Progress Report Series No. 106 Agricultural Experiment Station R. Dennis Rouse, Director Auburn, Alabama AUBURN UNIVERSITY Vegetable Variety Trials, 1973 JACK L. TURNER and HARRISON BRYCE 2 VEGETABLE VARIETY and breeding line 3 trials were conducted at the Gulf Coast Substation, Fairhope; the Chilton Area Horticulture Substation, Clanton; the North Alabama Horticulture Substation, Cull- man; the Sand Mountain Substation, Crossville; and the Main Station at Auburn. All trials were con- ducted in randomized replicated plots. Recom- mended fertilizer rates and applications for each crop and locations were used. Disease and insect control measures were applied on a regular schedule through- out the growing season and irrigation was applied as needed. Summaries of results from these trials are reported in this publication. RESULTS Bell Pepper (at Cullman). Seed were planted in the greenhouse at Auburn March 15, and seedlings were transplanted into the field May 31. Plants were spaced 2 feet apart in 44-inch rows. Three harvest were made beginning July 25, and ending August 21. Weather and growing conditions were favorable. Yields of marketable fruit were higher than in 1972, Table 1. Hybrid No. 19 and World Beater were the two highest yielding varieties of marketable fruit and also produced the highest number of pods per plant. Miss Belle produced the largest pod size. This variety is a recent release from the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station and has shown good characteristics in our area. Several other varieties also had good pod size. Burpee's Bell- ' Data presented in this publication is a true evaluation of each entry. Variety and company names are used for identification and does not imply endorsement of one over the other. 2 Research Associate and Field Superintendent, Department of Horticulture. l Seed and seed stocks of breeding lines are not available for planting until named and released. TABLE 1. BELL PEPPER Variety Bellaire ..... Burpee's Bellringer ........ California Wonder -------- C a n a p e ------------------------------------- Delaware Bellle e ....----- Early Bountiful ........... Emerald Giant ------- ----- HIybrid No. 19 Keystone Resistant Giant No. 3 M iss B elle ............... Pick-A-Peck ........ ----- Titan (TMR) Twilley's Big Pack W orld Beater ............. Yolo Select Pack Yolo W onder L ........... 1 Soil test p = 340 (high); of limestone applied per acre. VARIETY TRIAL, CULLMAN, 19731 Marketable Mean yield / acre pod weight Cwt. Lb. 62.03 .28 41.45 .29 65.70 .24 75.01 .17 66.89 .24 75.73 .19 50.29 .28 139.00 .23 48.09 99.45 86.22 63.98 52.24 130.28 45.07 67.13 .27 .31 .18 .28 .23 .22 .28 .28 k - 150 (high); pH Marketable fruits per plant No. 3.8 2.4 4.7 7.3 4.8 6.6 3.0 10.2 3.0 5.4 8.2 3.9 3.8 10.0 2.7 4.0 5.6. 1 ton ringer and Yolo Select Pack produced the least nim- ber of pods per plant. Varieties Canape, Hybrid No. 19, Pick-A-Peck, and Early Bountiful do not have typical bell pepper type fruits, however, where this feature is not important these varieties are very pro- ductive. Hybrid Cabbage (at Auburn). Seed were planted in the greenhouse on January 14, and seedlings were transplanted 15 inches apart in 40-inch rows on Feb- ruary 28. Excellent yields were obtained for all the varieties, Table 2. Round Dutch is not a hybrid but was included in the study for its productiveness and adaptability. Prime Pak and Headmaster produced the highest yields per acre and the highest mean head weights. Market Prize had the most uniform head size. Headmaster was the most variable variety rr "' April, 1974 ] TABLE 2. HYBRID CABBAGE VARIETY TRIAL., AUBURN,.93 AL .SIE UUBRTIL ULA, 19731 Variety Blue Chip------- Headmaster------ Jet Pak ------ --- King Cole ------- Market Prize ---- Prim Pak-------- Round Dutch Market- able yield acre Cwt. 333.4 369.2 -341.6 299.0 344.8 396.6 347.6 Mean head weight Lb. 3.19 3.53 3.27 2.86 3.30 3.89 3.41 Uni- formity of heads' Lb. -+-1.04 11.30 ?.79 ?.78 ?.49 ?.85 ?.60 Grow- C rHar- days vs No. 85 92 74 74 85 92 85 C BC BC DC No. 1 Soil test p - 410 (very high); k 70 (low); pH 5.5. 1 ton limestone applied per acre. ' Standard deviation. 'Color - G, green; BC, blue green; DG, dark green. for head size. jet Pak was the earliest maturing va- riety. King Cole was harvested too early in this study and should have a higher number of growing days than is reported. All varieties were harvested once- over except Round Dutch. Egg Plant (at Cullman). Seed were started March 29, in the greenhouse at Auburn and seedlings were transplanted May 31. Plants were spaced 2 feet apart in 5-foot rows. Seven harvests were made from July 10, and ending August 28. Good yields of mar- ketable fruit were produced from all but one variety, Table 3. Long Purple is a very attractive fruit but is very soft and has a tender skin. The plant is heavily colored with purple and would do well as a fower bed type for home production. Peerless Hybrid pro- duced a very good fruit type at Cullman. The fruits were elongated 6 to 9 inches and had a dark purple skin. Jersey King Hybrid is also a good fruit type with plant characteris tics very similar to, Peerless Hybrid. Black Beauty is perhaps the standard for egg plant in this area, but its fruit is somewhat rough and not well shaped. TABLE 3. EGG PLANT VARIETY TRIAL, CULLMAN., 1973 Marketable yield per acre and fruit size Variety Cwt. Black Beauty 292.02 Black Magic ----------- 317.81 Black Oval ------------- 416.86 Early Beauty Hybrid 277.05 Florida Highbush ------- 228.38 Florida Market 140.72 Hybrid No. 29 - 298.67 Jersey King Hybrid- 322.03 Long Purple - 66.42 Mission Bell------------- 258.13 Peerless Hybrid--------- 316.25 Pompano Pride --------- 201.01 ' Soil test p - 330 (high); k of limestone applied per acre. Fruit No. 2 Fruit size size Lb. Cwt. Lb. .90 87.69 .81 .84 90.92 .84 .82 38.80 .81 .48 110.23 .43 .88 135.68 .8 .79 157.17 .79 .98 76.43 1.03 .68 66.29 .64 .49 163.95 .60 .77 140.55 .87 .69 66.56 .73 L .80 49.07 .81 =190 (high); pH 5.6. 1 ton Fresh Market Cucumbers (at Cullman). Seed were planted June 10, in hill 6-inches apart in 44-inch rows. Twelve harvests were made from August 2, until August 31. Victory trellised and Victory pro- Total Fruit Variety market- Frit able wih Color' Shape' Uni- Vine' formity' vigor Bonnie Nema- tode Resistant AU 72-44------ Terrific VFN-- W alter-------- Homestead 61-- Floradel Homestead E lite------ -- AU 72-4------- Sunburst ------ Homestead 24 Tropic -------- Homestead 500 Campbell 28 A U 4 -------- - Traveler-- Creole---- Chico Crande- AU 72-5------- Monte Carlo VFN ------- Avalanche ----- M H -1--------- Pelican------- Ace 55-------- VFN Bush----- Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Replicated 274 323 288 209 181 213 193 185 105 132 219 138 105 224 140 144 135 180 243 164 127 175 120 89 148 89 110 119 124 106 29 13 17 30 27 9 451 425 415 358 332 328 109 24 326 124 11 320 149 55 309 132 38 302 75 4 298 116 35 289 146 36 287 52 5 281 108 25 273 102 24 270 96 26 257 65 6 251 Observational 156 128 93 55 61 51 19 11 32 13 7 11 418 303 252 243 188 151 Cwt. Pct. Pct. 88 96 138 65 48 129 67 72 57 30 80 54 45 88 19 77 56 122 107 61 81 123 66 155 45 64 67 46 41 53 50 65 17 21 41 37 2 35 3 55 0 67 45 8 12 27 32 64 13 11 17 18 16 17 19 8 22 19 38 5 20 37 5 10 6 21 25 41 30 44 38 5 Pct. 42 25. 16 36 43 30 31 27 61 60 21 58 78 28 92 35 94 12 30 51 58 29 30 31 ' Soil test p 250 (very high); k 190 (high); pH 6.2. 2 Others were mostly tomatoes too small to be marketed in the above sizes. Some were from rots, insect damage and misshapen fruits. [2] TABLE 4. SLICER CUCUMBER TRIAL, CULLMAN, 1973' Cwt. Lb. emini- - 224 .37 3 3 4 3 Poinsett 167 .34 4 4 4 4 TXP-B .-181 .53 4 4 4 4 Victory 284 .37 3 3 4 3 Victory trellised-.-290 XP 10485--- -245 . 3 1 4 1 1 Soil test p-170 (medium); k - 130 (high); pH - 5.9. 25 excellent, 4 - good, 3 fair, 2 poor, and 1 - very poor. duced the highest yields of marketable fruit, Table 4. A small increase in yield was obtained by trellising and spraying was made easier. All the varieties ex- cept XP 10485 had acceptable color, shape, uniform- ity and vine vigor. Poinsett and TXP-B had excellent fruit color and shape. Fresh Market Tomatoes (at Fairhope and Cull- man). Seed were planted in the greenhouse at Au- burn on March 1, for Fairhope. and April 1, for Cull- man. Seedlings were transplanted April 24, at Fair- hope and May 31, at Cullman. Plants were spaced 15-inches apart in 5-foot rows at both locations. At Fairhope, plants were staked and pruned to a two leader system. At Cullman, a split plot was used TABLE 5. STAKED FRESH MARKET TOMATO TRIAL, FAIRHOPE, 1973' Marketable yield per acre Culls Variety Cat- 0th- 5 x6 6xz6 6 x7 Total Total Cracks face ers 2 TABLE 6. STAKED AND UNSTAKED FRESH MARKET TOMATO TIAL, CULLMAN, 1973' Staked and trellised Variety Marketable yield per acre 5 x6 6x6 6x7 Total Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Tropic-- ----- -- - Floradel------ -- Terrific VFN- Creole-- -- -- -- -- - Homestead Elite - Tropi-Red ---------- Traveler ------- ------- Supermarket --------- Homestead 500 ------- Bonnie Nematode Resistant---- - ------ Homestead 24 ------ W alter ------------- TAMU Monte Grande. Homestead 61 ------- Sunburst ------- ---- Chico Crande --------- 46.81 57.47 85.36 29.50 31.61 19.53 9.34 7.86 10.35 11.34 8.45 3.87 11.07 8.77 .79 .51 253.06 215.77 215.99 208.44 215.13 216.23 177.17 183.45 185.59 172.98 159.11 135.27 164.74 133.62 94.13 8.45 95.74 395.61 117.57 390.81 84.67 386.02 118.41 356.35 93.09 339.83 99.41 335.17 141.88 328.36 116.84 308.15 107.55 303.49 106.07 290.39 108.21 275.77 124.57 263.71 83.80 259.61 94.13 237.24 105.06 199.98 35.62 44.58 AU 72-44 ----- -49.00 184.74 68.03 301.77 XP 2011--- *28.30 153.34 93.30 275.54 AU 4----- 21.99 164.36 48.90 235.25 AU 72-5-------- - 10.46 149.65 6939 229.50 Pelian - 22.34 140.31 66.01 228.66 AU 72-4 5.58 78.20 109.01 192.79 Saturn-------------- 7.18 65.00 117.17 189.35 Venus--------------- .00 82.18 103.26 185.44 ' Soil test p 390 (high); k - 160 (low); pH 2 Others were mostly tomatoes too small to b( misshapen fruits. Culls Total Cracks Cat- Others' face Cwt. Pct. Pct. Pct. Replicated 139.64 27 3 70 147.17 18 1 81 123.53 11 6 83 160.57 7 5 89 152.94 11 4 85 235.29 14 2 84 172.04 2 8 95 211.52, 5 6 89 210.62 8 4 88 169.44 8 2 90 210.67 6 4 90, 279.55, 9 2 89 175.28 17 2 81 202.29 7 3 90 344.46 4 1 95 472.42 1 0 99 Observational 100.82 2 8 90 190.35 1 10 89 110.*62 10 21 69 92.47 0 7 93 219.66 2 30 68 143.27 2 4 94 149.37 0 5 95 125.19 .50 .50 99 = 5.8. 1 emarketabi Unstaki Marketable yield per acre 5 x6 Cwt. 44.03 48.42 63.05 23.12 30.76 24.78 7.28 22.36 27.57 31.31 17.19 10.66 14.34 20.39 6.80 .77 58.23 15.37 28.86 17.95 26.52 18.30 .00 .00 6x6 6x7 Total Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. 175.21 135.81 148.39 174.08 165.54 156.76 189.73 177.68 203.79 177.98 152.01 136.16 114.17 202.25 120.76 19.43 139.89 129.89 79.29 109.75 110.27 99.88 87.41 98.98 54.57 273.61 52.21 236.44 46.61 258.05 77.93 275.13 63.65 259.95 70.02 251.56 107.71 304.72 107.67 307.71 90.42 321.78 68.06 277.35 86.20 255.40- 94.00 240.82 69.32 197.83 72.70 295.34 110.32 237.88 65.38 85.58 56.0,8 254.20 59.49 204.75 33.14 141.29 46.25 179.50, 40.64 177.43 66.77 184.95 67.44 154.85 85.35 184.33 Culls Total Cracks Ct Others' Cwt. Pct. Pct. Pct. 142.63 132.83 148.74 140.17 156.91 206.66 146.30 189.19 163.71 186.90 173.98 226.54 167.54 151.28 176.90 396.61 88.59 231.96 110.34 97.41 191.61 103.12 130.20 149.41 ton of limestone applied per acre. e in the above sizes. Some were from rots, insect 34 12 16 6 22 17 3 4 10 10 8 11 22 7 5 1 3 3 12 31 40 7 20 14 62 86 76 90 72 79 95 87 87 87 89 76 76 88 93 99 96 96 82 68 58 91 71 86 damage, and where one-half of the plants was staked using the binder twine trellis system and the other half was left to lie on the ground. Bonnie Nematode Resistant produced the highest yield of marketable tomatoes at Fairhope, Table, 5. An Auburn line, AU 7244, also performed well. The three most crack resistant varieties were Campbell 28, Traveler and Chico Grande, while Traveler was the most blemish free variety in the trial. Observa- tional Variety Monte Carlo VFN was somewhat rough and flat in shape but otherwise was high yield- ing. MH-1, a jointless fresh market machine type, had a round, red fruit with good quality. Avalanche produced well, has a round flat fruit type, and was the most crack free of the observational varieties. Yields and other data are reported in Table 6 for the Culiman trial. At this location staked versus un- staked results are reported. Staked varieties in gen- eral produced higher marketable yields than did un- staked. A few varieties did, however, make a higher yield on the ground. Fruit size was reduced this year and is reflected in the amount of culls reported and the cwts. of 5 x 6's. In the staked trial, Tropic was the highest yielder of marketable fruit and followed closely by Floradel and Terrific VFN. In the unstaked trial Homestead 500 produced the highest yield of marketable fruit. Traveler, Sunburst, and Chico Grande produced the most blemish free, of the replicated varieties. Observational entries Saturn and Venus are small fruited types, but had a high degree of crack and cat- face resistance this year. Both are resistant to south- ern bacterial wilt disease. This characteristic makes these two tomatoes very desirable for home. gardens that have a southern bacterial wilt problem. AU 72-44 produced the. highest marketable yield of the observational varieties whether staked or unstaked. Pickling Cucumbers, (at Auburn). Seed were planted May 1, for the spring crop and August 16, for the fall crops. Plants were spaced 6 inches apart in 40-inch rows. Nine harvests were made for the spring crop from June 15, and ending July 13. Six harvests were made for the fall crop from September 27, until October 16. Spring yields were much higher than fall yields. Gynoecious varieties Carolina and Explorer pro- duced good yields and both have good pickling qual- ite, Table 7. Chipper is an older variety that also yielded well. Score is a new release for 1974 and has lots of good pickle characteristics. Line 817A is a monoecious line with excellent color and good pickle shape. [3] ed TABLE 7. PICKLING CUCUMBER TRIAL, AUBURN, 1972' Marketable yield per acre Variety No. Cwt Carolina--- -- 18 Earlipik (NK)- 13 Explorer ---- _20 Mariner (jH)- 17 72-G2 (NC) - 16 Chipper------ - 64 Ark. 71-10---- - 21 Ark. 71-74 -- - 30 Ark. 71-37-- - 25 14A X 817A (AS)- 15 817A (AS)--- 24 Score (AS)--- 27 FX3806 (FM)- 22 FX3807 (FM)- 28 38ND (jH)--- 15 3885 (jH)--- 11 73-GlO (NC)24 73-Gil (NC)- 20 Green Spear (NK) 19 Exp. 816 (NK)- - 36 Triple Cross (TAMU) - 22 Carolina--- - -- 19 Earlipik (NK) ------- 18 Explorer ---------- 19 Mariner (Jil) ------ 17 72-G2 (NC)-------- 14 Chipper ---------- 9 Ark. 71-10 ---------- 7 Ark. 71-14 -------- 6 Ark. 71-37 ------- 19 14A X817A (AS)-. 24 817A (AS) -------- 14 Score --------- --- 15 FX3806 (FM) ------- 10 FX3807 (FM) ------ 13 38ND (ll) -------- 18 3885 (jil) --------- 17 73-G10, (NC)------- 20 73-GIl (NC)------- 22 0 Green Spear (NK)--. 18 Exp. 816 (NK) ----- 9 Triple Cross (TAMU) -------- 17 Grades 2 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 Total t. Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. 92 108 110 106 111 93 92 112 73 77 101 129 95 153 105 94 130 126 91 151 Harvest Clr Fruit Spine Vine Carpel sep aration 5 Colorn shape color- vigor N.T o ' Pct. Pct. Spring 177 66 353 Early G Excellent Wh Excellent 0 197 48 366 Early G Good Wh Good 1 210 65 405 Medium G Excellent Wh Excellent 1 191 62 376 Medium DG Fair Wh Good 1.5 206 49 382 Early DG Good Wh Excellent 5 200 47 404 Medium G Excellent Wh Excellent 0 192 40 345 Late DG Fair Wh Excellent 0 187 38 367 Late DG Fair Wh Excellent 3 190 70 358 Late DG Fair Wh Excellent 0 137 38 267 Early G Good Wh Good 0 133 29 287 Medium DG Good Wh Excellent 0 230 7 393 Early G Good Wh Excellent 0 182 45 344 Medium G Fair Wh Excellent 0 298 53 532 Early LG Good Wh Excellent 0 196 42 355 Early LG Fair Wh Fair 0 160 43 308 Early G Good Wh Good 0 184 52 394 Early DG Good Wh Excellent 0 197 64 407 Medium G Good Wh Excellent 0 175 15 300 Medium G Fair Wh Excellent 0 220 69 476 Late G Fair Wh Excellent 0 101 159 53 335 Early G Good Wh Excellent 0 Fall 52 53 6 130 Medium G Good Wh Good 0 102 104 6 230 Early LG Good Wh Good 0 70 60 14 163 Medium LG Good Wh Good 0 60 61 10 168 Medium G Good Wh Good 5 46 50 10 120 Medium DG Good Wh Good 0 35 31 2 77 Late C Good Wh Good 0 32 14 5 58 Late DG Fair Wh Fair 0 29 37 9 81 Late DG Fair Wh Good 0 45 63 21 148 Late DG Good Wh Excellent 4 79 47 12 162 Early G Good Wh Good 0 50 45 3 112 Late G Excellent Wh Fair 0 53 48 9 125 Medium G Fair Wh Good 0 41 45 4 100 Early LG Fair Wh Fair 0 60 56 15 144 Medium LG Fair Wh Fair 0 64 110 15 207 Early LG Fair Wh Good 0 85 64 12 178 Early DG Fair Wh Fair 0 88 65 8 181 Medium G Fair Wh Excellent 0 88 65 4 179 Early G Fair Wh Excellent 0 81 47 4 150 Medium G Fair Wh Excellent 0 34 28 5 76 Medium G Fair Wh Excellent 0 70 72 6 165 Early LG Fair Wh Excellent 0 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 25 0 15 45 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spring: Soil test p 520 (very high); k - 90 (medium); pH 6.4. Fall: Soil test p 530 (very high); k 80 (medium); pH- 5.6. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. 'No. 1 grade ranged up to 1-u inch in diameter; No. 2 grade ranged from 1-& to 1 inches in dianeter; No. 3 grade ranged from 11/2 to 2 inches in diameter; No. 4 grade ranged from 2 to 2 1/4 inchies in diameter. - green; LG - light green; DG - dark green. 4 Wh white. 'Carpel separation was based on the per cent of fruits cut that had open or air spaces in the middle. [4] 1IPn G: r/ TABLE 8. POTATO VARIETY TRIAL, CROSSVILLE, ALABAMA, 19731 Variety Yield per acre Total Eye Eye Skin Shape Eye No. 1 No. 2 depth' size' color 4 appeal 5 Cwt. Cwt. Cwt. Kennebec .------------------------ 73.81 20.64 94.45 S S Wh Long 4 La Chipper 40.53 19.16 59.69 S S Wh Round 3 Norchip 19.48 11.28 30.76 S S Wh Round 3 Raratan 32.30 7.65 39.95 S S Wh/SR Round 4 Red La Soda 100.98 28.96 129.94 D L Red Round 4 Superior 59.47 18.05 77.52 M S Wh/SR Round 4 Frito-Lay 96 63.93 34.97 98.90 D L Wh/SR Round 3.5 Frito-Lay 162 ----------------------------------- 62.74 20.57 83.31 S S W h/SR Round 4 Seminole _............................ 50.94 11.43 62.37 S S W h/SR Round 4 Frito-Lay 657 66.38 17.30 83.68 S S Wh Rd./long 4 L71-82 --------------------------------- 55.91 25.99 81.90 S S W h/SR Long 3.5 L71-110 .-------------------------- 62.97 21.61 84.58 D M Wh Round 4 Wis. 623 -- 52.20 43.66 95.86 S S Wh Round 3 Wis. 66-13R-72_ .....................-------- 121.70 19.16 140.86 D L Red Round 4 W is. 703 .................................... 71.95 24.58 96.53 M M W h/SR Round 4 W is. 704 ........................................ 23.02 25.84 48.86 S S W h Round 3 Wis. 707 64.89 19.83 84.72 S S Wh/SR Round 4 Wis. 717 65.71 24.99 90.70 S S Wh/SR Round 3 W is. 718 ........................................ 92.14 22.80 114.94 S S W h/SR Rd. /long 3.5 B6495-12...... 101.28 41.21 142.49 S S Wh/SR Long/flat 2.5 B6503-2 ........................................ 77.15 24.13 101.28 S S W h/SR Long/flat 3 B6516-26 101.28 24.13 125.41 S S Wh Long/flat 2.5 B6567-12 ............................... 88.95 16.86 105.81 M M W h Rd./long 3 B6955-24 ............................... 62.30 19.38 81.68 S S W h Rd./long 3 B6955-33 -------------------------------- 70.24 30.22 100.46 S S W h/SR Round 3.5 B6967-9 ............................ 58.07 21.16 79.23 M M Pink Round 2.5 B6987-43 ------------------------------- 55.84 6.76 62.60 S S W h/SR Round 2.5 B6987-56 112.79 26.44 139.23 M M Wh/SR Round 3 B7132-14---------------------- 68.83 15.81 84.64 S S Wh Rd./flat 3.5 B7132-25---------------------- 61.70 45.37 107.07 S S Wh Round 2.5 B7138-11---------------------- 59.18 25.10 84.28 D M Wh/SR Rd./long 2.5 B7139-4----------------------- 132.91 17.75 150.66 M M Wh/SR Rd. /long 3.5 B7620-4 ---------------------- 87.47 13.96 101.43 S M Wh/SR Rd./flat 4 B7629-3 -.................... 104.10 27.33 131.43 S S Wh Rd./long 3 B7649-5 -----------..-------.. 49.08 16.63 65.71 S S Wh Round 3 B7664-2----------------------- 61.26 20.57 81.83 S S Wh Round 2.5 B7667-2----------------------- 42.47 16.63 59.10 S S Wh. Russet Round 3.5 B7680-3----------------------- 39.43 38.17 77.60 S S Wh Long/flat 3 B7694-1----------------------- 77.59 32.52 110.11 S M Wh Long/flat 3 B7707-5----------------------- 60.74 22.35 83.09 S S Wh Round 2.5 B7766-2 ....................... 72.99 18.86 91.85 S S Wh Rd./flat 2.5 B7768-3------------------ - --- 64.30 11.29 75.59 S S Wh Rd./flat 3.5 ' Soil test p - 310 (high); k - 90 (medium); pH = 5.0. 1000 pounds of basic slag applied per acre. 2S - Shallow; M = Medium depth; D - Deep. 'S = Small; M = Medium; L-- Large. ' Wh - White; SR = Some russet. 55 - Excellent, 4 = Good, 3 = Fair, 2 = Poor and 1 - Very Poor. Potatoes (at Crossville). Seed potatoes were col- lected from Maine, Wisconsin, and the USDA in Beltsville, Maryland. These seeds were brought to Auburn and stored at 40 degrees F. until they were planted. Seed pieces were cut to approximately 11/2 ounces each and treated for rot control. Seed pieces were presprouted at 55 degrees F. for 2 weeks and planted March 23. Seed were spaced 12 inches apart in 42-inch rows. Plots were harvested July 12. Yields were low for most of the varieties, Table 8. Red La Soda and Wis. 66-13R-72 were the highest yielding red types and B7139-4 and B6495-12 were the two highest yielding white selections. Many selections had some russet skin with B7667-2 having a complete russet skin type. Kennebec and La Chipper are good processing type potatoes, Snap Beans (at Auburn). Seed were planted April 25 and August 15 respectively for the spring and fall crop. Seed were spaced 2 inches apart in 40-inch rows. Harvest dates varied with the different varie- ties. Harvest was done once over to simulate ma- chine harvesting. Yields were higher for the spring crop than the fall, Table 9. Line 72 AI-4 produced the highest yield. Eagle was very susceptible to powdery mildew. Astro had very desirable charac- teristics for both home garden and processing. Early Gallatin also had a good yield and is a good home garden and commercial bean. Sieve sizes were ade- quate for all varieties except Roma which has a large flat pod that did not fit into the sieve size groups. [5] TABLE 9. SNAP BEAN VARIETY TRIAL, AUBURN, 1973' Marketable Growing Color Shape Straight- Bean Sieve sizes" Variety yield/acre days ness length 1 2 3 4 5 Bu. No. In. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Spring Astro --- -------- .... 208 59 G Round S 5.00 5 10 16 53 16 BBL Supreme ------------- : 308 61 G Round CTD 5.00 8 23 15 39 15 BBL 272 ............................ 218 62 DG Round SC 4.50 10 20 23 39 8 Eagle 410 63 G Round SC 5.00 3 5 13 61 18 Early Gallatin- -- 359 59 G Round SC 4.75 3 5 10 42 40 Exp. 116-137 294 60 G Oval CTD 4.75 0 5 8 72 15 Exp. 140-2347 216 58 G Round S 5.00 3 8 18 58 13 GP 669,37-A .--------------------- 276 62 DG Round SC 5.00 10 10 17 46 17 Roma _ 296 58 G Flat SC 4.50 0 0 0 17 83 Slenderette- - - - 339 58 DG Round SC 4.75 0 3 13 66 18 XI68-2988 290 57 DG Heart CTD 4.75 6 13 14 50 17 72AI-4 .------------- - . 436 59 G Round CTD 5.50 3 18 10 54 15 Fall Astro - 102 61 DG Round SC 4.75 14 13 16 86 21 BBL Supreme ---------- 146 61 DG Heart SC 4.50 23 13 8 33 23 BBL 272 ._ 176 61 DG Heart SC 4.75 10 15 18 39 18 Eagle 140 61 DG Heart SC 5.00 13 10 21 36 20 Early Gallatin - 135 61 DG Round SC 4.75 0 13 18 49 20 Exp. 116-137 98 57 G Oval SC 4.75 18 13 13 33 23 Exp. 140-2347 84 61 G Heart SC 5.00 18 13 13 41 15 GP 66937-A------------ 84 57 G Round SC 4.50 18 16 11 39 16 Roma .................. 95 57 G Flat SC 4.75 0 0 0 0 100 Slenderette ----------- - 61 61 DG Heart SC 4.00 23 13 13 38 13 XI68-2988 --- 85 57 G Round SC 4.75 15 13 13 46 13 72AI-4 -164 57 G Heart SC 5.00 18 10 15 31 26 1 Spring: Soil test p - 530 (very high); k - 80 (medium); pH - 5.6. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. Fall: Soil test p = 520 (very high); k - 90 (medium); pH - 6.4. 2 G - green; LG light green; DG dark green. 'S -= straight; SC slightly curved; VC = very curved; CTD - curved in two directions. SSieve size was determined from a 100 pod sample taken at random from the four replications. Sieve denoter canning size grades with size 1 having the smaller diameter and 5 having the larger. Sweet Corn (at Cullman). Seed were planted May 16, in 44-inch rows and spaced 9 inches apart, leaving two plants per hill. Excellent yields were produced this year, Table 10. Rogers 64-2160 was the highest yielding variety with 3,303 dozen ears per acre. Mon- arch Advance and Triumphant II produced the larg- est ear size, while Merit, Monarch Advance, and Triumphant II produced the largest cob diameter. XP 358 had the highest rating for tip cover and ear filling. These two characteristics are excellent for a fresh market corn. Plant characteristics of each variety are presented in Table 11. Trop. 2 was the tallest variety and Royal Crest was the shortest. Royal Crest, Rogers 64-2160, and Tendersweet had the highest seedling vigor ratings. Royal Crest was the earliest maturing corn in the trial and Trop. 2 was the latest maturing variety. Calumet, Merit, and Monarch Advance were rated the easiest varieties to harvest, Sweet Potatoes (at Auburn, Clanton, and Cull- man). Varieties and breeding lines were collected from the breeders and brought to Auburn in Feb- ruary. Seed were presprouted at 850 F. for 2 weeks before bedding for plant production. Some varieties were in short supply from breeders, therefore, plant production was not enough for adequate planting at all locations. Plants were set at Auburn May 16, at Clanton May 17, and at Cullman May 31. Yields were average to excellent for the three locations, Table 12. At Au- burn Jewel, Red Jewel, and L9-190 produced the highest yields of U.S. No. 1 roots. At Clanton, N.C. 289, M7-21, and L7-182 produced the highest yields of U.S. No. 1 roots. At Cullman, Centennial, Red Jewel, and Jewel produced the highest yields of U.S. No. 1 roots. Red Jewel at Auburn and Cullman and N.C. 289 at Clanton produced the highest percentage of No. 1 roots of the total marketable yield. Jumbos were excessive at Auburn and Cullman on some va- rieties, [6] TABLE 10. SWEET CORN VARIETY TRIAL, CULLMAN, 1973' Ears per Ear Kernel Ear Ear Cob Row Ear set Tip Ear Eye acre weight Color rows length diameter diameter shape' height cover' filling" appealP Doz. Lb. Butter Sweet 2222 .58 Calumet 2585 .57 Capitan 2343 .66 Commander..... 2343 .69 Golden Queen.------ 2421 .65 Goldenrod 2706 .60 Golden Security------ - 2836 .60 Goldie - 2274 .57 Hybrid Seneca Chief . 2129 .56 Hybrid Seneca Feather_ 2395 .51 Hybrid Seneca Scout --- 1919 .56 Hybrid XP 185 A .--- 2317 .60 Iochief 2334 .49 Keystone Ev. Green Hy._ 2257 .60 Merit 2283 .62 Monarch Advance.. . 1945 .73 NK-435 2144 .66 NK-1791 2343 .64 Royal Crest- 2576 .38 Rogers 64-2160 ------- 3303 .51 Rogers 70-1631 --------- 2784 .58 Rogers 70-2428--------- 2714 .59 Silverliner 2110 .62 Silver Queen ... 1971 .68 Sweet-A-Korn WI -... 2559 .44 Sweet Tennessee ------ 2516 .63 Tendersweet - 2196 .57 Triumphant II 2412 .73 Trop. 2 ------------ . 1729 .62 Wintergreen -- 2481 .52 XP 301Y 2447 .54 XP 358 2611 .50 XP 362............... 2317 .64 Yukon 2490 .62 No. In. In. In. Y 14-16 7.91 1.67 .90 Y 12-14 8.65 1.51 .73 Y 14-16 8.51 1.59 .81 Y 16-18 8.05 1.62 .87 Y 12-14 7.89 1.58 .82 Y 14-16 8.88 1.53 .77 Y 14-16 7.76 1.57 .81 Y 14-16 7.75 1.67 .86 Y 12-14 8.12 1.50 .76 Y 12-14 7.67 1.45 .79 Y 14-16 7.12 1.56 .86 Y 12-14 8.22 1.50 .74 Y 14-16 7.50 1.53 .78 Wh 16-18 7.70 1.67 .98 Y 16-18 7.90 1.76 1.02 Y 14-16 8.96 1.69 1.03 Y 14-16 8.85 1.65 .83 Y 16-18 7.86 1.73 .97 Y 10-12 6.43 1.28 .78 Y 12 8.35 1.48 .85 Y 16 8.04 1.60 .92 Y 14-16 8.20 1.63 .94 Wh 12 7.90 1.73 .96 Wh 12-14 8.05 1.61 .90 Wh 12 6.95 1.44 .83 Y 16 7.82 1.71 .92 Y 14-16 8.39 1.49 .82 Y 16 8.41 1.73 1.05 Y 16 8.18 1.47 .81 Y 14 8.14 1.53 .83 Y 14-16 8.16 1.60 .77 Y 14-16 7.45 1.50 .85 Y 16-18 7.80 1.74 .89 Y 14 9.22 1.46 .80 SC SC S SC SC SC SC SC S SC SC S SC S SC SC SC SC SC SC S S S SC SC SC SC S SC SC SC SC S SC 6s 4s 6s 8s 8s 4s 4s 6s 6s 8s 8s gs In. 33 3.38 3.50 3.28 32 3.53 3.50 3.25 36 3.63 3.50 3.58 34 3.23 2.63 3.20 39 4.13 3.75 3.58 37 3.75 2.25 2.83 33 4.18 3.13 3.23 29 2.95 2.75 2.90 21 3.90 2.75 3.25 26 4.15 4.25 3.23 34 3.98 3.63 3.50 31 3.65 3.25 3.13 37 3.15 1.75 2.58 40 3.93 2.25 2.55 36 3.63 3.75 3.45 29 4.20 2.25 2.85 20 3.55 1.88 3.05 27 3.48 2.50 3.08 17 3.00 2.00 1.95 24 4.09 1.50 2.68 23 4.25 2.50 2.83 29 3.80 2.38 2.90 36 3.20 2.25 2.93 38 3.95 3.75 4.00 29 4.18 4.00 3.03 39 3.65 3.38 3.20 34 4.08 4.00 3.30 33 3.28 3.00 3.20 56 3.78 2.13 2.35 27 4.00 3.63 3.30 29 3.13 2.00 2.23 33 4.68 4.63 3.85 30 4.03 3.50 3.45 23 4.30 2.75 2.75 ' Soil test p 310 (high); k - 140 (high); pH - 5.7. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. - Y yellow; Wh - white. 'S - straight; SC - slightly curved. 'Rating index: 5 - Excellent, 4 Good, 3 - Fair, 2 = Poor, 1 Very poor. [ 7] Variety Y Il~_lr~ Wfl ( I CIX '/X Variety In. Butter Sweet----- -95 Calum et------------- - 100 Capitan ----------- - 98 Commander---- 96 Golden Queen --- 105 Goldenrod---------- - 99 Golden Security -101 Goldie ------- --- ---- 92 Hybrid Seneca Chief- 78 Hybrid Seneca Feather-90 Hybrid Seneca Scout- 94 Hybrid XP 185 A--- 92 loch ief ------- --------- 97 Keystone Ev. Hybrid- 104 M erit------- ----------- - 96 Monarch Advance - 94 NK-435---- -------- - 88 NK-1791 ------------ 89 Royal Crest ----------- 71 Rogers 64-2160 -------- 84 Rogers 7-6186 Rogers 70-2428 -------- 92 Silver Queen ---------- 98 Sweet-A-Kom ,Wi ------ 88 Sweet Tennessee -------- 102 Tendersweet ----------- 97 Triumphant II -------- 97 Trop. 2 --------------- 131 Wintergreen ---------- 90 XP301Y -------------- 90 X P 358 ------------ -- 99 X P 362 -------------- 88 Yukon ---------------- 90 Plat SedlngEase of Shank Grow- height vigor' snap- length n ping' days 3.05 2.50 3.80 4.49 3.63 3.49 3.13 3.60 3.75 3.57 3.30 3.75 3.38 3.25 2.08 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.25 2.25 3.50 3.50 3.30 4.00 2.25, 4.00 3.38 2.88 3.75 4.75 3.50 4.50 2.75 2.75 3.13 3.50 4.00 2.00 4.13 4.00 3.13 2.25 2.75 2.50 2.38 3.13 3.13 3.00 2.75 3.50 4.00 3.50 3.30 3.50 2.93 2.88 3.25 2.75 3.38 3.00 3.13 2.75 3.88 4.00 2.75 3.50 In. 3.23 3.25 4.00 3.00 3.50 3.16 5.06 2.76 4.26 3.51 3.23 4.05 3.03 3.06 3.15 3.17 4.40 3.86 2.37 3.13 4.13 3.85 3.79 3.45 4.98 3.98 4.21 3.88 3.54 2.29 2.79 3.00 4.35 No. 70 72 72 72 72 72 72 70 72 70 72 72 70 75 70 70 72 72 54 65 65 72 75 68 72 72 72 82 70 70 68 72 65 'Soil testp 310 (high); k 140 (high); pH 5.7. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. Rating Index: 5 excellent, 4 good, 3.- fair, 2 = poor, 1 -very poor. Rating Index: 5- very easy, 4- easy, 3 - average dif- ficulty, 2 difficult, 1 very difficult. TABLE 12. SWEET POTATO VARIETY TRIALS, AUBURN, CLANTON AND CULLMAN, 1973' Marketable yield per acre U.S. Total Variety U.S. Can- No.1 solids No.. 12ners' 3 Jumbo Total of total Bu. Bu. Bu. Bu. Pct. Pct. Centennial.- Jew el------- Red jewel_ L7-177 ----- L7-182 ----- L9-163 ----- L9-190 ------ Lo-132 ----- Lo-360 ----- M7-21 ------ NC-289----- NC-304 -- --- Auburn 291 36 255 582 50 28.36 *340 47 162 549 62 25.48 380 67 79 526 72 26.00 -174 56 77 307 57 23.19 - 301 54 215 570 53 27.37 212 106 53 371 57 27.07 350 99 175 624 56 25.67 316 61 84 461 69 28.53 294 40 146 480 61 27.91 249 63 96 408 61 28.84 280 30 115 425 66 29.97 179 45 37 261 83 28.63 (Continued) TABLE 12 (Cont.). SWEET POTATO VARIETY TRIALS, AUBURN, CLANTON, AND CULLMAN, 1973' Marketable yield per acre U.S. Total Variety U.S. Can-Jmo No. 1 solids No. 12 ners 1 umo Total of total Centennial-- jewel Red Jewel--- L7-177------ L7-182------ L9-163------ L9-190 Lo-132 Lo360- m7-21 ------ NC-289 NC-304 Centennial-- Jewel------- Red Jewel--, L7-177------ L7-182------ L9-163------ L9-190- Lo-132______ Lo-360- M7-21 ------ NC-289 ----- NC-304 ----- Bu. Bu. Bu. Clanton ------ 86 147 116 ------ 95 151 163 - 75 144 35 105 126 96 -- 111 120 69 - - 03 136 26 --------i1 0 03 44 116 132 112 Cullman 382 56 82 --- 326 71 94 349 73 69 ------ 315 54 145 ------289 60 173 ------ 125 147 0 ------271 86 159 216 113 23 199 95 17 -293 79 171 313 93 185 Bu. Pct. Pct. 349 25 27.13 409 23 27.07 254 30 27.41 327 32 26.35 300 37 27.38 2656 39 25.5.7 257 43 30.28 360 32 29.73 551 69 24.00 491 66 24.75 491 87 24.00 514 61 19.20 522 55 26.70 272 46 24.38 516 53, 25.40 352 61 23.80 311 64 27.40 543 54 30.20 591 53. 22.80_ 'Auburn: Soil test p - 170 (medium); k - 70 (low); pH 5.2. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. Cullman: Soil test p 180 (medium); k - 120 (high); pH 5.6. 1 ton of limestone applied per acre. Clanton: no soil test made. 2 U.S. No,. 1 roots were 2 to 3 12 inches in diameter, 3 to 9 inches in length, well shaped and free of defects. 'Canners were 1 to, 2 inches in diameter and 2 to 7 inches in length. jumbo roots exceeded the diameter, length and weight re- quirements of the above two grades but are of marketable quality. AC KNOWLEDGMENTS- The authors wish to thank the following people who assisted in the research. They are: Harold Yates, retired; Bill Barrett, Jr., Superintendent; Ron- nie McDaniel, Assistant Superintendent; and Frank Garrett, State Department of Agriculture and In- dustries, Gulf Coast Substation: C. C'. Canlton, Su- perintendent; and Kenneth Short, Assistant Super- intendent; Chilton Area Horticulture Substation: Marlin Hollingsworth, Superintendent, North Ala- bama Horticulture Substation; and S. E. Gissendan- ner, retired; and John Eason, Acting Superintendent; Sand Mountain Substation. TABLE 11. PLANT CHARACTERISTICS OF SWEET CORN VARIETIES, CULLMAN, 1973' --