BULLETIN No. 170 FEBRUARY, 1913 ALABAMA Agricultral Experimen tto OF THE Aabama aolytechnic Institute AUBURN Local Fertilizer ExperimentsWith Cotton in North Al aaa in 1912. J. F. DUGGAR, J. T. WILLIAMSON and L. J. H AW LE Y. a Post Publishing Company 1913 COMMITTEE OF TRUSTEES ON EXPERIMENT STATION. HON. ®ON. F. KoLB--------------------------------------Montgomery R. ---------------------------- Ozark H. L. MARTIN HON. A. W. BELL--------------------------------- -------------- Anniston STATION STAFF. C. C. THACH, President of the College. J. F. DUGGAR, Director of Station DEPARTMENTAL AGRICULTURE: ORGANIZATION. BOTANY: J. F. Duggar, Agriculturist. E. F. Cauthen, Associate. M. J. Funchess, Assistant. J. T. Williamson, Field Agent. L. J. Hawley, Field Agent. J. F. Duggar, Jr., Assistant. 'VETERINARY: J. S.Caidwell, Botanist. C. S. Ridgway, Assistant. PLANT PATHOLOGY: F. A. Wolf, Pathologist. HIORTICULTURE: C. A. Cary, Veterinarian. 1. S. McAdory, Assistanlt. CHEMISTRY: B. B. E. P. Sandsten, Horticulturist. J. C. C. Price, Assistant. H. M. Conolly, Agent Field {ENTOMOLOGY: W. E. Hinds, Entomologist. s Ross, Chemist, State Chemist Physiological Chemist J.T.Anderson,ChemistSoil&Cro J. A. Dew, Field Agent. Jesse M. C. I. Hare, T. Bragg, First Assistant. S. Adler, Assistant. Jones, Animal Husbandmzan.. EXTENSION: L. N. Duncan, Superintendent." J. B. Hobdy, Assistant. x I. Bechdel, Mrs. Birdie I.Robinson, Assistant.* S. L. XW.Summers, Assistant, sisat L. W Shook, 0. Assistant.* *ln cooperation with United States Department of Agriculture. S. S. Jordan, A. IR. Gissendanner, Assistant. J. M. Johnson, Assistant. Assistant.* LOCAL FERTILIZER EXPERIMENTS WITH COTTON IN NORTH ALABAMA IN 1912 BY J. F. DUGGAR, J. T. WILLIAMSON, L. J. HAWLEY. SUMMARY. Bulletin No. 170 records the results of fertilizer experiments with cotton conducted by the Alabama Experiment Station in the counties of the northern half of Alabama in 1912. In 14 out of 16 conclusive experiments, cotton seed more effective than either acid phosphate or kainit. In 7 experiments, phosphate was more effective than kainit; in meal was 2 it was about equally as important as kainit, and in 3 tests, it was less effective than kainit, though needed; thus in 75 per cent. of these experiments, acid phosphate was needed to a greater or less extent. In 5 experiments kainit was more important than phosphate, and in 2 instances it was about equally as effective as phosphate; that is, in 44 per cent. of these experiments, kainit was needed to a greater or less extent. This table shows that as a rule the complete fertilizers (Plots 12, 10 and 9) were more profitable than fertilizers applied singly or in pairs. The complete fertilizers were also the most profitable applications in 1911 in North Alabama. In the general average it was more effective and more profitable in both years to apply 100 pounds of kainit in a complete fertilizer (Plot 10) than to use 200 pounds of kainit (Plot 9). The average of the conclusive experiments shows that 200 pounds of cotton seed meal applied before planting was in 1912 practically equal in effect to 100 pounds of nitrate of soda applied after the plants were six inches high. The average results of the 16 experiments are shown in the table below: 46 o a c' KINtO KID OF FERTILIZER Z o 1 2 3 4 U a Lbs. 200 240 000 200 200 240 200 000 20 C. S. Average increase over unfertilized plot; seed cotton per acre. Lbs. 226 Averge Aeaepoi from fertilizer pofi per acre. Acid Phosphate No fertilizerKainit---- Meal 141 $6.06 6.68 6.14 2.7 3.98 1.62 - 75 6 C. S. Meal?_ Acid Phosphate _-_ C. S. Meal N o fertilizer-Acid Phosphate _ 284 264 7 81 - ----- --- ---- ----146 240 200 240 200 1011 12 200 240 100 000 240 100 Kainit 146 C. S. Meal Acid Phosphate -346 7.75 Kainit ----------C. S. Meal ) Acid Phosphate 353 8.73 Kainit__________ No fertilizer--------------------------------------Acid Phosphate ----- -- Kainit_ 355 9.34 100 Nitrate of Soda(late) Introductory The chief object of these local fertilizer experiments or soil tests has been to ascertain the best combinatiorn of fertilizer or fertilizers for cotton, growing on each of the principal soils of the northern half of Alabama; this is, in counties north of the, Prairie Region. The results recorded in this bulletin were obtained in fertilizer experiments conducted by funds provided by the Legislature of Alabama in February, 1911. Local fertilizer tests constitute only one of many lines of experiments instituted in 1911 by the Alabama Experiment Station with the support of State funds. Local fertilizer experiments as now conducted are made by farm- ers especially recommended as being men likely to take the necessary pains to secure accurate results. These experiments, located all over the State, are visited and supervised by representatives of the Experiment Station. 47 "What fertilizer does my soil need" is a question which can be answered only by repeated tests made on the same or similar soils, so that average results extending through several years may be obtained. The reader should bear in mind that there are great numbers of different soils in Alabama, and that even the same soil would give different results in the same year, depending on how it had been cropped, fertilized, and cared for in the year or two immediately preceding the test. Patient repetition of these tests is necessary before we can positively answer the above question. It is the purpose of the authors in later years to publish bulletins classifying the soils on which all these tests are made and drawing conclusions relative to the needs of each class of soils. However, before this can be safely done, these experiments must be repeated, so that the average results may teach clearly the fertilizer requirements of each distinct type of soil. Averaging the results obtained on dissimilar soils will not afford the desired information. Chemical analysis of the soil does not indicate what fertilizers are needed. Otherfertilizertests in North Ala.-This bulletin does not contain the results of all the fertilizer experiments made in North Alabama in 1912. Those testing the effects of lime, acid phosphate versus ground rock phosphate, complete fertilizer experiments in which nitrate of soda was the carrier of nitrogen, etc., are reserved for publication in later years, because of insufficient funds for printing. Small lots of carefully weighed and mixed fertilizers were supplied to each experimenter. Detailed instructions as to how to conduct the experiment and blank forms for reporting results were also furnished. Representatives of the Station inspected the experiments here published as often as practicable. WEATHER CONDITIONS The season of 1912 was especially unfavorable for conducting fertilizer experiments. This was an exceedingly wet year, especially in spring and summer. The average rainfall in the part of Alabama covered by these 48 experiments is given below by months, according to data furnished by the Alabama 'Weather Service: Inches Jan.-_______5.78 Feb.-----5.14 Mar. ----9.98 Inches April _ 8.89 May-_,,_, 3.24 June-_____ 5.58 Inches JulyAug.Sept.- 5.52 3.60 Inches Oct. Nov.Dec. _2.81 5.36 1.07 wasting Doubtless, the heavy rains resulted in the leaching and of the fertilizer on certain soils and plots. In spite of these and other serious obstacles, the majority of the experiments afforded useful results. In nearly every test one or more fertilizer mixtures were decidedly profitable. If we would know the fertilizer requirements of our soils, tests must be made in unfavorable as well as favorable seasons. In 1912 killing frost occurred early, that is on October 24 and November 3. LOCATION OF EXPERIMENTS. Page COUNTY POST OFFICE NAME Bibb------------- Centerville --------- John D. James-----------69-70 Bibb-------------Randolph ---------- J. E. Perry-------------72-73 Blount ----------- Oneonta-----------W. E. Lecroy-----------72 Blount ---------- -Oneonta-----------W. F. Tidwell 6-67-6 Calhoun ---------- Alexandria --------- E. M. Cowden.----------72-73 Chambers----_ .--- Cusseta-----------W. T. Edge------------72 - Paul Bishop------------65-66 Cherokee---------- Cedar Bluff J. F.Westbrook----------64-65 Cherokee--------Gaylesville____ J.F. Lester-------------72-73 Clay-------------Lineville-----W. E. Hargett-----------_71-74 Colbert------Tuscumbia___ Tuscumbia Coosa ------------ Equality, R. No. Colbert----------Cuilman----DeKaib---------- ---- ----- ----- 54-55 Geo. E. Harris70-71 1_W. M. Blankenship ----Johnston---------61-62 Hanceville'-------- A. 72-74 Ft. Payne---------_J. J. Sampley-------------. _--------- W. Etowah---_-----Gadsden, R. No. 3__T. A. Lewis-------------_72-74 Franklin---------_Russeilville-------- -Florence Lauderdale Lawrence--------_Courtland-----W. Lawrence---------_Town Limestone--------- Athens-----Madison------_New Lamar-----------_Sulligent-----__-----Jack Woods-------------_72 F. Dennis....-------------71 ---- ----------. --- Creek Madison--------._Huntsville---------_G. E. Hoy--------------_71-74 52-53-54 Marion----------- Glen Allen--------- W. P. Letson ----- Hope --------- Charles J. R. 51-52 P. E. 56-57 W. 55-56 8th Dist. Agr. School T. Butler--------_71-74 D. J. Underwood---Udrod---Hotchkiss---------- 57-58 Terry------------ --- Marshall ---------- Boaz -------------Pickens Pickens Morgan ---------- Hartselle ----------Morgan ---------- New Decatur ---- Smith--------6-6 Randolph--------- Roanoke ----------St. Clair----_ - ---------------------- M. White--------------_60-61 L. B. Wyatt------------_71 Reform------------L. R. Hollingsworth Aliceville---------E. Sanders--------------_72-74 R. E. Taylor-----------_72-73 lJenkins & Stevenson Asheville --- 72-74 ----------- --- 72- 73 49 Shelby ---------- Montevallo --------- H. E. Butler------------68-69 Talladega _ - __Childersb rsburg )'V. Boz--------27 -Talladega ----------- J. R. Weisenger--------72 Tuscaloosa__-__ Tuscaloosa--------I-I. T. Burks------------72 T e___- Walker Winston - ----- - -Cordova----------G. L. Alexander - 59-60 _ Natural Bridge___--R. J. Mobley-----------72 The directions sent to each experimenter stated that the land employed for this test should be level and uniform, not manured in recent years, not in cowpeas the preceding year, and that it should be representative of large soil areas in its vicinity. The need of perfect uniformity and standard treatment for all plots (except as to kind of fertilizer used) was emphasized. Fertilizers were applied in the usual manner-that is, drilled before planting, except nitrate of soda, which was directed to be applied when the plants were 6 to 10 inches high. THE FERTILIZERS USED The following prices are used, as representing approximately the the average cash price in local markets during the last few years: Acid Phosphate (16 per cent available)Cotton seed meal-______---Per Ton $14.00 -$30.00 - Klainit---____-----------____---- $14.00 Prices naturally vary in different localities. Any one can substitute the cost of fertilizers in his locality for the prices given above. In each experiment three plots were left unfertilized, these being these yields differed widely the plots 3, 7, and 11. ment was classed When experi- as inconclusive. The increase on plots 4 to 6 is calculated on the assumption that the gradation in fertility is uniform from plots 3 to 7; likewise the increase is calculated forplots 8 to 10 inclusive." PRICE ASSUMED FOR SEED COTTON The price assumed is $18.00 per ton for seed, and 12 cents perpound for lint. This is equal to 4.6 cents per pound for seed cotcents perton turning out 3313 per cent of lint. Deducting o% cost of picking and ginning, and we havepound as the average left 4 cents as the net value per pound of the increase of seed cot-. ton due to fertilizers. This latter is the figure used in all financial} calculations. *For the standard method of calculation employed, see Alabama Stations Bulletins 160 or 162. 50 .Pounds per acre of fertilizers; nitrogen, phosphoric acid, potash used and composition of each mixture. FETLIESMIXTURE FETCONTAINS and COST OF FERTILIZERS KIND OF FERTILIZER n o 4-1 -'o +a en Las. 1 200 Cotton seed meal 2 4 240 200 55 6 200 240 In 100 lbs. c. s. mcatn -ea 6.79 2.88 1.77 Acid phosphate_-38014.00 In 100 lbs. acid p/os.16.00 - Kainit___________ -24.60 In 10.)lbs. IKainit --- _---12.30 Cotton seed meal Acid phosphate - -13.58 In 100 lbs. above mixt._ 3.09 10.04 .80 ---13.58 Lbs. Los. 5.76 Lbs. 3.54 - 1.68 14.00 1.40 ----3.39 200 Cotton seed meal - }--13.58 5.76 28.14 . In 100 lbs. above vixt. - 1.44 7.03 4. 4 .9 Acid C240 phosphate In 100 lbs. above mnixt, 200 -- 135 --- 2 Cotton seed meal - - -- - -anit.9003.08 10 240 Acid phosphate--In 100 13.58 2.59 5 100 44.1628154~2.3 8.18 2.93) 4.658 53 10 12 lbs. above 19ainit0 inixt._ 240 100 Acid phosphate---___ ) K.4 0 C30)3 V, O0 oa, i.. 0 V w0 ba a, a, "0 ( 0a, "0 v a t aON C D0~ H-C) a,0 D ba - -O >40 1 2 3 4 7. 94 104 11 12{ 200 240 000 200 200 240 200 200 000 240200 200 240 200 200 240 100 000 240 100 100 Acid C. S. Meal---Phosphate -- No fertilizer__-_ C. Kainit S. Meal_- ---------. Acid Phosphate C. S. Meal-__ Lbs. Lbs. 840 -616 1040 1456 1616 1536 140 1416 1336 1352 1320 1064 Lbs. 560 448 432 280 504 504 336 504 504 504 224 576 10 Lbs. 320 272 208 256 560 432 320 336 392 544 288 576 Lbs. 112 64 -20 296 140 24 88 148 Lbs. 480 312 168 248 560 405 312 240 440 340 300 Lbs. 312 144 44 320 129 -69 134 37 Lbs. 880 720 680 728 776 688 664 640 760 664 392 Lbs. 200 40 4 20 44 fLbs Lbs. 896 -__168 1000 -64 1064 1016 -14 1192 196 1184 928 864 222 -4 312 244 Lbs. 720 640 528 592 784 616 Lbs. 192 112 8 144 -80 -126 84 174 Acid Acid Kain Kainit------fertilizer--Phosphate Kainit------- 50 -14 -16 - No C. 352) 752 616 8161 S. Meal-Phosphate 1 23211 11201 204 992 688 320 952 Kainit-_-_---- Acid C. S. Meal-- Phosphate it__-_-_ 272 896, 712 No fertilizer-Phosphate Acid Kainit-___ Nitrate of Soda_ 288 548 248 712 264 792 80 Inconclusive Experiments in Colbert, Madison, DeKaib, Winston, Etowah and Pickens Counties. " TUSCJMBIA HUNTSVILLE GURLEY FT. PAYNE DELMAR GADSDEN REFORM ALICEVI . 0 0 a g 0 0 0 0 P 0 p , 0 0 . 2 y'd 0 I 0 1a y 0o -' aa wU KIND OF FERTILIZER ? us. I 0 0 N 5 Zd-+ c C. ' i N " V cd5 0W N m 4Q) V m u 0 m ' N W W 0 o" N 0 C 'b a3 cS 0 a N "u0r CI c5 ta , N c 0 d 1 +-+ ~ c'4 1 ) U5) - 0) - 0 - 0 5) 0- .) -5 1 2 3 200 240 000 4 5 200 20 240 S200 000 00200 --No fertilizer---- C. S. Meal--------256 Acid Phosphate __ 512 248 No fertilizer--___ --_-_-__ 416 KainitC. S. Meal _696 Acid Phosphate C. S. Meal 408 KainiL. 352 8 ------142 396 82 264 696 -144 800 840_ -40 150 292 338 608 768 64 224 1088 1328 1472 5 4-__ 784 288 1008 560 X68 800 -192 320 1312 992 -____ 512 536 486 32 56 _-_--_ 944 1040 800 144 240 - 1144 1072 984 1192 .872 176 728 960 968--_- 576 -8 200 208 1072 1120 928 84 136 -52 ------ 544 800 608 48 288 80 -- -- 1032 976 77 6 292 266 ------ 720 896 800 7 1 368 ----- 512 7 --126 204 282 1232-------- 352 784 944 784 976 1360 1056 1040 832 544 660 688 560 320 680 704 616 416 - 584 784 720 992 704 _-- 840 170 76 318 728 864 936 0 360 896 - 80 9 10 11 Aid Phosphate_ 472 1120 824 728 512 68 -- 48 36 476 680 564 -____ 420 152 172 ______ 172 256 184 - 130 148 54 -5 14 27 -- 200 240 200 200 C. S. Meal -Acid Phosphate ~ 544 Kainit--------) C. S. Meal - -- _ 240 100 000 Acid Phosphate~ Kainit--------) No fertilizer--- 616 328 12 240 100 100 Acid Phosphate __-_ Kainit Nitrate of Sodal --136 ----- 176 -- 256 464 512 624 448 1216 384 656 336 568 312 1064 28