Revised January 1948 SEED TREATMENT /r PEANUTS COYT WILSON, Plant Pathologist P OOR stands of peanuts, which cut growers' profits, may be caused by one of several conditions. Seed rot, how- ever, is one of the most common causes of poor stands. Much of the seed rot can be prevented by treating seed with the proper disin- fectant (chemical compound). The results given here are from 5 years' work at the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. They are similar to results obtained by other investigators working on the same problem. VALUE of SEED TREATMENT High yields of peanuts are dependent on good stands (Figure 1). Soil fertility, growing conditions, insect and disease damage, and weather conditions during I. Original printing I3M, .Jnuary 194-. Re\ision 5NM, January 194N. FIG-kL: i, 11C r harvest time influence total yields. How- ever, high yields cannot be expected from fields of poor stands. Treating the seed with a chemical seed disinfectant may mean the difference between good and poor stands of peanuts. WHAT IT DOES Seed treatment serves two purposes. The disinfectant kills the organisms pres- ent on the seed surface that cause seed- rotting and seedling disease. It also pro- tects the seed against similar organisms that are present in the soil. This latter protection is especially im- portant on machine shelled seed, because seed coats are broken frequently by the machine. Unless the seed are covered by a disinfectant, broken skins are ideal places for entramcc of ced-rotting org~anisms. "(,c-d red C Aj 2 -re rcr. AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION of the ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE Leaflet 23 ~lp*~,~:~P"' ;'. 4: "_ ~- I C r*. 1 LL(5- ~ u : ( ".' "Y~~:- ;i ~ ~; ;--- - : , -, -c:; ~t;-i~:: -u M. J. Funchess, Director Auburn, Alabama t- FIGURE 2. Seed -rea-ments do not pre- vent seedling blights and roof rots of peanuts, as shown above. However, seed treatments do result in more seedlings. Thus, damages from seedling blights and r o rots are re- duced. This protection during germination also gives the young seedling a better chance to become established before disease organisms attack and produce stem and root rots similar to those shown in Figure 2. Since seed treatment usually results in more plants, the loss of a few from seedling blights is not as serious in stands from treated seed as in those where untreated seed are planted and stands are weak. MACHINE vs. HAND-SHELLING Treatment is more important on ma- chine-shelled seed than on either hand- shelled or unshelled seed. Good stands usually can be obtained from hand-shelled seed without treatment. Treating such ,eed results in only 5 to 10 per cent more seedlings. Treatment of machine-shelled seed usually increases the number of plants from 30 to 50 per cent. Unshelled seed generally yield poor stands, and treatment causes very little im- provement. These facts are shown in Table 1. MATERIALS USED A number of different seed-treating materials have been tested on both Spanish and runner peanuts. All of the materials have improved the stands, but some have given better results than others. The re- sponse to seed treatment of Spanish and runners is about the same. Table 2 sum- marizes the results obtained at the Main Station, Auburn, over a period of 5 years. Two per cent Ceresan and DuBay 1452-F have been two of the best treatments throughout the tests. However, these ma- terials contain mercury and are poisonous. They must be handled with caution, and seed treated with either of these should be planted or destroyed. In addition to the danger to people and livestock, there is the hazard of using too much of these materials on the seed. Overdosage with any mer- cury compound causes abnormal germina- tion. The first root becomes greatly en- larged, root branching is retarded, and the young leaves develop very slowly. Quite frequently these seedlings die. Such symp- toms are shown by the plants in Figure 3. TABLE 1. EFFECT OF METHOD OF SHELLING AND SEED TREATMENT ON EMERGENCE OF SPANISH PEANUTS, AUBURN, ALABAMA, 1943-44 Method of shelling Not shelled Not shelled Hand-shelled - . Hand-shelled Machine-shelled Machine-shelled Disinfectant .- None .2'c Ceresan ..- None ... 2' Ceresan None 2 ; Ceresan Average number of plants from 100 seeds TABLE 2. EFFECT OF VARIOUS SEED DISINFECTANTS UPON EMERGENCE OF MACHINE- SHELLED SPANISH AND RUNNER PEANUTS AT MAIN STATION, AUBURN, ALABAMA Disinfectant Rate of applica- tion per 100 pounds of shelled seed Ounces None Merc-O-Dust Dow 9B Yellow Cuprocide Spergon Arasan Phygon Ceresan, 2% DuBay 1452-F New improved Ceresan should never be used, because it contains 5 per cent of the mercury compound. Injuries to the seed are almost certain to result from use of this compound. I)uBay 1452-F is now on the market under the name of Ceresan M. When used at 1,'2 ounces per 100 pounds of seed, it has been very satisfactory, but it should be used with caution. Overdosage may cause mercury injury. Spergon and Arasan are reliable materials that are not dangerous to handle. They do not cause injuries to the germinating seed, even when used in ex- cess. The two materials appear to be about equally effective under Alabamai conditions. Average number of plants from 100 seeds Spanish Runners Per cent 48 69 65 66 71 62 78 86 Per cent 58 67 71 73 79 83 80 87 85 Spergon is not dusty and is not irritating to the eyes or nasal passages. Arasan is more disagreeable to handle, but is less expensive than Spergon. Phygon is easily handled and is quite effective. The dangers of overtreatment with this material have not been investigated. Dow 9B was not as ef- fective on runner peanuts as other tested materials. It has a disagreeable odor, but it is not as dangerous to handle as the mer- curial treatments. WHEN to TREAT Seed may be shelled and treated during the winter months when labor is more abundant. In tests conducted at the Main FIGURE 3. r :q t were treated atn dn overduse ot Cresn. No-e -no en arged -r r: 's. Ie two at the left are from seed treated at he recommerded rate. Station, 2 seed shelled and treated 9 weeks before planting have produced stands as good as those shelled and treated one day before planting. These tests have been in progress for 3 years. In no instance has there been any significant difference in the stands obtained from seeds shelled on the different dates. The results given in Table 3 were obtained in 1946; they are in agree- ment with those obtained in earlier years in other tests. After the seed are shelled and treated, they should be stored in a dry place. Under such conditions they will keep for several months. Seed shelled, treated, and stored in screened cages at Auburn have germi- nated as well 15 months after shelling as they did at the time they were shelled. Usually, though, it is impractical to carry treated seed over from one year to another because of the webworms that get into seed. HOW to TREAT The method used to apply the disinfect- ant will depend upon the volume of seed 2. All machine-shelled seed used in these experiments were shelled by the USDA Tillage Machinery Laboratory, Auburn, Ala., on a portable sheller designed and built by that laboratory. to be treated. Whatever method is used, it should insure uniform distribution of the disinfectant over every seed. For greatest efficiency each seed should be coated with a film of the chemical dust. Some disinfectants will evaporate, and the vapors that enter the sack of seed will kill the disease-producing organisms on the seed. However, the seed will be re-infected as soon as they are placed in the ground, unless covered with the disinfectant. Thorough coverage is especially important on machine-shelled seed. Most commercial peanut shellers are equipped to treat seed. If the grower has access to a reliable sheller, it is usually more practical to buy treated seed or to have the sheller treat the seed at the time they are shelled. For the grower who wishes to shell and treat his own seed, the rotary seed treater or one of the gravity seed treaters is satis- factory. 3 Always plainly label treated seed and use them only for planting. Treated seed should not be used for human food, live- stock feed, or sold to oil mills. 3. Details for construction of these seed treaters may be obtained from the Agricul- tural Experiment Station, Auburn, Ala- bama. TABLE 3. EFFECT OF TIME OF SHELLING AND SEED TREATMENT ON THE EMERGENCE OF HAND-SHELLED'AND MACHINE-SHELLED RUNNER PEANUTS Method of Seed Time elapsing between shelling and planting shelling treatment Nine weeks Six weeks Three weeks One day Per cent Per cent Per cent Per cent Hand None 71 80 80 80 Hand ................. 2% Ceresan 85 86 82 86 Machine------- None -- - 64 64 51 44 Machine...... 2% Ceresan 80 79 83 80