio* 1975--76 1976--77 1977-78 1978-79 19798 Number Pet. Number Pet. Number -Pet. -Number Pct, Number Pt "112,761 26.8 2,972 25.5 791 20.7 1,040 23.4 1,6201 3. 2-1 1,0511 14.6 1,888 16.2 618 16.1 560 12.9 972 1. 1-2 412 4.0 335 2.9 80 2.1 94 2.1 195 2. 1-0 3,492 33.9 4,103 35.1 1,747 45.6 1,885 42.3 2,912 4. 0-1 2,138 20.7 2,377 20.4 591 15.4 8174 19.6 1,0871 6. Tota~l samj)les neceding, ferttlizer 10,3.14 100.0 11,675 100.0 3.,827 100.0 4,453 100.0 6,786 10. *Needed by those samples for which we reconmeud feriilizer. [Ili VI ,..r.._. Table 17. Number and Percent of Peanut Samples by Need of P and K Fertilizer P or K fertilizer 1975-76 197677 1977-78 1978-79 Number Pet. Numr Pet. Number Pct. Number Pet. Number Pet. Recommended 3.31742 87.4 2,872 90.8 6,325 83.2 5,207 83.0 Not recommended 538 12.6 291 9.2 1,280 16.8 1,062 17.0 Total samples 4,280 100.0 3,163 100.0 7,605 100.0 6,269 100.0 Table 18. Number and Percent of Peanut Samples Netdlng P or K Fertilizer by P-K Ratio P-K ratio* 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79979 -8 Number Pct. H4umber Pet. Number Pct umrPt. Number Pet. *1-1 1,244I 33.2 1,003 34.9 2,017 .31.9 1,583 30.4 135 3. * 2-1 361 9.6 305 10.6 791 12.5 553 10.6 46 1. 1-2 495 13.2 378 13.2 474i 7.5 . 452 8.7 43 1. 1-0 381 10.2 233 8.1 1,613 25.5 1,131 21.7 32 1. 0-1 1, 261 33.7 953 33.2 1,430 22.6 1,488 28.6 102 2. * Total samples needing fertilizer" 3,742 100.0 2,872 100.0 6,325 100.0 5,207 100.0 370 10. *Needed by th~ose for which we recor mend (r lzr N\ ON fertilizer. Table 19. Number and Percent of Soybean Samples by Need of P or K Fertilizer P or K fertilizer Recommended Not recommended 'Total samp~les 1975-76 Number Pet. 4 ,604 87.7 646 12.3 1976-77 1977-78 Number Pet. Number Pet. 6,725 88.0 6,963 87.5 920 12.0 993 12.5 1978-79 Number Pet, 8,485 84.9 1,512 15.1 5,250 100.0 7,645 100.0 71956 100.0 9 ,991 100.0 1979-80 Number Pet. 9,437 88.5 1,228 11.5 10, 665 100.0 k) Table 20. Number and Percent of Soybean -Samples Heeding P and K Fertilizer by P-K Ratio P- ai*197/5-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 .19-8 Number Pet. Number Pet. Number Pct llumber Pet..' Number Pct. m 1-1 1,549 33.6 2,165 32.2 2,307 33.1 2,658 31.3 3,315 3. 2-1 851 18.5 1)168 17.4 1,222 17.6 1,303 .15.4 1,6261 7. 1-2 356 7.7 463 6.9 537 7.7 617 7.3 721 76 1-0 694 15..1 1.,156 17.2 1,2,5 17.6 1,549 18.2 1,448 1. 0-1 1,154 25.1 1,773 26.4 1,672 24.0 2,367 27.9 2,321 2. 'total samples needing fertilizer 4,604 100.0 6,725 100.0 6,963 100.0 8,485 100.0 9,437 10. *Needed Iby those snuitples for which we recommen~d fert:il7 izer. ..w Table 21. Number and Percent of Samples by Need of 1' andl K Fertilizer, 1979-1980 P or K fertilizer Cotton Corn Peanuts Soybeans Total row crops Pasture and hay Tot Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Number Pct. Nu Recommended 2,932 70.0 6,786 73.1 3,708 92.0 9,437 88.5 22,863 81.2 14,072 82.2 36 Not recommended 1,259 30:0 2,497 26.9 322 8.0. 1,228 11.5 5,306 18.8 3,053 17.8 8 Total samples 4,191 100.0 9,283 100.0 4,030 100.0 10,665 100.0 28,169 100.0 17,125 100.0 45 Table 22. Number and Percent of Samples Needing P and K Fertilizer By Crop and By P-K Ratio Recommnended, 1979-1980 Cotton Corn Peanuts Soybeans Total row crops Pasture and hay Totaagooc P'-K Ratio Number Pet. Number' Pct. Number Pet-. Number Pct. Number Pet. Number Pct. Numbr Pt 1-1 890 30.4 1,620 23.9 1,305 35.2 3,315 35.1 7,130 31.2 3,878 27.6 11,08 2. 2-1 377 12.8 972 .14.3 476 12.8 1,626 17.2 3,451 15.1 2,906 20.6 6,37 1. 1-2 .96 3.3 195 2.9 453 12.2 721 7.6 1,465 6.4 894 6.3 2,5 6. 1-0 590 20.1 2,912 42.9 392 10.6 1,44i8 15.3 5,342 23.4 3,622 25.7 8,94 2. 0-1 979 33.4 1,087 16.0 1,082 29.2 2,327 24.6 5,475 23.9 2,772 19.7 8,27 2. Total samples 2,932 100.0 6,786 100.0 3,708 100.0 9,437 100.0 22,863 100.0 14,072 100.0 36,3 10. 00 Table 23. P-K Ratios Needed for Various P.1-K Ratings For Most Crops P-K ratio. P-K rating combinations 1-i VL-VL, VL-L, L-VL, L-L, M-M4 2-1 VL- Nb-fL- 1-2awV, M-L 0.1 H-VL, H-L, H-11, VH-VL, V-L, V-,EH-V7L, EE-L, E-24 0-0 H-H, H-VH, VH-H, VH-VHl, EH-H, Eli-Va 29 0 District I -- District 2 FIG. 4. Alabama Cooperative Extension Service Districts. 30 Inforation conta~ned herein. is available t1o all re~gardLess o'- race, color, sex, or nat-ional orig=n