Vegetable Variety Trials, 19841 J. L. Turner, H. M. Bryce, E. L. Carden, N. R. McDaniel, L. Wells, F. E. Garrett, J. A. Pitts, K. C. Short, M. H. Hollingsworth. J. T. Eason, M. E. Ruf, and W. H. Hearn V EGETABLE VARIETY and breeding line trials were conducted during the 1984 growing season at the Gulf Coast Substation, Fairhope, Chilton Area Horticulture Substation, Clanton, North Alabama Horticulture Substation, Cullman, Sand Mountain Substation, Crossville, and E. V. Smith Research Center, Shorter. All trials were conducted in ran- domized complete block designs with four replications. Non- replicated observational plantings were also made of selected varieties and lines of tomato. Herbicides and fertilizer applica- tions were used for each crop and location in accordance with recommended production practices Other pest controls were 'Data presented in this report represent an unbiased evaluation of each entry. Variety, company, and chemical names are used for identification and do not imply endorsement of one over another Seed of breeding lines are not available for planting until named and released. 2Respectively, Research Associate and Field Superintendent of Horti(ll- ture; Superintendent, Associate Superintendent, and Assistant Superintend- ent, Gulf Coast Substation, State Department of Agriculture and Industries (retired); Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent, Chilton Area Horti- culture Substation, Superintendent, North Alabama Horticulture Substation Superintendent and Associate Superintendent, Sand Mountain Substation; and Senior Systems Analyst, Research Data Analysis. PROGRESS REPORT NO. 121 also applied, using recommended chemicals on a regular sche- dule throughout the growing season. Irrigation was applied at the Gulf Coast Substation to potatoes, at the Chilton Area Horticulture Substation to sweet potatoes, and at the E. V. Smith Research Center to sweet potatoes. Trickle irriga- tion was applied to tomatoes at the Gulf Coast Substation, the Chilton Area Horticulture Substation, and the North Alabama Horticulture Substation. RESULTS Broccoli FAIRHOPE. Seed were planted in the greenhouse at Auburn University July 9 and transplanted August 20 at a 15-inch spacing in 5-foot rows. Five harvests were made beginning October 8 and ending October 26. Green Duke and Gem were the two most uniform varieties for an early once- over harvest, table 1. Green Duke produced the most desirable bud with no leaves growing through the bud, while Gem %*1 JULY 19)85 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AUBURN UNIVERSITY GALE A. BUCHANAN, DIRECTOR AUBURN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA Green Comet, Bravo, and Southern Comet were the earliest varieties with a large percentage of the buds maturing at the first harvest date. Premium Crop produced a few early buds but the bulk of the harvest was midseason. Futura, the latest maturing variety, and Orion were the two lowest yielding varieties. The poor yield of these two varieties was due mainly to their lateness and small bud size. Futura and Orion also produced many leaves in the bud. Of the varieties tested, Green Duke exhibited more desirable characteristics for market pro- duction. Bravo would be an ideal home garden variety that is early and productive. Potatoes Seed potatoes for the variety trials were obtained from producers in Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, and Can- ada. FAIRHOPE. Seedpieces were cut by hand to approximately I ounces each and treated with Orthocide 10 dust at the rate of 1 pound per 100 pounds of cut seed. Seedpieces were stored approximately 5-10 days at 50 0 F, planted March 12, and har- vestedJune 12 (93 growing days). Red La Soda from the North Dakota source was the highest yielding entry, table 2. Atlantic, La Chipper, and W 946R produced similar total marketable yields. Atlantic has produced tubers with high dry matter content in the past, but in 1984 produced tubers with only 17.47 percent dry matter. A new red skin entry, L-18-119R, produced a good yield of tubers with good dry matter content. This line is from Louisiana State University and has promise for the Baldwin County potato producing area. Another line from LSU, L-01-38, is a white skin entry that has good dry matter content. Wisconsin 760 produced tubers with the high- est dry matter of all the entries. This selection has produced high dry matter content at Fairhope for the past 3 years. Entries W 855, W 877, and W 870 produced tubers with above 20 percent dry matter content. Russet Sebago, Superior, and BelRus were the lowest yielding entries. To date, Russet skin varieties have generally been among the lowest yielding varie- ties at Fairhope. BelRus, in some years, will produce above 100 hundredweights per acre, however, this variety will also pro- duce a high yield of size B potatoes. The russet skin of BelRus is attractive with an oblong shape similar to Russet Burbank. CROSSVILLE. Seedpieces were cut March 20 and treated the same as those for Fairhope. Varieties were planted by hand April 12 and harvested July 20 (110 growing days). Red La Soda from the North Dakota seed source was the highest yielding entry, table 3. Atlantic and L-01-38 produced 196 hundredweights each, however Atlantic produced tubers with the highest dry matter content. L-01-38 is a new line from LSU that is showing promise for the Sand Mountain potato area. L-81-119R, a new red skin entry, produced 130 hundred- weights whereas the lowest yielding Red La Soda entry pro- duced 164 hundredweights. Red La Soda remains the best red skin potato for Alabama. Other red skin entries, W 946R and W949R, have produced erratic yields and have never out- yielded Red La Soda. W 949R does, however, have a higher dry matter percent than Red La Soda. Atlantic, Norchip, La for the Sand Mountain area. BelRus produced a poor yield. This is the most promising russet skin type potato to date for Alabama potato growing areas. Continued research is in pro- gress to evaluate new russet releases and numbered selections for adaptation to Alabama. Sweet Potatoes Plants were produced at the E. V. Smith Research Center, Shorter, for each of the trial locations. Seed roots were soaked for 1 minute in a solution containing 8 ounces of Mertect 340 F and 1 pound of 75 WP Botran per 712 gallons of solution. Mother roots were bedded in an electrically heated bed. Plants were harvested and lined out in the field as they were pulled from the bed. SHORTER. Varieties were transplanted May 25 and har- vested October 17 (146 growing days). Resisto, a new variety from the USDA Vegetable Laboratory. Charleston, South Carolina , produced the highest yield of total marketable roots, table 4. Resisto has a good level of root knot nematode resist- ance and is resistant to stem rot or fusarium wilt. The flesh color is dark orange and attractive as a baked potato. The dark copper skin of Resisto is somewhat rough to feel and tends to have a russet appearance in the storage house. Resisto also has a good level of resistance to some species of wireworms, flea beetles, and cucumber beetles. However, under no conditions should the use of approved chemicals for the control of nema- todes and insects be omitted from the productior iro( ,dui s Sumor, a white flesh variety h,:s good slhipc aIId I ., ili\ c been good. Sumor will produce high yields of canners in some years; therefore, a long growing season should be provided for this variety. Centennial andJewel are high quality sweet pota- toes and have performed well over the years. Carolina Nugget is an excellent storage potato and has a very attractive rose skin and good shape. It has been in the foundation seed improvement program since 1981. Some progress has been made for selecting roots free of purple pigment and excessive white flesh. At present, three selections are under evaluation for improved flesh color. CLANTON. Varieties were planted June 5 and harvested October 18 (136 growing days).Jewel was the highest yielding entry and also produced the highest yield of jumbo size roots. No explanation was found for this high yield of large size roots. Yields of most of the entries at Clanton were higher in canner and jumbo grades than at the other two locations. Three sources of plants of Jewel produced variable yield response.Jewel (Auburn plants) produced the highest yield of the three sources of plants. Carolina Nugget from two sources produced similar yields of total marketable roots, but the local source of plants produced higher yields of No. I's than plants from the Auburn source. Also, Carolina Nugget (Auburn plants) produced the highest yield of culls but was followed closely by plants from the local source. Resisto produced the highest percent of U.S. No. 1 roots, while Jewel from Georgia and Auburn plants produced the lowest percent of No. 1 roots. CROSSVILLE. Varieties were transplanted June I and harvested October 3 (125 growing days). Centennial produced new variety from Texas, produced the second highest yield and equaledJewel (Georgia plants) for the highest percent of No. I roots. Jewel (Auburn plants) produced 38 more marketable bushels than Jewel from Georgia plants. Auburn plants of Jewel produced higher marketable yields at each location when compared to other sources of plants for this variety. At Shor- ter, however, Auburn plants did not produce as well as any source of Jewel at Clanton or Crossville. Carolina Nugget produced a good yield and a higher percent of No. I roots. Porto Rico was the lowest yielding variety. Tomatoes FAIRHOPE. Seed were planted in the greenhouse at Auburn University February 26 and transplanted April 4 at a 15-inch spacing in 5-foot rows. Thirteen harvests were made beginningJune 5 and endingJuly 17. Mountain Pride was the highest yielding variety in the replicated trial, table 5. Moun- tain Pride is a new variety with race 2 fusarium wilt resistance. Fruit size was about equally distributed for the three size arrangements. Also, Mountain Pride produced the lowest yield of culls of the large fruited varieties. Monte Carlo VFN was the second highest yielding entry at Fairhope. Monte Carlo fruit is slightly larger than Mountain Pride. Monte Carlo has race 1 fusarium resistance.Jefferson PS, Castlehy 1035, Castlehy 105, Burgis, Bonnie Nematode Resistant, and Bigset VFN pro- duced above 700 hundredweights of marketable fruit per acre. Pole King Hybrid, Carmen, President, and Experimental ..:ie produced the highest yields of large size fruit (5 x 6). Carmen and President are root knot nematode resistant and have resistance to race 2 fusarium. Blossom-end rot accounted for a high percent of the culls for Early Cascade, Carmen, Conte Sa, and President. Observational line Castlehy 1065 and Pole Boy 83 were the highest yielding entries for the 1984 tests. Castlehy 1065 produced a high yield of medium size fruit (6 x 6), but only slightly higher than Pole Boy 83. Both varieties produced good yields of large size fruit. Auburn University hybrid ATH 22 produced a high yield of small (6 x 7) fruit and ATH produced a good yield of medium (6 x 6) size fruit. ATH 12 produced a good yield of large size fruits. These three hybrids show good potential. Castlehy 1065 and Free- dom produced the highest yield of culls and all of the observa- tional entries produced high yields of catface fruit. Burgis, Bigset VFN, Early Cascade, Conte Sa, President, and Experi- mental Bonnie were the earlier maturing varieties, table 6. Peak harvest dates were somewhat variable within many var- ieties and between varieties. In general,June 26 throughJuly 3 was the peak period for most of the varieties. Pole Boy 83 produced the latest peak harvest of all the entries. Early Cas- cade and Pole Boy 83 produced the tallest plants, table 7. Freedom and Red King were the shortest growing plants. Castlehy 105, Burgis, Hayslip, Flora-Dade, Four Way Hybrid, and Sunny produced firm fruit. These varieties should be desirable for commercial shipping. All of the varieties were rated smooth or slightly rough, except Carmen was rated rough for general appearance. 15-inch spacing in 5-foot rows. Monte Carlo VFN produced the highest yield of total marketable fruit and larger size fruit, table 8. President, Bonnie Nematode Resistant, Sunny, Moun- tain Pride, and Hayslip also produced good yields of total marketable and large size fruit. President and Bonnie Nema- tode Resistant have resistance to root knot nematode and President, Sunny, Mountain Pride, and Hayslip have race 2 fusarium resistance. While Monte Carlo VFN and Bonnie Nematode Resistant have only race 1 fusarium resistance, they are good home garden varieties; however, where race 2 fusa- rium is a problem, varieties that have this resistance will be more dependable and live longer. President and Carmen have resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. This is an added protection where this disease is a problem. Culls were above 100 hun- dredweights in several varieties, which is somewhat high. Harvesting schedules that were performed closer together would lower the cull yield in most years. Early Cascade is a good garden type or roadside market variety for small uniform tomatoes. This variety is not round in shape and would not be acceptable in the small round salad tomato markets. Little separation occurred for earliness for all the varieties, table 9. A total of seven harvests was made for the season. Mountain Pride and Flora-Dade were a week later than the other varieties in the first harvest. Most of the varieties had one of their peak harvests on July 20, except for Four Way Hybrid, Pole King Hybrid, and Early Cascade. Pole King Hybrid produced the latest peak harvest of all the varieties. Bonnie Nematode Resistant, Experimental Bonnie, and Early Cascade produced the earliest peak harvest. Monte Carlo VFN produced the tallest plant and Experimental Bonnie and Bur- gis produced the shortest plants, table 10. All varieties pro- duced globe to deep globe shape fruit, except for Burgis which produced some fruit that did not conform to its normal deep globe shape. Four varieties were rated very firm, 5 were rated firm, and 7 were rated as soft fruited. Eye appeal was good for all the entries. CULLMAN. Seed were planted in the greenhouse at Auburn University on March 28 and transplanted May 3 at a 15-inch spacing in 5-foot rows. Experimental Bonnie pro- duced the highest yield of total marketable fruit and Big Girl was a close second for total marketable yield. Big Girl produced the highest yield of large (5 x 6) size fruit. Sunny, Four Way Hybrid, and Castlehy 105 produced above 400 hundredweights of marketable fruit. Sunny produced a high yield of medium size fruit while Four Way Hybrid and Castlehy 105 produced about equal yields of large (5 x 6) size fruit. All varieties produced a high yield of medium size fruit (6 x 6) and some- what low yields of small (6 x 7) fruit. Celebrity, a new variety, has resistance to race 2 fusarium, root knot nematode, and tobacco mosaic virus. Vista, a new variety, is resistant to race 1 fusarium and root knot nematode. Red King produced the lowest total yield, 235 hundredweights of marketable fruit, and the lowest yield of large (5 x 6) fruit. Observational ATH 12 produced the highest yield of total marketable fruit and the University hybrids, ATH 5 and ATH 8, produced good total marketable yields. ATH 8 is a medium (6 x 6) size fruit. Freedom was the lowest yielding observational entry, 256 hundredweights. Cull yields were somewhat high, mostly due to catface and small size fruit. Eight harvests were made beginning July 17 and ending August 16, table 12. Earliness was not exhibited by any one variety, but 19 of the entries were harvested on the first harvest day. Red King produced a peak yield on July 24 and only had five harvests after this date. Most varieties produced a peak harvest on July 31. Jefferson PS and ATH 5 produced peak harvest on August 16, the last harvest date. shortest plant, table 13. All the ATH hybrids produced tall plants. Most entries produced fruit of globe to deep globe shape. Big Girl produced fruit that were mixed in shape. Sunny, Four Way Hybrid, Hayslip, and Flora-Dade were rated very firm and would be suitable for commercial shipping. Eye appeal was good for most entries. In the different trial locations, those varieties designated "3" for suggested use would have potential for all three suggested uses, tables 7, 10, and 13. However, those entries rated for home garden and roadside use ("I" and "2") should be studied carefully before any plantings are made for commercial shipping. TABLE 1. BROCCOLI VARIETY TRIAL, FAIRHOPE, FALL 19841 Leaf Variety and Marketable Head Head Stem in bud, Plant Date, no. of harvests, and Days from seed source yieldbacre size dia. dia. 1 none height 10percent of total transplant (center bud only) 5=many 10-8 10-12 10-17 10-22 10-26 to harvest Lh. Lbh. In. In. No. In. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Dayj Green Duke (Twilley) ........ 6388 0.88 7.1 1.4 1.0 18 0 84 16 0 0 54-59 Premium Crop (Twilley) ..... 6171 85 7.2 1.4 2.8 16 15 10 75 0 0 50-59 (Green Comet (Agway) ....... 5662 78 7.0 1.3 1.I 14 53 37 5 0 5 50-68 Bravo (A&C) ............... 5009 .69 68 1.3 1.5 19 50 10 40 0 0 50-59 Southern Comet (Agway) ..... 4719 65 6.9 1. 1.i 17 50 10 40 0 0 50-59 Gem (Asgrow) ............. 4501 62 5.5 1.3 4.2 18 0 85 15 0 0 54 68 Green Valiant (Twilley) ...... 4356 .60 5.1 1.4 1.3 16 0 0 16 79 Q' (,S Futura (Asgrow) ............ 2613 6 4.7 11 1.0 16 0 0 0 17 Orion (Asgrow) ............. 2250 .i 1,9 I 0 i40 Il 0 ) ,4 'Soil test results: P = 100 (M); K - 110 (H); pH = 6.1. Date seeded in greenhouse, Auburn: 7-9-84. Date transplanted in greenhouse, Auburn: 7 16-84. Date transplanted in field: 8-20-84. TABLE 2. YIELD, DRY MATTER, AND STAND COUNT FOR POTATO VARIETY TRIAL, FAIRHOPE, 1984' Variety and Marketable yield/acre Size A Dry Stand at seed source Total Size A2 Size B of total matter harvest Cu t. Cu t. Cut. Pct. Pct. Pct. Red 1.a Soda (Rudnik, North Dakota) ............................ 277 271 6 98 16.84 98 Atlantic (Zalewski Bros Inc., W isconsin) ......................... 265 254 9 97 17.47 95 1.a Chipper (Starks Farms) ..................................... 257 253 4 98 17.68 86 W 946R (U W isconsin) ....................................... 251 239 12 95 17.05 97 Red La Soda (Starks Farms) .................................... 247 241 6 98 16.63 95 .-81-119R (Starks Farm s) ..................................... 243 252 11 96 18.24 99 L-01- 8 (Starks Farms) ........................................ 225 222 3 99 18.53 78 W 949R (U. W isconsin ....................................... 222 217 5 98 17.05 95 Red La Soda (A Szczepahski, Minnesota) ........................ 221 211 10 96 16.65 95 W 760 (U W isconsin) ........................................ 201 197 4 98 22.33 97 W 855 (U Wisconsin) ........................................ 199 195 4 98 20.00 97 Norchip (G. J. Johnson, M innesota) ............................. 193 185 8 96 18.74 95 W 842 (U. W isconsin) ........................................ 188 178 10 95 21.06 100 W 742 (U. W isconsin) ........................................ 174 170 4 98 19.58 86 W 887 (U W isconsin) ........................................ 168 165 5 97 20.00 87 W 870 (U. W isconsin) ........................................ 162 154 8 95 20.85 86 Russet Sebago (Starks Farms) ............................................. ......... 139 154 5 95 15.78 91 Superior (Starks Farm s) ....................................... 124 123 1 99 18.32 91 BelRus (Starks Farm s) ........................................ 91 76 15 84 19.58 94 iSoil test: P = 100 (M); K = 110 (H); pH = 6 1 Rainfall date for growing season (inches): March 5.58; April 3.19; May 2.49; June 1 -12, 0. ,'Size A = potatoes with 17 inches diameter and larger; size B = potatoes with I v to I inches diameter. Variety and Marketable yield/acre Size A Dry Stand at seed source Total Size A Size B of total matter harvest Cut. Cu . Cu . Pct. Pct. Pt. Red La Soda (Rudnik, Minot, North Dakota) ...................... 226 198 28 88 16.8. 99 Atlantic (Zalewski Bros. Inc., W isconsin) ......................... 196 172 24 88 20.85 95 1-01-18 (Starks Farm s) ........................................ 196 180 16 92 17.47 69 W 9 1R (U W isconsin) ....................................... 188 157 51 81 6.61 100 Red La Soda (A Szczepahski, Minnesota) ........................ 182 150 12 82 1684 91 W 887 (U. W isconsin) . ....................................... . 173 1-9 24 86 2085 89 W 8,12 (U W isconsin) ........................................ 172 149 21 87 2061 91 Norchip (G. J. Johnson, M innesota) ............................. 171 152 19 89 18.55; 87 Red La Soda (Starks Farms) .................................... 164 156 28 83 16 ;6 91 W 7,2 (U W isconsin) ........................................ 161 147 16 90 19.79 92 W 855 (U Wisconsin) ......................................... 162 l15 27 85 19.16 97 La Chipper (Starks Farm s) ..................................... 155 138 17 89 18.;2 90 W 919R (U. W isconsin) ....................................... 154 129 25 84 17.05 97 W 760 (U. W isconsin) ........................................ 1-17 122 25 85 20)64 96 Kennebec (Canada) ........................................... 145 124 21 86 1599 87 L-81-1 19R (Starks Farm s) ..................................... 130 102 28 78 19.16 94i W 870 (L. W isconsin) ......................................... 111 97 11 87 20145 75 Russet Sebago (Starks Farms) .................................. 109 95 16 85 15 1S 78 Superior Starks Farm s) ....................................... 91 85 8 91 18 10 96 Be]Rus (Starks Farm s) ........................................ 74 55 19 74 18.i2 94 'Soil test: P = 2510 (VH); K 180 (H), pH = 5.5. Rainfall data for growing season (inches): April 5.71. May 6.98 June 1.7, July 1-20, 248. 'Size A = potatoes with 1 ? inches diameter and larger; size B = potatoes with 1/ to I s inches diameter TABLE 4. YIELD, SKIN AND FLESH COLOR FOR SWEET POTATO VARIETY TIRIALS, 1984' Variety and Marketable yield/acre Percent Culls Cracks Skin Flesh seed source Total No l's' Canners Jumbos No. I's color color Bui Ryu. Bu. Bu. Pct. Bu. Bu. Shorter Resisto (USDA) .................. 5 ,1-, I .'1 Dark coppvr Dirk , m.i Sumor (USI)A) ................. . 468 i25 128 1) o9 55 5 White White Centennial (Auburn) ............. 3'00 195 ;6 69 65 77 75 Copper Orange Carolina Nugget (Auburn) ........ 287 178 16 75 62 75 179 Rose Light orange Jewel (Auburn) .................. 286 216 18 32 76 60 108 Copper Light orange Regal (US)A) .................. 265 182 44 i9 69 SI 115 Purple Light orange Coidner (Auburn) ............... 244 152 45, 49 62 50 75 Copper Orange Clanton Jewel )Auburn) .................. 764 208 1;2 424 27 62 6 Regal (USDA) .................. 553 166 142 245 ;0 49 62 Sumir (USDA) ................. 551 2;1 155 185 42 15 56 jewel (loncal) .................... 51 6 202 151 181 18 119 14 Carolina Nugget (Auburn) ........ 429 1,18 85 196 15 248 50 Porto Rico (Auburn) ............. 416 129 156 151 ;1 77 55 Tan Light orange Carolina Nugget )Local) .......... . 408 190 99 119 47 215 , Resist IUSDA) ................. ;596 197 160 59 50 25 79 Jewel (Georgia) ................. 540 80 86 174 24 77 17 Crossville Centennial (Auburn) ............. 581 588 l16 57 68 1 2 Cordner (Auburn) ............... 491 565 66 62 74 20 1 Jewel (Auburn) .................. 462 298 85 79 64 11 0 Carolina Nugget (Auburn) ........ 444 322 79 41 73 27 1 Jewel (Georgia) ................. 1.24 515 67 44 74 15 5 Regal (USDA) .................. . ,85 274 47 62 72 61 0 Porto Rico (Auburn) ............. 2 9 196 59 44 65 5 3 'Soil test: Shorter, P 140 (H). K 160 (H) pH 53 Clanton, P 210 (VH), K 110 (H), pH = 6.0. Crossville, P = 40 (M); K 70 (L); pH 6 .3 'U.S No. I -roots 2 to ;' inches in diameter, length 3 to 9 inches, well-shaped and free of defects. Canners -roots I to 2 inches in diameter, 2 to 7 inches in length Jumbos or oversize -roots that exceed the diameter, length, and weight requirements of the above two grades, but are of marketable quality Culls -roots 1 inch or larger in diameter and so misshapen or unattractive they could not fit as marketable roots in any of the above three grades 'Bushel = 50 pounds ibI ,,Ihi IA li) > !A KiIl HiIM 1A tKl I I I Ol1A! 0i i i I A! i IjOP, 'S Culls Variety and Marketable yield/acre2 Pct. of seed source Total 5 x 61 6 x 6 6 x 7 Total total Cracks Ca- Blossom Others' yedface end-rot yield Cu t. Cu t. Cu t. Cu't. Cut. Pct. Pct. Pit. Pct. Pct. Replicated Mountain Pride (Castle) ..................... 771 204 290 277 89 10 0 26 0 74 Monte Carlos VFN (Petoseed) ................ 768 224 357 187 156 6 9 58 2 31 Jefferson PS (Petoseed) ..................... 754 132 307 315 III 8 2 19 3 76 Castlehy 1035 (Castle) ...................... 740 185 337 218 101 8 4 39 4 53; Castlehy 105 (Castle) ....................... 733 255 293 185 112 8 3 29 0 68 Burgis (U Florida) ......................... 722 214 318 190 98 8 0 25 2 73 Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) .... 720 133 293 294 96 9 7 42 2 49 Bigset VFN (Petoseed) ...................... 707 243 281 181 100 8 10 30 57 Early Cascade (Petoseed) .................... 6911 ' 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 28 72 Pole King Hybrid (Twilley) .................. 660 324 239 97 169 5 0 50 8 42 Hayslip (U Florida) ........................ 658 135 313 210 1H5 6 1 49 0 50 Flora-Dade (Asgrow) ....................... 650 45 283 322 104 7 0 34 2 64 I-our Way Hybrid (Four Way Farms) .......... 6_149 246 275 128 106 7 0 53 2 45 Carmen (Petoseed) ......................... 638 376 196 66 161 5 7 41 21 ,1 Sunny (Asgrow) ........................... 633i 176 265 192 122 6 2 48 6 44 Conte Sa (Petoseed) ........................ 605 252 230 123 184 4 8 33 22 37 President (Petoseed) ........................ 555 309 167 79 147 5 2 50 11 38 Experimental Bonnie (Bonnie Farms) ......... 555 314 165 76 167 4 3 55 4 38 Observational Castlehy 1065 (Castle) ...................... 858 217 385 256 101 9 5 49 7 39 Pole Boy 83 (Twilley) ....................... 848 252 361 235 85 11 0 25 6 69 ATH 22 (Auburn) .......................... 712 29 247 436 36 21 0 35 4 61 ATH 8 (Auburn) ........................... 677 185 326 166 50 15 0 32 0 68 Liberty (Twilley) ........................... 640 47 244 349 64 11 2 34 18 46 ATH 12 (Auburn) .......................... 615 295 254 66 67 10 0 45 9 46 Freedom (Twilley) ......................... 542 120 259 163 141 5 0 51 4 45 Red King (Twilley) ......................... 494 25 129 340 62 9 2 57 2 39 Soil test: P = 330 (VH), K = 160 (H); pH = 5.0; 211., tons limestone applied per acre. -Size yields reported here are in accordance with the size standards established by the USDA for the Los Angeles type lug arrangements. 5 x 6 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 11/16 inches, maximum diameter 3 3/16 inches. 6 x 6 arrangement: minimum dianicter 2 8/16 inches, maximum diameter 2 14/ 16 inches. 6 x7 arrangement. minimum diameter 2 4/ 16 itiches, maximum diameter 2 10/1( inches. 'Although fruit were graded as carefully as possible under field conditions, no rigid effort was made to grade for a strict U.S. No. 1 grade. Fruit were separated for cull conditions as reported here. 'Some fruit in this size arrangement were larger than standard sizes 'Others were mostly tomatoes too small to be marketed in the above sizes. some were culled because of rots, insect damage, mechanical damage, and misshapen fruit. 'Fruit of this variety averaged between I and 2 inches in diameter A limited yield of marketable size fruit was harvested I A BLL 6I. UIA RVEI DIAI ES FORSH [iA KID I RiS sI M AtRKE F I OM Al 0 1 I HAL, FAIRHOLoi, 1)?i I Variety and Harvest dates' seed source 6/5 6/8 6/11 6/15 6/19 6122 6/26 6/29 7/3 7/6 7/10 7/13 7/17 Replicated Mountain Pride (Castle) ................. X - X - X Mo~nte Carlo VFN (Petoseed) .............. X X X Jefferson PS (Petoseed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. X - X Castlehy 1035 (Castle) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X X Castlehy 105 (Castle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. X X Burgis (U. Florida) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. X X Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) ......... X X Bigset VFN (Petoseed) .................. X X Early Cascade (Petoseed(...............................................X X Pole King Hybrid (Twillev(................ X Hayslip (U. Fliirida)( . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . X Fliira-Dade (Asgrow( ................. X X Four Way Hybrid (Folur Way Farms)........... X X X Carmen (Petoseed(.......................................................X X Sunny (Asgrow( . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X Conte Sa (Petoseed) . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . X President (Pettiseed( . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . X Experimental Biinnie (Bonnie Farms) ........... X Observational Castlehy 1065 (Castle).................................................X - X X X Pole Boy 81 (Twilley) .................. X X X X X ATH 22 (Auburn) .................... X X ATH 8 (Auburn) .................... X X - X Liberty (Twilley( ........................................................ X X ATH 12 (Auburn) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X X Freedom (Twilley).............................................................X Red King (Twilley) ...................................................... X X X indicates peak harvest date, tbe date at which tbe highest yield iccurred. In some varieties, highest yield was appriiximately the same for two or more barv est dates. TABLE 7. PLANT HEIGHT AND FRUIT CHARACTERISTICS OF TOMATO VARIETIES, FAIRHOPE, 1984 Variety and Plant Fruit characteristic Fy( Suggc td seed source height Color Shape' Firmness' appeal' use' In. Replicated Mountain Pride (Castle)...........................................38 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Monte Carlo VFN (Petoseed)......................................49 Red 1 2 2 1,2 Jefferson PS (Petoseed)...........................................46 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Castlehy 1035 (Castle)............................................29 Red 2 2 21,2 Castlehy 105 (Castle).............................................49 Red 2 1 13 Burgis (U. Florida)...............................................32 Red 2 11 Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms)..........................33 Red I 1 2 1.2 Bigset (Petoseed)................................................29 Red 2 2 2 1,2 Fatly Cascade (Petoseed)..........................................51 Red 2 31 1,2 Piile King Hybrid (Twilley).........................................1 Red 22 1 1,2 Hayslip (U. Florida)..............................................33 Red 1,2 11 Flora-Dade (Asgrow)..............................................I Red 2 1 Four Way Hybrid (Four Way Farms)................................47 Red I 1 1 Carmen (Petosced)...............................................30 Red 32 1.2 Sunny (Asgrow)..................................................i Red 2 11 Conte Sa (Petoseed)..............................................36 Red 3 2 2 1,2 President (Petoseed) ............................... 30 Red 1 2 1 1,2 Experimental Bonnie (Bonnie Farms)...............................28 Red 1 3 1 1,2 Observational Castlehy 1065 (Castle).............................................4 Red 1,2 2 1 1,2 Pole Boy 83 (Twilley).............................................52 Red 2 2 2 1,2 Castlehy 1035 (Castle)............................................35 Red 1,2 2 1 1,2 ATH 22 (Auburn) ................................................ 38 Red 2 2 2 1,2 ATH 8 (Auburn) ................................................. 36 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Liberty (Twilley)..................................................5 Red 2 2 1,2 1,2 ATH 12 (Auburn) ................................................ 38 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Freedom (Twilley)...............................................23 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Red King (Twilley) .............................................. 25 Red 2,3 2 1 1,2 'Shape rating. I = globe, 2 =deep globe, 3 oblate, 4 =deep oblate, 5 mixed. 2 Firmness rating: I =very firm, 2 firm, 3 soft. 'Appearance rating. I =smooth, 2 slightly rough, 3 =rough. 'Use rating: I =home garden, 2 = roadside and other direct marketing, 3 =commercial shipping. i i il, ). li DI 1 ) 0H IA K! ) 1 hl l ,I o '!A RKE I I OMA 0t 1 llk I 1(3 ' ), ;" Culls Variety and Marketable yield/acre - Pct. of Cat Blossom seed source Total 5 x 6, 6 x 6 6 x 7 Total total Cracks face endo Others' yield Cu t. Cu t .Cut. Cut Ct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct Pet. Replicated Monte Carlo VFN (Petoseed) ................ 515 422 76 37 90 17 40 27 1 30 President (Petoseed) ........................ . 468 106 54 8 125 27 23 36 1 ,8 Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) .... .162 362 82 18 107 23 11 6 0 81 Sunny (Asgrow) ........................... 442 358 65 19 62 14 11 40 1 45 Mountain Pride (Castle) ..................... 416 560 65 11 109 25 14 21 0 45 Hayslip (U. Florida) ........................ 451 157 57 17 109 25 5 35 0 ;0 Experimental Bonnie (Bonnie Farms) .......... .118 362 46 10 99 24 28 20 2 50 Castlehy 105 (Castle) ....................... 116 346 50 20 111 27 35 12 5 50 Four Way Hybrid (Four Way Farms) .......... 409 328 58 23 125 30 62 19 2 17 Jefferson PS (Petoseed) ..................... 406 324 58 24 73 18 34 24 ,9 Flora-Dade (Asgrow) ....................... -400 330 52 18 78 20 18 26 6 50 Bigset VFN Petoseed) ...................... 198 144 41 13 129 32 29 24 2 .45 Carmen (Petoseed) ......................... 395 352 34 9 157 40 51 29 6 14 Pole King Hybrid (Twilley) .................. 552 278 48 26 185 52 72 20 2 6 Burgis (U. Florida) ......................... 343 289 49 5 106 51 36 9 5 52 E arly C ascade (Petoseed ) .................... 445" -. ..... 'Soil test: P = 250 (VH). K = 150 (H), pH = 59, 1 ton limestone applied per acre 'Size yields reported here are in accordance with the size standards established by the USDA for the los Angeles type lug arrangements. 5 x 6 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 11/16 inches, maximum diameter , 3/16 inches 6 x 6 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 8/16 inches, maximum diameter 2 14/ 16 inches 6 x 7 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 4/ 16 inches, maximum diameter 2 10/ 16 inches 'Although fruit were graded as carefully as possible under field conditions, no rigid effort was made to grade for a strict U.S. No. I grade. Fruit were separated for cull conditions as reported here. 'Some fruit in this size arrangement were larger than standard sizes. 'Others were mostly tomatoes too small to be marketed in the above sizes. Some were culled because of rots, insect damage, mechanical damage, and misshapen fruit 'Fruit of this variety averaged between I and 2 inches in diameter. A limited yield of marketable size fruit was harvested TABLE 9. HARVEST DATES FOR STAKED FRESH MARKET TOMATO TRIALS, CLANTON, 1984 Variety and seed source Harvest dates' 6126 7/3 7/12 7120 7/27 8/ 2 8/9 M onte Carlo (Petoseed) ..................................................................... X X P resident (Petoseed) ........................................................................ X Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) ..................................................... X X Sunny (A sgrow ) ........................................................................... X M ountain Pride (Castle) ..................................................................... X X H ayslip (U Florida) ........................................................................ X X Experimental Bonnie (Bonnie Farm s) ........................................................... X X C astlehy 105 (C astle) ....................................................................... X X Four W ay H ybrid (Four W ay Farm s) .......................................................... X X Jefferson PS (Petoseed) ..................................................................... X X Flora D ade (A sgrow ) ....................................................................... X X Bigset V FN (Petoseed) ...................................................................... X C arm en (Petoseed) ......................................................................... X Pole K ing H ybrid (T w illey) .................................................................. X B urgis (U Florida) ......................................................................... X Early Cascade (Petoseed) ..................................................................... x 'X indicates peak harvest date, the date at which the highest yield occured In some varieties, highest yield was approximately the same for two or more harvest dates, Variety and seed source Plant height Fruit characteristic - Eye Suggested Color Shape' Firmness2 appeal' use, Replicated Miitit Carlo VFN Petoseed)......................................5 - Red 2 A1 1,2 President (Petoseed. .................................................... Red I I I Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farm S)..........................26 Red I I I ~Sunny, (Asgrow).................................................26 Red 2 1 1 Mountain Pride (Castle)...........................................52 Red 2 1 H-ayslip (U Fliirida)..............................................21 Red 2 1 1A Experimecntal Bonnie (Bonnie Farms)...............................22 Red 2 A 2 1 ( .stlehy 105 (Cistle).............................................50 Red 2 2 11 Four Way Hybrid (Four Way Farms)................................52 Red 2 1 1 .Jefferson PS (Petoseed)...........................................50 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Florai 1ade (Asgrow).............................................25 Red 2 1 1 A Bigset VFN (Petoseed) ............................................ 28 Red 2 3 1 2 Ca.rmni i l'eriseed)................................................8 Red 1 2 2 1 Pole King Hybrid (Twilley).........................................1 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Burgis (U. Florida)...............................................23 Red 2,5 2 1 1,2 Early Cascade (Petoseed)..........................................29 Red 2 A 1 Shape rating: 1 globe, 2 =deep globe, A oblate, *ideep oblate, 5 mixed. 2Firmness rating: t very firm, 2 -firm, 3 soft. Appearancc raiting: I =smooth, 2 slightly rough, A rough. Use rating: I b orne garden, 2 =roiadside and iither direct marketing, A - commercial shipping. TABLE 11. YIELDS FOR STAKED FRESH MARKET TOMATO TRIAL, CULLMAN, 198-4 Culls Variety and Marketable yieldi acre- Pct of Ct Bosm Ohr seed source Total' 5 x 6, 6 x 6 6i x 7 Toitail total Cracks Cae- endso rot rs yield fc n-o Cwt. Cut. Cu t. Cut. Cu 1. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Replicated Lx c i i ic i .. me (Bonnie Farms)..............61 167' 259 AS 106 2A (1 06 0 64 Big Girl (Burpee...............................i2 240 199 IA 121 27 0 141 0 59 'iiiii (Asgriiw)...............................423 97 277 49 HA7 A2 0 AA 0 67 I oi r WXay Hybrid (Four Way Farms)...............18 1 Al 2A7 50 112 27 0 24 0) 76 i sticbs 105 (Castle)............................0; 1A6 2A2 AS 115 29 0 18 11 71 Hayslip (L. loirida).............................94 95 247 52 1.44 ;7 0 23 0) 77 (Celebrity (Petoseed)............................81 15s 44 02 25 68 18 0 Al (0 69 Cairmen (Petiiseed).............................79 145 21)7 27 1-47 ;9 1 18 2 59 Burgis iU. Florida).............................77 80 225 72 171) 45 0 12 0 88 Miiuntain Pride (Castle)................. I........61 96 227 38 127 AS (0 9 0 91 Jefferson PS (Petoseed).........................AS 71 219 6A 105 AO 0) 16 2 82 Bonnie Nematoide Resistant (Bonnie Farms) ... A48 57 22,1 67 181 5 A 0 16 0 84 Bigset Pctoseedi..............................5.1 4 1A 2A8 6A3 200 58 1 17 0 82 Flora-Dade (Asgrow............................09 41 215 SA I1A4 -43 0 21 0 79 Pik-Red (Harris)...............................i)A 100 155 4i8 1A6 45 0 21 0 79 Piile King Hybrid (Twilleyi.....................297 150 152 I5 96 52 0 56 A 4 Vista (Asgrow................................282 lA1 1A4 15 9-1 A3 1 25 2 69 Red King (Twilley) ........................... 235 20 157 58 161 69 (0 18 1 81 Observational ATH I2 (Auburn) ............................. AO 127 215 18 76 19 0 42 0 58 PSR 72979 (Petoseed)..........................80 156 191 AA 78 21 0 23 0 77 ATH 5 (Auburn) ............................... 65 134 182 49 56 15 0 26 0 74 Castlehy 1054 (Castle)..........................56 122 201 AO 91 26 0) 27 (0 73 PSR 26i;81 (Petii5ced)..........................39 1II0 200 29 82 24 (0 24 0 76 ATH 8 (Auburn) ............................... 19 7A 208 58 77 24 0 27 14 59 Conte Sa (Pettiseed)...........................289 95 175 19 13A6 47 0 11 0 67 Freedom (Twilley)............................251 28 180 48 151 51 0 34 0 66 Sil test: P =5;0 i VH) K =160 (Hi, PH =5 1), 211 tons litmestiine applied per acre. 2Size yields reported here are in accordiance w ith the size standards established by the USDA for the Lois Angeles type lug arrangements. 5 x 6 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 11/16 inches, maximum diameter A A/16 inches. 6 x 6 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 8/16 inches, maximum diameter 2 14/16 inches. 6 x 7 arrangement: minimum diameter 2 -4/16 inches, maximum diameter 2 10 //16 inches. 'Although fruit were graded as carefully as possiblt under field conditions, no rigid effort was made to grade for a strict U.S. No. I grade. Fruit v.ere separatedl for cull ciinditiiins as reported here. 'Some fruit in this size arrangement were larger than standard sizes. Others w~ere mostly tomaties toio small to be marketed in the above sizes. Some were culled because of rots, insect damage, mechanical damage, and misshapen fruit Harvest dates t 7/17 7/24 7/26 7/31 8/2 8/9 8/14 8/16 Replicated 1Experim ental Bonnie Bonnie Farm s) .................................................... B ig ( ir B urpee) .................................................................... S u n n y (A sg ro w ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Four W ay H ybrid (Four W ay Farm s) .................................................... Castlchy 105 (Castle) ................................................................. H ayslip (U Florida) .... ............................................................. C elebrity (Petoseed) .................................................................. ( arm en (Petoseed) ................................................................... . -- X B urg is IU . Flo rida) ................................................................... M ountain Pride (C astle) ............................................................... Jefferson I'S (Petoseed) ............................................................... Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) ............................. .............. B igset (Petoseed ) ...................................................................... -- X lnra-I)ade (A sgrow ) ................................................................. Pik-R ed (H arris) ...................................................................... . . X Pole K ing H ybrid (T w illey) ............................................................ V ista ( A sg row ) ...................................................................... R ed K ing (T w illey) ................................................................... X Observational A T H 12 (A uburn ) .................................................................... PSP, 72979 (Petoseed) ................................................................ A T H 5 (A uburn ) ..................................................................... C astlehy 1054 (C astle) ................................................................ PSR 26 18 l (Petoseed) ................................................................ A T H 8 (A uburn ) ..................................................................... Conte Sa (Petoseed) .................................................................. F reedom (T w illey) ................................................................... X X X X X X X X X X X IX indicates peak harvest date, the date at which the highest yield occured. In some varieties, highest yield was approximately the same for two or more harvest dates 'Vista was not harvested August 14. TABLE 13. PLANT HEIGHT AND FRUIT CHARACTERISTICS OF IOMATO VARIETIES, FAIRHOPE, 198-i Variety and seed source Plant Fruit characteristic height Color Shape' Firmness2 appeal Suggested use, Replicated Experimental Bonnie (Bonnie Farms) ........................... 36 Red 3 2 1 1 Big G irl (Burpeei ............................................ 44 Red 2,3 1 2 1 Sunny (A sgrow ) ............................................. 43 Red 2 1 1 1 Four W ay Hybrid (Four W ay Farms) ............................ 48 Red 2 1 1 3 (astlehy 105 (Castle) ......................................... 47 Red 2 2 1 1,2 H ayslip U . Florida) .......................................... 38 Red 2 1 1 3 Celebrity (Petoseed) .......................................... 43 Red 2 2 2 2,1 Carm en (Petoseed) ........................................... 45 Red 3 1 1 1,2 Burgis U. Florida) ............................................ 33 Red 2 2 1 1 M ountain Pride (Castle) ....................................... 41 Red 2 2 1 3 Jefferson PS (Petoseed) ....................................... 55 Red 3 3 1 1,2 Bonnie Nematode Resistant (Bonnie Farms) ...................... 3. 8 Red 1 2,3 1 1,2 Bigset (Petoseed) ............................................ 1. 9 Red 2 2,3 2 1,2 Flora-Dade (Asgrow ) ......................................... 44 Red 2 1 1 3 Pik-Red (H arris) ............................................. . . Red 2 2 2 1,2 Pole King Hybrid (Twilley) .................................... 49 Red 2 2 1 2 V ista (A sgrow ) .............................................. 46 Red 2 3 1 1 Red K ing (Twilley) ........................................... 39 Red 2 2 1 1 Observational ATH 12 (Auburn) ............................................ 52 Red 2 2 1 1,2 PSR 72979 (Petoseed) ........................................ 51 Red 2 3 1 1 ATH 5 (Auburn) ............................................. 6 Red 2 2 2 1,2 Castlehy 1054 (Castle) ........................................ 48 Red 2 2 1 1,2 PSR 20581 (Petoseed) ........................................ 48 Red 2 2 1 1,2 ATH 8 (Auburn) ............................................. 60 Red 2 2 1 1,2 Conte Sa (Petoseed) .......................................... 45 Red 1 2 1 1,2 Freedom (Tw illey) ........................................... 35 Red 2 2 1 1,2 'Shape rating: I = globe, 2 = deep globe, , oblate, 4 = deep oblate, 5 2Firmness rating: I = very firm, 2 firm, S - soft. 'Appearance rating: I = smooth, 2 slightly rough, i = rough. 'Use rating: I = home garden, 2 = roadside and other direct marketing, mixed 3 = commercial shipping Variety and seed source Information contained herein is available to all persons regardless of race, color, sex, or national origin.